As we speak, we are witnessing the latest episode in the age-old struggle between globalization and multipolarity. The efforts of a small hostile elite to impose its will on the world and to reduce all people but themselves to the status of obedient slaves, is called globalization. Multipolar is what the world, like nature itself, is in its essence: variegated and diverse, a bit like the treacherous slogans with which the hostile elite is trying to impose woke and gender lunacy on the world in order to accelerate humanity’s descent into slavery.

Seen from different perspectives, the war between the hostile elite and the rest of the world’s population is also a struggle between evil and good, darkness and light, death and life, the ambition of the few and the rights of the many. It is also a struggle between stupidity and intelligence, shortsightedness and wisdom, the ephemeral and the eternal.

For several centuries a small elite, held together by strong bonds such as blood relationship, financial interests and blackmail (with the Epstein Show as its latest manifestation) has been trying to reorganize the world according to its wishes. The elite has been variously imputed of being masonic, Jesuit, Jewish, and composed of Illuminati, Rosacruceans, Maltese knights and other similar groups such as Skull and Bones. It is just impossible to provide solid documentary evidence for any such claims, but much evidence points to the fact the elite has a base in London and has many members who consider themselves Jewish or rather Zionist. What also seems certain is that it is intertwined with powerful banking circles.

In a recent interview, economist Dr. Richard Werner pointed out that the world’s first central bank, the Bank of England (founded in 1694) was founded especially as a weapon to be used in war. Not surprisingly therefore, a few years afterward, the first world war broke out.

Like all wars, the big wars that can be classified as World Wars are ostensibly fought to determine who wins a dispute in the course of a kinetic encounter. In this respect those World Wars can indeed be characterized as the continuation of diplomacy by other means. Another reason world wars are fought seems to be to cull the population. Substantial numbers of peasants and workers are left behind lying dead on the battlefields and the bottom of the seas. Although these numbers are usually roughly specified, these are nevertheless always questionable since we can just never really be sure about historical statistics.

All those poor young men in the prime of their lives being slaughtered instills fear among those left behind and generally makes them meek and weak with respect to government policies. Wars therefore also need to be considered a powerful tool in the hands of elites with which to keep the population subdued.

Given the well-founded doubts concerning established chronology, profusely discussed here at Unz.com, any list of world wars can only be tentative. Of course, the key being in the adjective “World,” real world wars can not have been waged before the Old World was connected with the New and before European maritime explorers had opened the sea route to the East. Therefore, such a world war could not have taken place before the 16th century. Even though in the opening stages of globalization, initiated by the voyages of men like Columbus, Vasco da Gama and Cabral, there were conflicts between explorers and natives, the extent of the fighting and the number of victims will always be shrouded in mystery. Hence, it is probably incorrect to speak of world wars before such armed encounters would involve a certain critical mass of soldiers, sailors, ships, guns and kinetic energy. Moreover, it is not really feasible to compile a reliable list of all the participating parties and territories in those 16th- and 17th-century wars, as well as the true nature of alliances. Therefore, it makes sense to regard the War of the Spanish Succession as the first true world war.

World War I

It is a long-lasting duel that has begun around the beginning of the 18th century. In 1700, the first of a series of wars broke out, which would involve the world’s leading powers, with fighting taking place all over the world. In standard historiography, this first episode consists of two separate wars, namely the Great Northern War between Russia and Sweden (1700-1721) and the War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714). In their DTV-Atlas zur Weltgeschichte (1964-66, published also in English as The Penguin Atlas of World History), German historians Herman Kinder and Werner Kindermann have called the latter the “first world war of the modern age.” It was fought in Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, and at sea. Most great powers were involved: England, the Netherlands, Austria, the Holy Roman (German) Empire, united with some smaller powers in a grand alliance against France. The allies were intent on preventing France from forming a dynastic alliance with Spain.

As one can read in Spamers Illustrierte Weltgeschichte (1914, volume 7, p. 126): “the War of the Spanish Succession created a new order of the European state system. The Spanish monarchy, dominant during the preceding century and a half, was dissolved, preventing the threat of its alliance with France and thus the hegemony of the Latin peoples in Europe and the Americas. The lion’s share of the victory was for England. It had laid the basis for the unitary state of Great Britain and was the beginning of its hegemony in the Mediterranean. With its economy and culture now highly developed, England had become the first power in Europe.” English ally Savoy-Piedmont had managed to make a first step towards its dominance in northern Italy. France was seriously impoverished, with famines repeatedly striking its population. In the east and the Baltic, Russia had become the dominant power thanks to its crushing defeat of Sweden. In over two decades of fighting, more than two million people, mostly soldiers and sailors, had been killed.

The English victory certainly also meant a victory for the Bank of England, which from the beginning had many Jewish shareholders, many of whom were living in Amsterdam.

World War II

After only a few decades, the Second World War broke out. Generally known as the Seven Years’ War, it began in 1756 and ended in 1763. This was also involved most of the world’s great powers, pitting England, Prussia, Portugal and Russia against France, the Holy Roman Empire, Austria, Spain and Sweden, later also joined by Russia. In North America, this war is known as the French and Indian War. The Seven Years’ War was ended by two separate treaties, one between Austria and Prussia, the other, between England and France signed at Paris. This war also claimed about one million deaths (very few civilians) and further consolidated English power. As French historian Jacques Godechot put it on page 336 of volume 3 of the Histoire universelle in the Pléiade series (1958): “the Treaty of Paris brought English power in the Atlantic to its peak, effectively gaining complete control over the entire American coast line in the North Atlantic. It is rightfully said that the British Empire dates from the Treaty of Paris, since in fact England left the stage of commercial colonization for the imperial one.”

This war was one of the “cleanest” and “civilized” in history, since it seems to have affected the civilian population to a much lesser degree than most other wars. It represented the peak of organized warfare, in the sense that opposing armies (composed of highly trained soldiers) operated according to strict disciplinary codes. Armies were organized in such a way as to be autonomous in taking care of their needs, relying on pre-organized depots and warehouses instead of living off the land and at the expense of the local peasants.

World War III

The next world war also essentially pitted England against France, but this time the struggle was further complicated by ideology. It may be said to have begun in 1775 with the American Revolutionary War, during which thirteen English colonies, militarily supported by France and financially by the Netherlands, were striving for the establishment of an independent, federal (“multipolar”) political organization. After a brief pause, this epic Anglo-French struggle was resumed in the form of the French Revolutionary wars (1792-1802) and the Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815), continuing in the Americas as the Wars of Independence, ending only in 1826 with the defeat of the Spanish colonial armies in the Battle of Ayacucho in Peru. This time, all major powers participated in the war: England, France, Spain, Austria, Prussia, Russia, Sweden, the Netherlands and the Ottoman Empire. The total number of deaths could be as high as seven million, a bit less than one percent of the world’s population around that time.

World War IV

The next world war broke out right in the middle of the 19th century. One may regard the 1848 revolution, which affected especially France, Germany and Austria (not hitting England, Russia the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain and Portugal) as a preliminary to WW IV. At its basis one might discern an attempt by England (and the cliques running that country) to destabilize Germany and France.

It is the First Italian War of Independence of 1849 that can be regarded as the actual beginning, pitching Savoy-Piedmont (now morphed into the Kingdom of Sardinia) against Austria and the Vatican which were in control of the political landscape in the Italian peninsula. It ended in a defeat for Sardinia, which was invited to join England and France when in 1853, as allies of the Ottoman Empire, they invaded the Crimean Peninsula and began a war against Russia, in order to prevent her from controlling the Black Sea. After the Crimean War ended in 1856, it found a sequel in the Second Italian War of Independence that began in 1859, in which the government and the financial interests of London were deeply but covertly involved. Plans had been drawn up for digging a canal connecting the Mediterranean to the Red Sea, with work being started in 1859, without any English participation. Management was in the hands of the French (Ferdinand de Lesseps), while Pasquale Revoltella, an Italian businessman from Trieste, was one of the principal financiers. Since at that particular moment, the most powerful navy in the Mediterranean was that of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, alarm bells were ringing all over London. The Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, essentially all of Southern Italy including the Island of Sicily, with a surface of about 100,000 square kilometers and home to about 40% of all Italians, was making remarkable economic progress. It was industrializing impressively and its agriculture was both dynamic and highly diverse. Moreover, the local dynasty enjoyed a broad popularity and all of this made the kingdom a formidable rival.

Hence actually, there were two threats to the English lifeline with its most important colony in India. In a first move, the London government decided to get involved in the fight for Italian unification by subsidizing Giuseppe Garibaldi and the Kingdom of Sardinia. It was decided to force a breakthrough by focusing on the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies. It was Garibaldi who in 1859 at the head of his “thousand red shirts” landed near Palermo, thus initiating the armed rebellion in the kingdom that would eventually lead to its forced dissolution in 1860.

Some other European wars can also be considered part of the broader violent settling of accounts centered around the Crimean War. These include the Prussian-Danish War of 1864, the “Seven Weeks’ War” between Prussia and Austria in 1866, as well as the Franco-Prussian War of 1870. During these wars Prussia, unopposed by England (which sympathetically looked on), moved to replace France as the European continent’s leading power.

Outside Europe the Sepoy Rebellion (1857-58) in India, the Second Opium War (1856-1860), the American Civil War (1861-1865) and the Paraguayan War (1865-1870) were all part of the broader war, which can best be described as a comprehensive English effort to rearrange the map and consolidate English power by eliminating potential rivals and obstacles. World War Four, claiming between three and four million dead at least, ended in 1871 with France defeated, humiliated and forced to rely on English protection for its survival as a nation.

World War V

For a while, the result seemed to be in accordance with English wishes, but German unification under Prussian leadership proved to be a growing threat to English hegemony. Nevertheless, more than three decades of economic growth and peace followed the final consolidation of English World domination. The situation seemed so satisfactory to the English elites that all they were wishing for was for time to stand still. As German historian Giselher Wirsing noted on page 15 of his monumental classic Der masslose Kontinent. Roosevelts Kampf um die Weltmacht (1942), which was never translated into English: “British politics and worldview now converged into one desire: world history ought somehow to stand still. Such had been the underlying concept during the 1897 festivities, as it was later during the silver jubilee of King George V. The 19th century had been the Age of the English. Why would not the 20thand 21st centuries be so as well?”

However, time would not obey English wishes and London had to find new alliances to maintain its position. The United States was a logical choice, and in 1913 it was clear that a big wave of international violence was being planned, for in that year (like the Bank of England in 1694), the Fed was founded, as Richard Werner recently reminded us.

Russia being perceived as the biggest threat to English interests, still centered on the crucial seaway connecting the British Isles to India, Japan also seemed a logical choice for an ally. Armed to the teeth (especially its navy) by London, Japan in 1904 started a war against Russia. This can be considered the opening stage of the Fifth World War. As so often in a world war, this one also began somewhere in the periphery, at least not anywhere near the central stage of operations. The next stages were also set in the periphery. In 1911 Italy went to war against the Ottoman Empire over control of Cyrenaica in what is now Libya. Although officially a member of the Triple Alliance with Germany and Austria-Hungary, Italy had always maintained strong ties with England. This preferential relationship had earned it its first colony in 1890. In that year the Italian commercial presence on the Red Sea coast, right along the sea route from England to India, was converted into a colonial settlement. This would never haven been possible without English permission and support.

Even though it had been weakened by the defeat against Italy the Ottoman Empire remained the dominant power in the Balkans (with an area of 170,000 square kilometers and over six million inhabitants)- However, in 1912 it was attacked by an alliance of Serbia, Bulgaria, Montenegro and Greece, set up with Russian support (First Balkan War). The allies succeeded in depriving Turkey almost completely of its European possessions. The following year, when the spoils were being divided, Bulgaria turned upon Serbia, but was defeated in the Second Balkan War.

Then in the summer of 1914, after a long and meticulous preparation by England, the general European war broke out. When Italy joined the fray in 1915, all six European great powers (England, France, Russia, Italy, German and Austria-Hungary) were involved. With Japan and the United States also participating, the war became the biggest history had ever seen. The war finally ended in 1922, when the Greco-Turkish War come to a conclusion. In the mean time there also had been a Russian-Polish War, when the new Soviet regime in Russia attacked Poland in the hopes of starting a revolution in Western Europe.

World War V took about 20 million victims, mostly military personnel. If one were to add to that the deaths caused by the worldwide Spanish flu “pandemic” (claiming anywhere between 17 and 100 million deaths), which ought to be added to that number, the total might reach 120 million.

The London-based initiators of the war had enough reasons to be quite happy and content. England’s main competitors had been effectively trimmed and neutralized, maybe not forever, but at least for some foreseeable future. Three great empires had fallen, two of which had also fallen apart in the process (Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire). The British empire had been consolidated and fortified. The power of the United States, a central part of the English-speaking world, had grown spectacularly. In a first step towards a central world government, the League of Nations was set up.

World War VI

There was still a lot of work to do before the entire world had been brought to speak English and before the next step towards a unified central world government could be taken. Needless to say, the next step would have to be another world war.

Some have said the Second World War of standard historiography is so closely connected to the Great War or First World War, that both could be considered to be episodes of a single war covering almost the entire first half of the 20th century.

Yet since the leader of a main protagonist of this epic struggle was conscious of what was truly at stake, basing his decisions on that conviction, we must consider this war as a separate one. Let us once again hear what Giselher Wirsing has to say on this: “Here we touch upon a central point of the world crisis of our time. Since Germany’s opponent is a global power, this struggle, comprising all revolutionary movements on the Eurasian continent, is also global. Nevertheless, Germany does not aspire to world domination. (…) From the start, it has been the principle of the limitation of powerwhich Germany under Adolf Hitler set as a goal against the claim for universal world domination. However, England refused to accept such a limitation of powers. She could do so only because she felt assured of US support.” (pp. 25-26).

The Sixth World War began in the mid-1930s. In 1935, again with covert English support, Italy started a war against Ethiopia, then known as Abyssinia. In 1936 the Spanish Civil War broke out, with General Francisco Franco leading the rebellion against a leftist government allowing all sorts of crimes against conservatives and Roman Catholics. In 1937 England’s longtime ally Japan invaded China. On September 1, 1939 Germany and the Soviet Union invaded and occupied Poland, and this armed intervention then became officially the Second World War when England and France declared war on Germany (September 3). After the Soviet Union and the US entered the war (in the summer and winter, respectively), the conflict truly became a world war. After the defeat of Germany and Japan in the spring and late summer of 1945, respectively, fighting continued in several places, either as a civil war or an anti-colonial war.

One civil war was fought in Greece (1946-1949), between Communist rebels and state forces, at a cost of between 80,000 and 160,000 killed. Most important anti-colonial wars, or wars for independence, were fought in Indonesia (against the Dutch, 1945-1949), with at least 120,000 killed, and the First Indochina War (1946-1954), pitching the Vietnamese against their French overlords (between more than half a million and over 1.2 million dead), as well as the Algerian War (1954-1962) against the French (1.5 million dead, officially claimed by the Algerian authorities). Due to the policies of English wartime PM Churchill, some three million people in Bengal died during a famine in 1943. Together with their Soviet allies, the English were also responsible for creating a famine causing the deaths of three to four million Iranians in 1942-43.

All in all, World War VI can be said to have killed at least some 80 million people, most of them civilians, making it one of the bloodiest conflicts both in absolute numbers and proportionately. That figure would represent roughly almost three percent of the world’s population.

As for the goals the English initiators had set for themselves this time, some serious doubts about their achievement are in order. It was the United States that benefited most from the victory of “Democracy” over the “forces of evil” as Allied propaganda would have it. Nevertheless it has also been suggested that London-based elites and groups have never relinquished their effective control over world political events.

The League of Nations was dissolved and replaced by a renewed attempt at achieving a unified world government: the United Nations, headquartered in New York, evidently.

Against the background of the war in the Ukraine and the televised Israeli holocaust in Gaza and other neighboring areas, many “experts,” pundits and other analysts have been saying “World War III” is imminent. The perseverance with which the legacy media and political leaders in the Collective West keep denying the holocaust in Gaza may in itself be an indication that something major is underway.

It seems this new World War is not just imminent but already under way. After more than three quarters of a century of US world hegemony, indeed today we seem to be in the opening stages of a world war. Today the true goals and methods of the elites responsible for all the past organized blood baths seem clearer than ever. Culling the population being apparently a main goal, efforts in that direction are varied and multifarious. These comprise outright attacks on family cohesion through imposed gender lunacy, poisoning and killing off the population with unhealthy food (sugar, nanoplastics, agricultural chemicals, mRNA-manipulated meat), lab-engineered diseases, mandatory vaccinations and thousand kinds of intimidation and manipulation.

The war may said to have started in 2014 with the US-organized “color revolution” in the Ukraine. Immediately, a shooting war was started against the Russian speaking population of the Eastern Ukraine, leading to the deaths of at least 14,000 civilians when the Russian government decided to intervene. In February, 2022 Russia began its “Special Military Operation” which is now in its fourth year and has cost the lives of some 1.5 million Ukrainian soldiers, without an end to the massacre seeming anywhere near.

The second phase of the new world war began in 2019 with the launching of the engineered COVID-19 “pandemic”. Worldwide, at least some 20 million people are estimated to have died as a result of the disease, the vaccination, and the mandatory treatment according to strict protocol in hospitals and nursing homes. As we speak, all over the world people are still dying in unknown, but high numbers as result of having taken their anti-COVID-shots and boosters. Even the official statistics, despite the concerted efforts to manipulate the numbers, indicate high excess death rates since the start of the Great Covid Show. Based on all the evidence now available, it is safe to say that the Covid operation was intended to kill off people and to keep killing them piecemeal every year, in order to reduce the number of “useless eaters.” Research is being carried out for more of such centrally coordinated killing sprees in the future.

In the background, leaders and representatives of globalist outfits such as the World Economic Forum have for some time been talking about a “Great Reset,” that would benefit all of us. We shall own nothing and be happy, the WEF assures us. The World Health Organization has also made a contribution to establishing a world government by demanding everyone submit to the policies, diagnoses and treatments that it wants to impose.

Based on what governments and banks have done to us so far, it would seem plausible that we are now faced with the last episode of an operation initiated more than ten generations earlier, designed to turn the world into one giant concentration camp, compared to which the world portrayed in Soylent Green will seem like paradise.

Perhaps though, we should not give up hope, because in times like these that is the only thing that might pull us through.

https://www.unz.com/article/world-war-vii/

READ FROM TOP.

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.