SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
mass murder, war crimes, genocide.....Imagine how this would have been reported if Russian soldiers had executed Ukrainians in this way. Not like this, you can be sure. Here is yet another example of stunningly craven journalism from The Guardian, entirely illustrative of what is going on across the British establishment media in its coverage of Israeli war crimes in Gaza for the past 18 months. A monstrous media and murder in Gaza
We are now a month on from Israel executing 15 paramedics and hiding their bodies in a mass grave. Since then, video footage has surfaced of that atrocity, showing Israeli soldiers firing on a convoy of emergency vehicles that were clearly marked and with their warning lights on. We have had post-mortems of the victims showing they were shot from close range in the head and torso. And we’ve had eye-witness accounts of the killings. All of that, of course, is on top of compelling circumstantial evidence. Israel sought to destroy the evidence of its war crime by crushing the emergency vehicles and then burying them, along with the bodies of the 15 crew members, presumably in the hope that they would decompose, making it hard to forensically determine exactly what had happened. The latest evidence to emerge, reported by Israel’s Haaretz newspaper this week, shows that Israeli soldiers fired continuously for 3½ minutes on the convoy, despite the emergency vehicles being clearly marked. According to details from an internal investigation by the Israeli military leaked to the paper, the soldiers fired from near-point-blank range and while the emergency workers were trying to identify themselves. (Not surprisingly, the other parts of the investigation, those made public, have been a whitewash, suggesting only “professional failures” and “ operational misunderstandings”.) In other words, this new evidence confirms that Israeli soldiers intentionally murdered most of the occupants of the emergency vehicles with a prolonged hail of bullets. Those who survived, the post-mortems suggest, were executed with shots to the head or torso. Then the evidence was hurriedly buried. None of this is surprising. We have known for some time, as repeatedly reported by the Israeli media, that the Israeli military has created undeclared “kill zones”, where anything that moves is shot – even children, aid workers and emergency crews. As has also been evident for most of the past 18 months, Israel is implementing a policy to destroy Gaza’s health sector, including its hospitals and ambulances, and killing or kidnapping medical staff – on top of wrecking the rest of the enclave’s infrastructure. The goal is to force the Palestinian population out of Gaza, driving them into the neighbouring Egyptian territory of Sinai. Israel is carrying out a genocide to facilitate its ethnic cleansing plan. The murder of the 15 paramedics entirely fits with this picture. The video evidence has already proven that Israel’s original claim that the ambulances and fire engines were “ advancing suspiciously” — whatever that is supposed to mean — was utterly untrue. Israel’s other implausible claim, that several of the emergency crew were really Hamas fighters in disguise, has been thoroughly debunked too. The biographies of those murdered by Israel show they have long been emergency workers. Israel has been relying on this knee-jerk excuse every time it gets caught lying about its latest atrocity. Why is The Guardian failing to do its job? So how on earth is The Guardian still writing a headline like this? ‘New details on killing of paramedics in Gaza appear to contradict IDF’s account’ Or writing a first paragraph like this? “New developments have come to light in the killing of 15 Palestinian medics and rescue workers by Israeli troops in the Gaza Strip last month, with evidence reportedly contradicting the Israel Defence Forces’ claim that soldiers did not fire indiscriminately at the medical workers.” The “evidence” cited by The Guardian is a reference to the Haaretz report of Israeli soldiers firing for 3½ minutes on the convoy. The Guardian’s wording falsely suggests two things. First, that the Israeli military’s account of the killings still has enough credibility that it needs contradicting. And second, that Haaretz’s latest evidence only “appears to contradict” an account that has already been so repeatedly contradicted that it cannot be entertained as true on any level whatsoever. The Guardian’s phrasing is also utterly subservient to Israel. The Israeli military framed its internal investigation as if its aim was to determine whether soldiers fired “indiscriminately” or not – so that it can then claim to have concluded that they did not fire indiscriminately. That presumably means the Israeli military wants us to believe its soldiers shot at the emergency vehicles with precision and intention – in this case, to kill those “Hamas fighters” invented retroactively by the Israeli military to justify its atrocity. The Guardian buys into this framing, suggesting that the unpublished part of the investigation found that the 3½ minutes of live fire at the vehicles was actually “indiscriminate” rather than intentional. The reality is far worse: it was both. Israeli soldiers fired indiscriminately at the vehicles with the intention of killing all the emergency workers inside. The issue of “discrimination” is meant only to serve as a red herring. Before Haaretz’s new disclosure, it was already clear that the Israeli military’s account was a pack of lies. So why is The Guardian not doing its job? Why is it still pretending a month on that the Israeli military’s version has not already been thoroughly discredited? Even a highly cautious headline from The Guardian ought to read like this: ‘New details on killing of paramedics in Gaza further discredit IDF’s account’ And the text should read: “New developments have come to light in the killing of 15 Palestinian medics and rescue workers by Israeli troops in the Gaza Strip last month, with an internal Israel Defence Forces’ investigation reportedly finding its soldiers fired a prolonged hail of bullets from close range at a clearly marked convoy of emergency vehicles.” Any rookie journalist knows The Guardian is reporting this all wrong. It keeps giving Israel the benefit of the doubt, even after the case against Israel has been proven. It keeps fudging the story. It keeps suggesting that Israel’s guilt is not already an incontrovertible, established fact. If this isn’t clear to you, just imagine how this story would have been reported were the executed paramedics Ukrainian and the soldiers responsible Russian. Not like this, you can be sure. Why is a whole team of highly experienced Guardian journalists still getting this story so wrong? It is not because they are incompetent. They get it wrong because it is their job to do so: they work for a corporate media outlet, one that exists within a corporate news system that serves a corporate financial system that is protected by corporate political structures. Or for shorthand, these journalists — whether they understand it or not — work for the British establishment, advancing British foreign policy goals that are subservient to Washington’s imperial demands for global full-spectrum dominance. The role of corporate advertising is clear. It is there to make us want to consume, to encourage us to feel that we need more to be complete, to cultivate an aspiration in us to a materially “better” way of life. People in the advertising industry don’t think of themselves as monsters. Nonetheless, the profession’s goal is to create an endless demand for resources on a finite planet. Ultimately, it is to will the suicide of our species. The role of the corporate media is no different. It is there to create the illusion that we are the masters of our own thoughts. It is there to make us think we have reached an independent understanding of the world, even though that understanding has been carefully crafted for us from birth. It is there to cultivate a worldview in us that aligns precisely with the privileging of a tiny corporate elite whose wealth depends on the relentless pillaging of the planet for their benefit. Journalists don’t think of themselves as monsters either. Nonetheless, they are part of a media machine whose goal is to lull us into passivity as our leaders actively collude in the perpetration of a genocide, as our corporations, militaries and intelligence services press ahead with endless wars for resource control, and as the tripwires of nuclear confrontation grow ever more numerous and entangled. No one wants to think of themselves as a monster. But we keep doing monstrous things.
Republished from Consortium News, 29 April
https://johnmenadue.com/post/2025/05/a-monstrous-media-and-murder-in-gaza/
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
|
User login |
burning THEIR land?...
By Ivan Kesic
The latest wave of wildfires sweeping through the occupied Palestinian territories has once again drawn global attention to Israel’s pillaging of the Palestinian land—and to its insidious practice of using afforestation as a smokescreen to hide the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
The wildfires began on April 30, 2025, near occupied Jerusalem al-Quds, between Eshtaol and Latrun, and spread alarmingly and rapidly due to dry conditions and fierce winds. By May 2, 2025, they had scorched through over 100 locations across the occupied territories, including the occupied West Bank.
The fires scorched more than 2,500 hectares (25 km²) of the occupied Palestinian land, making them among the most extensive wildfire events in the Zionist entity’s recent history.
Major roads were closed for days, and over 10,000 people were evacuated from several settlements.
April 2025 experienced unusually high temperatures (averaging 3°C above the 1991–2020 norm) and low humidity, following a dry winter with 20 percent less rainfall than average, according to the regime’s Meteorological Service. These conditions rendered forests highly susceptible to ignition.
Frustrated by the destruction and the incompetence of the authorities, Israeli right-wingers blamed the Palestinians, accusing them, without evidence, of deliberately starting the fires.
The real story, though, is starkly different and dates back to the 1948 Nakba and its aftermath.
Background of Zionist afforestation
The Jewish National Fund (JNF), also known as Keren Kayemeth LeIsrael (KKL), has led the afforestation campaign in the occupied Palestinian territories, planting over 260 million trees since its establishment in 1901, driven by a nefarious agenda.
Although these efforts have transformed arid landscapes, expanded forest cover, and supported Zionist objectives of land seizure, they have also significantly influenced wildfire patterns in the Zionist entity, increasing their frequency, intensity, and scale.
The JNF began a tree plantation drive in the early 20th century to “green” the desert, combat soil erosion, and establish a Zionist presence on the land, aligning with their settler-colonial agenda.
Tree planting, particularly during Tu Bishvat (the Jewish “New Year for Trees”), came to symbolize renewal and provided a pretext for Jews to claim a false connection to the Palestinian land.
By 2025, forest cover in Israeli-occupied territory had reached 7 percent of the land area (154,000 hectares), largely due to JNF efforts, with 70 percent (approximately 100,000 ha) consisting of pine species such as the Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis).
The Aleppo pine, native to the Mediterranean but extensively planted by the JNF, became the “backbone” of forests due to its rapid growth, drought resistance, and ability to thrive in poor soil conditions.
Pine trees as wildfire fuel
These pines are extremely flammable due to their resin-rich needles, dry bark, and dense growth, which create a continuous fuel load. Environmentalists describe the pine as “like a gallon of petrol” under fire conditions, highly prone to rapid ignition and spread.
The frequency of fires in the occupied territories has risen with the prevalence of pine-dominated forests. From 1980 to 2010, the average annual number of fires increased by 20 percent, with pine forests burning more often than mixed or native species areas.
The 2010 Carmel fire, which burned 2,500 hectares and claimed 44 lives, was largely fueled by pine forests, underscoring their contribution to large-scale wildfires.
Although drought-tolerant, pines shed dry needles that accumulate as tinder during hot, dry summers (June–September), a period when 90 percent of local wildfires occur.
The JNF’s reliance on pine monocultures has reduced biodiversity, creating uniform forests with minimal undergrowth diversity to act as natural firebreaks. Native species such as oaks and carobs, which are less flammable and support more varied ecosystems, were largely sidelined.
Monocultures facilitate the rapid spread of fires. For instance, the 2016 Halutzit fire near occupied Jerusalem al-Quds burned 600 hectares of pine forest in less than 12 hours, a speed attributed to the absence of natural barriers.
Ecological studies show that mixed forests, with a diversity of species and spacing, can reduce fire intensity by up to 40 percent. Yet, such forests comprise less than a third of the planted areas.
Another significant issue stems from dense planting practices. Early JNF efforts prioritized quantity, with stands reaching densities of up to 1,000 trees per hectare, aiming to maximize shade and soil retention.
This high density increased fuel loads, as pine needles and deadwood accumulated in the absence of natural thinning processes. Studies have found that unthinned pine forests carry a 50 percent higher fire risk compared to those that are actively managed.
Following the 2010 Carmel fire, the JNF began thinning forests, reducing tree density to 300–500 trees per hectare, and incorporating more native species. However, according to the most recent data, at least 60 percent of existing forests remain dominated by pines.
Despite this record of mismanagement and negligence, widely seen as the primary cause of major wildfires, Zionist settlers and regime authorities have repeatedly accused Palestinians of arson, a claim that only seeks to hide the inefficiency of the regime.
Truth behind the JNF afforestation
JVF has invested significant effort in soliciting international donations for afforestation projects, presenting them under the guise of environmental activism and ennobling the Holy Land and combating climate change.
In this manner, not only Zionists but also well-meaning environmental activists worldwide have contributed millions to the JNF, unaware that their donations have been effectively supporting a Zionist effort to obscure the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
Yosef Weitz, the first director of the JNF’s Land and Afforestation Department, became known within the Zionist entity as the “Father of the Forests,” but also earned the title “architect of transfer”—with “transfer” being a euphemism for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
Weitz is infamous for his statements declaring that “there is no room in the country for both peoples” and that “the only solution to the Zionist plan is a country without Arabs,” who, he insisted, “should be expelled to neighboring countries.”
His vision was realized in 1948, when hundreds of thousands of native Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homeland in an event known as the Nakba (catastrophe), leaving behind hundreds of deserted villages, towns, and cities.
Since the Nakba, afforestation has been used as a tool to further displacement and dispossession. Zionists planted forests to obscure the ruins of destroyed Palestinian communities and to deter displaced residents from returning to their ancestral lands.
In many cases, the few remaining Palestinian communities have been encircled by so-called “nature reserves,” enabling the Zionist regime to confiscate private Palestinian land under the pretext of public use, while simultaneously preventing the natural expansion of these communities.
Even a cursory glance at maps comparing ethnically cleansed Palestinian settlements with Zionist forested areas reveals a striking geographical overlap, excluding the heavily urbanized coastal zones.
Confiscation of Palestinian land
The most heavily afforested zones are located west of occupied Jerusalem al-Quds, on Mount Carmel (Mar Elias) south of Haifa, and Mount Meron (Jarmaq) in northern Palestine.
In recent years, the JNF has expanded its afforestation efforts into the Negev Desert, confiscating lands traditionally inhabited or used by Arab Bedouin communities, who have now been reclassified as “trespassers” on areas where they once lived and worked.
Through this gradual process of land confiscation, the Israeli occupation regime has come to control more than half of the land in the Bedouin region of Siyag, located in the northern Negev.
Despite the presence of dozens of Bedouin communities, the regime has officially recognized fewer than a dozen, leaving the remaining 34 under constant threat of eviction and demolition.
One particularly notable case is that of the unrecognized village of al-Araqeeb. Its inhabitants were offered relocation to a “development town” modeled after American-Indian reservations, but they refused.
Al-Araqeeb has become a symbol of steadfast resistance, with its residents determined to preserve their ancestral home and rebuild what has been repeatedly destroyed, despite Israeli authorities citing “state land” claims to justify demolition.
The village was first razed in 2010, only to be rebuilt shortly thereafter. This cycle of destruction and reconstruction has continued monthly for the past 15 years. As of February, al-Araqeeb had been destroyed for the 236th time.
The Yatir Forest, one of the largest forests established by the Zionist entity, was planted by the JNF in the same region with the support of militarized Israeli police, who protected the foresters from native Bedouin inhabitants.
Even the internationally recognized Palestinian territories have not been spared from the JNF’s land appropriations under the pretext of afforestation. A prominent example is the notorious Canada Park, located in the occupied West Bank.
This national park, recently damaged, was constructed with donations from Canadian Jews on the ruins of three Palestinian villages, which were ethnically cleansed by the Israeli occupation army under Yitzhak Rabin.
The operation expelled up to 10,000 inhabitants and demolished approximately 1,500 homes.
In 2015, South African Jewish donors publicly apologized for supporting a park built on the site of the ethnically cleansed village of Lubya in northern Palestine, stating that they had been misled by the JNF.
During the 2009 World Conference Against Racism (WCAR or Durban II) held in Geneva, Switzerland, several international NGOs launched the “Stop the JNF” campaign—an initiative aimed at exposing the true nature of the Israeli regime’s afforestation practices.
The campaign offers educational materials and organizing resources focused on the JNF, the halting of its afforestation projects, and the broader goal of ending the Israeli occupation of Palestine. It also raises funds to plant olive trees in the occupied West Bank in support of Palestinian farmers.
Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:
www.presstv.ir
https://www.theinteldrop.org/2025/05/04/behind-smoke-and-ashes-how-israeli-forest-fires-mask-ugly-truth-of-squatter-colonialism/
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.