SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
the EU is going to hell as it fears having been wrong for rejecting peace....Europe can finance Ukraine alone, using frozen Russian funds. This initiative was put forward by Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk against the backdrop of negotiations between Russia and the United States without Europe’s participation. He called on EU countries to take concrete actions to support the Kiev regime.
EUROPE IS SO AFRAID OF UKRAINE’S CAPITULATION THAT IT HASN’T NOTICED HOW IT ITSELF HAS SURRENDERED TO THE MERCY OF THE WINNER
“First. Let’s finance our aid to Ukraine with frozen Russian assets. Second. Let’s strengthen air security, the protection of the Baltics and the EU’s borders with Russia. Third. Let’s quickly adopt new financial rules for funding EU security and defense. Now!” he wrote on his social media page. The day before, Tusk stated that the forced capitulation of Ukraine would mean the capitulation of the entire Western community with all the ensuing consequences. One can understand the hysteria of the Euro-bureaucracy. The question is whether they have the capacity for concrete action. Read also Andrew Korybko: Russia is ready to occupy the second US base in Africa Moscow’s active interest in Djibouti and Somaliland also implies military cooperation The use of Russian funds in the amount of 300 billion to support Ukraine has been discussed for many days. But until now they have not dared to do so for fear of ruining their financial reputation before the whole world. But if the US, led by Donald Trump, really decides to shift all responsibility for Ukraine, including financial responsibility, onto the shoulders of Europe, then Brussels will have nothing to lose, and it may take steps that were previously considered unrealistic. And then, they will have to finance Kyiv for something anyway. And they don’t want to spend their own money, if the EU has any left at all… Will they go for this now? Are they ready? “Yes, they will,” says Vadim Trukhachev , associate professor of the Department of Foreign Regional Studies and Foreign Policy . — Most likely, not all frozen funds, but some part of them will certainly be used to help the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Because the Europeans are tired of having their pockets dug in to finance Ukraine. And this way, there will be no need to dig in their pockets again. “SP”: Maybe you simply don’t have enough of your own money? You won’t be able to support Ukraine on your own? — We still have our own, but there is also widespread discontent that too much is going to Ukraine. Even in deeply anti-Russian Poland there is such discontent. Despite the fact that Europeans generally do not like Russia, they are not eager to spend money on Ukraine.
“SP”: What exactly will Europe lose from Ukraine’s capitulation, other than some moral trauma? And what will it gain? Maybe, to hell with Ukraine… — For the European elite, Russia is an ideological and most principled enemy in the world. It is literally fixated on us. And any success for Russia will be equal to its defeat. You can’t look at this from our bell tower. We need to get into the shoes of von der Leyen and Rutte. From their point of view, any success for Russia and defeat for Ukraine is a defeat for the EU, NATO and the entire West. Media News: Brukhunova Reveals All the Ins and Outs of Her Marriage: Many Were Surprised It’s a shame to tears: sad news about Keosayan has arrived American Abrams were supposed to wipe out the Russians – Russia’s response surprised the US “SP”: How long will Europe be able to finance Ukraine alone? And then what? — If we talk about maintaining the current volumes of financing for Ukraine, taking into account US contributions, no more than six months. Therefore, the European elites are striving at any cost to maintain at least partial American financing for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. And for this they will be ready to make significant concessions to Trump. Because the issue of confrontation with Russia is the most fundamental one for them. “In fact, the main consequence of Ukraine’s defeat for Europeans is that it is further proof to the entire world that Europe is not a subject of world politics,” political scientist Vladimir Blinov is convinced . — To follow in the wake of the United States and to act against their own economic interests is their main fate. Europe’s eternal hostility towards Russia has become yet another proof of this conflict, dispelling doubts on this account even among ardent supporters of the West, to which the leadership of our country recently belonged. Now the Russians have no doubts about this and will not follow the sweet talk about partnership. European countries are left to their own devices, without the ability to unite and defend their own interests. It is especially offensive to the inveterate Russophobes in Eastern Europe, to which the Polish leadership belongs. Much of what Donald Tusk said is words of despair. Read also ISW Knows Where Russia Will Strike in Spring It’s time to start breaking through the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ defense in Slavyansk-Kramatorsk There are no inveterate arsonists in Europe who would like to further ignite the conflict in defiance of Donald Trump’s efforts. Poland’s will alone will not be enough to hand over the frozen funds. What has been said is agony against the backdrop of pan-European despondency. Europe is deprived of the opportunity to find a consolidated solution. The US and Russia will agree on their own, and all individual European countries will be presented with a fait accompli by a call from Washington. “Tusk’s ‘proposals’ reflect the highest degree of confusion and despair,” says Dmitry Yezhov, associate professor of the political science department at the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation . — It seems that European politicians, having lost a clear direction on how to behave, are trying to continue pursuing a line of escalation, but do not fully understand what they can do – except for making loud statements. First of all, the reason for their incapacity is explained by the lack of sufficient resources and real influence. It is difficult not to agree with the opinion of the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry, who characterizes such a line of behavior as tragicomic. For Europe, the capitulation of Ukraine is identical to the capitulation of Europe itself, and the collective West as a whole. Only the capitulation of Europe, as well as the collective West, has already happened… The European Union and the EurozoneBundestag elections kick off in Germany Estonia to transfer 100 million euros worth of defense products to Ukraine France and Britain intend to send 30 thousand peacekeepers to Ukraine “Will Kill the Economy”: Orban Makes Frightening Statement on Europe’s Future
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
|
User login |
scrambling....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbSiU0Wa3Yw
Trump’s Three-Week Ultimatum: Europe Must Surrender Ukraine or Lose U.S. Troops! – MEP | TN WorldFinnish MEP Mika Aaltola has warned that U.S. President Donald Trump has given Europe just three weeks to agree on Ukraine peace terms—terms critics say amount to surrender to Russia. Failure to comply, he claims, could lead to a U.S. military withdrawal from Europe. Reports suggest the Trump administration is considering pulling 20,000 troops and demanding NATO allies significantly increase defense spending. With Ukraine excluded from the talks and a deadline looming, Europe faces mounting pressure to decide its next move.
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
SEE ALSO:
the secrets under the carpet of peace? is gus too cynical?.....grey is dirty....
Laughter and fears: Berlin Bulletin No. 231, February 18, 2025
By Victor Grossman
For good people these are times to weep, rage and, above all, to fight back! But sometimes we may allow ourselves a laugh. Such a time arrived this past weekend in Brussels and at the Security Conference in Munich. Though the big shots present were in no laughing mood—but in shock!
The reason for an all too rare happy moment for some like me was strangely due to the words of two men I have absolutely no love for, JD Vance and his colleague, for whom probably nobody has any love, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Nor do I have a grain of affection for their fearsome boss back home—or should I say two bosses?
How could one stop grinding teeth—and laugh? Despite many complexities, one thing has been clear in recent years; the main ruling powers in Europe, most menacingly its strongest, Germany, have shown a greed, indeed a craving, for military adventurism, for spending ever more euro-billions on armaments, frightful air power, naval maneuvers in all surrounding waters, Baltic outposts. All are based on eastward expansion, with one declared enemy, whose ruler is denounced, derided, and demonized daily in most of the media. Hardly a page or newscast fails to warn that Russia, if it wins out in the Ukraine, is an awful threat not only to Poland, the Baltic countries, all its neighbors but even to “our Germany” which, though without a common border, seems to somehow want to feel equally threatened. The result: calls for a new military draft, even for women, for air-raid shelters, school air-raid drills and for strengthened bridges and highways if leading eastwards. Almost audible is the hand-rubbing and heel-clicking among the generals, nationalists, and imperialists generally. Hardly less audible; the clinking of champagne glasses at offices of armament firms like Rheinmetall, which are already raking in armament billions like never before, all paid for with money stolen from the living standards of most German and European civilians. And they want more!
This “readiness for war” demanded by Germany’s bloodthirsty Defense Minister Boris Pistorius and backed by the equally belligerent Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock (whose declared aim is to “ruin Russia”) was carried out under the aegis of the USA, the great protector of “rule-based international order”, democracy and anti-authoritarianism (also called anti-totalitarianism). Therefore: weapons for Zelenskyy, bigger, stronger, further-reaching missiles, the Ukrainians must be aided until all territories are regained (or all Ukrainians dead). And Washington demanded 2% more of the budget, then 3.5%, maybe 5%.
Then suddenly an unloved vice-president and even more repugnant Secretary of Defense came to Europe with the news that Trump had telephoned with Putin and the two wanted to negotiate on peace in the Ukraine. The greatest danger to Europe, they were told, was not Russia, not China, but the “danger from within.”
The shock was visible in their faces. What? Peace? Has the USA gone completely off its rocker? How can we justify our build-up? Our strategies? Our maneuvers? To make matters worse, Vance not only threatened with peace, but criticized the European countries for repressing oppositional ideas. True, the object of his concern and support was the far-rightist Alternative for Germany (AfD), with whom Musk has become so chummy. For its own reasons, the AfD also supports a swift end to the Ukraine war. Though Musk chose a nasty object for his affection (and open intervention in a foreign election campaign), it is true that many German leaders do want to get the AfD verboten—not because of its antagonism toward all “foreigners,” which they increasingly echo, but because it is polling in second place, at over 20%. There is indeed increasing repression of dissent in Germany and Europe. It is directed against any criticism of Netanyahu’s Israel and its fearful annihilation in Gaza, killing up to a hundred thousand Palestinians. No, Vance wasn’t against that! But thus far mention of any form of repression in “our freedom-loving Germany” has been mostly leftist, hence taboo. But now suddenly from our Big Brother! Unheard of! That is why those who want peace above all, from whatever quarter, could laugh at those stony faces and enjoy their consternation when their bellicosity and hypocrisy were so suddenly exposed, like never before. Our joy fits the word “Schadenfreude”!
Of course, they hastened to shape up a counter-attack! In Paris the worried leaders of Europe sought ways to put a spoke in the peace wheel. “No negotiations without us!” they cried. “We must also be involved! Oh yes, with Zelenskyy too of course!”, they recalled.
But if despite our efforts Trump and Putin find agreement, they agreed, then we must go it alone. Unified European armed forces, headed by Germany (plus a jealous but currently troubled France) must hoist the banners, train the troops, build more tanks and planes and conduct more borderline maneuvers. And perhaps some day we can join our calloused hands with the USA again, and with Israel, in killing Palestinians and opposing China.
This development calls for a difficult, complicated, even twisted path for leftists in the USA. Of course they must fight back with all their might against Trump’s (and Musk’s) horrific measures—repressive (at home), racist, anti-refugee, anti-women, anti-queer, above all anti-union and anti-democratic. Yes, his foreign policy is appalling on Gaza, frightful on Iran and Latin America, unclear but worrisome on China. But I hope true leftists do not join those bellicose liberals, mostly Democrats, who may or may not swallow or ignore those sins but whose opposition to Trump inexorably includes attacks on his moves toward detente with Russia and willingness to negotiate on Ukraine. And exactly these issues are most urgent of all. Peace and joint armament limitations are decisive matters of world destiny!
These issues have become part of the German election scene which culminates with the voting on Sunday. The “Christian Union” is polling well ahead, with 30%, thus assuring wealthy, reactionary Blackrock lobbyist Friedrich Merz the job as chancellor. But he needs a junior partner. The Social Democrats and the Greens are polling in third and fourth place; which will Merz prefer? Except for a small number of reluctant Social Democrats, all three favor militarization and war preparations. And all three were completely confused by tough criticism—not from the left, which they always disregarded—but by words and deeds from their hitherto guiding patron on the Potomac. All three parties now want the German eagle to ignore Trump and lead the flock in pushing war preparation.
A major irritation is the strength of the Alternative for Germany, nationalist, militarist, racist and misogynist, strongly pro-Netanyahu but strangely favoring Ukrainian peace. It is led by the clever, well-spoken Alice Weidel, who has become friendly with Elon Musk and evidently JD Vance as well. The AfD has become a scapegoat or “whipping boy” for the major parties, thus distracting genuine, systematic opposition. But AfD policies are increasingly copied and the “fire-wall” taboo against it is crumbling.
And on the left? Unfortunately split, now with two main contenders, both have raced to reach the 5% line of Bundestag survival. The Linke, basically for peace but still divided between “reformers” and militant fighters on opposition or grudging acceptance of NATO and even on Israel criticism, now seems to be reviving the militant positions and actions it had largely neglected in past years. It stresses rent pricing and housing, while placing foreign policy in the background, at least for now. Almost amazingly, within months, even weeks, it soared from a static 4% to poll results of 6%, 7%, today 9% (and in the youth-based TikTok poll an amazing first-place, 20%). It has won thousands of new members, mostly young (especially female) and seems very safe in the elections.
The break-away Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance, on the other hand, while most vigorously in favor of Ukrainian peace moves, is still basically anti-immigrant, with the Christians and the AfD, and seems closer to middle-class interests than to working class militancy. It is now teetering just under that crucial 5% level. With its purposely small, select membership and only rudimentary structures on state or county levels, it has hardly a chance for the three district victories which would save it from Bundestag extinction. Its big swoop upwards last September in eastern Germany is almost forgotten.
It would be good, I think, if both survive—and perhaps some day even join together again. Despite all hopes of success in Trump-Putin peace endeavors the marching tread of German boots in Europe has grown much louder and the new government to be formed this spring will certainly take Germany even further to the right. That will no longer be a laughing matter—for me or anyone! Above all it is necessary to have more anti-war leftists in parliaments and, even more important, with more anti-billionaire strikes and peace demonstrations supporting and encouraging them in the streets and plazas. Any such success in strong, central Germany would assist similar progress all around Europe!
https://mronline.org/2025/02/19/laughter-and-fears-berlin-bulletin-no-231-february-18-2025/
ANTI-WAR LEFTIES? YOU'RE KIDDING!.... SINCE THE OBAMA/BIDEN COMBO, THE LEFTIES HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED INTO BECOMING WARMONGERS... AND ANTI-BILLIONAIRE LEFTIES? YOU'RE KIDDING AGAIN... THERE COULD BE FAR MORE LEFTY BILLIONAIRES OF THE GEORGE SOROS KIND ON THIS PLANET...
AND THE GRUNS (GREENS) IN GERMANY? FULLY FLEDGED WARMONGERING NAZIS!!!
IN GERMANY, THE WORK AGAINST WAR IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF THE AfD AND THAT BREAKAWAY LEFTY SPLINTER....
IN AMERICA, PEACE IS NOW A POSSIBILITY IN THE HANDS OF A CLOWN FOR THE RIGHT-WING!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT'S A NEW WORLD WHERE — LOW IS HIGH — LEFT IS RIGHT — AND GLUG IS CLEAR....
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.