SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
scandinavians, the world’s happiest people, love killing for the USA....Midway in Wimbledon’s championship last July, Denmark’s favorite son, Rune Holger, bashed a forehand over to his senior by 16 years, the seven-time Wimbledon champion Novak Djokovic, who had leg surgery a month before. I missed the return as a loud Danish voice droned over the TV. “Russian missile hit children’s hospital killing….” Part III Media Brainwashing [See Parts 1 and II in veteran journalist and political activist Ron Ridenour’s series on Denmark and its alliance with U.S. imperialism.—Editors]
True or false is not my point. Lies are spread incessantly about this war. I was away from it today, enjoying my favorite sport, when Big-Brother-Is-Watching came into our living room. Denmark did not experience the McCarthy period as I did when still an American Exceptionalist believer. Since this war began, Denmark has effectively prohibited any rational or irrational voice to be publicly expressed that maybe the Russians have a right to fight for their own sovereignty. Schools do not even allow teachers to discuss if Russians might fear that the U.S. plus its NATO are edging into Russian territory with the intent of taking over. Facts to support that are not allowed, such as: recruiting countries’ governments into NATO at Russia’s border; money-arms-training for terrorist organizations to fight color revolutions and overthrow non-compliant governments. Not to mention, U.S./U.K. invasion of Russia shortly after communist revolutionaries won a relatively bloodless revolution in 1917, and on and on. Even at universities there is an atmosphere of Nazi Germany Berufsverbot (professional ban). History Professor Jens Joergen Nielsen was fired after four teachers walked out of the “People’s University” because he taught there, and one of his students contended that he was too “pro-Putin” for their taste. Nielsen has written three books on Ukraine and Russia. He knows their languages. Nielsen had taught there for eight years, and was teaching about the current war. While he spoke against Russia’s invasion, he explained what motivated Russia. Both sides were taught. Nielsen was able to tell the media his version after he was fired, in November 2022. His main concern had been to prevent world war. “We stand in a situation that could end in an atomic war.” “There has been a shitstorm. I mean, there is a wrong take on Russia and Ukraine. I am inspired by some American realists, such as John Mearsheimer and Henry Kissinger.” Kissinger died recently, 100 years old, after having been a major figure in forging U.S.’s wars in many countries. He is especially known for his role in the Indochina war, and for overthrowing democratically elected Salvador Allende, a mild socialist. His choice was establishing General Augusto Pinochet as dictator of Chile in the first 9/11 coup d’état, September 11, 1973. Kissinger’s reasoning: “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its own people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.” Kissinger, nevertheless, was placed on Ukraine’s Myrotvorets “hit list”, because he “suggested that fully antagonizing Russia threatens stability in Europe.” This list is backed by Kyiv’s government, and the CIA. At least a score of people on it have been murdered, a couple thousands arrested, and thousands of critical journalists are named. Professor Nielsen is now listed, as is CovertAction Magazine’s managing editor, Jeremy Kuzmarov. Manufacturing Consent to Militarize Society In this free-spirited land that first brought pornography legally to the world, today’s mass media is daily fraught with anti-Russian reportage and editorializing á la the red scare. During most of this two-and-on-half years of Ukraine-Russia war, the key television stations devote hours daily to the war, in one way or another. For days on end, there is often a program with Danish military officers showing where the fighting is happening, and who has the best of it. News coverage never suggests that Russia has a point of view other than as an imperialist grabbing European territory and will not be satisfied only with devouring Ukraine. As I write this, September 17, the main TV channel is showing a special “Horizon” program: Neighbors to Russia—will war also come to me?” A Dane reports from Norway at the artic speaking with young guards who, she says, wonder if or when Russia will invade Norway. Again, the media doesn’t consider that would mean 140 million Russians are so stupid, including the two generation-long experienced president and the military, that they are prepared to war against 32 nations at once. “The alliance has increased its NATO Response Force deployments in Eastern Europe, and the combined militaries of all NATO members include around 3.5 million soldiers and personnel. All member states together cover an area of 25.07 million km² and about 973 million people.” I took [a] photo of a major daily front page at my local food market this summer. Another customer held the newspaper for me. When he asked what I wanted this for, and I explained, he became livid with patriotic anger that I could question the rationality and morality of censoring “the enemy Russians” right to tell their side of the story and my right to know what they say. Denmark and the EU have made it subversive to read, see or hear Russian media. If one can figure out modern technology, or get help as I must, it is still possible to go around their technologic Berufsverbot and see RT. Even the anti-Semitic Martin Luther Lutheran state church is for the war. Its 10 bishops encourage their priests to be “field priests”—consoling soldiers fighting the “common” enemies. Several of them write for newspapers, especially the “Christian Daily” (KD), which I rename the “Anti-Christ Christian Daily.” “Weapons must there be so life can grow,” is Bacher’s lead. He concludes: “It is, in fact, unethical to be for fine to invest in our common security” so the weapons industry must end “their ethical reservations for investing in weapons industry.” He does not explain when any weapons industry had such “reservations.” My effort to debate via letter-to-the-editor was, of course, a waste of angry energy. I met one of these “field priests” at a dinner invitation some years ago. He sat before me wearing a t-shirt emblazoned with: “Operation Enduring Freedom,” which he had obtained when praying for Danish soldiers as they fought Afghanistan Taliban soldiers. He didn’t know that the CIA had created the Taliban, and he refused to take off his t-shirt. I walked away from the venue waving a clenched fist. The most grotesque yet is that “field priests” are training to kill U.S. enemies when they travel to a land the U.S. wants to dominate. In October 2024, The government sponsored TV network DR sent a four-part series entitled: “Priests at War—from Priests Dress to Uniform” The advertisement for it shows a priest shooting his pistol at a target range: “A priest takes aim with his gun to pass a shooting test. Adam is currently a parish priest in Gentofte church, but is training to become a field priest. And when priests have to go to war, they must be able to both shoot and run if necessary. But why would a priest expose himself to danger and conflict when he could live in peace in his rectory and his church?” The government’s media war propaganda escalates. At the same time it sends God’s earthly delegates killing for the US-ARME, DR sends an hour-long, six part series in which Danish soldiers kill people in several countries for the U.S. entitled: “Velkommen til frontlinjen.” [Welcome to the Front Line]. It goes on to say: WARNING: The series contains violent images. “The risk of dying in war is there, but it is a shame when it is because we are not up-to-date with our equipment.” says Jesper. Another of the anti-Christ headlines (May 25, 2024) is too tempting not to mention here. “Europe can achieve peace, if we can realize that war never disappears.” So much for the holy church messages to us sinners in the name of some kind of “Christian” god. During last May’s EU parliament elections, three candidates from three different political parties were signaled out by two lunch counter newspapers for being connected to a Russian fund, which helped Russian speaking citizens living in Denmark with “legal assistance.” After being slurred in the media, they all dropped out of the race. One of them, 28-year old, Danish born Alexandra Sasha Bessmertnaia, was a member of Venstre (liberal-conservative) party, known for its perennial war hawkish positions. Sasha was a star for her party, and publically supports Ukraine in this war. Yet she was “exposed” for having connections with Russia at forums, such as the European Russia Forum, before the war. She has a Russian background. She designs and sells fashion clothing. A Russian expert at the Danish Institute for International Studies, a pro-military think tank, told B.T. that the European Russian Forum is a “forum of influence.” I could find no evidence that it is blacklisted. Be that as it may, Sasha not only dropped out of the election she dropped out of politics. Without having spent much time researching the mainstream media throughout Europe, I can conclude, nevertheless, that the Danish media can be proud that more Danes, and other Scandinavians, are more gung ho about warring against Russia than the average European. In the latest EU-sponsored poll (ECFR May 2024) of the 15 countries polled only Sweden represented Scandinavia. It placed 2nd highest (66% to 16%) wanting to continue sending arms/ammunition/funds to Ukraine. Greece, Bulgaria, and Italy majorities opposed doing so. In earlier Danish media polls, 72% Danes considered Russia an enemy opposed to EU average of 54%. In the same period, 80% to 7% wish to continue sending more weaponry. “Enhedslisten” (Red/Green) was created, in 1991, as a Marxist political party by the traditional Communist Party, the key Trotskyist Party and Left Socialists. It has been in the parliament since 1994. Yet today it is mildly social democratic and 68% of its members say yes to arming Ukraine to 19% no. “Marxists” and the MSM can congratulate themselves for assisting the slaughter house.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.
|
User login |
not interested.....
Si Vis Pacem, Para Vinum © Andrei Martyanov's Blog
For all my deep respect for Alex, here are some important points one has to consider and I will be blunt.1. Russians don't give a flying coitus about having sway anywhere--Greece, Germany or the US. Russia is not USSR and is not interested in the International Worker's Movement or International Socialist (and Communist) Movement. Russians don't give a fuck about being loved or respected in EU. Europe is Russia's existential enemy. Russia is strictly transactional--wanna do business? Fine. If you don't, well, feel free to find better deals elsewhere. Russians DO NOT buy all this crap about cultural "closeness", or common "Orthodox root" and shit like that--everybody has their price, look what $5 billion buys one in 404. Tsipras government demonstrated to Russians everything they needed to know about Greece. Tourism and a few Russophile clubs here and there in the EU are just that--clubs with negligible impact.
2. As Paul Atreidis stated in Dune: "He who can destroy a thing, has the real control of it". Soviet/Russian projection of power was always NOT about bombing the shit out of locals--this is the American idea of "projection of power". Russian idea in Med since post WW II was about a) Shipping Lanes Of Communication (SLOC) and free movement of commodities between USSR/Russia and her clients, b) to prevent the Med's flank from resupplying NATO forces in case of WW III. And here is the issue:
3. Alex speaks from the POV of how NATO people think, that is the problem, because--this is the thinking from the XX century school of geopolitics, which ignores completely a simple XXI century fact that Russia can sink ANY combination of the NATO Fleets, including any number of the US Navy's Carrier Battle Groups from Gibraltar to Bosporus and NATO can do nothing about it. Zero, zilch. Combined West is simply stuck in the 1980-90s military thinking and technology.
A single frigate of Gorshkov-class with a single pr. 885 Yasen-class SSGN can, in a single salvo of 4 3M22Zircon each destroy two US Navy Carrier Battle Groups--none of those CBGs will know what hit them. Moreover, what is also missing from this outdated POV is the fact of a term which Vladimir Putin and Russian military professionals saying about Oreshnik--read attentively--it is a HIGH PRECISION weapons. That means that Oreshnik's hypersonic maneuvering blocks with the range of 5,500 kilometers can hit any types of targets on the land or in the sea. NATO navies, including US Navy's CBG can huff and puff, can simulate Alfa-strikes but all this is for naught because since roughly 2018 there is no NATO "lake" in Med with or without Russian bases there, because all of those navies are nothing more than fat prestigious defenseless targets. What matters the most, those who are not completely brainwashed in NATO navies know this. And this is why any attempt to sabotage Russian commercial activity supported by Russian Armed Forces can start with the demonstration of sinking some Euro-chihuahua ship, say French or Spanish FFG as a warning.
Too bad Royal Navy's ships do not go to sea anymore--no, really and, yes, I am being facetious about sinking those. So, in this case, after Syrians (or whatever they consider themselves now) made their choice. Now they, ahem... LOL))
Don't you love it? Meanwhile Russia relocates a few assets to Libya, which is a critical location for expanding Russia's Saharan and sub-Saharan commercial and military activity. Just to demonstrate what Oreshnik's reach is in relation to Med...
https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.