SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
the METOO movement.....Ukraine/Russia – Interview given by M. Christophe Lemoine, Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs Spokesperson, to LCI (excerpts) Paris, 20 November 2024 Q. – What’s your reaction, France’s reaction to the immediate development, i.e. the firing of Storm Shadow missiles at positions in the Kursk region? We’ve got a lot more details coming in, we’re going to see the images. It’s reportedly a [command] post where North Korean officers were operating, in Marino, which is in the Kursk region. It’s in keeping with what the Americans said: you can fire, the Ukrainians can fire these weapons in this region. What’s France’s view on this? THE SPOKESPERSON – France’s view is clear. As President Macron said, there’s no red line on this. Ukraine has the right to defend itself against the aggression it has suffered from the Russians since 22 February 2022, and it’s in a situation of self-defence. It’s a principle in keeping with public international law, it’s in the UN Charter. So it absolutely has the right to defend itself and must be able to do so. Q. – So, if we’re being very specific: if Kyiv uses French SCALP missiles to strike in Russia tomorrow, you’re fully in favour of this? France fully accepts this? THE SPOKESPERSON – France has provided Ukraine with substantial military support since the start of the aggression. It has supplied various assets, including missiles. And once again, there’s no red line. It’s quite a clear point that President Macron reiterated recently. Q. – Does that mean – to be even clearer – that France authorizes Ukraine to use French SCALP missiles in Russia? THE SPOKESPERSON – Once again, it’s in a situation of self-defence. It’s what the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs reiterated only this morning. And this situation of self-defence is one that’s in keeping with public international law: it can defend itself, it’s the victim of an aggression. The aggressor is Russia, Ukraine is the aggressee. It can and must defend itself. Q. – Have we got a rough idea of the number of French SCALP missiles the Ukrainians have got? THE SPOKESPERSON – We obviously know the number of SCALP missiles we delivered to the Ukrainians. We delivered a number of them. Once again, it’s part of the military aid provided by France. Q. – Roughly how many? THE SPOKESPERSON – I can’t tell you roughly how many now, but at any rate, some were delivered. Q. – What’s been stopping France giving the OK so far? Why haven’t any French SCALP missiles been fired yet? THE SPOKESPERSON – For the moment, France’s position has always been clear. It’s been of total support for Ukraine, support in principle – with our European allies – and support in terms of supplying equipment. Once again, there’s currently a situation where there’s a clear escalation in the conflict. This escalation is down to Russia. It’s Russia that’s escalating at the moment. So there’s a need to respond, and France is backing this response. Q. – Signatories have signed an article in the Le Monde newspaper calling for a European coalition of military instructors to be sent to Ukraine, with obviously a major role for France. It obviously follows on from President Macron’s ideas. (…) Does France support such an initiative? THE SPOKESPERSON – As President Macron said in February – i.e. a few months ago now –, currently, all options are open and on the table. France is already doing a great deal in terms of training Ukrainian military personnel. We’re hosting on French soil Ukrainian battalions that are trained, the Anne of Kyiv Brigade in particular, which you talked about a few days ago. The Minister went to see them at their camp. And once again, President Macron said this in February: currently, nothing can be ruled out. The ideas developed in the article published today are ones that fit into that rationale. Q. – We’re talking about a European coalition of military instructors in Ukraine. On our very station, on this programme, [Gabrielius] Landsbergis, the Lithuanian [Foreign] Minister, said: “Let France head such a coalition; we’ll go.” THE SPOKESPERSON – If it’s a European coalition, the Europeans have to discuss it among themselves, quite obviously. And once again, France – which brought together partners in February – had put forward this scenario. It’s still a valid idea, but this is a discussion we’ve got to have as Europeans so that all armed forces can contribute to the effort to help train Ukrainian military personnel. Q. – The past few hours have seen threats on Russia’s part – the new nuclear doctrine, as claimed by Russia at any rate. What is France’s reaction? THE SPOKESPERSON – It wasn’t really a surprise. They’d sort of announced it in recent days. It’s a posture which, in substance, hasn’t completely changed – in other words, the Russian doctrine is still along the same lines. There have been adjustments. We’re clearly being extremely vigilant on this point, because once again a nuclear attack is being talked about, so it’s something which is extremely serious, something which is being handled with a lot of precautions. Russia itself – which is a member of the United Nations Security Council, a permanent member – knows this. So we remain very vigilant. But once again, there hasn’t been any surprise. Above all, as the Minister said this morning, we won’t allow ourselves to be intimidated by these statements. Q. – Is France talking to Russia? Mr Scholz, the German Chancellor, has called Vladimir Putin. As for the American President, we don’t really know, it’s unofficial for the moment. Can France, can your minister… It’s what M. Lecornu did with his counterpart in Russia, isn’t it? Has M. Barrot already spoken to his counterpart in Russia? THE SPOKESPERSON – Not to my knowledge, but in any case there was a brief contact – because it was highlighted a lot in the press – between President Macron and the Russian Foreign Minister, at the G20 summit. Q. – The handshake between M. Macron and Mr Lavrov. THE SPOKESPERSON – Exactly, the handshake, which was commented on a great deal. But there’s no regular dialogue. Q. – What does that mean, no regular dialogue? THE SPOKESPERSON – It means that, in this case, there isn’t any. Now, you cited Sébastien Lecornu… Obviously there are elements, but the dialogue is still slightly chaotic. And as far as the [Foreign] Minister is concerned, I don’t think it exists. Q. – In principle, could M. Barrot call Mr Lavrov tomorrow? THE SPOKESPERSON – The Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs’ position is clear. Once again, it’s about being in support of Ukraine and giving Ukraine the best possible conditions for its defence. That’s really the first point, because once again, the defence of Ukraine has really been the priority for 1,000 days now, because yesterday we passed the 1,000th day since the Russian aggression against Ukraine. Everything the Minister is doing, all the Minister’s activity, is entirely directed towards the Ukrainians and the possibility of supporting the Ukrainian position in the current situation. (…)./.
MAKE A DEAL PRONTO BEFORE THE SHIT HITS THE FAN:
NO NATO IN "UKRAINE" (WHAT'S LEFT OF IT) THE DONBASS REPUBLICS ARE NOW BACK IN THE RUSSIAN FOLD — AS THEY USED TO BE PRIOR 1922. THE RUSSIANS WON'T ABANDON THESE AGAIN. THESE WILL ALSO INCLUDE ODESSA, KHERSON AND KHARKIV..... CRIMEA IS RUSSIAN — AS IT USED TO BE PRIOR 1954 TRANSNISTRIA WILL BE PART OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. A MEMORANDUM OF NON-AGGRESSION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE USA.
EASY.
THE WEST KNOWS IT.
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
SEE ALSO: colleagues....
|
User login |
I am the storm....
More than just a dangerous provocation aimed at Russia, the ATACM and Storm Shadow attacks represent an attempt to turn foreign policy on its head.
“The Deep State whispered to Trump: ‘You cannot withstand the storm’. Trump whispered back: “I am the storm”. The war is on. The Deep State has launched a war of disruption to disable Trump’s ‘storm’. This week’s ATACM strike was but one part to an inter-agency counter-insurgency – a political strike directed at Trump; so too are all the inter-agency false narratives attributed to the Trump camp; and so too, the escalating provocations directed at Iran.
Be assured the Five Eyes are full participants in the counter-insurgency. Macron and Starmer openly conspired together in Paris ahead of the U.S. announcement to promote the ATACMS strike. The inter-agency grandees clearly are very fearful. They must worry that Trump may expose the ‘Russia Hoax’ (that Trump in 2016 was a Russian ‘asset’) and put them in jeopardy.
But Trump understands what’s afoot:
“We need peace without delay … The foreign policy establishment keeps trying to pull the world into conflict. The greatest threat to Western civilization today is not Russia. It’s probably more than anything else ourselves… There must be a complete commitment to dismantling the entire Globalist Neo-con establishment that is perpetually dragging us into endless wars, pretending to fight for freedom and democracy abroad while they turn us into a Third World country and a Third World dictatorship right here at home. The State Department, the Defense bureaucracy, the intelligence services and all of the rest need to be completely overhauled and reconstituted. To fire the Deep Staters and put America first – we have to put America First”.
Whilst the long-range ATACM launch on ‘deep Russian pre-2014 territory’ is no game-changer – it will not change the course of the war (ATACMS regularly are – at 90% – downed by Russian Air Defences); the salience of this act however, is not strategic; rather, it lies with the crossing into the realm of direct NATO attacks on Russia.
Colonel Doug MacGregor reports that two sources are telling him that “Russian nuclear rocket forces are on full alert. They are at the highest level of readiness ever achieved. It suggests that Russia has taken this crossing of the line very seriously”.
Yes, it was a provocation, and President Putin will respond appropriately. He has to – but not necessarily through nuclear escalation. Why? Because the war in Ukraine is moving rapidly in his direction, with Russian forces closing-in on the Dnieper east bank. Effectively, facts on the ground will be the outcome determinant, leaving little point to external mediation.
But more than just a dangerous provocation aimed at Russia, the ATACM and Storm Shadow attacks represent an attempt to turn foreign policy – literally – on its head. Instead of policy being aimed directly at a rising foreign adversary threatening U.S. hegemony, it is being transformed into a loaded weapon locked onto America’s domestic war. It is aimed specifically at Trump – to ‘hog tie’ him in, and to divert his attention to wars that he does not want.
Logic suggests that Trump would want to keep clear of Netanyahu’s scheming for a war against Iran. But the ‘Israel Firsters’ and the Lobby (as Professor Jeffrey Sachs argues) long have had effective control over Congress and the U.S. military – more than does the President. Explains Sachs:
“Because the Zionist Lobby is so powerful, Netanyahu basically has had control over the Pentagon to fight wars on behalf of Israeli extremism. The war in Iraq in 2003 was a Netanyahu War. The attempt to overthrow Bashar al-Assad in Syria, the overthrow of Moamar Gaddafi – All were ‘Netanyahu Wars’”.
The important point is that Netanyahu can ‘do what he does’ because it was always planned this way – a plan that has been 50 years in execution. The ‘Israel First’ strategy was fully embraced by Scoop Jackson (a two-times Presidential candidate). And just so the policy could not be rolled back, Scoop insisted on Zionists staffing the State Department, and that neo-cons and Zionists hold the reins at the NSC. That same pattern continues until today.
At bottom lies the ultimate boondoggle by which the political class of both U.S. parties become wealthy and afford the campaign costs of remaining legislators: “It’s quite a dandy deal that the Israel Lobby or the Zionist Lobby puts in, say, a hundred million dollars into campaigns and it gets trillions out –trillions, not billions, trillions out [in government] expenditures. And so, when Netanyahu speaks, it’s bizarre to me, but it is not Trump who is appointing or naming [those ‘Israel Firsters’ who are part of his Team, but Netanyahu]”, Sachs says.
When Netanyahu describes Trump’s ‘Israel First’ nominations as his ‘dream U.S. team’, the explanation is not difficult to see. On the one hand, Trump has a ‘Revolution’ to conduct in America and wants his nominations to office approved. And, on the other, Netanyahu has a further war he wants the U.S. to fight for him.
“The ‘Big Ugly’ was always a description of the battle that few understood”,another commentator notes:
“The Senate is factually the core of republican opposition to MAGA and President Trump. The visible battle … consumes the most attention. However, it is the less-visible battle against the entrenched ideological Republicans that proves to be the hardest”.
“The Republicans in the upper chamber will not relinquish power easily. They have a multitude of weapons to use against the (Trump) insurgency … We are seeing this play out now in the alignment of Republican Senators who stand in opposition to Trump’s nomination of Matt Gaetz as Attorney General, [as] this recent report[explains]”.
“The basic outline is that the senate leadership will reluctantly support Matt Gaetz for Main Justice, where ‘support’ means they will not directly oppose; in exchange for the nomination of FBI Director Mike Rogers [a co-founder of the ‘Never Trump’ group] to defend inter-agency interests at FBI”.
The prospective Republican Senate Leader, John Thune, will play his cards carefully in order to extract maximum damage . He has leverage by trying to connect Trump to Netanyahu’s carnage in the region.
Thune, whilst announcing huge quantities of weapons for Israel, said:
“To Our Allies in Israel, and to the Jewish People Around the world, my message to you is this: Reinforcements are on the way. In six weeks, Republicans will reclaim the Senate Majority, and we will make clear that the United States Congress stands squarely In Israel’s Corner”.
Trump will need to play his cards carefully, too. Since, for his purposes, the absolute priority are his two domestic wars: First, “dismantling the entire Globalist Neocon Establishment”, and secondly, ending the out-of-control government expenditure that has bloated the Deep State boondoggle and turned the U.S. real economy into a shadow of its former self.
Trump needs those radical reform nominations to pass, even if he has to sacrifice one or two to secure Senate approval for the others. The Israel First nominees, needless to add, will be approved seamlessly.
Of the two ‘entanglement’ threats to Trump’s reform agenda, Russian escalation is the lesser of the two. The Ukraine war is motoring steadily towards some form of dénoument. One that works for Russia. Putin is in the driving seat, and does not need a major war with NATO. Nor does Putin need Trump’s ‘art of the deal’. A resolution of some sort will occur without him.
However, Trump’s role will be important subsequently to define a new border between the security interests of the Atlanticists and those of the Asian heartland (including China and Iran).
The other putative war – Iran – is the more dangerous to Trump. Jewish political influence and the Lobby has taken the U.S. into multiple disastrous wars before. And now, Netanyahu desperately needs a war and he is not alone. Much of Israel is clamouring for war that would end ‘all the fronts’ facing it. There is a profound conviction in this prospect as the solution and the ‘Great Victory’ that Netanyahu and Israel so desperately need.
The ground has been dug-over, both by propaganda that Iran’s nuclear programme is ‘staggeringly vulnerable’ (which it isn’t), and by the media’s onslaught that replays the meme that to attack Iran now represents a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, with Hizbullah and Hamas already weakened. War with Iran – totally erroneously – is thus being sold as an ‘easy war’.
There is an unshakeable certitude that it must be so. ‘We are strong, and Iran is weak’.
Who will roll-back the Israel Firsters? They have the momentum and the fervour. A war against Iran will fare badly for Israel and the U.S. The wide ramifications likely will precipitate precisely the severe financial and market crisis that could derail Trump’s ‘Storm’.
https://www.unz.com/article/the-counter-insurgency-is-on-against-trumps-storm/
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.