Saturday 30th of November 2024
Home » Blogs » Gus Leonisky's blog

a thousand years of chinese wisdom......

This is the tale of two pilgrims following the road that really matters in the young 21st century; one coming from NATOstan and another one from BRICS.

Let’s start with Le Petit Roi, Emmanuel Macron. Picture him with a plastic grin in his face strolling alongside Xi Jinping in Guangzhou. Following the – long and gentle – sound of classic “High Mountain and Flowing Water”, they enter the Baiyun Hall  to listen to it played by the 1000-year-old Guqin (a beautiful instrument). They taste the fragrance of 1000-year-old tea – and muse on the rise and fall of great powers in the new millennium.

 

BY Pepe ESCOBAR

 

And what does Xi tell Le Petit Roi? He explains that when you hear this eternal music played by this eternal instrument, you expect to be in the company of a bosom friend; you are in synch as much as the high mountain and the flowing water. That’s the deeper meaning of the ancient tale of musicians Yu Boya and Zhong Ziqi, 25 centuries ago in the Kingdom of Chu: bosom friendship. Only bosom friends can understand the music.

And with that, as Chinese scholars explained, Xi brought up the concept of Zhiyin. After Zhong Ziqi died, Yu Boya broke his Guqin: he thought that no one else could understand his music. Their story imprinted the term “Zhiyin”: someone who understands music, with the added meaning of close friends that can completely understand each other.

All bets are off on whether a narcissist puppet like Macron would ever be cultured enough to understand Xi’s subtle, sophisticated message: those that get it are true soul mates. Moreover, Macron was not dispatched to Beijing and Guangzhou by his masters to do soul mating, but to try to bend Xi towards NATO on Russia/Ukraine.

His body language is a dead giveaway – complete with crossing his arms demonstrating boredom. He may at first have been impervious to the notion that true friendship requires mutual understanding and appreciation.

But then something extraordinary happened. Xi’s message may have touched a key spot in the tortured inner depths of the narcissist Petit Roi. What if, in international relations, mutual understanding and appreciation is the key for nations to find common ground and work together towards common goals?

What a revolutionary notion; not exactly the Hegemon-imposed “rules-based international order”.

Are you a true Sovereign?

By inviting Le Petit Roi to China, and personally spending no less than 6 hours with his guest, Xi enacted millenniums-old diplomacy at its best. He reminded his guest of the turbulent history between France and the Anglo-Saxon powers; and he talked about sovereignty.

The key subtle sub-plot: “Europe” better think hard about being subservient to the Hegemon and minimize as best as possible the massive economic turbulence when Confrontation Day with the U.S. arrives. Implied is Beijing’s priority of breaking up growing U.S. attempts to encircle China.

So Xi treated France as a potential true Sovereign even under the EU; or somewhat splitting from EU dogma.

Of course another key message was implied under this Confucian invitation to epistemological growth. For those not willing to be friendly to China because of complex geopolitical layers, it will never be too late for Beijing to show the less “friendly” side of the Chinese state – if the situation arises.

Translation: if the West goes for Total Machiavelli, China will apply Total Sun Tzu. Even if Beijing would rather go for international relations under the aegis of Beauty, Goodness and Truth rather than “you’re with us or against us”, war of terror and sanctions dementia.

So did Petit Roi have a “road to Damascus” moment? The verdict is open. He literally freaked the Hegemon out with his outburst that Europe must resist pressure to become “America’s followers”. That’s pretty much in synch with the 51 points agreed upon by Beijing and Paris, with emphasis on “legitimate security concerns of all parties”.

The Americans got even more spooked when Macron asserted that Europe should become an independent “third superpower”. Le Petit Roi even advanced some baby steps in favor of de-dollarization (certainly under supervision of his financial masters) and not in favor of Forever Wars.

So the Americans, in panic, had to send German 5th column Annalena “360 Degrees” Bearbock in a hurry to Beijing to try to undo Le Petit Roi’s outbursts – and reaffirm the Washington Dictates Brussels official script. No one, anywhere, paid the slightest attention.

That came on top of the most glaring subplot of the whole tale: how European Commission dominatrix Ursula von der Leyen was treated by Beijing as worse than irrelevant. A Chinese scholar scathingly described her as “just the mouthpiece of a canine organization with no teeth. Even her bark sounds like whimpering from a terminally ill dog that is about to be euthanized.”

The “terminally ill dog” had to go through passport control and customs (“Anything to declare”?) No diplomatic status. No official invitation. No sovereignty. And no, you cannot take the special high-speed train alongside Macron to go to Guangzhou. So here’s another message – this one quite graphic: Don’t mess with the 3,000-old Middle Kingdom ethos.

Lula and “Zhiyin”

Top Chinese scholars were absolutely riveted by Xi applying diplomatic stratagems that had been so useful 25 centuries ago, now re-enacted on the road-to-multipolarity global stage.

Some are calling for a new “Strategies for the Warring States” rewritten for the 21st century. The massive round table set up by Chinese protocol with the “jungle” in the middle and Macron and von der Leyen positioned as if for a job interview was a monster hit on Weibo and We Chat. That led to endless discussions on how China is now finally able to “drive a wedge among the barbarians”.

Compared to all this hoopla, the tale of Brazilian President Lula coming to Shanghai and Beijing reads like a graphic illustration of Zhiyin.

Lula went for the jugular right from the start, during the inauguration of former President Dilma Rousseff  as the new president of the NDB, the BRICS bank.

In simple, direct language that anyone from Sahara to Siberia can understand, Lula said, “Every night I ask myself why should every country need to be tied to the dollar for trade? Why can’t we trade in our own currencies? And why don’t we have the commitment to innovate?”

Directly implied is the fact that the expanding BRICS+ should design and promote its own currency (the long, complex process has already started), on top of allowing trade in national currencies.

Lula’s powerful message was addressed to the whole Global South. A Brazilian example is China’s ICBC setting up a clearing house in Brazil allowing direct yuan-real exchange.

It’s no wonder that the CIA official rag, the Washington Post, foaming at the mouth, immediately issued the Deep State verdict: Lula is not obeying the “rules-based international order” diktat.

That means the Deep State will come after Lula and his government – all over again, and will go no holds barred to destabilize it. Because what Lula said is exactly what Saddam Hussein and Colonel Gadaffi said – and tried to implement – in the past.

So Lula will need all the help he can get. Enter, once again, “Zhiyin”.

This is how Xi officially welcomed Lula in Beijing. Very few people around the world, non-Chinese, understand that when someone of Xi’s stature tells you, right in front of you, that you are “an old friend of China”, this is it.

All doors are open. They trust you, embrace you, protect you, listen to you, help you in times of need and will always do their best to keep the friendship close to their hearts.

And that ends, for now, our tale of “bosom friends” taking the road to Beijing. The BRICS friend certainly understood all there is to know. As for the NATOstan Little King dreaming of becoming a true sovereign leader, the moment of truth is knocking at his door.

 

 

READ MORE:

https://strategic-culture.org/news/2023/04/15/all-roads-lead-to-beijing/

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

bold bullshit....

BY  Rachel Marsden

 

What lurks behind Macron’s epiphany that angered US lawmakers? The French president has made bold statements about Europe asserting its independence from Washington’s belligerent foreign policy

 

En route back from China, the French president suddenly started singing the praises of European independence vis-à-vis Washington. But words are cheap.  

On the way back from his recent visit to Beijing aboard the presidential plane, Emmanuel Macron revealed the apparent and sudden epiphany he had; that Europe really doesn’t have to ride shotgun alongside Washington every time that it decides to load up the warmobile and speed down the regime-change highway.  

“The paradox would be that, overcome with panic, we believe we are just America’s followers,”Macron said, according to Politico. “The question Europeans need to answer … is it in our interest to accelerate [a crisis] on Taiwan? No. The worse thing would be to think that we Europeans must become followers on this topic and take our cue from the US agenda and a Chinese overreaction.” So Macron just figured out that France can have a foreign policy that’s independent of both East and West? Not sure how he managed to miss that lesson earlier, since he claims to be a big admirer of former French President Charles De Gaulle who kept France out of NATO, built a relationship with Moscow, and kicked the Americans out of France when they wanted to stick around indefinitely after the Second World War as they did in Germany. 

“Europeans cannot resolve the crisis in Ukraine; how can we credibly say on Taiwan, ‘watch out, if you do something wrong we will be there’? If you really want to increase tensions that’s the way to do it,” Macron told the journalists. If he realizes that the EU is useless in the Ukraine conflict, then why doesn’t the bloc cut its losses? Why continue to commit personnel, weapons, and funding to something viewed as unresolvable in Europe’s favor in light of all the current efforts?

Had Macron come to this realization earlier, he may have been able to convince his European counterparts and the EU not to jump off an economic cliff over Ukraine. In doing so, they have harmed their own energy supply and industries because the US wanted them to, thinking that it would bring the Russian economy to its knees, as French economy minister Bruno Le Maire has said.  

Macron now also says that European nations should reduce their dependence on the “extraterritoriality of the US dollar” and avoid becoming vassals. Incidentally, the French multinational TotalEnergies just transacted with China in yuan for the first time. 

Some US lawmakers are now furious with Macron. “If, in fact, Macron speaks for all of Europe, and their position now is they're not going to pick sides between the US and China over Taiwan, maybe we shouldn't be taking sides either. Maybe we should basically say we're going to focus on Taiwan and the threats that China poses, and you, guys, handle Ukraine and Europe,” said Florida Senator Marco Rubio.  

Rubio is playing the “how could you, after everything we’ve done for you” card, now that Macron is flirting with China. Because Washington has just done so much for Europe in Ukraine? This is why Macron has pleaded with Washington for lower prices on gas exports to Europe, now that the bloc is dependent on US LNG having been encouraged by Washington to cut off their cheap Russian supply. And the Ukraine conflict is so good for Europe that Macron was begging US lawmakers on a visit to Washington last December to reconsider the impact of Biden’s protectionist Inflation Reduction Act on European industry, which has become vulnerable to energy shortages and skyrocketing prices as a result of Washington’s agenda on Ukraine. 

So if the US wants to let the EU handle Ukraine alone, as Rubio says, there’s a pretty good chance of peace breaking out. Perhaps he didn’t think that through very well. It’s worth recalling that Rubiowas a strong advocate for killing off Europe’s Nord stream pipeline with sanctions and hit the roof when Biden considered lifting them. Then, when the pipelines were mysteriously blown up, he claimed that it’s just “common sense” that Russia did it. This is weird because there weren’t any Russian officials running around like Rubio and his fellow American neocons demanding its demise.

 

Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton also attacked Macron on Monday on Fox News, over the French president’s newfound disinterest in blindly following Washington into a conflict with China at the risk of it kicking off militarily. Cotton was most recently seen advocating sending American troops into US ally and next door neighbor, Mexico, ostensibly to fix America’s own fentanyl drug problem. 

But Macron went even further in his statements about China than simply expressing disinterest in being dragged into a new US-led conflict over Taiwan – and this has really been underreported. He also expressed an understanding of China’s position vis a vis Taiwan. “As Europeans, our concern is unity. The Chinese are also concerned with their unity, and Taiwan is a component of this unity from their point of view,” Macron said, according to Deutsche Welle.  

Macron sure has managed to get Washington’s attention fast. He goes over to China, leaves with a massive new economic deal for Airbus to sell 160 new commercial jets to China, leading to a foreign policy change of heart. This deal doubles the French-headquartered multinational’s production in the country, which ultimately amounts to a major victory over big global rival and Pentagon contractor, Boeing. 

It’s worth wondering, though, if there’s more to Macron’s recent proclamations than meets the eye. Could he simply be using his new position on China as a ploy to pressure the US to give Europe more to keep it on the team? After all, Macron is president of a country synonymous with seduction games. This all sounds like someone who was just given a pricey gift by a suitor and then flashes it to everyone in town. All while hoping that it gets back to their partner who hasn’t given them anything recently except headaches and a lower net worth. Now that frustrated partner, Washington, is behaving exactly as you’d expect a possessive lover to act.

 

 

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

 

READ MORE:

https://www.rt.com/news/574675-macron-france-independence-us/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

the business.....

 

 

The working visit of French President Macron and European Commissioner von der Leyen to China on April 5-8 was not ridiculed only by the lazy. The distinguished guests themselves gave reasons: one day before the trip, one managed to be rude to the Chinese leadership from a high rostrum, the second already on the spot behaved, to put it mildly, inappropriately. Of the three days of the visit, business communication with the Chinese side took at most a few hours, and the rest of the time the “tourist” Macron examined the sights on duty, von der Leyen was sent home on a common flight, and so on.

In fact, everything is not so clear. As expected, it was not possible to persuade President Xi to “put pressure” on Russia in one way or another, but a large delegation from French industrial giants managed to harvest a good harvest of lucrative contracts. The success of Airbus with contracts for the construction of a second assembly line of airliners in China and the supply of 50 helicopters is best highlighted, but the nuclear concern EDF, the supplier of railway transport Alstom and others, did not go offended either.

In general, in the economic part – definitely a success, but with the main political mission – a clear embarrassment. It would be nothing, because no one seriously expected any “breakthroughs” in relations with China (waiting and hoping, as we understand, are not the same thing) – but upon Macron’s return home, something strange began.

On April 9, he suddenly noticed that Europe was relying too much on the United States, and it would be nice for it to increase its “strategic independence” from the overseas “ally”. A couple of days later, on April 11, President of the European Council Michel spoke with approximately the same idea, and French Economy Minister Le Maire said that Paris was not going to quarrel with Beijing simply because Washington would like it so much. Such words, of course, caused displeasure in Washington, but not too strong: various European puppets, for example Scholz, had already allowed themselves to yelp before.

But on April 12, France, unexpectedly for many, blocked EU appropriations for the notorious “million shells” for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This means that now the industry has nothing to pay for the purchase of fresh shells for the European armies, and because of this, the transfer of the available stock from the arsenals to the Ukrainian fascists has also hung up.

This, of course, was unbearable. A flurry of criticism fell upon Macron from colleagues in the dangerous geopolitical business, starting with Polish Prime Minister Morawiecki (who is just in the States on a three-day visit) and ending with Truss’s back bench.

“Something incredible happened?! We occupied Moscow?!

It’s funny that Chief European diplomat Borrell, who was supposed to go to China on April 13 with new attempts at persuasion, urgently caught the coronavirus and postponed the trip indefinitely. It seems that the Washington Regional Committee decided not to risk it until it was found out which Chinese hypnotoad bit Macron.

In fact, the change with the French president was something completely unexpected, and most importantly abrupt. Still, Macron is not de Gaulle, who at one time quite consistently bent the line on “equal partnership” with the Americans and shocked them over and over again with demarches, and the situation is not the most successful for such maneuvers.

It is important to clarify: unsuccessful personally for Macron. Anti-American and anti-NATO sentiments in society have just grown and would very much contribute to the course towards “strategic independence” from the States. The problem is that the incumbent president has already proven himself to be a fairly obedient American puppet and has completely lost popular sympathy, so no one expects Macron to turn around from Washington.

Maybe it’s in the interests of the military-industrial complex? As we remember, the French shipyards had an agreement with the Australian Navy for the supply of 12 submarines worth $66 billion, but in the fall of 2021 they lost the contract, which was divided between the Americans and the British. The demarche with shells for the Armed Forces of Ukraine is regarded by many as “revenge” for the submarines and an attempt to intercept cash flows in order to direct them towards the French state defense concern Nexter.

Indeed, the French government did not just block the payment of ammunition for some “ethical reasons”, but put forward a number of conditions, including the advantage of European manufacturers in concluding contracts and imposing restrictions on the termination of the latter. If these requirements are accepted, then Nexter, as one of the leading manufacturers of rocket and artillery weapons in Europe, will receive serious competitive advantages.

But this can only be somewhere in the future, and here and now the demarche threatens France with serious political costs. The Poles were among the first to wake up for good reason: the demands of the French jeopardize Warsaw’s plans to saddle the same monetary artery with the help of South Korean industrialists who are increasing their presence in Poland. With Kiev, everything is already clear, screams about “betrayal” and “Putin’s agent” Macron are already heard from there, but this is not a problem – the problem is that the same terminology was connected in Washington.

“Be realistic! Demand the impossible!

“Pro-Russian encroachments” in the ranks of European “allies” in recent weeks began to occupy Uncle Sam much more than before. For this, I must say thanks to the journalist Hersh, after whose publications about the sabotage at SP-1/2, no matter how vague they were, the negative attitude towards the Americans in Europe really intensified.

Even though the main “renegades” were Hungary and Serbia, which were frankly third-rate in influence, and Turkey, which was more significant, but with its forces undermined by a natural disaster, Washington began to increase pressure on them. Even the failure of the “peaceful democratic protest” in Georgia came back to haunt Tbilisi officials with threats and personal sanctions. On April 11, the US special envoy to the Balkans, Rubin, bluntly stated that he intended to achieve a ban on RT channel broadcasting in Serbia and, in general, to fight against “Russian disinformation.” Just yesterday, April 12, restrictions were imposed on fifty Hungarian companies and businessmen suspected by the Americans of circumventing anti-Russian sanctions.

And it is at this wonderful moment that Macron, who is absolutely unpopular at home, decides to put on either a cocked hat or a cap and quarrel with the dominant external force too. At the same time, at his side, the whole country literally stands in general political strikes and blazes with barricades from garbage cans, the street demands the resignation of the president.

Attention, the question is: what is the likelihood that on the crest of a wave of these protests it will carry out some “professional revolutionaries” (of course, not connected with the United States in any way) who will demolish Macron himself and, possibly, the Fifth Republic as such? If the French president continues to get out, then it is very high. In something, but in the skill of organizing putschs, even on an almost level ground, the Americans cannot be denied, and here the clearing has already been prepared.

It is hardly worth talking about Macron’s firm determination to “tip the table” in relations with the United States, so most likely he will soon repent and return to the ranks (or should I say a stall?) of patent democrats. If not, then the card of the right-wing radical French officer corps is always ready against him. Just two years ago, in April 2021, an informational precedent had already taken place: then more than a thousand officers, including twenty retired generals, published an open letter against Macron’s migration policy and the harsh suppression of anti-migrant demonstrations. Who said that among the current officers there will not be those who want to remove the president from a command post, even if on command from Washington?

Another thing is that in the specific conditions of France in 2023, a hypothetical pro-American military junta, even if it takes power, is unlikely to be stable on its own. It is possible that the very attempt to putsch will result in a mass desertion of ordinary soldiers and junior officers, who are already not enthusiastic about serving in “almost war” time. The military will not be able to stabilize the socio-economic situation, even with the involvement of civilian “professional” managers, an attempt to re-engage with the Americans will cause a new surge of discontent. However, even the potential failure and sliding of one of the pillars of the EU into the chaos of a civil war is unlikely to stop Washington: as you know, “better dead than red.”

Such a prospect threatens not only France, but also other deviators from the “general line of the party.” True, in Turkey, the top of which only seven years ago thwarted a coup attempt, this is well understood. This is also understood in Hungary: in January, massive purges took place in its armed forces, after which several hundred officers, including many colonels, were left overboard – precisely because of unreliability.

But does Macron understand what thin ice he is walking on? Probably yes. It is much more difficult to judge whether this is understood by German Foreign Minister Burbock, who, upon her arrival in China, hastened to declare that “the European Union and Macron are on the same wavelength” on the issue of relations with China. Unless this is just another dust in the eyes of the Chinese comrades, inspired from Washington, then the ice under the European puppets may crack.

 

https://topcor.ru/34095-kak-vashington-mozhet-nakazat-makrona-za-nedostatok-lojalnosti.html

 

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

the vassals......

E77: Is Europe a vassal of the US? With Yanis Varoufakis, Julijana Zita, Erik Edman and more!

Speaking during an official visit to China, Emmanuel Macron said that Europe should chart its own course and be a 'third pole' in world affairs between Washington and Beijing – and not be a vassal to either as the New Cold War threatens to escalate. Unsurprisingly, his comments have caused unease among many European leaders, for whom unquestioned alignment with Washington is the only way.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyO2lmGq0_U

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyoxYFF12gY

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....