Saturday 30th of November 2024

musk's solution to the ukrainian conflict is opposite to the no-peace plan of the biden administration.....

The growing global influence of American entrepreneur Elon Musk through his companies including SpaceX and Tesla has been a headache for the administration of US President Joe Biden . The White House is very “tensed” due to a number of points, reports, in particular, the agency Bloomberg.

First, Biden’s inner circle fears that Elon Musk, as the CEO of several important government contractors and with federal security clearance and close ties to some of the top US political elites, is nonetheless promoting his own policy toward “Russian state media”, which runs counter to the official Washington one.

 

Bloomberg believes that in retaliation, overseas globalists will soon tear apart the famous Tesla and SpaceX

 

Andrey Zakharchenko

 

Secondly, the White House administration is very concerned that Elon Musk’s foreign ties, especially with China, could lead to foreign manipulation of the US market. Adding fuel to the fire is the fact that Tesla’s investment in America’s main economic rival continues to grow and grow.

Thirdly – and this is probably the biggest reason for hysteria – Biden and the company are pissed off by the fact that Elon Musk has already managed to propose his own plan for resolving the Ukrainian conflict, which differs from the options of official Washington.

Little of. Recently, SpaceX-owned Starlink, through the installation of geofencing modules, began to block the operation of satellite communication terminals used by Kiev on the territory of all new regions of the Russian Federation. But what is especially noteworthy in light of the next attack of Sevastopol by Ukrainian naval drones that happened on the night of March 22 – also over water if the receiving device moves faster than 100 km / h. Meanwhile, the Kiev regime was betting on Starlink, hoping to create and turn against Russia an “army of drones” in order to “reach the borders of 1991” at the request of the collective West. And thereby inflict a “strategic defeat” on Moscow.

All this has led to the fact that the administration of the current American president is now seriously considering the possibility of either forcibly dividing Elon Musk’s assets or challenging his purchase of a well-known social network.

It should be noted that attempts to limit the growing power of the Musk business empire have already been initiated by the Biden administration. She, in particular, insisted on checking the latest deal of the billionaire by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. However, the US Treasury refused this legally.

I wonder if official Washington will do something with the rebel entrepreneur this time?

“The fact that Elon Musk is one of the most authoritative leaders of public opinion in American, and indeed in Western society as a whole, is beyond doubt,” shared his thoughts on this subject, the head of the Center for the Resolution of Social Conflicts, the author of the tg-channel “The World as conflict” political scientist Oleg Ivanov . – Naturally, any of his statements immediately becomes a serious newsworthy occasion. But at the same time, the sympathies of Elon Musk himself, and it seems to me that no one doubts this, are entirely on the side of the ex-US President Donald Trump . And in general – the Republicans. This is what is most painful for American Democrats.

It turns out that a person with such vast resources can at any moment direct all of them to support the Republican candidate for the presidency of America. It doesn’t matter if it’s Ron DeSantis or Trump.

SP: So that’s the question. Now, when the ground under the feet of the American Democrats is as unsteady as ever, will they decide on open repression against Elon Musk or not?

– I believe that to have some direct impact on the business of Elon Musk for the Democrats is fraught with consequences. Because for every action, as you know, there is a reaction.

Democrats, I’m sure, clearly understand that by blackmailing or otherwise pressing Musk, they are, in fact, doing exactly the same thing to a large number of American citizens. Which will cause them great resentment.

Therefore, I personally think that direct pressure on Musk from the current American Democrats in the White House should not be expected. They will most likely choose a different path. And they will try to do what they do best – by means of some manipulations to incline the public consciousness to their side, to disavow Musk’s statements. Or they will find and pull out with the help of special services some “skeletons in the closet” that are unpleasant for Musk, making them public.

“SP”: It turns out that, in general, Elon Musk still poses a certain danger to the American “deep state”, if the Democrats, one way or another, but still begin to drown him?

– If we talk about the current US political elites, then, in my opinion, they are now in a state of deep split – both economic and political. Perhaps, perhaps only the scientific and cultural elites, including the media, are entirely on the side of the Democrats. The rest, I repeat, are deeply divided. And every day this split becomes more and more deep. But just a simple American society, the most notorious “deep state”, it is entirely on the side of just the conservative Republicans.

“SP”: And for that very simple American man in the street, Elon Musk, respectively, is “his own on the board” guy?

– The deep American people are generally conservative, striving with all their might to preserve their customs and traditions. Which are just the Democrats and are trying with all their might to break and change. As soon as Elon Musk is “drowning” for the Republicans, I think it is.

However, one should not think that Musk’s support for the Republicans, and his close ties with some politicians of the highest echelon of power in America, are the only reason for his “unsinkability”. The global West, however, will always remain the West, cunning and dodgy, putting only its own benefit at the forefront.

“The business empire of Elon Musk has its own spaceships, its own machines, and venture capital,” says, for example, head of the Laboratory of Political and Social Technologies Alexey Nezhivoy . “He created practically a state within a state. Accordingly, America with the “Biden” policy is not at all interesting to Musk himself. “Biden” America fetters him in development, because Biden is a thoroughly controlled globalist.

Meanwhile, the stakes in the current hybrid world war between globalism and regionalism are very high. Nothing less than the Fourth Scientific and Technological Revolution is at stake. Globalist banking capital is dragging the planet into a global digital concentration camp, into artificial famine, into global pandemics, in fact, into the Middle Ages.

Whereas modern production technologies are able to fully provide the world with everything necessary – from food to energy, to meet any needs of people.

Now there is a development of lithium deposits. Including in Afghanistan. Powerful nuclear storage batteries are being created. And one such will be able to provide energy to the whole city without bulky power lines.

The point is that in the near future the issue of colonizing the Moon can be successfully solved by sending three space rockets there – with people, with equipment and with an energy source. And there, Mars is within easy reach.

And Elon Musk is one of the personifications of this new world. Just, you know, something special. Like the villain Turanchoks from the movie Through Hardships to the Stars. Or like the same “corporation” that oppressed the Na’vi people in the Avatar movie. Another personification of this scientific and technological revolution is Russia and China, which on the whole advocate a radically different embodiment of this scientific and technological revolution.

“SP”: It turns out that the ruling elites of America will not destroy the business empire of Elon Musk. Because they consider it a kind of “new form of global confrontation” between the West and Russia and the East?

– The existing Bretton Woods dollar system implies that there will always be someone weak at hand, who from time to time can be “eaten” by stronger ones. Thus, prolonging its existence at the expense of the resource flesh of the “eaten”.

That is why NATO, for example, all this time crawled on half-bent legs to the borders of Russia. But as a result, the Anglo-Saxon world began to devour itself in its death throes. The decision to arrest Donald Trump, who personifies Western manufacturing capital, clearly demonstrates that the Western banking elite is well aware that their days are numbered.

Against the background of this statement of the expert, the thought comes to mind – who knows, maybe the global West, which does not take cunning and resourcefulness, has prepared another role for Elon Musk? The role of a kind of “canned food”, which is usually stored as a last resort, to eat it on a very “rainy” day?

 

READ MORE:

https://www.theinteldrop.org/2023/03/27/biden-furious-as-elon-musk-blocks-zelenskys-drone-swarm-offensive-aimed-at-russia/

 

SEE ALSO:

 

 

MAKE A DEAL PRONTO BEFORE THE SHIT HITS THE FAN:

MAKE A DEAL PLEASE:

 

NO NATO IN "UKRAINE" (WHAT'S LEFT OF IT)

THE DONBASS REPUBLICS ARE NOW BACK IN THE RUSSIAN FOLD — AS THEY USED TO BE PRIOR 1922. THE RUSSIANS WON'T ABANDON THESE AGAIN.

CRIMEA IS RUSSIAN — AS IT USED TO BE PRIOR 1954

A MEMORANDUM OF NON AGRESSION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE USA.

 

EASY.

 

THE WEST KNOWS IT.

 

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

 

 

biden borders.....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H8QwrxscGs

At today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) grills DHS Sec. Alejandro Mayorkas about an app used by migrants who seek to enter the US.

 

----------------

 

 

musk stopped ww3.......

Elon Musk personally intervened to stop a Ukrainian attack on Crimea last year due to fears of a nuclear war, CNN reported on Thursday, quoting an excerpt from the upcoming biography of the SpaceX and Tesla founder.

As Ukrainian drones approached the Crimean coast, they “lost connectivity and washed ashore harmlessly,”according to the book by Walter Isaacson, scheduled to be published next week. 

Musk had secretly ordered SpaceX engineers to shut off the Starlink signal near Crimea, according to this account, concerned that Russia might use nuclear weapons in reaction to what he described as a “mini-Pearl Harbor.”

Ukrainian Digital Transformation Minister Mikhail Fedorov then begged Musk to turn the signal back on via text messages, outlining the capabilities of the sea drones. Musk said no, explaining that Ukraine “is now going too far and inviting strategic defeat” by attacking Crimea.

 

The abortive drone strike was first reported by the New York Times in July, but did not include details of the exchange with Fedorov.

SpaceX has donated more than 20,000 Starlink terminals to Kiev since February 2022, with the intention of providing internet access and communications to civilians. The systems were weaponized almost immediately, however, leading to Musk having to explain himself to both Moscow and Washington.

“How am I in this war?” Isaacson quotes Musk as saying during one of their conversations. “Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.”

Following the attempted attack on Crimea, Musk told the Pentagon that Starlink would not continue donating its services to Ukraine. When this was leaked to CNN, Musk publicly reversed course, tweeting that “we’ll just keep funding Ukraine govt for free.”

“The Pentagon had a $145 million check ready to hand to me, literally,” SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell told Isaacson. “Then Elon succumbed to the bullshit on Twitter and to the haters at the Pentagon who leaked the story.”

SpaceX eventually got the US and some EU governments to pay for another 100,000 satellite dishes for Ukraine in early 2023, according to the biography. Musk has since said that SpaceX would not “enable escalation of a conflict that may lead to WWIII,” including the use of Starlink for long-range drone strikes.

Musk has yet to comment on the latest excerpt from Isaacson’s book. On Wednesday, he describedanother excerpt published by TIME magazine, dealing with AI, as “not quite how I would tell the story, but very accurate for an observer who only saw part of the puzzle.”

Isaacson is a former editor of TIME, a professor of history at Tulane University, and the biographer of Benjamin Franklin, Albert Einstein, Henry Kissinger and Steve Jobs. 

 

https://www.rt.com/news/582543-musk-starlink-crimea-attack/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....................