Saturday 30th of November 2024
Home » Blogs » Gus Leonisky's blog

when vaccines were contaminated with official legal conspiracies, back in june 2022.....

The August 23, 2021 FDA approval of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine was a cause for celebration. Marked as a turning point in the battle against COVID19, the announcement was highly publicized by the Biden Administration with the clear intention to extinguish “vaccine hesitancy” and boost uptake.

It was celebrated as a cause for national relief, and many Americans arrived at their local pharmacies under the impression, via government and pharmaceutical propaganda, that they were receiving an FDA-approved COVID vaccine. Yet that legally distinct product, as we know it, never existed. And now we know, via Pfizer, that it will never exist.

  

Jordan Schachtel Jun 4, 2022 Ghost Shot: Pfizer quietly admits it will never manufacture original FDA approved COVID vaccines

 

For the uninitiated: 

Comirnaty is a legally distinct product from the emergency use authorization (EUA) shots, and it has never made its way to market. For months on end, no such vaccine has ever become available. Those who received the “Pfizer shot(s)” have been injected with the emergency use authorization (EUA) version of the shots. See my piece in The Dossier for more info:

The DossierShell Game? There remains no FDA approved COVID vaccine in the United StatesI fact checked the fact checkers and couldn’t believe what I found. Despite the corporate press, Big Pharma, and the federal government telling us otherwise, it is absolutely true that there is no FDA approved COVID-19 vaccine available in the United States today. And there are no plans to make one available any time soon… 

The information operation succeeded. There was indeed an FDA approved vaccine, at least on paper, but you couldn’t get it. 

When originally confronted with this ordeal, Pfizer labeled this issue an inventory question that had nothing to do with the legal distinction between an experimental EUA product and an FDA-approved vaccine. Up until just weeks ago, this was the statement up on the CDC website via Pfizer:

“Pfizer received FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY).  At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename.

At present, Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new NDCs and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution.  As such, the CDC, AMA, and drug compendia may not publish these new codes until Pfizer has determined when the product will be produced with the BLA labels.”

In May, Pfizer updated its statement to mention a December 2021 licensed Comirnaty product, which was granted a license four months after the highly-publicized August FDA press release.

And just last week, Pfizer finally acknowledged that its original licensed product will never be distributed. In an unreported update on the CDC website, Pfizer told the agency:

“Pfizer received initial FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename. These NDCs will not be manufactured. Only NDCs for the subsequently BLA approved tris-sucrose formulation will be produced.”

The key distinction between the originally approved formulation and the tris-sucrose formulation is that — according to manufacturers — the latter can be held for a much longer period of time outside of an ultra cold freezer. These freezers cost over $10,000 a piece and each unit uses as much energy per day as an average American household. Improper storage can render the mRNA unstable.

Notably, the clinical trials for the Pfizer shot were conducted without the modified tris-sucrose ingredient. Given the partisan nature of Pfizer, the corporate media, government health bureaucracies, and your correspondent’s lack of expertise in this area, it is unclear whether this is significant.

Another notable thing to look out for in the coming days and weeks is the possibility that the subsequently FDA approved product finally becomes available in the United States. In recent days, the CDC removed the language of “not orderable at this time” above the description of both Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax.

Additionally, as reported by Uncover DC, the Defense Department appears to be in the early stages of ordering what it has interpreted as a legally required minimum of Comirnaty in order to continue its mRNA mandate of American service members.

 

READ MORE:

https://dossier.substack.com/p/ghost-shot-pfizer-quietly-admits

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

protecting pharma.......

by The AIMSIB editorial staff

Gardasil episode 1: Already the beginning of the end?

Gardasil episode 2: “From Vioxx to Gardasil, how can you trust Merck? »

***

This week Marceau takes us to 1986 in the USA, probably when the worst consequence generated by the Cold War was born. Since the protection of the populations and the US armies required that we be able to deploy anti-poison quickly in the event of a Russian attack, federal law had to provide for this eventuality. But what does this have to do with the vaccination of European babies, you might ask? Obvious corollary: aren't we just “failed Americans”? Good reading.

baby umbrellas

Let's pause for a moment on the United States which is used as an example to impose on our children all the magic potions which are injected into American children. Our politicians, VRP doctors and government-funded media often tell us: look, the United States has made this vaccine mandatory for X years and everything is going well. And this for all the vaccines they want to make compulsory in France.

But what they don't say - and I'm sure many DON'T KNOW - is that in the US there can't be a trial against CDC-recommended vaccines, even if they're not not obligatory!

Let us explain: in the 80s after numerous lawsuits lost by vaccine manufacturers following complaints from parents of children who had died or been seriously injured by vaccines, Pharma companies have threatened US politicians to stop making vaccines if they don't pass a law protecting them from being sued for serious or fatal side effects.

It was therefore on November 14, 1986 that President Ronald Reagan signs the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) creating a federal compensation fund to compensate vaccine victims, while giving FULL immunity to manufacturers for all vaccines put into the CDC's recommended childhood immunization schedule from the start of life.

So you understand why the FDA and the CDC, which have very close relations with labs like Pfizer or Moderna, have validated all COVID-19 injections up to babies.

Therefore, once the state of emergency is lifted, no one will be able to turn against the manufacturers because the injections are included in the vaccination schedule for babies recommended by the CDC, even if they are not compulsory.

If babies and young children had not been included, as soon as the state of health emergency was lifted in the USA, all adults could have taken legal action against Pfizer and Co.

BUT, there is a limit to this immunity given to vaccine manufacturers: if the victims can prove that the manufacturer hid important data, knowingly lied about the harmlessness of its injections, falsified data or clinical trials, then this protection by the “Vaccine Act” falls away.

Holes in the umbrella

There have been many lawsuits filed since 2006 against Merck, but until then the victims have all been dismissed as the judges felt there was insufficient evidence to prove that Merck lied and cheated on the tests. clinics. The victims were therefore invited to seek compensation from the federal government for their injuries and illnesses caused by the vaccine.

After years and thousands of complaints dismissed by the courts as falling under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, it finally seems that the accumulated evidence can no longer be ignored by judges to bring Merck to justice.

This lawsuit which will take place in the USA at the beginning of 2023 against Merck concerning the disaster of Gardasil with serious side effects is therefore truly exceptional, because despite the "Vaccine Act", the judge considered that he could not close his eyes and that Merck could no longer rely on this protection1.

Regarding COVID-19 injections, we have already accumulated all the evidence and it will be easy for victims to demonstrate fraud much faster than with Gardasil.

So in the future when you are given the USA as an example and told that this vaccine has been made compulsory for so many years without problems (implying the vaccine is still administered and that there are no complaints ) remember this "Vaccine Act" which completely protects the manufacturers and leaves the victims destitute.

In the same way, when any vaccine is validated by the American CDC for children and you do not understand why, remember that criminal immunity only works if the vaccine is on the baby schedule, even if it is only given in adolescence, because it is already on the 0-18 schedule .

What Pfizer imposed on France, through the European contract negotiated via SMS by Saint Ursula von der Leyen, but also to almost all the governments of the world in order to be able to subject populations to these deadly injections known as COVID-19, is nothing more than a replica of this "Vaccine Act" in force in the USA.

Pharma labs have therefore succeeded in declining in the rest of the world what only existed in the USA: their TOTAL immunity in the event of side effects linked to vaccination in the case of COVID19 injections!

Since the “Vaccine Act” and under pressure from the United States Department of the Armed Forces, vaccines also benefit from special new regulations exempting manufacturers from the need to use a real placebo in clinical trials and to carry out numerous tests to prove their safety, such as bio-distribution, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, etc… which were nevertheless necessary and essential to obtain the approval.

Why the military?

There could not be such heavy regulation because in the event of bacteriological attacks or threats targeting the military, the American army had to be able to quickly formulate and inject the soldiers without having to pass all the security tests in order to theoretically be able to protect them. .

The problem is that this regulation now also applies to all vaccines intended for the civilian population! This short circuit having of course been conveniently maintained for the greater good of Big Pharma and Fauci & Co, but to the detriment of citizens.

OUR PROBLEM is that the EMA in Europe only follows the recommendations of the American FDA, so in reality Europe is under the same regulations imposed by the American army.

The fact that vaccines made compulsory by mafia states plagued by pharmaceutical lobbies, such as France, transfers compensation for victims from the manufacturer to the state (ONIAM in France) effectively amounts to applying the same "Vaccine Act", without that no French law allows it!2

And finally, as indicated by MEP Virginie Joron3, it was Emmanuel Macron who pushed the European Commission to negotiate the contracts directly with the manufacturers of Covid-19 vaccines because he knew that the French penal code would not allow him to sign such an immunity clause!

No thanks to him...

The scene is set, we will then be able to dive into the heart of the matter…

source: AIMSIB

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....