SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
on sleaze balls .....from Mike Carlton in today’s
SMH ….. ‘The blatant dishonesty came towards the end, with a brief nod at the war on terrorism. "It remains," intoned Howard, "an inconvenient truth that if countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia simply abandon the people of Iraq this would be an enormous victory for the forces of terror and extremism around the world." No mention of the deceit and incompetence that got us into Iraq in the first place. Nothing on those non-existent weapons of mass destruction. Not a word to concede that the conflict has become a fiasco which, far from realising the neo-conservative fantasy of democracy and freedom in Iraq, has merely replaced the horrors of Saddam Hussein with the horrors of sectarian civil war and heightened the risk of terrorist atrocities elsewhere. And certainly no acknowledgement of the most inconvenient truth of all: that Australia's outstanding contribution to the war has been $300 million swindled from the United Nations by the wheat exporter AWB and delivered in kickbacks to the bank accounts of Saddam's henchmen. All on Howard's watch. At the Sleaze Ball, they get to take their clothes off. At the Quadrant ball, the emperor had no clothes to begin with.’ PM Selective About Which Bits He Let Hang Out and, from Anne Summers ….. ‘"Of the causes that Quadrant
has taken up that are close to my heart, none is more important than the role
it has played as counterforce to the black armband view of Australian
history," the Prime Minister said. What a strange and sad statement. No issue is closer to the heart of our Prime Minister? We could have hoped that perhaps when it comes to indigenous Australia he might judge chronic illness, low life expectancy, drug and alcohol problems and, above all, violence against women and kids in outback communities as more important than rants about a so-called black armband approach to our history. Others might yearn for a Prime Minister who had "close to his heart" critical national problems such as poverty, unemployment, declining education levels, global warming, the increasing Australian diaspora, the water crisis or even, given the theme of the speech, protection of democratic liberties in an age of terror. But this speech had no such ambitions. Its focus was narrow, its spirit was mean. It boasted abut the virtually complete vanquishing of the left here and abroad but it showed no interest in setting out a new agenda or in helping us think through the big challenges that confront us today. In many ways, the speech could be seen as the "Mission Accomplished" of the Culture Wars. I wasn't there but while press photos show that John Howard was wearing civvies, not a flying suit, his words suggest he was nevertheless in combat mode as he proclaimed victory on the battlefield of ideas in recent Australian history. As he surveyed the room he no doubt felt a degree of satisfaction at the size of his ideological army.’
|
User login |
Corrupted security
From our ABC
Howard Govt 'corrupted' security policy
Former senior intelligence analyst Andrew Wilkie says Australia's security has been severely threatened under the Howard Government.
Mr Wilkie, who resigned three years ago over his concerns of political interference, addressed the Independent Scholars Association in Canberra tonight.
He says the Government is not addressing the country's two main security threats - the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the security aspects of climate change.
But on the subject of the nation's intelligence agencies, Mr Wilkie says the Government has ensured they have been silenced.
"The war on terror which is being lost and the war in Iraq which has been lost reflect the fact that security policy in Australia has been seriously corrupted by the Howard Government and part of that corruption is that it now has subservient security officials which never challenge the Government, who just tell the Government what it wants to hear," he said.
"The Government has shaped the agencies so they will do exactly what the Government wants and never push back against the Government when it's doing anything wrong in regards to security."