Tuesday 8th of October 2024

keeping faith .....

keeping faith .....

I, along with the members of September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, support the position that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the four detainees charged with 9/11 crimes should be tried in federal courts and not in military tribunals.

This was the promise made to us by Barack Obama throughout his campaign, and by Attorney General Eric Holder, as the justice department began its inquiry into the process of closing Guantánamo Bay. Then, closing Guantánamo Bay was a promise to keep faith with the American people that we are a nation of laws, laws that determine and reflect our best qualities, laws that we aspire to live by.

Since 9/11, criminals have been successfully prosecuted in our civilian courts, yet we continue to detain human beings outside of our borders, outside of our view and outside of our Constitution. Since 9/11, our country has been locked into this problematic binary of political bipartisanship. And since 9/11, the world has been a poorer place because of all we have lost, personally and collectively.

This week, Eric Holder himself acknowledged that he still believes the best venue for the prosecution of the 9/11 suspects is in the federal courts. That suggests his change of heart arises more from political pressure than a loss of faith in our judicial system. Going forward, we hope there will be no further excuses used to prevent the remaining detainees from being tried in the federal courts, which as the record has shown, have successfully adjudicated terrorism trials. We cannot continue to let politics subvert our system of justice.

We, the members of September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows want our nation back. We want the rule of law restored. The right thing to do is to close Guantánamo Bay and work within the system of justice and our long-established rule of law.

Close Guantánamo and let the 9/11 suspects receive a fair trial

homeland insecurity .....

The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) issued a statement concerning the hearing before the United States Court of Military Commission Review in United States v. Al Bahlul, before its scheduled date of March 17, 2011.

Al Bahlul is the first appeal of a Guantanamo military commission conviction to proceed before the Court of Military Commission Review. The case is notable because, in essence, it is a conviction in desperate search of supporting war crimes.

But it's also notable for the ahistorical and racist rhetoric in the government briefs that suggest equivalency between Native Americans resisting US takeover of their homelands and al-Qaeda. If you were to ask the Seminoles, I suspect they would say that the greatest threat to their homeland security during the 1800s was in fact the US government.

It's appalling that the Obama administration has abandoned its pledge to close Guantanamo. But it's intolerable that it would invoke and distort one of the darkest moments in American history to justify its failure.

Government Calls Native American Resistance of 1800s "Much Like Modern-Day Al-Qaeda"