SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
topology: the fourth dimension.....
MATHEMATICS RULE. WE DON'T KNOW MUCH ABOUT THIS BECAUSE MOST OF US HAVE NO IDEA HOW STRINGS OF ONES AND ZEROS BECOME LANGUAGE, WRITTEN AND SPOKEN AT SPEEDS WE CAN'T IMAGINE, WHILE STROLLING THROUGH THE COUNTRYSIDE... POLITICS AND ECONOMICS BECOME VICTIMS/USERS OF MATHEMATICS, THROUGH POLLS, STATISTICS AND TRENDS. WE, LITTLE BOURGEOIS, COUNT OUR MONEY ON OUR FINGERS.... ASTRONOMERS COUNT STARS IN BILLIONS OF BILLIONS...
Michael Freedman's parents Benedict and Nancy Freedman are both quite famous. His mother, Nancy Mars, was born in Chicago in 1920 and had some acting roles before attending the Chicago Art Institute, Los Angeles City College, and the University of Southern California. She married Benedict Freedman on 29 June 1941. Benedict Freedman's father, David, was born in Romania. Benedict was a talented mathematician, musician and writer. He studied at Curtiss-Wright Technical Institute at Glendale, California, graduating with a degree in aeronautical engineering. He taught aeronautical engineering at Curtiss-Wright during the 1940s but had a parallel career as a scriptwriter of radio shows, drama critic and newspaper editor. Benedict and Nancy Freedman are joint authors of several well-known novels. They had three children, Johanna, Michael and Deborah.
Freedman has received many honours for his work. He was California Scientist of the Year in 1984 and, in the same year, he was made a MacArthur Foundation Fellow and also was elected to the National Academy of Sciences. In 1985 he was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Science. In addition to being awarded the Fields Medal in 1986, he also received the Veblen Prize from the American Mathematical Society in that year. The citation for the Veblen Prize reads (see [Michael H Freedman awarded 1986 Veblen Prize, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 33 (2) (1986), 227-228.">3]):- After the discovery in the early 60s of a proof for the Poincaré conjecture and other properties of simply connected manifolds of dimension greater than four, one of the biggest open problems, besides the three dimensional Poincaré conjecture, was the classification of closed simply connected four manifolds. In his paper, The topology of four-dimensional manifolds, published in the Journal of Differential Geometry (1982), Freedman solved this problem, and in particular, the four-dimensional Poincaréconjecture. The major innovation was the solution of the simply connected surgery problem by proving a homotopy theoretic condition suggested by Casson for embedding a 2-handle, i.e. a thickened disc in a four manifold with boundary.Besides these results about closed simply connected four manifolds, Freedman also proved:
In his reply Freedman thanked his teachers (whom he said included his students) and also gave some fascinating views on mathematics [Michael H Freedman awarded 1986 Veblen Prize, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 33 (2) (1986), 227-228.">3]:- My primary interest in geometry is for the light it sheds on the topology of manifolds. Here it seems important to be open to the entire spectrum of geometry, from formal to concrete. By spectrum, I mean the variety of ways in which we can think about mathematical structures. At one extreme the intuition for problems arises almost entirely from mental pictures. At the other extreme the geometric burden is shifted to symbolic and algebraic thinking. Of course this extreme is only a middle ground from the viewpoint of algebra, which is prepared to go much further in the direction of formal operations and abandon geometric intuition altogether.In the same reply Freedman also talks about the influence mathematics can have on the world and the way that mathematicians should express their ideas:- In the nineteenth century there was a movement, of which Steiner was a principal exponent, to keep geometry pure and ward off the depredations of algebra. Today I think we feel that much of the power of mathematics comes from combining insights from seemingly distant branches of the discipline. Mathematics is not so much a collection of different subjects as a way of thinking. As such, it may be applied to any branch of knowledge. I want to applaud the efforts now being made by mathematicians to publish ideas on education, energy, economics, defence, and world peace. Experience inside mathematics shows that it isn't necessary to be an old hand in an area to make a contribution. Outside mathematics the situation is less clear, but I cannot help feeling that there, too, it is a mistake to leave important issues entirely to experts.In June 1987 Freedman was presented with the National Medal of Science at the White House by President Ronald Reagan. The following year he received the Humboldt Award and, in 1994, he received the Guggenheim Fellowship Award. https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Freedman/
SO THERE....
PLEASE VISIT: YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005. Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951. RABID ATHEIST. WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….
|
User login |
fear....
“Fear will keep the local systems in line.”
STAR WARS
[2025] Dennis Gaitsgory, Who Proved Part of Math’s Grand Unified Theory, Wins Breakthrough Prize
By solving part of the Langlands program, a mathematical proof that was long thought to be unachievable, Dennis Gaitsgory snags a prestigious Breakthrough Prize
BY MANON BISCHOFF EDITED BY JEANNA BRYNER
The Langlands program has been described by mathematician Edward Frankel as the “grand unified theory of mathematics.” Conceived by Robert Langlands in 1967, the program includes numerous conjectures that were intended to connect disparate mathematical realms: number theory and harmonic analysis. In the 1990s, a similar connection between geometry and harmonic analysis was noticed, and the geometric Langlands program was born. Decades later, in 2024, Dennis Gaitsgory of the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in Bonn, Germany, and eight of his colleagues achieved a breakthrough. In five scientific preprint papers, consisting of nearly 1,000 pages, they proved that a large class of geometric objects is related to quantities from calculus. Gaitsgory has now been awarded the Breakthrough Prize in Mathematics, which includes a $3-million award, for this outstanding achievement.
Scientific American’s German-language sister publication Spektrum der Wissenschaft spoke to Gaitsgory about his math career, the Langlands achievement and the prestigious Breakthrough Prize.
[An edited transcript of the interview follows.]
You’ve been working on the geometric Langlands program for 30 years. When was the moment that you realized you’d be able to prove it?
There was a very crucial step that was always a mystery. This got solved by a former graduate student of mine, [mathematician] Sam Raskin, and his graduate students in the winter of 2022. They proved that something is nonzero. After this, it was clear that we would be able to work out a proof.
How did you feel when you realized that it could really be done?
I’ve always perceived it as some kind of long-term project for self-entertainment. So I obviously felt happy, but it was not like a very strong emotion or anything. It wasn’t a eureka moment.
The conjecture that we proved is one particular case of something much, much bigger. It has received a lot of attention because it’s one well-formulated thing. But it’s just one step. I was happy that this step had been done, but there’s much more to do.
So there was no champagne popping? You just sat down and continued working?
There was no champagne but something similar. When [Raskin] said that he could prove this crucial part, we made a bet: if he could really do it, I promised him a bottle of scotch.
The proof is huge, almost 1,000 pages. Did you oversee everything in it?
I wrote 95 percent of it. [That was] not for a good reason but because I had an injury from skiing, and I was just lying in bed. So what else was there to do? I was watching Star Wars with my son and writing this thing.
Do you mean you did both at the same time?
Initially, some sections in our papers were named after Star Wars episodes, but at the end, we deleted [that element], mostly out of copyright concerns. But one paper still has a quote from Star Wars: “Fear will keep the local systems in line.” It was a really good fit, because in this paper, we had to control the moduli space of local systems.
It’s one thing to understand something but another to write everything down in detail. Did any problems pop up?
Of course. We had a road map, but there were still a lot of blanks to fill, many theories to be developed.
But I don’t think there was a moment of actual panic. Sometimes I was not sure if one thing would require three more pages, 20 more pages or 50 more pages. There was just an uncertainty of how much more work had to be done.
READ MORE: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dennis-gaitsgory-wins-breakthrough-prize-for-solving-part-of-maths-grand/
====================
The Langlands program is built on existing ideas: the philosophy of cusp forms formulated a few years earlier by Harish-Chandra and Gelfand,[1] the work and Harish-Chandra's approach on semisimple Lie groups, and in technical terms the trace formula of Selberg and others.
What was new in Langlands' work, besides technical depth, was the proposed connection to number theory, together with its rich organisational structure hypothesised (so-called functoriality).
Harish-Chandra's work exploited the principle that what can be done for one semisimple (or reductive) Lie group can be done for all. Therefore, once the role of some low-dimensional Lie groups such as GL(2) in the theory of modular forms had been recognised, and with hindsight GL(1) in class field theory, the way was open to speculation about GL(n) for general n > 2.
The "cusp form" idea came out of the cusps on modular curves but also had a meaning visible in spectral theory as "discrete spectrum", contrasted with the "continuous spectrum" from Eisenstein series. It becomes much more technical for bigger Lie groups, because the parabolic subgroups are more numerous.
In all these approaches technical methods were available, often inductive in nature and based on Levi decompositions amongst other matters, but the field remained demanding.[2]
From the perspective of modular forms, examples such as Hilbert modular forms, Siegel modular forms, and theta-series had been developed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langlands_program
=====================
READ FROM TOP.
PLEASE VISIT:
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
RABID ATHEIST.
WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….