SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
the conspiracy theory that should not go away….
THE VAGARIES OF READING FIVE-YEAR OLD SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES AGAIN, AND LINKING A FEW NEW SOURCES, CONTROVERSIAL IN THEIR CONTENT, RE-AWAKEN A MONSTER THAT SHOOK THE WORLD SIX YEARS AGO…. WAS COVID-19, A NATURAL EVENT OR WAS IT IS ENGINEERED — OR ACCIDENTALLY RELEASED — WITH GAIN-OF-FUNCTION ADDED TO NATURAL PATHOGENS?… Gus asks the question AGAIN..…
I am writing this for people who were then too young to understand the breadth of the event. Many people died, mostly old people. EVERYWHERE. According to statistics, more than seven million people died worldwide from the disease — or about 0.9 per cent of people infected. (779 million worldwide). About 1.2 million people died in the USA… Drastic measures such as lock-down and entire cities being in quarantine, as well as intensive vaccination, prevented a more severe catastrophe. Or did it? We have to accept that it did. Covid-19 was a SARS disease that affects the respiratory system in humans. It was strongly related to a benign pathogen in bats that basically jumped a “zoo-barrier”. Bats have the defence mechanism to fight this bacteria. Humans had no defence and the jump from bats to humans, implicated a FUNDAMENTAL change — a SURPRISING adaptation of the bacteria to human bio-conditions…
The controversy that soon emerge was about how such adaptation of human bio-conditions happened. Was it a natural shift or had it been engineered by bio-labs doing experiments on increase the lethality of such disease‚ in gain of function experiments?
We will never know the truth, though bio-labs all over the world, study and manufacture gain of function pathogens. This is reality. Meanwhile the said bio-labs and their cousins in big Pharma work on developing and manufacturing vaccines for such pathogens. This is reality. There is money to be made.
In November 2021, SCIENCE (https://www.science.org/content/article/weve-done-nothing-wrong-ecohealt...) published an article “Prophet in Purgatory” — Peter Daszak [of EcoHealth Alliance] is fighting accusation that his work on pandemic prevention helped sparked COVID-19 — by Jon Cohen. EcoHealth Alliance became at the centre of the controversy — leading to a major set of conspiracy theories.
Seven million deaths is a lot of people to have on one’s conscience. This is on par with the scientist who invented leaded petrol. [https://www.bbc.com/news/business-40593353?]
779 million sick people, some very sick and some still suffering to this day is a lot to carry responsibility for…
So what to make of this pandemic? Could humanity suffer another such infection on a planetary scale or is our general hygiene good enough to avoid a catastrophe? Do we use too many antibiotics and too much anti-bacterial gels? The hidden correspondence between Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer should tell us that while the origin of the disease may not be discussed there, huge sums of cash were transacted to assure delivery of vaccines — cash amounts that could be WAY OVER the real value of the service. Some people may have been corrupt and von der Leyen would be one of those.
So, the smell of conspiracy AND OF subsequent conspiracies have plagued the official narration: Covid-19 came from bats and pangolins in a wet market in Wuhan, China… Full stop.
Wuhan, a large Chinese city, was also where a bio-lab [NEXT DOOR TO THE WET MARKETS?] PARTLY financed by EcoHealth was doing gain-of-function research on BAT VIRUSES… Coincidences are mysterious. Walk one metre further and a pot-plant falling from six floor above would have crashed on your head. You got distracted by a pigeon on the pavement. So you slowed down. the bird is dead now. Squashed.
Meanwhile, the official line was maintained by seriously authoritative doctors and draconian laws, including restriction of movements and assembly. ANY doctors and researchers who challenged the official story of the origin of the pandemic got banned from all NEWS outlets, WORLDWIDE, on legacy and social media. Very few managed to tell a different story on YouTube, to soon be ejected from the platform. The OFFICIAL narrative HAD TO STICK 100 %. Any contrary opinion had to be killed. Drastic? Sure… And Donald Trump drank whatever chlorine product, to show that the pandemic was easy to defeat… a Trumpian conspiracy added to the rest….
SO, COULD WE FOR A MINUTE, CONSIDER THAT THE WHOLE COVID-19 EPISODE — REMINISCENT OF THE “SPANISH” [AMERICAN*] FLU DURING WORLD WAR ONE — WAS AN ACCIDENTAL RELEASE OF A FABRICATED PATHOGEN, OR A FULLY FABRICATED EVENT, LIKE WARS ARE DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AN OUTCOME?… INCLUDING making some rich people richer?… while controlling our level of misery…. and destroying countries…?
More CONSPIRACY THEORIES to come… INCLUDING POSSIBLE LINKS TO THE PRESENT WAR ON IRAN....
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951. RABID PEACEFUL ATHEIST
|
User login |
daszak...
Peter Daszak’s life took a turn for the worse on the evening of 17 April 2020. It has yet to recover.
Daszak, a conservation biologist, heads the EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit research group based in New York City that aims to prevent new infectious diseases from emerging. His family had been in a COVID-19 lockdown in their home outside the city for 1 month, and Daszak had spent long days working from a wood-paneled basement office, occasionally giving interviews as a pandemic expert.
That Friday evening, he went upstairs for a cup of tea with his wife, who was in the kitchen watching a White House Coronavirus Task Force press conference on her iPad. A reporter asked then-President Donald Trump about supposed U.S. intelligence reports that SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab in Wuhan, China, which she claimed received $3.7 million from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH).
https://www.science.org/content/article/weve-done-nothing-wrong-ecohealth-leader-fights-charges-research-helped-spark-covid-19
=====================
Science Magazine Attacks the Journal of the Academy of Public Health
By: Peter C. Gøtzsche
Only two days after the Journal of the Academy of Public Health‘s official launch, Science Magazine criticised it in a news item. A scientist I had recommended as a member of our Academy wrote to me that the fact that Science feared our new journal suggested that we were on the right track.
Indeed. Science scored an own goal by illustrating so clearly what is wrong with the legacy media and traditional scientific journals. It started out with denigrating remarks about the journal being the brainchild of President Donald Trump’s pick to direct the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Jay Bhattacharya, and Martin Kulldorff “who became known for his opposition to lockdowns, child vaccination, and other public health measures during the Covid-19 pandemic. Its editorial board also includes Trump’s pick to lead the Food and Drug Administration, Johns Hopkins University surgeon Marty [wrongly spelled as Martin] Makary, who also opposed vaccine mandates.”
Why did Science mention that Trump picked Jay and Marty? This is irrelevant for any scientific judgments about these people. And what was wrong with their positions during the pandemic? Nothing.
Sweden did not lock down and yet had one of the lowest mortalities in the world. To vaccinate children against Covid-19 down to 6 months of age as in the US is highly likely harmful, and we have not recommended this in Europe. Many people, me included, have argued against vaccine mandates and it was never a requirement in Denmark to become vaccinated against Covid-19. Such mandates are ethically and scientifically indefensible and can increase vaccine hesitancy for vaccines in general.
Science’s denigration continued: “The journal, which has already published eight articles on topics including COVID-19 vaccine trials and mask mandates, eschews several aspects of traditional publishing. It lacks a subscription paywall.”
“Lacks” a paywall? This is a negative statement, although it is positive not to have a paywall like Science has. And mask mandates? There is no need to mandate whole populations to dress as bank robbers given masking’s tenuous – and potentially nonexistent – benefits on a population level.
Since only members of the Academy of Public Health can submit articles, Science is worried that the journal will be used “to sow doubt about scientific consensus on matters such as vaccine efficacy and safety.”
Scientific consensus is rare, and even when it exists, it has often been proven wrong by later research. Science is the opposite of consensus. The status quo should be challenged, and free scientific debate – that so many traditional journals have suppressed – moves science forward. There are many good reasons why some top scientists have abandoned publishing in top scientific journals, and they include censorship, and financial and other conflicts of interest among anonymous peer reviewers, editors, and journal owners.
https://www.malone.news/p/science-magazine-attacks-the-journal
=====================
COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN INTERMEDIATE SPECIES HOST : 03/09/2025 10:53:04
THE DASZAK STRAIN
.....
With its new focus, Accountability Journalism Institute has expanded its board of directors, bringing in respected scientists, human rights advocates, and journalists. Among the new board members is renowned zoologist Dr. Peter Daszak, the former president of EcoHealth Alliance, who has been the target of politically motivated attacks based on unsupported narratives about the origins of COVID-19. "I joined the Board because I've seen first hand the damage that politically-driven misinformation can do through five years of awful attacks against me, my family and my work," Daszak said. "These often involved the same methods, organizations and people as those lined up against climate change, GMO and vaccine scientists. The AJI will shine a light on who's behind anti-science misinformation, and who pays for it, so we can all better distinguish fact from fiction." House Oversight Committee Report points to Daszak as cause of Covid-19 Pandemic
LOCK HIM UP
Final Report of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Committee on Oversight and Accountability U.S. House of Representatives
FINDING: Dr. Peter Daszak Provided False Statements to Congress in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 18 U.S.C. 1621. In comparing Dr. Daszak’s testimony—both during his transcribed interview and public hearing—to available documents, it is likely Dr. Daszak provided false statements to the Select Subcommittee in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 18 U.S.C. 1621.
a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
1) The possibility that COVID-19 emerged because of a laboratory or research related accident is not a conspiracy theory.
CHAPTER 12) EcoHealth Alliance, Inc. and Dr. Peter Daszak should never again receive U.S. taxpayer dollars.
3) The U.S. National Institutes of Health funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
2) The Chinese government, agencies within the U.S. Government, and some members of the international scientific community sought to cover-up facts concerning the origins of the pandemic.
THE CASE AGAINST DASZAK
DASZAK EXPLORES THE LAB LEAK THEORYDr. Daszak: "This summary contains the information for the 2014 and 2017 NIH and NIAID grants to the Ecohealth Alliance that funded the WIV research on bat conronaviruses. As the grant description shows, this research included gain-of-function / gain-of-threat research to make coronaviruses viruses more pathogenic using techniques including genetic engineering, cell culture, and animal experimentation." Source of document: Covid-references-International Center for Technology Assessment
Dr. Fauci told Rand Paul: “Senator, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect, that the N.I.H. has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.” The N.I.H. used Daszak as its surrogate to do this. To hold Daszak responsible means holding Fauci responsible which the Democrats and Corporate Media will not do.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/20/science/covid-lab-leak-wuhan.html
READ MORE: https://peterdaszak.com/
WE HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT THE VERACITY OF THIS CONSPIRACY THEORY... BUT IT'S WORTH ANALYSING...
MORE TO COME....
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.