SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
sanctions and deletions.....YouTube Deleted Neutrality Studies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwXKbTpKiTA
==================
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
GOOD LUCK, PASCAL.....
====================
EU Sanctions against the block's own citizens and residents are a horrible development toward a totalitarian future. Their extralegal nature is what gives them their force. An explanation attempt.
What Goes Around: The EU's Extralegal Sanctions Regime
It has come as a shock to many of us in the alternative media sphere when, on December 15, the EU put the esteemed analyst, political commentator, and former Swiss Army colonel Jacques Baud, on its Russia-Sanctions list. He was one of several newly sanctioned individuals (alongside, for instance, the popular French journalist, Xavier Moreau). Baud is already the second Swiss to be sanctioned. In June 2025, the EU announced that Nathalie Yamb, a Swiss-Cameroonian activist against neocolonialism, would be sanctioned. Being on the EU sanctions list is a devastating event for the people concerned, especially if they reside in an EU country or a closely associated state like Switzerland, Norway, or the UK. It means banks will freeze their accounts, credit companies will cancel their cards, they are not allowed to enter into contracts with EU-affiliated companies or private persons, and no business in the EU is allowed to have dealings with them, which, in theory, even precludes them from buying bread and other necessities of life. Furthermore, many international businesses will cancel all their services to them, including mail providers, social media platforms, etc. Even Swiss banks freeze or cancel accounts, out of fear they might get in trouble if they don’t comply with EU regulations. I recently interviewed two sanctioned people, Nathalie Yamb and Hüsseyin Dogru, and their testimonies are heartbreaking. For an equally harrowing account by Jacques Baud, see the most recent interview with him on Nima Alkhorshid’s ‘Dialogue Works’ channel. Nathalie also posted the short video below, in which she gives an overview of the ordeal (post in French, subtitles in English). Are Sanctions Against EU Citizens and Residents Illegal?As of early January 2026, there were 59 private individuals on the EU’s Russia sanctions list. Originally, this tool was levied only against Russian businessmen and people living in Russia (which was already problematic in my view), but since 2024, the EU has begun using sanctions as a political sledgehammer to crack down on various forms of dissent. Yamb, for instance, was sanctioned mostly for her activism against France’s neocolonial behavior in Africa, and Dogru for being a vocal German journalist for the Palestinian cause. The little text snippets that serve as justifications for the decision to include them in the sanctions list even mention those non-Russia-related activities for their listing. Naturally, one would assume that in a free and liberal society, based on the rule of law, sanctions against citizens and residents must be illegal. Right? In fact, the EU parliamentarian Michael von der Schulenburg has commissioned a report that is very clear in its verdict. Sanctions, it holds, break existing EU law on individual freedoms (see my interview with him here). However, the problem we have is that while sanctions are doubtlessly a breach of some EU law, there is other EU law that allows the Council to take these measures. Procedurally, the EU is not in breach of its competences because sanctions are not a domestic policing matter but a foreign policy decision. Foreign Policy, For Domestic PurposesI will not go into the details of the accusations against the sanctioned individuals. That would be beside the point. Whether the reasons given for the sanctions have merit or not is not the issue. The problem everyone should understand is that the accusations don’t need to constitute illegal behavior. There are no laws in the EU or its member states that forbid doing what the people on the Russia-Sanctions list have been doing. On the contrary. Many of the activities, including civil activism (Nathalie Yamb), journalism (Hüsseyin Dogru), or the publication of geopolitical analysis (Jacques Baud) are explicitly protected liberties. That’s the point. Since the acts committed are not crimes, the sanctions against them are not judicial measures, either. The EU explicitly says so on its sanctions explainer homepage: Restrictive measures or ‘sanctions’ are an essential tool of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy. They allow the EU to respond to global challenges(sic) and developments that go against its objectives and values. Decisions on sanctions are taken by the Council of the European Union by unanimity. EU sanctions are targeted and aim at those responsible for the policies or actions the EU wants to influence. They do not target a country or population. Sanctions are not punitive (sic) and instead seek to bring about a change in the policy or conduct of those targeted, with a view to promoting the objectives of the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy. Great. Isn’t it? The EU has managed to create a system under which the executive branch is within its legal rights, under its foreign policy arm to designate behavior of its citizens as “undesirable” and then impose the most draconian measures imaginable—all without trial or conviction. Everything Baud, Yamb, Dogru, and others did (and still do) is perfectly legal in the EU. But the Council of the European Union has the power to impose coercive measures on them to “encourage” a change of behavior. And because member states are treaty-bound to implement EU sanctions, there is no recourse to domestic courts for the victims. What an accomplishment. The EU has sneakily outmaneuvered the legal safeguards of its member states against arbitrary political persecution. Not illegal. Extralegal.So, I think this is key to understanding what’s happening: the sanctions are not illegal in the sense of a breach of protocol. They are part of the powers the Lisbon Treaty grants the EU Council, and they have a set and well-defined process behind them. They are legal in a purely formal sense of the word (leaving aside the questions of conflict with other branches of EU law that the von der Schulenburg’s Report raises). What the sanctions do is they create a regime that allows the circumvention of safeguards against political persecution. In this sense, they must be understood as extralegal measures. They create a space for the persecution of people not subject to the legal system as we know it. That is why all the usual principles of justice do not apply to the sanctions question. Due process, the assumption of innocence, the right to be heard before conviction, etc. All of these fundamental bedrocks of the legal system don’t come into play because the sanctions themselves are not judicial measures. The only recourse victims of this system have is to appeal to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). But—and here comes a very big but—the ECJ will only check if the sanctions decision is formally consistent. It will not check whether the accusations and the imposed sanctions regime are proportional or infringe on basic rights of the sanctioned individuals. The ECJ will only make sure the rationale given is correct. What this means is that only if the victims can show that the little blurb in the sanctions database is factually incorrect, the ECJ might issue an order for the EU Council to delist them. However, if the accusations are consistent, then the ECJ will uphold the sanctions. Hence, as long as the Council doesn’t lie in the sanctions rationale, more or less anything goes. The ECJ will defer to the EU Council regarding the political importance of sanctioning someone. It does not interfere with the logic of taking sanctions. Sounds incredible, but I talked to a sanctions law scholar, Alexandra Hofer, from the University of Utrecht, and she explains the situation in these terms. And to make matters worse, even when the ECJ finds that the Council used an incorrect rationale (aka the accusations are lies), the Council, at any time, can simply list the individuals again with an adjusted rationale. Then, the legal circus begins anew for the victims, as they have to bring a new case to the ECJ. This happened, for instance, to Petr Aven and Mikhail Fridman, two Russian businessmen who won their case against the EU Council in 2024, but remain on the sanctions list until today with an adjusted rationale. The EU Council has effectively absolute and infinite power over who gets sanctioned. The right of the sanctioned individuals to appeal to the ECJ is at best a paper-thin fig leaf for the EU to pretend that proper legal recourse is possible. In fact, granting the victims this form of fake access to the ECJ makes it (probably) even harder for them to win in other courts. For instance, since the sanctions create a severe infringement on their human rights, there is no question that human rights courts (there are several) might be used to challenge the regime. However, for the courts to act, one of the largest hurdles is proving that all domestic remedies have been used up. Hence, before the ECJ has been addressed, the chances for the victims to have a human rights court pick up their case seem relatively slim (it is, nevertheless, an avenue the victims should probably explore with their legal teams). Turning the Weapons InwardI wish I could say that this is the first time a Western institution has pulled such a dirty trick on civil society. But it is not. As Nathalie Yamb, in my interview with her, pointed out, EU countries and the USA have been using sanctions for decades to put extralegal pressure on activists and journalists in Africa and elsewhere. In fact, this is standard neocolonial behavior. This is why we cannot discuss sanctions without addressing Europe’s unresolved colonial mindset. The USA, too, has been using sanctions as a tool to crack down on legal behavior, for instance, with its attack on personnel from the International Criminal Court (ICC) or, most recently, the sanctions on the UN Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, Francesca Albanese. Just as the Patriot Act after 9/11, suddenly gave the US government the ability to use security services internally that were meant to protect the nation from external enemies only, the expansion of EU sanctions against people within the EU (or Schengen area) is transforming a dirty foreign policy tool into an even uglier domestic policy tool. The weapons to fight dirty outside are being turned inward. This is a prime example of why being silent when our states commit crimes overseas will, in the end, come to haunt us domestically. The chickens are coming home to roost. Unfortunately, as always, the first ones to suffer this are the people who fought against the injustices abroad already. Nathalie Yamb being the prime example. Right now, there are various pundits in the blogosphere and in mainstream media who more or less argue along the lines of “deserves them right, traitors.” These people, too, one day will understand what this system means if it is allowed to foster and grow in its draconian scope. By then, it will be too late. Either this stops now, or the future for freedom and democracy in the EU is bleak. The Eurocratic Death of DemocracyThe only hope I have is in popular uproar against this sanctions regime of doom. Political repression needs political answers. However, it will take a lot to put this genie back in the bottle. Even on a national level, the member states seem pretty happy with the new tool. Florian Warweg, a courageous German journalist who was on my show before, actually asked his government spokespeople at the Federal Press Club (Bundespressekonferenz) on December 17 about the case of Jacques Baud and the legality thereof. The smug answer he got from Martin Giese of the German Foreign Ministry tells us most of what we need to know about how these gray bureaucrats perceive their actions and what they have in store: (…) people who do such things can be sanctioned if the legal grounds exist and if there is a corresponding decision by the Council of the European Union. That happened this Monday, it will continue to happen, it has happened in the past, and anyone operating in this field must expect that it could also happen to them. (…) All those who do not agree with their sanctioning have all possible legal means to challenge it. They can appeal to the Council, and they can also bring the case before the European Court of Justice. What a blatant intimidation attempt. Seems like a pretty straightforward admission that there is more to come. After all, as I established above, the sanctions do have legal grounds in the purely formal sense, and the victims can indeed call on the very institution that took the sanctions decision and its rubber-stamp court that will only check the formalities. Seems very fair, right? Here you go. This is how democracy dies (again). By executive decree and bureaucratic smug. Well done, European Union. With love, Pascal https://pascallottaz.substack.com/p/what-goes-around-the-eus-extralegal
|
User login |
Israel connect....
[GUSNOTE: YOUTUBE IS OWNED BY GOOGLE... GOOGLE IS CONTROLLED BY THE JEWISH LOBBY]
Project Nimbus, Google in Service of Israeli Military
Monday, 12 December 2022
Google, the world's largest tech firm is being integrated into the military of the Zionist entity. Google signed a contract known as Project Nimbus that will have extremely negative consequences for the Palestinian people.
Project Nimbus and the resistance to it
A scandal has erupted at US tech behemoth Google following the rebellion of workers against the company's integration with the Israeli military.
This absorption of Google into Israel's arsenal of tools has developed in several ways.
The climax of this integration is the bonding of Google and Amazon with the Israeli military through Project Nimbus.
Project Nimbus is a $1.2 billion contract between Google and Amazon and the Israeli military and government. It was launched last year during May of 2021. Right after the siege on Gaza, during which over 250 Palestinian people were killed at the hands of Israeli military violence.
And the contract is actually providing tools to the Israeli Government and military that will help the government and military scale out a multitude of forms of violence, including surveillance, data collection, the expansion of illegal settlement expansion.
You know, there are a lot of different forms of violence that Google is essentially aiding and abetting through Project Nimbus.
Ariel Koren, Former Google Marketing Manager
The $1.2 billion contract is to construct six data centers, employing 500 Israelis at each site. The project will also provide cloud infrastructure to Israeli government institutions, including Israel's military and the Israel Land Authority, which is the agency responsible for stealing Palestinian land and allocating it to Zionist settler colonies.
It has been revealed that, through Nimbus, Google will supply very advanced artificial intelligence mechanisms to the Israeli military. Nimbus training documents, which were exposed by The Intercept, found that Google's Cloud Vision API would Empower Israel's facial recognition mechanisms.
It has also been confirmed that Nimbus will be able to process data for lie detection purposes. An interesting twist in the project Nimbus contract is that it contains an anti BDS clause. The companies are barred from withdrawing their services from any institution, regardless of how horrific its crimes are against the Palestinians.. This clause would have certainly been inserted to enforce integration with the Israeli military
So Google and Amazon will not have the power to stop their technology from being used for human rights violations. Even if they so wished.
Despite the humiliating conditions of this agreement, Google spokeswoman Shannon Newbury, still gushingly boasted, "we are proud that Google Cloud has been selected by the Israeli government to provide public cloud services to help digitally transform the country," but almost 40,000 members of the public and a thousand Google employees have signed a petition calling for the tech giant to pull out of the contract and some workers are already resigning from their positions in protest.
This full integration of the world's largest tech company with the Israeli military is only a matter of time, but the resistance still burns.
David Miller is an academic and former professor at Bristol University and a leading British scholarly critic of Israel. He's also the co founder and co director of the lobbying watchdog SpinWatch.
Huda Ammory is a founder of Palestine Action and has led an unprecedented insurgency against Israel in the UK. She succeeded in shutting down two sites in England belonging to the Israeli weapons company, Elbit Systems, and in coordination with the local community in Oldham, she helped to force Elbit Systems to sell a subsidiary in the town.
What do you know about this project Nimbus?
Well, as you saw in the film there, this is a huge contract which Google has signed with the Israeli government and which effects the military as well as other oppressive ministries and agencies in the Zionist entity, and it allows quite extraordinary capacities for the IDF, for visual intelligence agencies, for crowd control, for surveillance, for facial recognition, for lie detection.
Of course, these will be used straightforwardly in brutality and human rights abuses. And indeed, of course, the torture which the IDF is well known for in the territories, and indeed, in Israel itself. So this is a kind of agreement, which allows Google to help the abuses carried out (on a daily basis) by the State of Israel.
David Miller, Academic
Companies working with Israeli military complicit in Palestinian rights violations
What do you think this means for the Palestinian people?
Well, I think it's important to acknowledge that tech companies are now becoming more powerful than many governments. And when those tech companies are working with the Israeli military, they're essentially aiding in all of the violations against human rights and the colonization of the Palestinian people.
Now, practically that means, on the ground, encouraging the further blockade of the people of Gaza, the siege that has been routinely put up on them, the blockade that has lasted over 15 years and the constant military attacks of (sic) which often Israel use as an opportunity to test and improve the weapons that they use, to then use against other people across the world.
We know that Israel has already used cameras, as I've already mentioned, to blackmail Palestinians because they are so advanced in that arena and this project is going to further add to that.
But I think, at the end of the day, there are now companies that many of us are forced into using you know, it's often not a choice whether you use Google or Amazon because so many third party platforms use them.
It means that the the the weight and the size of the oppressors working against the Palestinians continues to increase. And as a result, we have to increase our power, our grassroots power, against them.
Huda Ammory, Palestine Action
Can you tell us something about the apparent anti BDS clause in the project Nimbus contract?
I think when you look at what BDS stands for, which is boycott, divestment, and sanctions, against the Israeli government, to pressure them into complying with a few demands, which include ending the colonization and occupation of Palestinian territories, including lifting the blockade of Gaza, Palestinian refugees have the right to return to their homes, which they were forced out of by Israel, and for Palestinian citizens to have equal rights as their Jewish counterparts.
To have an anti BDS clause is to go against those demands which are enshrined under international law and human rights conventions, and is to further perpetuate an apartheid system.
Basically by doing this, by working with the Israeli military and government in the first place, Google and Amazon have, basically, called themselves advocates for apartheid, and worse, against the Palestinian people.
Huda Ammory, Palestine Action
What do you know about Ariel Koren, former director of marketing for Google’s educational products department, who resigned from Google over project Nimbus?
She was one of the people who objected to this activity, and there were quite a number of them, you saw a thousand people there signed that letter, quite a number of Jewish employees sent a separate letter complaining about the contract and they've raised the issue of human rights abuses.
In all the ways that you would imagine, of course, what happened was that these people were either sacked or resigned. And so there's been a huge clear out there of people who have any kind of critical view on the contract.
And of course, inside Google itself, there are a number of others who are very supportive of this contract, partly for business reasons, one would guess, but also partly there are those who are ideologically supportive of the Israeli government and that's a significant problem for Google as a corporation.
David Miller, Academic
What kind of treatment has Palestine Action received from tech companies?
Well, from the start of Palestine Action, it became very clear that not only were we fighting the battle against Elbit but we also had to find new ways to actually be able to get our word, and our message out there, which was against an Israeli Arms Company.
Within a month or two Facebook had removed us after we were rapidly growing to 20,000 followers within a month or two. That was followed by PayPal, the open collective, many more liberal platforms as well removed us and in the end, I think it's about 10 different tech companies and third party platforms which have removed Palestine Action.
Our advisor told us that we cannot use that platforms. And we actually discovered, I think, after the seventh platform removed us, that it was because Elbit's lawyers were writing to them directly and that they were scared of a lawsuit, and they were scared of going bankrupt.
So basically, Elbit Systems, Israel's largest arms firm, were blackmailing companies into removing any support for our movement. But it has consistently failed to do so. And actually the fact that they are forced into spending so much money on these lawyers to do so, I think, is a testament to the success of Palestine Action.
Huda Ammory, Palestine Action
The tech aspects of Israel's activities doesn't really get the attention it deserves, does it? How can that be combated?
Well, it's, these are these are difficult stories to explain to people, I think, who understand human rights abuses. They understand direct support for human rights abuses from Zionist organizations and their activities in this country and in the US, for example.
They try to understand the technicalities of tech, if you like, of Google, of Amazon, of Twitter, is difficult for people and also they don't see the inside of these companies.
So the fact that there are huge numbers of people who are from Israeli intelligence organizations inside the social media companies, people don't get that, they don't understand that, they don't know about that.
So I think partly, the question is how you explain this story to people, how you explain the strategy which has been used by the State of Israel to penetrate tech companies so that they will be supportive of the human rights abuses conducted by the State of Israel.
So that's the key question that needs to be raised, to how you explain to people how tech is a useful, interesting way to look at the abuses caused by the State of Israel.
David Miller, Academic
Would you say a little bit about unit 8200, which people will have heard about, and many would be totally familiar with what it is, can you just give a little bit of background briefly?
Unit 8200 is an Israeli intelligence organization. So people will be familiar with Mossad, which is like the equivalent of the CIA or MI6 in the UK, but Unit 8200 is like the GCHQ, the signals intelligence, a surveillance intelligence organization, it is part of military intelligence, it is part of the IDF and they are engaged in the huge amount of surveillance there is of Palestinians.
They attempt to surveil Palestinians, to spy on them, to gather kompromat on them, to gather information about them which can be used to blackmail them, to stop them joining the resistance, or to make them informers, there is a huge amount of activity there.
And these people are leaving this organization and going into something like Google or Twitter and that's really quite scary.
David Miller, Academic
Sir Keir Starmer, interestingly, appointed a former Unit 8200 operative to head up the Labour Party's social media activities.
Israel lobby groups, former Zionist intelligence operatives and Google
Google's integration with the Israel military has been a steady development in which several key Israeli lobby groups have played an active role.
Firstly, a group of employees within Google, which calls itself the Jubbas, have been accused of driving right wing ideologies and actively surveilling Arab and Muslim employees.
The group successfully forced Google management to apologize for a donation it gave to the movement for black lives coalition, on the basis that groups within the coalition had stated their solidarity with Palestinians.
Another key entanglement Google has had with Israeli intelligence came with the founding of a tech hub by the name Team8, the CEO and co founder is Nadav Zafrira former commander of the infamous signals intelligence unit 8200 in the Israeli military, Team8 was co founded with Eric Schmidt, who at the time was executive chairman of Google.
(Eric Schmidt speaking with Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu)
Believe it or not, in all the years that I've worked with Israel, Israeli companies, this is my first physical visit here, and I now understand why everybody was so excited about the country.
You know, it really is startup nation, and for the stuff that I do, it's like the perfect positive storm. You know, the sum of the educational system, the way the military works.
You may not appreciate how significant an advantage it gives you because you're used to it right? You know, you live it, but it's notably different from any other country. You really feel it.
Eric Schmidt, Former Google Executive
The Israel lobby group, the Anti Defamation League, is a select contributing member of YouTube's Trusted Flagger program, meaning that Google allows it to regulate content on the most used video service in the world. In a declassified FBI memo from 1969 It is questioned if the ADL "represents a violation of the foreign Agents Registration Act", due to the "extreme close ties between the ADL and Israel".
Google is also a member of the ADL- Silicon Valley anti cyber-hate working group. Another part of this integration has been the Startup Nation Central organization set up by Republican donor Paul Singer. The stated purpose of the organization is to combat BDS by feeding big tech jobs into Israel, but also by feeding Israeli workers into big tech companies.
It's through organizations like Startup Nation Central, that you have a huge mass of former Israeli intelligence agents working inside Google today. A MintPress investigation found there at least 99 former Israeli intelligence unit 8200 personnel currently working inside Google, many of them working in very sensitive positions in the company.
No doubt the Google lobby group will include them amongst their number.
Some include Gabrielle Gordell, who from 2010 to 2016 worked in Unit 8200 analyzing intelligence data to understand patterns of “hostile activists”.
Today, he's the head of strategy and operations at Google.
Jonathan Cohen was a team leader at unit 8200, but is today the head of insights, data and measurement at Google.
The list is long and dangerous. Today, Google stands as a technological weapon against Palestinian Liberation.
What do you make of the tactics of this pro Israel group within Google?
Well, it seems to be a kind of unofficial Zionist lobby group, doesn't it? And of course, as a speculation in the film, presumably many of the people who are in, or who were in, unit 8200, the Israeli intelligence organization, are part of the group and they've been involved in the surveillance of Muslim employees of Google but also, I mean, the key thing was the return of this donation to Black Lives Matter, the foundation, which is a truly extraordinary thing.
It's part of this whole idea that is promoted by the ADL, who we saw in the film there, and indeed, by similar lobby groups in the UK, like the Community Security Trust, the idea that there is only racism against the Jews, which is important. that that's the most important form of racism in our society and we must not engage with with groups like BLM, in case they have, for example, supporters of Palestine amongst their supporters, which, of course, they do.
So it's an attempt, really, to focus all attention of liberals on antisemitism as the key preeminent form of racism in society. And to make sure we don't talk about anti black racism and, certainly not, about anti Palestinian racism.
David Miller, Academic
Organizations like a Team8 and Stand up Nation Central seem to be combating BDS by feeding figures from the Israeli Intelligence Corps, Unit 8200, into big tech companies.
These outfits are relatively unknown to most people, why do you think that is?
Well, I think it's slightly similar to Alphabet in the sense that these companies don't necessarily want the attention and they don't want the attention because they are aware that if people were completely exposed to it, it would be widely condemned, and it won't be allowed to happen in the first place, and so, often these companies stray away from public attention and operate more in the shadows, because by placing unit 8200 officers into companies like Google in order to infiltrate spaces which harvest a lot of data.
You know, these are power hubs for data collection, which there have been many scandals in the past.
But now, now it means that our data, my data, or anyone else's data who works with Palestinian people, is exposed to people who have, and may continue to work on behalf of the Israeli government, in order to perpetuate its oppression against the Palestinian people.
And obviously, this is not something which you would know when you use Google, because it's so widely known as is Amazon. And that's what makes it a dangerous; an effective strategy that the Israeli military or these companies are trying to use in order to gain access to that data without people's knowledge.
Huda Ammory, Palestine Action
Tell us a little bit about the Anti Defamation League, its history, and why its relationship with YouTube is such a cause for concern?
Well, the ADL the anti Defamation League has been in existence for over a century. It started off as a branch of the B'nai B'rith, one of the key international Zionist organizations, and for very, very early on, in fact from the 1940s, from before the creation of the State of Israel, it's been engaged in spying on Arab Americans and attempted to work with the FBI to harass them and to convict them for crimes.
It's been doing this since the 1940s, and indeed, in the 80s 90s, there were court cases against it, where it revealed that it had been spying on thousands and thousands of activists, left wing and liberal activists, including anti apartheid activists in the case of South Africa, and it was actually selling data, with a quote, from his spy operations directly to the apartheid regime in South Africa.
So this is an organization which is effectively an implement, an instrument, against the left which poses as being anti racist organization. ... it's very similar, in a way, to the Community Security Trust in the UK which are similar here, spies on the left. It's worrying; because they pose as liberals they have access to, you said YouTube, but also to Twitter, Twitter safety bound to many other social media companies safety policy.
And this is the case, not just with the ADL in the US, but with the CST in the UK, with Lucre Finn In France, the Zionist organizations are able to moderate and help to moderate content on social media companies in a way that no Muslim organization, certainly no Palestinian organization, is able to do.
So there's a fundamental imbalance here, even if we could weed out the former intelligence operatives who work inside the companies, we have Zionist organizations helping them to take decisions.
David Miller, Academic
Organizations like Team8, and Start up Nation Central, seem to be combating BDS by feeding figures from the Israeli Intelligence Corps unit 8200 into big tech companies.
Yet, these outfits are relatively anonymous to most people. Why do you think that is?
The timescale says a lot that this happened, that promotion happened after the Zionist project had started, he became head of strategy in October 2022. In general, the fact that anyone who had a job for harvesting things, Palestine Activist is a bit of a strange term to use in the first place, but it shows that, and I think Ariel Koren, a former Google worker has said this, but in the past few years, it's become clear from inside Google that there is an institutional Zionist bias.
And I don't think it's a coincidence that many of these former unit 8200 officers have been entering Google in those few years at the same time. So I think we're seeing a steady increase in the fact that Google is going to be used as another tool for the Zionist project. And, in all, Israel has created an economy based on the domination of the Palestinian people.
And I think what we're seeing here in general, is these companies are trying to cash in on that colonization and oppression of the Palestinian people.
And as long as we allow that to continue we're gonna see more and more powerful big tech companies, which normal people across the world are using day to day, also cashing in on that question.
Huda Ammory, Palestine Action
What would you say is the significance of Eric Schmidt's relationship with Israel?
Well, I mean, you saw a little bit of the clip there with him with Benjamin Netanyahu from some years ago. And if you've watched the whole clip, it's really quite vomit inducing, this obsequiousness, I mean, since it seemed to Netanyahu; I'm not sure if you realized, Benjamin, just how fantastic your country is.
And specifically mentioning the military, you know, nobody in the world who's ever paid any attention to the media would be unaware of the horrific war crimes committed by the IDF. The ongoing abuses that we see on television news every night, even on the mainstream news we see these things, never mind an alternative sources.
So that is a significant issue. I mean, this the question of what he said there, but also of course, as shown in the film, that the involvement in various startup firms, amongst which are those which helped to bring people into the high tech industry, from the Israeli military, the Israeli government, and indeed even from Israeli companies.
So that attempt to bring people together from Israel into the West and vice versa, is an attempt, in the end, to increase the support for Zionism.
David Miller, Academic
Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:
www.presstv.co.uk
https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2022/12/12/694322/Israel-Military-Google-Unit-8200-Merge-
=========================
Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, Yahoo!, MySpace, eBay….By Freedom Research
[ Due to the popularity of this document we since then have added some important
images, links, texts ]
In the following document we will give an insight into the Jewish penetration of the Internet and also show the level of cooperation between leading Jewish Internet entrepreneurs and the racist Jewish Apartheid state of Israel.
The Jews – contrary to the “liberal” views they officially say they profess – in their suppressive acts practically demonstrate that they always seek to dominate the information flow, they don´t tolerate any dissent. It is just as when Israel says “Shalom” while Israel´s military at the very same time pounds its Arab neighbour states with bombs and missiles.
The Arabs have learnt the hard way the falsehood of these Jewish statements, it is now time for the rest of the non-Jewish world to get this right, and to see that the freedom of information on the Net is seriously threatened.
This document will not cover the entire field. Also, as it is timebound to an an anlysis that is from a 2009 perspective – things will change. Companies will change names, new actors will appear. But still this piece of work is unique and will give a guide into the mechanisms behind the Net, mechanisms that will continue to act even in the future. And as many of these Jewish entrepreneurs are rather young and the Internet seems to be here to stay, we will hear from them for a long time onward.
WARNING: Please note that the contents of some of the sites with revealing Jewish material we have linked to below, may be altered by the Jews in the future. Perhaps even information contrary to this document and Radio Islam will replace the original material we had linked to. This has happened before and for our part just illustrates the level of Jewish dishonesty.
https://themillenniumreport.com/2016/05/the-jewish-hand-behind-the-internet/
=========================
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
[GUSNOTE: MANY FRIENDS OF GUS ARE JEWISH. MOST OF THEM ARE HORRIFIED BY WHAT ISRAEL DOES...]