Wednesday 27th of November 2024

the majority of american christians belong to a protestant denomination or a protestant offshoot....

JD Vance will bring a unique religious perspective to former President Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, since he’s done more spiritual exploration than many politicians.

Vance, who was unveiled as Trump’s running mate on Monday, grew up believing in God but not affiliating with a faith group, attended an evangelical Christian church off and on as a teen and then entered a period of near-atheism in his twenties. He ultimately chose to join the Catholic Church as an adult.

 

BY Kelsey Dallas

 

Here’s what Vance has said about his faith over the years.

 

JD Vance’s religion

Vance, who [turned] 40 on Aug. 2, 2024, felt close to God growing up, but he wasn’t invested in organized religion, as he told the Deseret News in 2016.

His family drew comfort from Christian beliefs amid chaotic times, but rarely chose to turn to religious leaders or local churchgoers for help.

Still, Vance credits local churches, and his dad’s evangelical Christian church, in particular, with showing him that there was something better out there than the poverty, drug addiction and conflict his family was dealing with.

“Going to church showed me a lot of really positive traits that I hadn’t seen before. I saw people of different races and classes worshipping together. I saw that there were certain moral expectations from my peers of what I should do,” he told the Deseret News.

JD Vance: Faith made me believe in a hopeful future

But by the time Vance enrolled in Yale Law School in 2010, he was disengaged from church and from God.

“I would have called myself an atheist,” he told the Deseret News in 2016.

At law school, though, Vance began to have new appreciation for the power of faith. He connected with Catholics and members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and recognized that their religious beliefs were propelling them forward, not holding them back.

When he graduated from law school in 2013, Vance wasn’t committed to a specific religious community but he was curious about them again. He told the Deseret News in 2016 that he could see himself joining a faith group in the future.

“I’ve been going to church for the past year or so. Not as much as I should, but more than I have been. I’ve been thinking very seriously about converting to Catholicism,” he said.

JD Vance conversion to Catholicism

About three years after his conversation with the Deseret News, Vance did indeed get baptized and received into the Catholic Church.

Rod Dreher broke the news in August 2019 by publishing a Q&A with Vance about his faith in The American Conservative.

Vance told Dreher that Catholicism appealed to him on both an intellectual and emotional level. He enjoyed studying Catholic teachings, and also connecting with Catholic loved ones.

“When I looked at the people who meant the most to me, they were Catholic,” Vance said.

He told Dreher that past scandals in the Catholic Church, including the clergy sex abuse crisis, delayed his conversion decision. Ultimately, he decided that he needed to take a “longer view” on religious institutions.

“The hope of the Christian faith is not rooted in any short-term conquest of the material world, but in the fact that it is true, and over the long term, with various fits and starts, things will work out,” Vance said.

Vance’s bio on X reads, “Christian, husband, dad. U.S. Senator for Ohio.”

Does faith inform JD Vance’s politics?

If Trump and Vance win in November, Vance would become only the second Catholic vice president in U.S. history, according to the National Catholic Register. The first was President Joe Biden, who served as vice president under former President Barack Obama.

Vance has said in the past that, even before he joined the Catholic Church, he shared many policy goals with Catholics. He told Dreher in 2019 that he wanted to be known for promoting the common good.

“I hope my faith makes me more compassionate and to identify with people who are struggling,” he said.

But since being sworn in as a U.S. senator in January 2023, Vance has angered some more conservative Catholics, especially when it comes to abortion.

Like Trump, he does not support a federal abortion ban, and instead says abortion policy should be left up to individual states.

Earlier this month, he again echoed Trump by expressing support for allowing abortion pills to remain widely accessible.

C.J. Doyle, executive director of the Catholic Action League of Massachusetts, criticized Vance’s recent comments in an interview with the National Catholic Register.

“Vance has no principles, at least none that aren’t for sale, and the asking price is cheap,” he said.

But Vance is far from the first Catholic politician to be out of step with the Catholic Church’s teachings on abortion, which state that life begins at conception and that any “procured abortion” is a moral evil, according to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Biden, who attends Catholic worship services regularly and who carries rosary beads with him, is personally troubled by abortion, but has spoken repeatedly during his time as president about the importance of protecting abortion rights, according to NBC News.

 

 

https://www.deseret.com/faith/2024/07/15/jd-vance-religion/

 

 

 

-------------------

 

Tim Walz’s religion

Beyond making jokes about Minnesota Lutherans, Walz doesn’t say much about his faith during media appearances.

On social media, he’s referenced attending Pilgrim Lutheran Church in St. Paul, but the references are few and far between.

Pilgrim Lutheran Church is part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, a mainline Protestant denomination that’s theologically liberal compared to other Lutheran denominations active in the U.S., such as the Missouri Synod Lutheran Church.

The church’s website highlights its effort to build an “inclusive Christian worshipping community,” and lists “living sustainably” and “doing justice” among the congregation’s core values.

 

 

https://www.deseret.com/faith/2024/08/06/tim-walz-religion/

 

------------------

 

Does Vice President Kamala Harris support religious freedom for all?

The answer depends on how you define religious freedom — and which Americans you’re most worried about.

To some, she seems unwilling to address the concerns of theologically conservative believers and quick to abandon religious freedom when it interferes with her other values, such as abortion access or LGBTQ rights.

To others, Harris appears well-positioned to try to strike a balance between religious freedom and other civil rights.

These views are shaped not only by Harris’ campaign speeches and political record, but also by an ongoing battle between conservatives and liberals over religion’s place in American life.

While Harris won’t be able to resolve that battle by Election Day, religion experts from different faith groups and political parties are hopeful that, by speaking about her unique religious background, Harris will help voters see the value of religious freedom in a new way.

“I don’t think we’ve ever before had a candidate who has navigated various religious spaces and celebrated those various spaces in such an intimate way as the vice president,” said the Rev. Paul Brandeis Raushenbush, president of Interfaith Alliance.

 

Kamala Harris and religion

As the Rev. Raushenbush noted, Harris has a deep familiarity with a variety of faiths.

Harris’ mother, Shyamala Gopalan, grew up in India and taught her about Hinduism. Her father, Donald Harris, connected her to Christianity, and she identifies as a Baptist today.

Harris’ husband, Douglas Emhoff, is Jewish, and has led efforts to combat antisemitism during his time as second gentleman.

Harris’ boss, President Joe Biden, is Catholic, and speaks regularly about his faith.

All of these connections help Harris put a spotlight on and celebrate religious diversity at a time when some Americans are growing increasingly hostile to non-Christian religions, said Nathan Finn, senior fellow on religious liberty with the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission.

“There are socially conservative believers who can be wrong-headed about religious liberty,” he said. “Maybe they think it’s OK to have a state church or maybe there are particular religious beliefs that they think are so wrong people shouldn’t have the freedom to believe it.”

It’s a unique moment in American history, and Harris is a unique candidate, Finn added.

“She represents a religious pluralism that ought to be amenable to religious freedom,” he said.

Harris’ past comments on religion

But supporting religious freedom is about more than supporting Americans’ right to believe whatever they want to believe.

It also involves supporting their efforts to live according to those beliefs in the public square, and it’s on this measure that Harris falls short for some religious voters, Finn said.

“I think it would be fair to say that many religious conservatives find Kamala Harris’ beliefs about religious freedom troubling,” he said.

Finn clarified that this discomfort doesn’t just stem from her support for abortion access or from what she believes about gender and sexuality, which can fuel faith-related legal conflicts.

“She believes what you’d expert her to believe as a political progressive about those issues. There are no surprises there,” he said.

But there are surprises, at least according to Finn and some of the religious conservatives in his personal and professional circles, in Harris’ past comments and policy moves related to religious individuals and organizations.

“She has been an unusually vocal proponent of the sort of legislation that causes those who are committed to religious freedom for all to be nervous and to think that she might not be as committed to that constitutional principle as I’m sure she would say she is,” Finn said.

For example, as a senator, Harris sponsored the Do No Harm Act, a bill that would limit the application of federal religious freedom protections. She argued that the bill was necessary in order to prevent people from using those protections as a license to discriminate.

“That First Amendment guarantee (of religious freedom) should never be used to undermine other Americans’ civil rights or subject them to discrimination on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation or gender identity,” Harris said in a 2019 statement about the Do No Harm Act, per NBC News.

Finn is among those who reject Harris’ characterization of the bill and instead believe it’s a threat to religious liberty. The Do No Harm Act “would make it harder for many institutions to maintain their religious identity,” wrote Michael Gerson in a column for The Washington Post in 2020 after Biden chose Harris as his running mate.

Gerson’s overall argument in that column was that Harris would exacerbate religious voters’ concerns about the Biden campaign instead of easing them. He noted that she had been accused in the past of applying a religious test to judicial nominees and of equating conservative faith groups with hate groups.

Finn echoed Gerson’s concerns in his interview with the Deseret News, arguing that Harris’ support for religious freedom weakens when it comes up against other socially progressive causes that she cares about.

“At times, its seems to me that her convictions about socially progressive issues inform the way she thinks about religious liberty rather than her seeing religious liberty as a constitutional right that ought to be defended regardless of what somebody believes,” he said.

Competing ideas about religious freedom

Although Finn’s views on Harris likely resonate with many voters, they’re not held by all people of faith.

Some religious people support Harris’ past work on religious freedom, including her sponsorship of the Do No Harm Act, the Rev. Raushenbush said.

They believe she’s embraced a faith-based call to care for others, not a mission to drive religion from the public square.

“Many of us working in religious freedom space feel strongly about its value but don’t want religious freedom to be used to harm others,” the Rev. Raushenbush said.

He added that the Do No Harm Act “is a perfect example of how she has taken a stand on religious freedom in an appropriate, measured way.”

Harris won’t be able to bridge the gap between competing views of religious freedom over the new few months, and it’s still unclear if she’ll try.

What is clear is that Harris’ candidacy brings ongoing conflict over the true meaning of religious freedom into sharp relief.

“That’s the question that needs to be answered in regards to any candidate — what are they talking about when they’re talking about religious freedom?” the Rev. Raushenbush said.

https://www.deseret.com/faith/2024/08/02/kamala-harris-beliefs-about-religious-freedom/

Kelsey Dallas

———————-

 

 

Trump Becomes the First President Since Eisenhower to Change Faiths in Office

Like many Christians switching churches, he now identifies as nondenominational

 

More than 180,000 people have stopped identifying with the Presbyterian Church (USA) in the past four years, according to official church numbers. Now there’s one more: President Donald Trump.

Trump told Religion News Service last week in a written interview mediated by spiritual advisor Paula White-Cain that he doesn’t consider himself to be Presbyterian. He was confirmed in the church and has called himself Presbyterian numerous times over the years. But no more.

“I now consider myself to be a non-denominational Christian,” Trump said in the statement. “Melania and I have gotten to visit some amazing churches and meet with great faith leaders from around the world. During the unprecedented COVID-19 outbreak, I tuned into several virtual church services and know that millions of Americans did the same.”

While the mainline denomination has previously challenged Trump’s affiliation, his recent departure seems to be the result of the president slowly moving away from his childhood church and toward a more evangelical faith.

Trump was not a regular churchgoer before he was elected president. He attended Norman Vincent Peale’s church for a while and praises Peale’s book The Power of Positive Thinking. He has also attended Episcopal churches for several Christmas and Easter services. In 2016, he was described by one prominent evangelical supporter as a “baby Christian.”

Since moving to the White House, however, he has visited many different churches, mostly evangelical and Pentecostal. He has met with numerous ministers, been prayed over, and sought the advice of spiritual counselors like White-Cain, a Florida televangelist often associated with the prosperity gospel, who took a position as the Trump administration’s faith outreach coordinator last year. City of Destiny, the church White-Cain founded in Florida, is nondenominational.

Most Americans don’t think Trump has strong religious beliefs, according to the nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute poll. Roughly 40 percent say the president “is mostly using religion for political purposes.” White evangelicals who vote Republican see things differently: Fifty-nine percent say Trump has strong religious beliefs.

In some ways, Trump’s decision to disassociate with a mainline denomination is also part of a larger cultural trend. Many Americans have done the same. In 1975, nearly a third of Americans identified with a mainline denomination. Today, that has dropped to a little more than 10 percent.

The Presbyterian Church (USA) has declined from 3.1 million members in 1984 to about 1.3 million today. Membership has dropped by an average of 4.5 percent every year that Trump has been president.

Changing religious identification is also common in the United States. Social scientists call this “switching.” This includes dramatic conversions, like when someone has a born-again experience, but also more subtle changes, like when someone moves to a new town and decides to try the local Baptist church instead of another Methodist congregation.

Religious switching seems to happen more often when there are a lot of choices—like there are in the United States. And it seems to happen more when people take religion very seriously and think it’s an important and distinctive part of their personal identity—like they do in the US.

In the three-wave Cooperative Congressional Election Study—which surveyed the same individuals in 2010, 2012, and 2014—1 out of every 6 Christians changed their religious identification over four years. Some stopped identifying as Christians and either called themselves “none” or “nothing in particular.” But about 16 percent changed denomination, including about 20 percent of Presbyterians, who stopped calling themselves Presbyterian and started calling themselves something else—often “nondenominational.”

Of course, most Americans are not the president. It is highly unusual for the chief executive to change religious identification in office. The last time it happened, Trump was six years old.

Dwight Eisenhower was baptized the second Sunday he was in the White House, in January 1953. He was joining the group that Trump is now leaving: the Presbyterians.

Eisenhower, like Trump, was not particularly religious before his election. He was raised in a small Anabaptist denomination, which he left when he went to military school. His parents later joined the Bible Students, a group that became the Jehovah’s Witnesses. When he was running for office in 1952, the World War II hero’s lack of a denomination became an issue. He was called “a man without a church and without a faith.”

One of his spiritual advisors, the evangelist Billy Graham, encouraged Eisenhower to set an example for the nation by joining a church, and recommended he become a Presbyterian. Though Graham was a Baptist, he worked across denominational lines, knew the Presbyterian minister in Washington, DC, and thought Eisenhower would feel comfortable at the orderly, formal Sunday service.

Eisenhower originally resisted the idea, according to historian Gary Scott Smith, thinking the move would just look cynical and political. He felt his faith was private.

He was convinced when one of his staff asked him to think about the nation’s children, yanked out of bed every Sunday to go to church, complaining that they shouldn’t have to go if the president of the United States didn’t have to go. The president should set a good religious example.

Eisenhower made it a priority in his administration to promote belief in God and religion, in very general terms. He saw religion as a spiritual resource in the Cold War conflict with Communism. He added “under God” to the Pledge of Allegiance and promoted the National Day of Prayer. He spoke frequently about the importance of “a deeply felt religious faith”—most famously when he said, “Our form of government has no sense unless it is founded in a deeply felt religious faith, and I don’t care what it is.”

Most Americans came to see Eisenhower as a very religious president, though some critiqued him for being specific about his faith. He seemed to promote a generic American religion, which had nothing to do with Jesus or any particulars about God or any theological content. He seemed to have, one person said, “a very fervent believer in a very vague religion.”

Today, when the Cold War struggle has been replaced by culture war conflicts, critics see Trump’s move from Presbyterian to nondenominational Christian in the opposite light: It’s too specific. Instead of trying to represent all Americans with platitudes about “deeply felt faith,” they claim Trump is making a political move, identifying with the religious voters he needs at the polls.

https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2020/october/trump-nondenominational-presbyterian-religious-eisenhower.html

 

Gus Leonisky, political cartoonist since 1951, is a fierce atheist. 

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

GUSNOTES:

The Deseret News (/ˌdɛzəˈrɛt/ )[3] is a multi-platform newspaper based in Salt Lake City, published by Deseret News Publishing Company, a subsidiary of Deseret Management Corporation, which is owned by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.[4] Founded in 1850, it was the first newspaper to be published in Utah.[5] The publication's name is from the geographic area of Deseret identified by Utah's pioneer settlers, and much of the publication's reporting is rooted in that region.[6][7]

On January 1, 2021, the newspaper switched from a daily to a weekly print format while continuing to publish daily on the website and Deseret News app.[8] As of 2024, Deseret Newsdevelops daily content for its website and apps, in addition to twice weekly print editions of the Deseret News Local Edition and a weekly edition of the Church News and Deseret NewsNational Edition. The company also publishes 10 editions of Deseret Magazine per year.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deseret_News

 

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believes in the sanctity of human life. Therefore, the Church opposes elective abortion for personal or social convenience, and counsels its members not to submit to, perform, encourage, pay for, or arrange for such abortions.

The Church allows for possible exceptions for its members when:

  • Pregnancy results from rape or incest, or
  • A competent physician determines that the life or health of the mother is in serious jeopardy, or
  • A competent physician determines that the fetus has severe defects that will not allow the baby to survive beyond birth.

Even these exceptions do not automatically justify abortion. Abortion is a most serious matter. It should be considered only after the persons responsible have received confirmation through prayer. Members may counsel with their bishops as part of this process.

The Church’s position on this matter remains unchanged. As states work to enact laws related to abortion, Church members may appropriately choose to participate in efforts to protect life and to preserve religious liberty.

https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/official-statement/abortion

 

SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2meFZBABjE

Gutfeld: Dems are trying to cover this fact up

 

SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYPaMB6l10E

warmonger tim....

Vice President Kamala Harris’s new running mate, Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN), has a reputation as a “reliable friend” to Ukraine, according to Ukrainian officials.

“It’s a good sign for us,” Oleksandr Merezhko, Ukrainian foreign affairs chairman, told the Washington Examiner. “Of course, we don’t know whether or not he will become the vice president because, you know, this political struggle is very close, and again, it’s becoming interesting and unpredictable.”

Merezhko and other Ukrainian officials have become avid American political news followers, given the importance of U.S. military assistance in continuing Ukraine’s ability to fight against Russia’s full-scale invasion. And Walz has found ways to cultivate relationships with them, even as a governor.

“Gov. Walz is definitely one of the leaders of such support and a reliable friend of our country,” Ukrainian Ambassador Oksana Markarova told a Ukrainian outlet Tuesday. “When I visited Minnesota in December … the governor and I met with the Farm Bureau and actually joined him in convincing them of how important Ukraine’s victory is to the U.S. national interest.”

And in February, Walz signed an agreement with Markarova to establish a partnership between the state of Minnesota and Chernihiv Oblast, a region near Kyiv.

“He is very pro-Ukrainian and our press and our people, they view him as a friend, as a true friend of Ukraine,” Merezhko said.

The presidential election has put Ukrainian officials in a tricky diplomatic position, given the divergent rhetorical postures of the Republican and Democratic tickets. Harris and President Joe Biden have maintained a very supportive tone throughout the full-scale war despite their policy of doling out aid by degrees or imposing restrictions on the use of American weapons against military targets inside Russia. 

Former President Donald Trump and his running mate, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH), have downplayed the relevance of the conflict to U.S. interests and signaled their desire for a quick end to the war — a prospect that worries many Ukrainians, who fear that such a scenario would amount to a victory for Russia. Yet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s team has been reaching out to Trump and his allies in recent months, which included what Trump described as “a very good phone call” with Zelensky after the Republican standard-bearer survived an assassination attempt at a rally in Pennsylvania.

“The fact that Trump described this as a good call means his animus against Zelensky is old news,” former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, John Herbst, told Politico. “It’s why the populist wing of the party was against Ukraine. If Trump is not there, then they’re not there.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/foreign-policy/3114458/ukraine-sees-walz-reliable-friend-against-russia/

 

READ FROM TOP

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

SEE ALSO: 

PEACE..........

woke tim....

 

The woke zealotry of Tim Walz
Kamala Harris’s VP pick confirms that the Democrats are beyond saving.

 

BY JENNY HOLLAND

 

Now that US vice-president and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has picked her running mate, the true nature of the 2024 election has come into sharp focus. When Americans walk into their voting booths this November, they will see the names Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, Donald Trump and JD Vance. But woke ideology and its resultant policies are really what are on the ballot.

Any hopes that the Democrats would tone down on woke, or cater to independents even a little bit, disappeared on Tuesday with the announcement that Governor Walz of Minnesota would be Harris’s running mate. Walz has for the past five years presided over a once-moderate state, which has now become a byword for ideological capture.

A more obvious bait-and-switch has perhaps never been played in American politics. Walz may have humble, centrist roots. But since ascending the ranks of power in the Minnesota Democratic establishment, he has fully embraced the kind of woke policies that have alienated working-class voters across America.

Walz is a zealot of gender ideology. He made Minnesota a ‘safe haven’ for the medical transitioning of children. He signed a bill into law last year that allows the state to take custody of children whose parents refuse permission for their child to receive ‘gender-affirming care’ – that is, harmful experimental drugs and surgeries. As of this year, menstrual products must now be put in the boys’ bathrooms in all public schools, as per a law he championed. Tampons and sanitary towels must be available to all ‘menstruating students’, regardless of their gender, above the age of nine, the bill states.

Walz has also gone hard on racial identity politics. During the Covid-19 crisis in 2021, as concerns over medicine scarcity raged, he backed a ‘weighted lottery’ approach to giving out monoclonal antibodies that prioritised not just health concerns, but also a patient’s race.

Of course, after his selection, the mainstream media’s narrative machine immediately jumped into overdrive to paint Walz as ‘kind’ and ‘folksy’ – just your average Joe with the common touch, as befits a football-coaching dad from the American heartland. John King of CNN described him as ‘a small-town Midwesterner’ who ‘won a Republican House seat and held it, in very difficult years for Democrats’. ‘He has that small town, rural appeal’, King insisted.

Having Walz on the Democratic ticket was a show of ‘love versus hate’, according to Mika Brzezinski on Morning Joe, who described him as a man ‘with an authentic touch that could really break through’. ‘Very, very, positive’, intoned her husband, Joe Scarborough. Elsewhere on MSNBC, Pete Buttigieg claimed that Harris ‘has found an extraordinary partner, who has brought that joy immediately to the campaign trail’.

At Harris and Walz’s first rally together in Philadelphia last night, Kamala projected total faith in being on the right side of history. ‘We are the underdogs in this race’, she said. ‘We will govern on behalf of all Americans.’ That seems unlikely.

For an American populace still reeling four years after the politically motivated riots that started in Walz’s home state, following the death of George Floyd at the hands of police, Harris’s VP pick feels like a smack in the face. In the aftermath of Floyd’s death in May 2020, Minneapolis became a flash point for the radical ‘defund the police’ movement. Three years later, even the New York Times admitted the experiment was a ‘failure’. ‘Violent crime soared’, wrote Ernesto Londoño in the Times in 2023. ‘Many residents have given up on the local public-transportation system, where some stations increasingly have become gathering points for people who openly smoke fentanyl and other drugs.’ Walz, while not directly responsible for Minneapolis’s policing, hired defund-the-police activists to the state’s sentencing commission.

Pay no attention to the Democrats’ paeans to fighting for the poor and oppressed. Just like every other woke policy, the ones overseen by Walz in Minnesota have harmed the very people he claims to fight for.

Take education. According to figures from 2022, Minnesota has ‘one of the largest education-achievement gaps between black and white students in the country’, notes one African-American journalist based in St Paul, the state’s capital. ‘Just 31 per cent of black students are proficient in reading compared to 59 per cent of white students. In addition, just 20 per cent of black students are proficient in math in comparison to 54 per cent of their white counterparts’, he adds. This is despite – or more likely, because of – the state’s enthusiasm for embedding the ‘diversity, equity and inclusion’ agenda into schools.

Much has been made about Walz’s star turn a few weeks ago, when he called the Trump-Vance ticket ‘weird’. The banal jibe went viral. Many commentators say that this quip was what made Harris ultimately decide in Walz’s favour, instead of the popular and centrist Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro. Given that the Harris campaign has thus far operated mostly on vibes, I find it quite plausible that the Democrats would go with a man who brings no electoral advantage, but who simply said something that caught the attention of people online. However, picking Walz over Shapiro betrays a more sinister impulse as well – it also speaks to the Democrats’ abandonment of American Jews.

Shapiro has high approval ratings, at just over 60 per cent overall and over 40 per cent among registered Republicans, in his own battleground state. He would have given the campaign a crucial edge in that all-important Electoral College vote. But he is an observant Jew who in the past has spoken out in defence of Israel and against anti-Semitism. This means he was the focus of ire from some pro-Palestine activists who campaigned to keep him off the ticket. As the New York Times wrote at the beginning of the month, this meant Harris was faced with a significant choice: ‘Should she take the opportunity to stand up to her far-left flank in an appeal to the centre of the party and to independents, or should she shy away from inflaming an issue that has divided and bedevilled the party – Israel’s war in Gaza?’

Well, Harris has made her choice: she has sided with the Hamas-loving, kid-transing wing of the Democratic Party. The battle lines have now been firmly and clearly drawn. Americans will face a stark choice this November.

Jenny Holland is a former newspaper reporter and speechwriter. Visit her Substack here.

 

https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/08/07/the-woke-zealotry-of-tim-walz/

 

READ FROM TOP

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

embellished past....

 

Paid letter: The Truth About Tim Walz

 

Tim Walz has embellished and selectively omitted facts and circumstances of his military career for years. 

We, retired Command Sergeants Major of the Minnesota National Guard, feel it is our duty and responsibility to bring forth the truth as we know it concerning his service record. So, we have put together a timeline of his service post 9/11. To the best of our knowledge, this information is completely true, having been verified by all those who served in positions with first hand knowledge of the facts and circumstances of his service and departure from the Minnesota National Guard. Many of the dates and time frames are from his official discharge document and the reduction order reducing him to Master Sergeant. 

On September 18th, 2001 Tim Walz reenlisted in the Minnesota Army National Guard for six years. 

In early 2003 he was selected to attend the United States Army Sergeants Major Academy. The non-resident course consists of two years of correspondence coursework, followed by a two-week resident phase at Fort Bliss, Texas. When a Senior Non-Commissioned Officer accepts enrollment in the course, they accept three stipulations. First, they will serve for two years after graduation from the academy, or promotion to Sergeant Major or Command Sergeant Major, whichever is later. Second, if they fail the course they may be separated from the military. Third, they will complete the course or be reduced to Master Sergeant without board action. Senior Non-Commissioned Officers initial and sign a Statement of Agreement and Certification upon enrollment. The State Command Sergeant Major or Army National Guard Command Sergeant Major counsels the soldier and certifies that the senior Non-Commissioned Officer understands their responsibilities. These stipulations are put in place because the academy is a college level school, the military invests a lot of taxpayer money in the student. The military needs to ensure they will get the return on investment that the taxpayers deserve. 

In late summer of 2003, First Sergeant Walz deployed with the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion in support of Operation Enduring Freedom to Italy. The mission was to augment United States Air Force Europe Security Forces doing base security for six months. In no way were the units or Soldiers of the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion replacing any units or military forces so they could deploy to Iraq or Afghanistan. 

After the units return to Minnesota in the spring of 2004, he was selected by high level Command Sergeants Major to serve in the position of the Command Sergeant Major of the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion. 

On August 5th, 2004 he was photographed holding a sign at a protest outside a President Bush campaign rally in southern Minnesota. 

On September 17th, 2004 he was conditionally promoted to Command Sergeant Major. The conditions had been outlined to him when he was counseled and he signed the Statement of Agreement and Certification. If the conditions are not met, the promotion is null and void, like it never happened. 

In early 2005, a warning order was issued to the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion, which included the position he was serving in, to prepare to be mobilized for active duty for a deployment to Iraq. 

On May 16th, 2005 he quit, leaving the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion and its Soldiers hanging; without its senior Non-Commissioned Officer, as the battalion prepared for war. His excuse to other leaders was that he needed to retire in order to run for congress. Which is false, according to a Department of Defense Directive, he could have run and requested permission from the Secretary of Defense before entering active duty; as many reservists have. If he had retired normally and respectfully, you would think he would have ensured his retirement documents were correctly filled out and signed, and that he would have ensured he was reduced to Master Sergeant for dropping out of the academy. Instead he waited for the paperwork to catch up to him. His official retirement document states, SOLDIER NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE. 

On September 10th, 2005 conditionally promoted Command Sergeant Major Walz was reduced to Master Sergeant. It took a while for the system to catch up to him as it was uncharted territory, literally no one quits in the position he was in, or drops out of the academy. Except him. 

In November of 2005, while the battalion trained for war at Camp Shelby, Mississippi, it received an offer from retired Master Sergeant Walz. He offered to fund raise for the battalions bus trip home over Christmas that year. 

The 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion was deployed for 22 months in 2006 - 2007. During this time, they were restricted by Army regulations and could not speak out against a candidate for office. In November 2006 he was elected to the House of Representatives. He claims to be the highest-ranking enlisted service member ever to serve in congress. Even though he was conditionally promoted to Command Sergeant Major less than eight months, quit before his obligations were met, and was reduced to Master Sergeant for retirement. Yes, he served at that rank, but was never qualified at that rank, and will receive retirement benefits at one rank below. You be the judge. 

On November 1st, 2006, Tom Hagen, Iraq War Veteran, wrote a letter to the editor of the Winona Daily News. Here are a couple of sentences from the letter: But even more disturbing is the fact that Walz quickly retired after learning that his unit -southern Minnesota's 1-125 FA Battalion - would be sent to Iraq. For Tim Walz to abandon his fellow soldiers and quit when they needed experienced leadership most is disheartening. 

Here is part of Tim Walzs response: After completing 20 years of service in 2001, I re-enlisted to serve our country for an additional four years following Sept. 11 and retired the year before my battalion was deployed to Iraq in order to run for Congress. 

According to his official Report of Separation and Record of Service, he re-enlisted for six years on September 18th, 2001. However, in his response he says that he re-enlisted for four years, conveniently retiring a year before his battalion was deployed to Iraq. Even if he had re-enlisted for four years following Sept.11, his retirement date would have been September 18th, 2005. Why then did he "retire" on May 16th, 2005, before his supposed four-year enlistment was up? And he makes it sound like he "retired" a year before his battalion deployed to Iraq; when in reality he knew when he "retired" that the battalion would be deployed to Iraq. 

The bottom line in all of this is gut wrenching and sad to explain. When the nation called, he quit. He failed to complete the United States Army Sergeants Major Academy. He failed to serve for two years following completion of the academy, which he dropped out of. He failed to serve two years after the conditional promotion to Command Sergeant Major. He failed to fulfill the full six years of the enlistment he signed on September 18th, 2001. He failed his country. He failed his state. He failed the Minnesota Army National Guard, the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion, and his fellow Soldiers. And he failed to lead by example. Shameful. 

 

Thomas Behrends, Command Sergeant Major (Retired) 

Paul Herr, Command Sergeant Major (Retired)

 

https://www.wctrib.com/community/letters/the-truth-about-tim-walz

 

WE HAVE NO WAY TO VERIFY THIS INFORMATION BUT BELIEVE IT IS CORRECT....

 

READ FROM TOP

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

godly god....

“You shall have no other gods before me.”—The Ten Commandments

“Christians, get out and vote, just this time. You won’t have to do it anymore. Four more years, you know what, it will be fixed, it will be fine, you won’t have to vote anymore.”—Donald Trump

Politics has become our national religion.

 

American Theocracy: Politics Has Become Our National Religion

    by 

 

While those on the Left have feared a religious coup by evangelical Christians on the Right, the danger has come from an altogether different direction: our constitutional republic has given way to a theocracy structured around the worship of a political savior.

For all intents and purposes, politics has become America’s God.

Pay close attention to the political conventions for presidential candidates, and it becomes immediately evident that Americans have allowed themselves to be brainwashed into worshipping a political idol manufactured by the Deep State.

In a carefully choreographed scheme to strip the American citizenry of our power and our rights, “we the people” have become victims of the Deep State’s confidence game.

Every confidence game has six essential stages: 1) the foundation to lay the groundwork for the illusion; 2) the approach whereby the victim is contacted; 3) the build-up to make the victim feel like they’ve got a vested interest in the outcome; 4) the corroboration (aided by third-party conspirators) to legitimize that the scammers are, in fact, on the up-and-up; 5) the pay-off, in which the victim gets to experience some small early “wins”; and 6) the “hurrah”— a sudden manufactured crisis or change of events that creates a sense of urgency. 

In this particular con game, every candidate dangled before us as some form of political savior—including Donald Trump and Kamala Harris—is part of a long-running, elaborate scam intended to persuade us that, despite all appearances to the contrary, we live in a constitutional republic.

In this way, the voters are the dupes, the candidates are the shills, and as usual, it’s the Deep State rigging the outcome.

Terrorist attacks, pandemics, economic uncertainty, national security threats, civil unrest: these are all manipulated crises that add to the sense of urgency and help us feel invested in the outcome of the various elections, but it doesn’t change much in the long term.

No matter who wins this election, we’ll all still be prisoners of the Deep State.

Indeed, the history of the United States is a testament to the old adage that liberty decreases as government (and government bureaucracy) grows. To put it another way, as government expands, liberty contracts.

When it comes to the power players that call the shots, there is no end to their voracious appetite for more: more money, more power, more control. Thus, since 9/11, the government’s answer to every problem has been more government and less freedom.

Yet despite what some may think, the Constitution is no magical incantation against government wrongdoing. Indeed, it’s only as effective as those who abide by it.

However, without courts willing to uphold the Constitution’s provisions when government officials disregard it and a citizenry knowledgeable enough to be outraged when those provisions are undermined, the Constitution provides little to no protection against SWAT team raids, domestic surveillance, police shootings of unarmed citizens, indefinite detentions, and the like.

Unfortunately, the courts and the police have meshed in their thinking to such an extent that anything goes when it’s done in the name of national security, crime fighting and terrorism.

Consequently, America no longer operates under a system of justice characterized by due process, an assumption of innocence, probable cause and clear prohibitions on government overreach and police abuse. Instead, our courts of justice have been transformed into courts of order, advocating for the government’s interests, rather than championing the rights of the citizenry, as enshrined in the Constitution.

The rule of law, the U.S. Constitution, once the map by which we navigated sometimes hostile government terrain, has been unceremoniously booted out of the runaway car that is the U.S. government by the Deep State.

What we are dealing with is a rogue government whose policies are dictated more by greed than need. Making matters worse, “we the people” have become so gullible, so easily distracted, and so out-of-touch that we have ignored the warning signs all around us in favor of political expediency in the form of electoral saviors.

Yet it’s not just Americans who have given themselves over to political gods, however.

Evangelical Christians, seduced by electoral promises of power and religious domination, have become yet another tool in the politician’s toolbox.

For instance, repeatedly conned into believing that Republican candidates from George W. Bush to Donald Trump will save the church, evangelical Christians have turned the ballot box into a referendum on morality. Yet in doing so, they have shown themselves to be as willing to support totalitarian tactics as those on the Left.

This was exactly what theologian Francis Schaeffer warned against: “We must not confuse the Kingdom of God with our country. To say it another way, ‘We should not wrap Christianity in our national flag.’”

Equating religion and politics, and allowing the ends to justify the means, only empowers tyrants and lays the groundwork for totalitarianism.

This way lies madness and the certain loss of our freedoms.

If you must vote, vote, but don’t make the mistake of consecrating the ballot box.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, it doesn’t matter what religion a particular candidate claims to subscribe to: all politicians answer to their own higher power, which is the Deep State.

Reprinted from The Rutherford Institute.

https://ronpaulinstitute.org/american-theocracy-politics-has-become-our-national-religion/

 

READ FROM TOP

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.