Search
Recent comments
- murky and foggy....
1 hour 53 min ago - the deal is.....
2 hours 32 min ago - opinions...
4 hours 35 min ago - reduced to rubble?....
6 hours 20 min ago - bregret.....
6 hours 35 min ago - troubles ahead....
15 hours 14 min ago - the most dangerous man ever......
15 hours 34 min ago - starvation as a weapon....
18 hours 18 min ago - war business....
18 hours 59 min ago - day one....
20 hours 41 min ago
Democracy Links
Member's Off-site Blogs
does dutton admit that global warming is REAL?.....
Why Dutton is going nuclear
The opposition leader thinks he can sell nuclear power to the public. The energy industry remains unconvinced by the business case.
BY Jennifer Hewett
Peter Dutton believes he has found a politically saleable energy formula. It includes the now familiar condemnation of Labor’s “reckless” policy and warnings of catastrophic consequences in making power “exorbitantly expensive and the grid unreliable”. The shiny new element is the Coalition’s commitment to establishing nuclear power.
https://www.afr.com/business-summit/why-dutton-is-going-nuclear-20240312-p5fbs1
REMEMBER:
an illegal operation by the ecuadorian government, by the USA and by the UK — and by Australia...
- By Gus Leonisky at 18 Mar 2024 - 11:19am
- Gus Leonisky's blog
- Login or register to post comments
duttonic power....
Douglas Hilton says he will ‘staunchly defend’ scientists as opposition leader repeats incorrect claim that CSIRO report does not accurately represent cost of renewables
Australia’s science agency, CSIRO, has rejected Peter Dutton’s claim its estimates of the cost of renewables are unreliable.
CSIRO chief executive, Douglas Hilton, has warned that maintaining trust “requires our political leaders to resist the temptation to disparage science”, rejecting Dutton’s comments about its GenCost report.
But the opposition leader has doubled down, repeating his incorrect claim on Friday that the report does not properly cost renewables and transmission required to integrate them into the grid.
On Tuesday, Dutton claimed the annual CSIRO report that had included estimates of costs for small modular reactors – which are not yet available commercially – was “discredited” because it “doesn’t take into account some of the transmission costs, the costs around subsidies for the renewables”.
Despite Dutton’s claim, the most recent GenCost report does include the cost of integrating renewables such as solar and wind into the electricity grid. That is, it includes the cost of building new transmission lines and energy storage such as batteries.
On Friday Hilton said that he would “staunchly defend our scientists and our organisation against unfounded criticism”
“The GenCost report is updated each year and provides the very best estimates for the cost of future new-build electricity generation in Australia,” he said in a statement.
“The report is carefully produced, its methodology is clearly articulated, our scientists are open and responsive to feedback, and as is the case for all creditable science, the report is updated regularly as new data comes to hand.
“The GenCost report can be trusted by all our elected representatives, irrespective of whether they are advocating for electricity generation by renewables, coal, gas or nuclear energy.”
The most recent GenCost report estimates a theoretical small modular reactor built in 2030 would cost $382 to $636 per megawatt hour. It says this is much more expensive than solar and wind, which it puts at between $91 and $130 per MWh even once integration costs are included.
Hilton said that “science is crucial to providing the data and models that allow society to tackle profound challenges … like the Covid-19 pandemic, transition to net zero, keeping Australian industry productive and sustainable, and protecting our unique biodiversity”.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/mar/15/csiro-peter-dutton-gencost-report-nuclear-energy-renewables-cost
READ FROM TOP
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....