Friday 29th of November 2024
Home » Blogs » Gus Leonisky's blog

what's coming next.....

let’s be serious for a moment…

RUSSIA HAS HAD THE MORAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE RUSSIANS IN UKRAINE. Until 24 February 2022, the deal was simple: NO NATO IN UKRAINE AND THE DONBASS (Russian) REPUBLICS WERE TO BE AUTONOMOUS IN UKRAINE. CRIMEA, RETAKEN BY RUSSIA IN 2014, WAS NON-NEGOTIABLE. THE NAZIS IN KIEV COULD HAVE BEEN TOLERATED TO A POINT…

Simple.

 

The same offer was made till the peace agreement of March/April 2022 which Boris Johnson sunk by telling Kiev’s merchant of death, Julius Volodymyr Zelensky, that the West/NATO would support him, if he reneged on the deal…

 

The West and Zelensky went for war — TO DESTROY RUSSIA…

 

Russia had two choices: give up the Donbass, let NATO come to its border — or fight back.

 

The rest is history….

 

Within a few months, the sad reality of this ongoing stubbornness of the West will hopefully (Gus deludes himself here) sink in in the morons’ brain at the Pentagon/WhiteShitHouse: Russia is not going to let itself be defeated AND RUSSIA CANNOT BE DEFEATED. So what’s coming next?

  1. Ukraine makes a deal. The deal has to be in favour of the Russians BECAUSE they are winning this military conflict 100 to one, while the West bullshits with SELF-wanking propaganda….
  2. The West does not want Ukraine to make a deal.

—    The West increases weapon deliveries; Ukraine looses another 350,000 young men, DEAD without making a single dint in the Russian defences.

—    Soon, “Ukraine” ceases to exist. 

C)    The world goes nuclear.

 

Now, any scribes for the Western media should contemplate that Russia has been right and that the West has been deviously and hypocritically wrong. EASY. 

COME ON! STOP BEING BLINDFOLDED BY YOUR MASTERS: THE CIA, THE FBI, THE MEDIA BARONS, THE PENTAGON AND THE WHITESHITHOUSE.

 

COME ON! TELL THE TRUTH! Not the truth as you see it from your crappy little tower, but from the HORIZON OF REALITY.

 

UKRAINE IS GOING TO BE DESTROYED

UKRAINE MAKES A WHATEVER DEAL

THE WORLD GOES NUCLEAR WAR

 

Which one of these alternatives is the best?…

I know… but do you know?

 

Gus Leonisky

Cartoonist since 1951.

 

question:....

QUESTION TO SERIOUS JOURNALISTS OUT THERE IN THE MUD OF THE WESTERN MEDIA CESSPOOL:

CAN RUSSIA BE DEFEATED IN UKRAINE?

IF YOU ANSWER YES, YOU'RE IDIOTS AND YOU NEED TO READ THE POINTS MADE ABOVE — AGAIN AND AGAIN....

IF YOU ANSWER NO, RUSSIA CANNOT BE DEFEATED IN UKRAINE, THEN WRITE SO IN YOUR ARTICLES...

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

MAKE A DEAL PRONTO BEFORE THE SHIT HITS THE FAN:

 

 

NO NATO IN "UKRAINE" (WHAT'S LEFT OF IT)

THE DONBASS REPUBLICS ARE NOW BACK IN THE RUSSIAN FOLD — AS THEY USED TO BE PRIOR 1922. THE RUSSIANS WON'T ABANDON THESE AGAIN.

CRIMEA IS RUSSIAN — AS IT USED TO BE PRIOR 1954

A MEMORANDUM OF NON-AGGRESSION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE USA.

 

EASY.

 

THE WEST KNOWS IT.

 

 

MEANWHILE:

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

the end.....

NATO has published an article by a retired American defense official, which calls on the bloc to fight and win a limited nuclear war against Russia. Should the US and China clash over Taiwan, the author claims that a full-scale war in Europe would likely follow.

The article was written by Gregory Weaver, who served as the principal nuclear and missile defense advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

In it, Weaver argued that, counter to Moscow’s long-standing nuclear doctrine, Russia may use tactical nuclear weapons either to stave off a battlefield defeat or bring about a swift victory to a conventional conflict, such as that in Ukraine.

In such a scenario, Russian military leadership would assume that the West would not respond in kind, for fear that the situation would “escalate uncontrollably to a large-scale US-Russia homeland exchange.”

Instead of fearing nuclear war, Weaver argues that the West should embrace it. NATO should equip its fighter jets and submarines with tactical nuclear weapons to deter a tactical Russian strike, and “convince Russian leadership that NATO is fully prepared to counter limited nuclear first use with militarily effective nuclear responses of our own.”

Russian nuclear doctrine allows for the use of atomic weapons in the event of a first nuclear strike on its territory or infrastructure, or if the existence of the Russian state is threatened by either nuclear or conventional weapons. This position has not changed since 2010, and makes no exception for the use of tactical nuclear weapons (which are far less powerful than the strategic nuclear weapons that NATO and Russia would fire at each other in the event of an all-out exchange).

Despite these clear guidelines on nuclear use, Weaver claimed that Russia could launch an attack on NATO states in Europe if the US were preoccupied with fighting China over Taiwan, a scenario that he treats as possible without further explanation. 

To counter this, he recommends that NATO move “more deep precision strike capabilities” to Europe, form “several modern armored divisions” in the Baltic states and Eastern Europe, and press European members to “provide more conventional capability,” while the US sends them tactical nuclear weapons.

READ MORE: Russia’s longest-range nuclear missile goes into service – space chief

Weaver did not mention the consequences that nuclear war would wreak on the European countries where such a conflict would be fought.

Speaking at the UN General Assembly in New York last month, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned that Western leaders have become so obsessed with inflicting a “strategic defeat” on Russia that they have lost their “sense of self-preservation.”

https://www.rt.com/news/584043-nato-nuclear-war-russia/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....