Wednesday 25th of December 2024

fault lines ....

fault lines ....

For about eight days now, Tony Abbott has been in worsening trouble, and he has no hope any more of being Prime Minister.

Not all of it is his fault, some of it was coincidence, but the overall effect has been a perfect storm whose hail and lightning is beating him senseless and consuming him.

Some of it, unexpectedly, is the issue of gay marriage and the momentum it has gained across the world. Some of it is things happening in America.

A week ago, it was revealed Mitt Romney said he disdained that 47 percent of Americans who did not pay income tax. These, apparently, included war veterans, the old, the disabled and single supporting mothers. Most may not have paid income tax, but paid, each week, various forms of salary tax, and, in some states, taxes like the GST. The secret video of this utterance not only ended Romney for good, it smashed the Tea Party, who will not now retain enough seats to hold up financial reforms, including more taxes on the rich.

When Wayne Swan attacked the Tea Party as economic vandals, it would have been wise for Abbott’s Liberals to stay silent. But they did not, execrating Swanny for commenting on a foreign election and not concentrating on his own patch, and on the economy here.

This aligned them with the Tea Party Republicans, an already discredited bunch of loons, and with Romney, a loser, and, by any measure, a stupid man. Abbott should have repudiated his ’47 percent’ nonsense, but he did not.

And, when Cory Bernardi, fumbling, seemed to compare gay marriage with wedlock of humans and farmyard animals, he should not have merely sacked him, he should have allowed the Liberals a conscience vote on one or other (he need only have picked one) of the gay marriage bills coming up in parliament last week.

None would have passed, but he would have shown himself to be a reasonable man to have allowed a conscience vote, in the wake of Bernardi’s idiocy. His own sister after all was lesbian, and bound for a billion years of hellfire if she does not repent, and his best friend Christopher Pearson was for many years promiscuous and gay before he became celibate and Catholic lately, and in that condition helped Abbott write Battlelines, his memoir-manifesto.

Though a reasonable person could sort out these contradictions in his moral history, an ordinary voter will see them as the qualities of an angry, flummoxed buffoon. My sister is going to hell, and no vote I have control of will hallow her perversions and save her from her sulphurous, burning fate, I have decided, you wait and see.

On top of this came Newman’s decisions to sack bushfire fighters and nurses, and O’Farrell’s decision to sack TAFE teachers. Abbott had to promise to find money when he becomes Prime Minister in a year or so to restore and salvage these good people, and he did not. He didn’t have to criticise his colleagues, he could have blamed Gillard for the economic desperation they are in, but he had to intervene. And he did not.

And having not done that, he proposed to find swags of money for the families of the victims of the Bali Bombing, to mark the tenth anniversary. And this, perhaps, was his most idiotic thought-bubble in years.

Money for the families of the dead in Bali, and those who were injured and survived, in 2002, he now proposed. Although for five years after the bombing, when he was in cabinet, he did not think of it, or argue it then and help enact it.

Even if he got to it later (which he did), it raised the question of why we should foot the bill and not, say, the Indonesian government or Jemiah Islamia. And, if the Bali Bombing victims deserve this much, how about the parents of children forcibly adopted? How about the children themselves? How, indeed, about the Stolen Children? How about the families bereaved by the Granville train wreck? How about the children born mutant because of Agent Orange and a war we had no right to be in?

It showed in him a distance from logical connection that was actually frightening, and bespoke, perhaps, of brain damage from his years as an amateur boxer. He seemed like a babbling, opportunistic, fool.

And all this on top of David Marr’s ‘revelation’ that he had, as a student, once bashed a wall (as telling as my confession, which I here submit, that I smashed a cup in 1966 while arguing with my wife and am therefore unfit for elective office now and hereinafter), and the upsurge of boat arrivals after the announcement of Nauru which Abbott claimed would end them, and Joe Hockey’s many, grinning, head-shaking attempts to cut eighty billion dollars from government extravagance without sacking anybody, put him deeper in trouble than any Australian leader since Peacock proved to have got his health figures wrong and called a press conference to say so, two weeks before an election.

I know Abbott, and for time I liked him, and I urged him to get some sleep, and get his bones fixed by a chiropractor. But he would not.

And this shambles of a leader is the result. And this, plus a good deal of bad luck last week, will bring him down.

And make Turnbull, perhaps, Prime Minister.

Tony Abbott Is Finished

 

is this where abbott's dream and our demise lie?...

Canada used to be hailed globally, especially vis-à-vis the US, for its progressive environment and social policies. But under the conservative government a drastic rollback has taken place, say green and rights groups.
As Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper on Thursday will receive the annual "World Statesman" award from the Appeal of Conscience Foundation, launched in 1965 by a New York rabbi, for his work as a "champion of democracy, freedom and human rights" his approval ratings at home are plummeting.
According to a recent poll conducted by an Ottawa-based research firm, 50 percent of Canadians disapprove of their leader and nearly that many of his Conservative Party. The country is headed in the wrong direction say 45 percent of respondents.
Linda Luneau, a 73-year-old artist, is one of these Canadians. On 17 September she participated in a protest on the steps of Parliament, as session opened, and just days after the award to Harper was announced, to voice her distaste with his government and its cuts to social programs.
"I'm here today because I'm watching one program after another being destroyed. There's just so many things and now they want to introduce another bill and how much are we going to loose again?"
Controversial decisionsOther protestors included union leaders, environmentalists, human rights activists, organic farming supporters, indigenous rights activists, anti-poverty activists and concerned citizens.
The list of their grievances with the direction Prime Minister Harper has taken the country is long. Internationally, it was Canada's withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol last year – the first country to do so – that caused the biggest headlines.
But other controversial decisions taken by the government are less known outside of the country.
Since taking office in 2006, Harper and his Conservative Party have shut down the International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, a think tank that promoted democracy and monitored human rights around the world and the Court Challenges Program, a program that helped fund court challenges to discriminatory laws on behalf of women, immigrants and gays and lesbians.
It also slashed funding for the Canadian Human Rights Commission and Status of Women Canada, resulting in office closures for both. The government also removed the words "women's equality" from Status of Women Canada's mandate and decreased funding to a variety of women's rights organizations.
Environmental programs have also been on the chopping block. The most recent budget bill cut funds to Environment Canada for conservation programs, such as fisheries protection, and introduced limitations on the types of environment assessments of large-scale natural resource projects that can be undertaken.
http://www.dw.de/dw/article/0,,16262786,00.html
Abbott is an idiott...

straight from the sauce bottle...

Mr Rudd today fronted a press conference outside the Princess Alexandra Hospital, which is in his Brisbane electorate of Griffith, to campaign against what he described as potential moves by the State Government to cut support for the Organ and Tissue Authority.

He said correspondence between the Queensland Health Minister Lawrence Springboard and the Federal Parliamentary Secretary for Health Catherine King cast doubt over the state's commitment to the issue.

"I take seriously my responsibility to get out there and argue the case for what the Australian Government is doing in health and hospital services when they are being ripped and torn apart by the Liberal National Party at the state level," Mr Rudd said, before turning his attack on the Federal Coalition.

"It's my continued objective to do everything within my power to prevent Mr Abbott from becoming the next Prime Minister of Australia.

"Because what we have with (Queensland Premier) Campbell Newman, Barry O'Farrell in New South Wales and Ted Baillieu in Victoria, we have simply the entree - the entree of slash and burn to basic government services nationwide.

"Tony Abbott - he's the main course."

Mr Rudd says he will continue to campaign against the possibility of an Abbott government as long as he thinks he still has a contribution to make.

While Mr Rudd was speaking to the media, Mr Newman took to Twitter to challenge the former Labor leader to explain potential tax changes to superannuation contributions and withdrawals.

Mr Rudd fired back, describing the comment as a distraction and proof that Mr Newman had his priorities wrong.

"If the Premier of Queensland has time to monitor my press conferences and send out a tweet, can I suggest he just comes down here... and provide a rolled-gold guarantee... that the delivery of critical health and hospital services will not be affected," Mr Rudd said.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-28/rudd-keeps-it-local-in-abbott-attack/4286408