Sunday 21st of April 2024

a christmas story .....

a christmas story .....

Gather ye now among thy tribes and among thy families and then shalt thou rest, for the year runneth its course.

Put aside therefore thy labours and place thy trust in thy investments, and possibly thy investments in thy trust. 

For it came to pass that there were great changes in the land.

For John was their leader, yea even unto eleven years and the land was covered in darkness and darkness was upon the face of the deep and there were troubles in the land without number, and there was war. And the money-lenders cranketh up rates, despite John’s claim that he keepeth them from being cranked.

For John was old and weak and thought only of the past, and he was sore afraid and his confusion was manifold. And he knoweth not what to do.  

And John sayeth unto Peter, ‘You are the anointed one. You will take my place. So get thee hence and wait.’

And Peter goeth ‘Why promiseth thou me this? And why, having promised, deliverest thou not? For we have had this conversation before and it shitteth me.’ 

And John smiled. And did nothing. For he knew that Peter pulleth not the skin from a rice pudding, and that he doeth nothing and abideth his time, which was fruitless. But John gathereth about him the Pharisees and he spake unto them, saying ‘Bretheren, there shall be a reckoning.

And mighty shall be our victory over those who oppose us. For we have found an infidel in Queensland and his name is Haneef and he is a healer of the sick. And he shall be deported without trial. For there will be no trial. For there will be no charges. For he has done nothing wrong. And he is not the infidel.' 

And the people saw this. And they shook their heads.

And yea, though John be old and hopeless, he walketh still each morning in the suit of track, and he waveth to his people. And his people waveth back.

But after John passeth by, his people turneth each to the other and they sayeth each privately ‘lo, he looketh a great tool.’  

But the scribes saw not. Nor did they write. For they mostly contemplateth the Lillies of the field and the Marshes and the Warnies and the Abletts and the Judds. For obsesseth they with sport. For those who record events in the land are concerned with the line that is bottom. For that is the way it works for ever and ever. Amen.  

So the scribes sensed not what the people knew.

But there was anger in the land. For the people haveth John up to here.  

For there were those who would come across the sea and they were placed in the centre that is detention.  

And there were those who were in the land since time immemorial and John spoke not to them.  But John spoke freely to others. For he told them stories. For example he told them there were unbelievers, who would attack the land.

And John said they numbered many millions and would smite us, for they were evil and full of hate and we were the lamb of God and had done nothing. For John gave his people a fridge magnet.  

For John faileth to understand the metaphor of the burning Bush.  For there was also a plague which causeth the land to become warmer.  And this was a huge surprise.  For this was not understood by science until thirty years previously.  

But John denieth this three times. For John calleth this a drought. But the people suspecteth something more permanent. For they worked on the land. And neither were they born yesterday. Nor cometh they down with the last shower. For there was no shower.  For who was John kidding?  

And there was great confusion in the land and the people were sore afraid.  

And then John introduced new laws; that man might profit not from his own work but from the work of others.

And the people sayeth to John ‘John. You are great and have all power and are wise and we wish to use the band that is called broad.’  And John shruggeth his shoulders and spake unto the people as follows; ‘What band is it that is called broad. I know nothing about any such band. Now begone, as I have to call George. ‘  

And the people giveth up. For they knew that cometh the reckoning, fixeth up they John in spades.  

And there was a crack of thunder and a mighty wind and lo, there was a light in the east. A bright light.

And there were three wise women. And they were Julia and Penny and Nicola.  And they came upon a house in Canberra and they said ‘Prepare ye. For a child will be born, whose name shall be called Kevin. And even though he perhaps be not thy saviour, he be something to be going on with.’  

And great hosannas rang out and booths opened for the reckoning, and great was the polling therein. And there was slide of land and he that is called Kerry announceth a swing to the ABC. For verily it was so.

And the people looked at their work and saw that it was good.  For John was defeated and lost, and ebbeth he and his kind like the tide.

And lo, Peter had a note from his mother and was excused leadership duties. And electeth they Brendan, who knoweth fanny adams and who loveth Brendan with all his heart.  And so it was that Kevin became a leader. And he spake unto his people and they fell into a swound for Kevin haveth many qualities but he hath not brevity.  

For the people did not need a lecture. For they understood the problems. For they put Kevin there, rather than the other way round.  But the three wise women saw. And they took Kevin out the back and explaineth they things very firmly to Kevin. ‘Kevin’ they said. ‘There is a time to every purpose. A time for speaking and a time for shutting thy face. We will give you a signal. For boreth ye not thy people.’  

And Kevin recogniseth that he had fallen among friends and he was pleased. For he had learnt to read signals.  

And the people rested. For it was a time of feasting and gift-giving and crippling debt. 

They would eat and drink. For they would need to be ready for work when they got back. For the place was a shambles.  

From The Book of Kevin 12; 15-73; The Gospel According to the Crikey Psephological Observation Unit. 

caught behind .....

from Crikey ….. 

Haneef inquiry can get to the bottom of Andrews' visa ruling 

Greg Barns writes: 

While AFP Commissioner Mick Keelty is seen by the media this morning as being the main target of the inquiry into the handling of the case of former Gold Coast doctor Mohammed Haneef, let’s consider the position of former Howard government ministers Kevin Andrews and Phillip Ruddock. 

Mr Andrews has some serious explaining to do when he fronts the inquiry headed by former NSW Supreme Court judge John Clarke. As the chronology of events published in this edition of Crikey shows, Mr Andrews and his office were clearly involved in preparing to undermine Brisbane magistrate Jacqui Payne’s decision made on 16 July last year to release Dr Haneef on bail after he had been charged with a terrorism offence.  

The AFP and the Immigration Department worked over the previous weekend on a contingency plan to ensure Dr Haneef’s visa would be cancelled if Ms Payne granted bail. She did, and within hours of her Monday morning decision Kevin Andrews was fronting the media telling us that Dr Haneef would not get bail after all because he would be detained under the immigration laws due to his visa being cancelled. 

Mr Andrews has been spinning the line that all he did was act on bureaucratic and legal advice in making this decision. That proposition can now be forensically tested by Mr Clarke and those assisting him on the inquiry. 

In doing so, the Clarke Inquiry might want to take a close look at what communications Mr Andrews’ office and Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock’s office had over that weekend with their respective departmental officials and with the AFP. 

It beggars belief, given that Mr Ruddock had acted so politically in the Haneef case to date (remember his running commentary about the investigation) that he and Mr Andrews did not muse on the fact that if Ms Payne granted bail then she would create a political headache for the Howard government. And it is highly likely that in their musings they came up with the brainwave of cancelling Dr Haneef’s visa. 

The Clarke inquiry will have the opportunity to call for email communications between Mr Andrews and Mr Ruddock’s office and their departmental agencies. It will be able to ask to see memos prepared for both ministers over the weekend of 14 and 15 July. And it will be able to ask Mr Andrews directly whether or not he spoke with Mr Ruddock and the Prime Minister about what to do with Haneef if Ms Payne granted bail. 

The Clarke inquiry is the one chance to ask this important question: Did Mr Andrews take into account political considerations in coming to his decision to cancel Dr Haneef’s visa? If the answer is yes, then he clearly acted outside the law and Dr Haneef should get compensation.