Wednesday 24th of April 2024

"prevention"...

 

tassie forests

Highly predictable and monumentally dumb: that was the decision by the American president to turn his back on our faltering collective effort to contain greenhouse emissions.

Equally stupid was the celebration of Donald Trump’s announcement by his acolytes in Australian parliaments, who share his ignorance of the science around climate change and his arrogant indifference to its ramifications.

It’s against that depressing background that Tasmanians are invited to appraise their new climate strategy, which the government released in its final form last week.

Environment minister Matthew Groom, with the support of premier Will Hodgman, has resisted internal demands from the Liberals’ anti-science ideologues for “Climate Action 21” to be mere window-dressing, or shelved altogether. Tasmanians should be thankful for that.

We should also be thankful that Groom acknowledges the “serious and urgent challenge” of climate change and has heeded some of the criticism of the plan’s first draft of December 2015, notably in toning down the hubris about Tasmanian climate leadership.

The plan supports more climate research including a revival of the mothballed “climate futures” modelling program, and a stronger focus on potential climate risk including the threat from coastal and river flooding, coastal erosion and large-scale bushfires.

read more:

http://southwind.com.au/2017/06/06/after-trump-any-climate-plan-is-a-rel...

 

trompology with a tweeting trump twit ...

The President of the United States' Twitter account was given a bit of a bump-up in significance overnight.

Sean Spicer confirmed President Trump's tweets should be considered "official statements of the President of the United States."

Over the last couple of days Trump's official statements on Twitter have been creating a number of news stories both at home and abroad  all concerning terrorism in one way or another.

Starting with the Travel Ban. Remember the travel ban? The ban that's not a ban that is a ban?

Calling it a Muslim Ban isn't ok, according to the courts.

Calling it a "watered down version" of the Muslim ban also isn't ok.

In fact calling it a ban at all isn't a great idea, given the Justice department is trying to say it's not a ban, but a pause.

So don't call it a ban, is the message from the Justice Department.

But Donald Trump isn't playing ball.

read more:

http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/matt/8595904