The day that Malcolm wants to take you to the cleaners — I mean vote for himself — in the next Federal election, could be the "coldest" of the year. It's not a fluke.

The date has been carefully chosen to make you — ignorant liberal (CONservative) bastards after a bit more cash in your tax deduction,  and you the swinging voters of no-man's land what's-in-it-for-me — forget about global "warming". You will be freezing your balls off when you vote, confirming that global warming is a "Russian conspiracy". Anyway as a fully fledged CONservative or a swinging monkey, you never believed in "global warming" because it's incovenient and makes your electricity bill inflate as Tony told you so. Your Murdoch newspapers — The Australian for the gentry and The Daily Telegraph for the plebs — tell you "global warming is crap", so you have no choice but to believe so, because it's the only thing you want to know.

The Federal Government has given up on the subject of global warming, thus Malcolm wants you to forget it ever happened, is happening and will carry on happening, while you vote for a budget which has been designed to favour the rich.

As a swinging voter, you dream of becoming rich while you are poor, so you want to switch class in your own bed. It's called envy and you vote with your greed.... But the budget is designed to hammer the poor once more, in the name of trickle-down economics — except instead of a 12-pound hammer, the Turnbull government has kindly reduced the weight to 11-pound fifty. 

Trickle down economics never worked. It's not going to work now. Trickle down economics is like a prostatic urinary tract infection with a kidney stone blockage trying to wet the porcelain in the loo of a club for old men. 

So please blame Labor for raising the idea of a class warfare — as if Malcolm did not give the rich lower tax cash rates, nor spend oodles on useless armaments while pouring endless money on public education and health... Yes the bastard lowered the tax for the rich, exclusively, spend cash on obsolete subs and planes, while giving nothing much to public education, public health and ahaha...

Let me add here, please make sure you property (negatively geared or not — especially should you decide on a "Jewish stocktake") is well insured against flood damage, hail damage and fire. Make sure there is no clause under "an act of God" or such nonsense in a small print fiddle. Global warming is not an act of god, despite some useless idiots trying to shift the blame from us onto "natural causes" or onto "it's not happening".

The fact is that so far the balance between doing something about global warming versus global warming damage is debatable. We're still alive, aren't we? Our feet aren't wet yet, are they? Our last major cyclone was two years ago so even in an El Nino year we did not get any. We won't mention Fiji and Vanuatu, because their cyclones were not in Queensland. Nor will we mention the biggest cyclone ever in the Indian ocean this year because it did not hit anyone.

From now on, it's likely that "global warming" induced major events on the planet will somewhat double/triple on a year to year basis, from about 50 events a year in 2016 to more than 100 in 2017 and more than 200 in 2018 — until we get dizzy. The Queensland floods and the cyclones of a few years ago will soon appear as chicken feed. Drought will be a component that will increase at warp speed, inter-spaced with destructive floods and cyclonic tornato-ish winds. Sea level is going to rise five millimetres per year from about 2017 and 10 millimetres per year from about 2022. 

By 2032, the weather patterns will break loose — according to Dr Uncle Gus. 

Some serious scientists have modelled this general weather havoc happening by 2038/2045, but I am more pessimistic than they are, though they are the most pessimists of real scientific number crunchers. Due to the political game demanding some "optimism" on this subject — we need to sell more coal despite the price having tanked below the cost of exploitation — many scientists hold conservative estimates on climate change numbers that of course were already outdated two years ago. Meanwhile, on the coal front, we can live in hope that wages will hit Indian standards of $4.79 a day for mining while using imported labour. Someone rich is going to profit before the shit hits the fan.

I am an expert in many scientific and technological areas. I have performed numerous experiments, build massive stuff and experienced massive failures as well as tremendous successes. But overall, despite having no university degrees in anything, I can run rings around the "experts". Piece of cake, really. No shock jock nor a minister of the crown could argue with me without them having to lie beyond decency or beg mercy. I can hold my own against the best of the best. I know my stuff.

For the last few weeks, I have been crunching a few doozies once more with the Chaos Theory. This theory, famous in the 1980s, seemed to have dropped of the radar as an oddity, yet it is as scientific as all get out. Far from being a fizzled system of understanding, it is the system that makes us accept uncertainty with a greater chance of predictive success. Many of the "imperfections" in our systems, from cells phone static to traffic light coordination rely on a certain amount of Chaos management to stay ahead and avoid a complete crash. Special algorithms allow for "chaos". The digitisation takes care of the missing bits, relying on a hit and miss in a chaos allowed framework, as if in a game of chance. These days our poll sampling is often too small to make a real forecast. A margin of 2 percent error on a political poll is still too big to make a proper analysis, but it gives the pundit something to speculate about. Chaos theory is on par with the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics.

Should you be sending a rocket to the moon, you need far better odds than 2 per cent. The law of big numbers sharpens this bracketing of error to nearly nil, but not quite. You still need to make some adjustments of time and distance at landing.

The Chaos Theory is the science of disturbances, in which small variations from the onset can lead to massive changes, several steps down the track. This is why weather cannot be exactly predicted three days in advance, even in very stable "apparent" conditions. BoM will make some probability predictions. But not so strangely, due to the law of averages and big numbers, one can "predict" global warming on a larger scale. Not on a day to day basis but on a blanket overall setting, BECAUSE WE KNOW THE general INFLUENCE OF THE various PARAMETERS ON THE SYSTEM. At some stage if you keep adding more salt to the soup, it will get too salty to be edible.

The Chaos Theory was actually started by someone called Lorenz in the Western world. In Russia they also came to investigate the idea at about the same time and had made some great strides but we don't want to glorify the Ruskies, do we?

Lorenz had invented a weird computer than was dedicated to a theoretical weather model where there was no seasons, nor day and night, only variation of air flow and density of vapour. Lorenz apparently was a moody bloke but. One day in 1961, he had to restart his computer and he chose a particular entry at a point which he expediently simplified from 0.506127 to 0.506. Within a few days, his model had gone totally apeshit. the graph he use to plot the minute variations in accordance with the computer numeric output soon were totally out of phase with what he expected.

Simplification of numbers on trends and economics is common place. When we look at the weather, it's a different story. As I have mentioned before, despite the system being erratic, it is STABLE — to a point, as long as the ingredients stay the same. We know that the weather, aka in a climatic form has been different in the past, according to different input into the system... 

So.

Looking at the acceleration of the Greenland melt plus the general trends of warming around the globe, plus the general warming trend of the last few years, and  allowing for the present cooling of El Nino into a La Nina, one can state that the 3 millimetre per year of sea level increase measured about 2 years ago by NASA is going to "accelerate". Say 5 millimetres by 2017 and about 10 millimetres by 2023. One could hope that it's not going to be as fast... But the figures are not good. So far this year, 2016, has been a record warm. 

The observations tell us of "latitude" weather modification. For example the town of Fort McMurray, Alberta is at 57 degrees North. It is experiencing weather that could be like inland Victoria on a hot day. Due to continental plate positioning, the equivalent is about 40-45 degrees south in the southern hemisphere, which is Tasmania, and parts of Argentina. Dry and desert. But there are differences due to the southern ocean which creates a specific large interference. In Tasmania, there are no high mountains to disturb this oceanic influence, unlike in Argentina where the Andes act like like a giant block for oceanic weather. But in Tasmania this year, the influence of El Nino has led to a much drier weather than before, which under "global warming conditions" becomes a "record dry". El Nino acted like a gigantic barrier. In inland Canada, the conditions are also stretched by what is called "continental climate". Due to being far away from the influence of the sea, land takes its own extreme variations. Very cold in winter and quite warm in summer. Global warming condition, will make warm a tad warmer — tipping weather patterns beyond a certain point when one will say: "abnormally warm weather and dry conditions" for the season. A huge fire like those experience in Victoria, Australia and Tasmania a few years ago, follows.

---------

The sky in Fort McMurray, Alberta, was grey with smoke. The ground beneath was glowing red — with fire.

Like everyone else, Cassie White, a 19-year-old resident of the Canadian oil sands town, was trying to escape the flames that began to tear through neighborhoods on Tuesday. But in a car bound for Edmonton with her boyfriend, White discovered that there was no easy way out.

In an interview with the Globe and Mail, White described a scene that resembled a “zombie apocalypse.”

As she drove south, “flames jumped over the highway” and engulfed a gas station to her left. “It was torched,” White said. Everywhere she turned, there was fire:

People were driving on the shoulder. There were flames maybe 15 feet high right off the highway. There was a dump truck on fire — I had to swerve around it — and there was a pickup truck on fire as well. The entire trailer park on my right was in flames. Roofs were coming down.

The chaos was the result of abnormally warm weather and dry conditions that had combined to make Alberta’s boreal forest a “tinder box,” the Associated Press reported. While the fire appeared manageable over the weekend, it grew into an inferno on Tuesday, buoyed by strong winds and dissolving into showers of ash.

The flames tore through the city, hitting several neighborhoods and a trailer park before striking the downtown core. Before nightfall, a mandatory evacuation order was issued. Fort McMurray’s some 80,000 residents needed to go — but where?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/05/04/a-canadian-oil-sands-town-on-fire-80000-residents-must-evacuate/?hpid=hp_no-name_morning-mix-story-g-duplicate%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

And the pattern of "abnormally warm weather and dry conditions" will increase, may not be in Alberta but in other places that will increase in number until UNSETTLED chaos sets in. What sort of Chaos? Good Question. A few years ago I mentioned this experiment where we have a piece of concave surface. A loose ball, after a bit of rolling back and forth on it will always settle in the middle. On a flat surface, the ball will roll off, unless placed gently and the surface is horizontal. On a tilted concave surface, the ball will roll to the lower side. On a convex surface the ball will always be "unsettled" to the most minimal of changes, if placed on the apex. When will the climatic change will fall off the present system is difficult to know. We have changed the topological surface of the weather map and of climate. The ball will roll off into another "fold" which will be a new balance after falling off the original topology.

But for a while, the trend will be simple as I have stated before: winters like summers and summers like hell. But not everywhere.  Be prepared. 

GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL.

GLOBAL WARMING is ANTHROPOGENIC.

Over the last 150 years we have changed the ingredients of the system, the system IS SLOWLY RESPONDING TO the changes. In geological timeframes, the changes are happening at lightning speed. 

DO NOT VOTE FOR MALCOLM AND HIS TROOPS of idiots., even if on the day of the election, the weather is freezing...