Friday 22nd of November 2024
Home » Blogs » John Richardson's blog

beware the march hare .....

beware the march hare .....

Here is news of the Third World War. The United States has invaded Africa. US troops have entered Somalia, extending their war front from Afghanistan and Pakistan to Yemen and, now, the Horn of Africa. In preparation for an attack on Iran, American missiles have been placed in four Persian Gulf states, and "bunker-buster" bombs are said to be arriving at the US base on the British island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean.

In Gaza, the sick and abandoned population, mostly children, is being entombed behind underground American-supplied walls in order to reinforce a criminal siege. In Latin America, the Obama administration has secured seven bases in Colombia, from which to wage a war of attrition against the popular democracies in Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and Paraguay. Meanwhile, the Secretary of "Defense" Robert Gates complains that "the general [European] public and the political class" are so opposed to war they are an "impediment" to peace. Remember this is the month of the March hare.

According to an American general, the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan is not so much a real war as a "war of perception." Thus, the recent "liberation of the city of Marja" from the Taliban's "command and control structure" was pure Hollywood. Marja is not a city; there was no Taliban command and control. The heroic liberators killed the usual civilians, poorest of the poor. Otherwise, it was fake. A war of perception is meant to provide fake news for the folks back home, to make a failed colonial adventure seem worthwhile and patriotic, as if "The Hurt Locker" were real, and parades of flag-wrapped coffins through the Wiltshire town of Wooten Basset were not a cynical propaganda exercise.

"War is fun," the helmets in Vietnam used to say with bleakest irony, meaning that if a war is revealed as having no purpose other than to justify voracious power in the cause of lucrative fanaticisms, such as the weapons industry, the danger of truth beckons. This danger can be illustrated by the liberal perception of Tony Blair in 1997 as one "who wants to create a world [where] ideology has surrendered entirely to values" (Hugo Young, the Guardian) compared with today's public reckoning of a liar and war criminal.

Western war states such as the US and Britain are not threatened by the Taliban or any other introverted tribesmen in faraway places, but by the antiwar instincts of their own citizens. Consider the draconian sentences handed down in London to scores of young people who protested Israel's assault on Gaza in January last year. Following demonstrations in which paramilitary police "kettled" (corralled) thousands, first-offenders have received two and a half years in prison for minor offences that would not normally carry custodial sentences. On both sides of the Atlantic, serious dissent exposing illegal war has become a serious crime.

http://www.truthout.org/have-a-nice-world-war-folks57985

Peace in the world has but one enemy - misinformation.

Since my interest in Hebrew/Canaanite history began (such as it is) I have been asking "why" repeatedly as to the conduct of the US/Zionist alliance. Besides this forum, I notice that other relatively small webs are showing enormous interest, especially in the duplicity of both the US and the Jews. And hopefully, we are seeing the possibility of the UK coming on board.  Nice of the Jews to call the English politicians "dogs" wasn't it? Is that anti-Semite?

It is eminently clear now that the American Jewish Congress has established a sufficient number of greedy and traitorous American Senators and Congressmen (or women) to be able to make the Jewish demands on US foreign policies appear as if the Jews had crafted them alone.

IMHO even if Obama had the support to "rattle the sabres" at the Zionists it would have no effect at all unless it carried with it massive financial and supply sanctions that hit them where it hurts most - in their pockets.  After all of the insults that the Jews have heaped on Obama and his administration, one can only ponder why the uncommitted non-Jewish press (if there is any) hasn't insisted on appropriate action - if only for the American nation's self esteem?

Why? I ask again - why doesn't the American new administration at least make some effort to demonstrate that they are still independent of the World Jewish Congress?  That is - if they are.

Since WW II the US Military/Corporate has trampled on freedom and democracy throughout the world.  The only group to effectively oppose them has been the Russians.  To counter this the US continually supports any small ex-Soviet Republic member to violently undermine the Russian government under the old and rusted excuse of democracy.

Democracy is not just a method of electing a government - even China has that.  Democracy has been destroyed by the very people who have used it as an excuse for pre-meditated wars of choice.

As far as having any pity for a race who have continually abused their host nations and brought some to the brink of financial ruin (as I believe they have now done to America) I have none left after the Gaza Holocaust.

A race of people whose humanity barely reaches the heights of the "Morlocks" in The Time Machine.

The Jews laugh at English "dogs" - Swedish idiots and American suckers and who is to stop them?  They have used the "Holocaust" religion to the extreme.

God Bless Australia and remove the Zionist claws from our media.  NE OUBLIE.

Whose Waterloo - US or Zionist?

Truth and Consequences in the Gaza Invasion

By NORMAN FINKELSTEIN  From Counter Punch.

Public outrage at the Gaza invasion did not come out of the blue but rather marked the nadir of a curve plotting a steady decline in support for Israel. As polling data of Americans and Europeans, both Gentiles and Jews, suggest, the public has become increasingly critical of Israeli policy over the past decade. The horrific images of death and destruction broadcast around the world during and after the invasion accelerated this development. “The increased and brutal frequency of war in this volatile region has shifted international opinion,” the British Financial Times editorialized one year later, “reminding Israel it is not above the law. Israel can no longer dictate the terms of debate.”

One poll registering the fallout from the Gaza attack in the United States found that American voters calling themselves supporters of Israel plummeted from 69 per cent  before the attack to 49 per cent  in June 2009, while voters believing that the U.S. should support Israel dropped from 69 per cent  to 44 per cent. Consumed by hate, emboldened by self-righteousness, and confident that it could control or intimidate public opinion, Israel carried on in Gaza as if it could get away with mass murder in broad daylight. But while official Western support for Israel held firm, the carnage set off an unprecedented wave of popular outrage throughout the world. Whether it was because the assault came on the heels of the devastation Israel wrought in Lebanon, or because of Israel’s relentless persecution of the people of Gaza, or because of the sheer cowardice of the assault, the Gaza invasion appeared to mark a turning point in public opinion reminiscent of the international reaction to the 1960 Sharpeville massacre in apartheid South Africa.

The truth can no longer be denied or dismissed. The documentation of the Arab-Israeli conflict set out by respected historians fundamentally conflicts with the version popularized in the likes of Leon Uris’s Exodus. The evidence of Israeli human rights violations compiled by respected mainstream organizations cannot be reconciled with its vaunted commitment to “purity of arms.” The deliberations of respected judicial and political bodies cast severe doubt on Israel’s avowed commitment to a peaceful resolution of the conflict. For a long while Israel’s “supporters” deflected the impact of this accumulating documentary record by wielding the twin swords of The Holocaust and the “new anti-Semitism.”

End of Quote.

At least the Jews of occupied Palestine have proved one thing – America can be ignored; insulted and manipulated and their world empire fears the Zionists.

God Bless Australia and thank goodness we are well away from the Morlocks.  NE OUBLIE.

 

 

Another Morlock act - thrive on the bodies of others.

Yasin Massacre, 09.04.1948

By Reham Alhelsi

10 April, 2010
A Voice From Palestine (COUNTERCURRENTS)

Since the arrival of the first Zionist to Palestine, hundreds of massacres have been committed against unarmed Palestinian civilians in the name of "Israel", making this entity synonym to death and destruction. One of the worst Zionist massacres committed against Palestinians is the Deir Yasin massacre. Defenceless Palestinian civilians were tortured before being massacres and their bodies mutilated. Women and children were raped, babies were butchered and pregnant women were bayoneted. Deir Yassin, a Palestinian village located at the outskirts of Jerusalem, had a population of around 750 on the eve of 09.04.1948. The village was surrounded by 6 Zionist colonies, the closest being Giv’at Sha’ul, and the Zionist colonists had blocked the main access road connecting Deir Yasin with Jerusalem, placing Deir Yasin under an almost total blockade.

At 4:30 on Friday morning, 09.04.1948, and while the villagers slept, the Zionist terror gangs surrounded Deir Yasin. Palestinians woke up to the sound of loud speakers ordering them to leave the village, and the unsuspecting residents went out of their homes to investigate the situation, and it was then that the massacre began. The Irgun attacked the village from the south east, Stern attacked it from the east while the Haganah bombarded the village with mortars.

The Zionists opened fire at whoever tried escaping the village, and then moved into the village and started their "clean up": they moved from one house to the other raping women, slaughtering children and killing whoever was inside with machine guns and knives. Whole families were lined up against the wall and executed. Pregnant women were bayoneted and the bodies of children were mutilated. Money and jewellery were snatched from the bodies of victims and other personal belongings were stolen before houses were burnt. Of the 144 houses of Deir Yasin, at least 15 were blown up over the heads of their inhabitants by the Zionist terror gangs. British interrogating officer, Deputy Inspector General Richard Catling, confirmed that:

"The recording of "The recording of statements is hampered also by the hysterical state of the women who often break down many times whilst the statement is being recorded. There is, however, no doubt that many sexual atrocities were committed by the attacking Jews. Many young schoolgirls were raped and later slaughtered. Old women were also molested. One story is current concerning a case in which a young girl was literally torn in two. Many infants were also butchered and killed. I also saw one old woman … who had been severely beaten about the head with rifle butts. Women had bracelets torn from their arms and rings from their fingers and parts of some of the women’s ears were severed in order to remove earrings."[1]

During the massacre; men, women, children and elderly were killed in cold blood and in a gruesome way and hundreds were wounded. The number of victims is disputed. Most sources put the number of martyrs at 254, including 25 pregnant women who were bayoneted and 52 children who were maimed in front of their mothers before being beheaded and the mothers slain.

"A chilling account of the massacre is given by a Red Cross doctor who arrived at the village on the second day and saw himself – the mopping up – as one of the terrorists put it to him. He says that the "mopping up" had been done with machine guns, then grenades and finished off with knives. Women’s bellies were cut open and babies were butchered in the hands of their helpless mothers. Around 250 people were murdered in cold blood.[2] Of those 250 people, 25 pregnant women were bayoneted in their abdomens while still alive. 52 children were maimed under the eyes of their own mothers, and they were slain and their heads cut off. Their mothers were in turn massacred and their bodies mutilated. About 60 other women and girls were also killed and their bodies mutilated[3].

The Haganah, as the armed unit of the Jewish Agency, was headed by the political leader of the Jewish Agency David Ben-Gurion who became the first prime minister of the Zionist entity. Irgun was headed by Menachim Begin who became the 6th prime minister of the Zionist entity. Lehi was headed by Yitzah Shamir who became the 7th prime minister of the Zionist entity. According to Menachim Begin: "The massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the victory at Deir Yassin."[12] and after the massacre, he sent the attackers of Deir Yasin: "Accept congratulations on this splendid act of conquest. Tell the soldiers you have made history in Israel." No one was ever punished for this and other massacres. This entity that had been headed by one war criminal after the other since its creation, and is still headed by war criminals, blatantly keeps claiming it seeks peace and is "only defending itself" when it kills unarmed civilians whether in Palestine, Lebanon or elsewhere. Deir Yasin was not an isolated incident. Hundreds of massacres followed and the Jenin massacre and the recent Gaza Genocide are only two examples of the blood-thirsty Zionist nature.

COMMENT:  These are the Jewish "heros" whose exercising of inhumanity  makes their claims of NAZI brutality fade by comparison.  Even the Japanese of WW II cannot exceed these unforgettable crimes.

Does the brutality of the multi-national Jewish Military Forces  and their crimes against humanity excuse that which was exercised by the Nazis - of course not but - it far exceeds the inhumanity of the Nazis/Japanese and the torture chambers of the US CIA.

God Bless Australia and stop this "only we were badly treated" Jewish propaganda. NE OUBLIE.