SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
double-crossed CIA...There was something suspicious about the official triumphalism behind the announcement of the capture of the "Taliban's No 2", Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, in Karachi earlier this week in a "joint CIA and Pakistan intelligence operation". Now suspicions are growing across the region that this may have been one of the biggest double-crosses at a high level in the long and tangled wars afflicting Afghanistan and Pakistan. The first details of the arrest said the Mullah had been pulled in by agents of Pakistan's Inter Service Intelligence (ISI) as he attended a madrassa on the outskirts of Karachi. According to one supposedly eyewitness account, "CIA agents watched from a car across the road". Latest well-informed analysis suggests that if those CIA agents were watching, they would have been fuming. Abdul Ghani Baradar is credited with being the Taliban's strategic brain behind their operations across Afghanistan. He has been putting together the campaigns of individual local faction leaders into something like a regional plan, matching strikes in Jalalabad and Khost with the more intensive operations in Kandahar and Helmand. At the same time he is credited with being the most senior, and most sane, of the Taliban leadership in favour of cutting a deal with the Karzai regime in Kabul and its American backers. In the past he has spoken to President Karzai's powerful half-brother, Ahmed Walid, strongman of Kandahar. He is also known to have been talking with the Americans, largely through go-betweens and proxies. Why would the CIA want to remove from the board the only senior Taliban leader described as being "intent or willing for peace negotiation"? If he was really needed for negotiation he should have been allowed to stay free, particularly as he is known to be close to the shadowy spiritual founder and chief of the Taliban of the south and west, Mullah Mohammad Omar. So, the incident puts the spotlight again on the ISI. Far from achieving a new rapprochement with the US and the CIA, there is a fear that they are still pursuing their own strategy, which for their hardliners would be for the Taliban, whom they helped create, and against the West and its creature Hamid Karzai.
|
User login |
what some pakistani want...
Mullah Abdul Salam Zaaef, former Taliban ambassador in Pakistan, former Guantanamo detainee, and adviser on reconciliation to President Karzai, told the New York Times this week that Mullah Baradar's arrest could be disastrous. "If it is really true, it could seriously affect negotiations, and gravely affect the peace process," he said in Kabul. And that may be just what the old hardliners of the ISI want.
discordination...
From the NYT
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Inside a secret detention center in an industrial pocket of the Pakistani capital called I/9, teams of Pakistani and American spies have kept a watchful eye on a senior Taliban leader captured last month. With the other eye, they watch each other.
The C.I.A. and its Pakistani counterpart, the Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence, have a long and often tormented relationship. And even now, they are moving warily toward conflicting goals, with each maneuvering to protect its influence after the shooting stops in Afghanistan.
Yet interviews in recent days show how they are working together on tactical operations, and how far the C.I.A. has extended its extraordinary secret war beyond the mountainous tribal belt and deep into Pakistan’s sprawling cities.
Beyond the capture of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, C.I.A. operatives working with the ISI have carried out dozens of raids throughout Pakistan over the past year, working from bases in the cities of Quetta, Peshawar and elsewhere, according to Pakistani security officials.
The raids often come after electronic intercepts by American spy satellites, or tips from Pakistani informants — and the spies from the two countries then sometimes drive in the same car to pick up their quarry. Sometimes the teams go on lengthy reconnaissance missions, with the ISI operatives packing sunscreen and neon glow sticks that allow them to identify their positions at night.
Successful missions sometimes end with American and Pakistani spies toasting one another with Johnnie Walker Blue Label whisky, a gift from the C.I.A.
The C.I.A.’s drone campaign in Pakistan is well known, which is striking given that this is a covert war. But these on-the-ground activities have been shrouded in secrecy because the Pakistani government has feared the public backlash against the close relationship with the Americans.
In strengthening ties to the ISI, the C.I.A. is aligning itself with a shadowy institution that meddles in domestic politics and has a history of ties to violent militant groups in the region. A C.I.A. spokesman declined to comment for this article.
------------------
See toon at top.
double-crossed UN...
The UN's former envoy to Afghanistan, Kai Eide, has strongly criticised Pakistan's recent arrest of high-ranking Taliban leaders.
Mr Eide told the BBC the arrests had completely stopped a channel of secret communications with the UN.
Pakistani officials insist the arrests were not an attempt to spoil talks.
Mr Eide confirmed publicly for the first time that his secret contacts with senior Taliban members had begun a year ago.
-------------------
see toon at top...
double-crossed double-cross...
By DEXTER FILKINS
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — When American and Pakistani agents captured Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban’s operational commander, in the chaotic port city of Karachi last January, both countries hailed the arrest as a breakthrough in their often difficult partnership in fighting terrorism.
But the arrest of Mr. Baradar, the second-ranking Taliban leader after Mullah Muhammad Omar, came with a beguiling twist: both American and Pakistani officials claimed that Mr. Baradar’s capture had been a lucky break. It was only days later, the officials said, that they finally figured out who they had.
Now, seven months later, Pakistani officials are telling a very different story. They say they set out to capture Mr. Baradar, and used the C.I.A. to help them do it, because they wanted to shut down secret peace talks that Mr. Baradar had been conducting with the Afghan government that excluded Pakistan, the Taliban’s longtime backer.
In the weeks after Mr. Baradar’s capture, Pakistani security officials detained as many as 23 Taliban leaders, many of whom had been enjoying the protection of the Pakistani government for years. The talks came to an end.
The events surrounding Mr. Baradar’s arrest have been the subject of debate inside military and intelligence circles for months. Some details are still murky — and others vigorously denied by some American intelligence officials in Washington. But the account offered in Islamabad highlights Pakistan’s policy in Afghanistan: retaining decisive influence over the Taliban, thwarting archenemy India, and putting Pakistan in a position to shape Afghanistan’s postwar political order.
“We picked up Baradar and the others because they were trying to make a deal without us,” said a Pakistani security official, who, like numerous people interviewed about the operation, spoke anonymously because of the delicacy of relations between Pakistan, Afghanistan and the United States. “We protect the Taliban. They are dependent on us. We are not going to allow them to make a deal with Karzai and the Indians.”
Some American officials still insist that Pakistan-American cooperation is improving, and deny a central Pakistani role in Mr. Baradar’s arrest. They say the Pakistanis may now be trying to rewrite history to make themselves appear more influential.
see toon at top
no peace talks...
The "solution of the issue lies in withdrawal of the foreign invading troops and establishment of a true Islamic and independent system in the country," he adds.
Mullah Omar also addresses former jihadi leaders working with Hamid Karzai's administration, urging them to join the struggle against the invaders.
"Was the aim behind your 14-years-long jihad [against the Russians] to let the place of the Russians to be occupied by the Americans?" he asks.
Casualties mount
This year has been the most deadly for Nato forces fighting in Afghanistan since the invasion of 2001.
In his statement, Mullah Omar says his aim is to increase Taliban operations "to entangle the enemy in an exhausting war of attrition and wear it away like the former Soviet Union".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11760383