Saturday 23rd of November 2024

stealing hope .....

stealing hope .....

"I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank." - Barack Obama, October 27, 2007

President Obama ordered top military leaders to begin carrying out his new strategy for the war in Afghanistan, a move that is believed to include the deployment of more than 30,000 additional troops into the 8-year-old conflict, the White House confirmed Monday.

In a 5 p.m. Oval Office meeting Sunday with his defense secretary, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and his top military commanders, Mr. Obama "communicated the final decision on the strategy and issued orders as to the strategy's implementation," press secretary Robert Gibbs said.

"The commander in chief delivered the orders," Mr. Gibbs said.

That meeting was followed immediately by a video conference with Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, and Karl W. Eikenberry, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, to relay the details of the orders. On Monday, Mr. Gibbs said the president will hold a series of phone calls, video conferences and in-person meetings with other world leaders to prepare them for the Tuesday speech that will set forth his new plans for military engagement in Afghanistan.

Mr. Gibbs said the briefings to leaders of Great Britain, France, Russia, Australia and Italy will include outlines of the plan but not details. Those will come in a speech to the American people that the president is scheduled to deliver Tuesday evening from the campus of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/30/obama-issues-afghan-war-plan-military-officials/

Just more US hypocrisy.

 

The US is to send more troops to Afghanistan to “finish the job”.  Fair dinkum.

 

The might of the largest and most active terrorist country in the world is going to finish what?  My guess is a face-saving surge like in Iraq and then a bail out claiming “Mission Accomplished”.  And that is a good thing.

 

Meanwhile their partners in Middle East terrorism, the Zionists, are “chomping at the bit” to illegally attack Iran, as they have attacked other Muslim countries in that area.

 

The Zionists have superiority in military technology and WMD’s and must protect that advantage by ensuring that their Semite “enemies” continue to be like the American Indians when the Gatling gun was invented. But, do they have the manpower to invade and gather the fruits of their bastardry?  And to occupy that nation and provide land for a larger “Israel”?

 

I have admired the guts of the little fellow who is the Iranian President.  So far he has done nothing, simply nothing, to warrant a US/Zionist attack – under any pretence.

 

According to the slight information that we in Australia receive, he is legally attempting to give his country nuclear energy  – training an army to defend his country (and goodness knows that he needs it) and generally being independent from the powers that have tried to force changes which his people do not want.

 

As the biggest supplier of munitions the US must be worried that their “sparring partner” Russia, may also have some modern weapons which can be sold to Iran to defend themselves?

 

The Zionists have to consider whether or not the Iranians can defend their sovereignty. I warrant that they won’t be the innocent Palestinian farmers that the Zionist Jews are accustomed to persecuting.   

 

Iran has warned that it will defend itself and these people are willing to give their lives to protect their independence and freedom of choice – I wonder if the Zionist Jews are?

 

God Bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.