Why MUST Iran comply with UN inspections when the Zionists refuse to co-operate in any way?  For more than a decade the UN capitulated to the cruel sanctions demanded by the U.S. against the Iraqis – it starved to death some 500,000 mainly children and Madeleine Albright the Secretary of State (born Marie Jana Korbelova of what race) said it was well worth it. 

Will America apply sanctions to Zionist Israel?  Not bloody likely!

IF Pakistan; Israel and India have nuclear weapons, what makes them more entitled than any other third world country?  When Golda Meir said that if Israel went down the Jews would take the rest of the world with them - was that an idle threat or is that the mindset of these radical Zionists?  When the Israeli Minister for "Defence" Lieberman stated that he wanted the Aswan Dam bombed to kill some 80 million people - was that an idle threat too?

What country is the biggest threat to world peace?  America for sure, then new Israel.

The Libyan and Iranian Presidents have had the courage to address the United Nations and, among other truths, they have simply pointed out that the power of veto is contrary to the UN charter.  Does it overrule the wishes of some other 180 nations? The simple truth is that it certainly does! And WHY is criticism of any nation fair play except new Israel?

So when all of the pomp and ceremony is cleared away - the United Nations is just another American control mechanism.

IF the original nuclear arms race between America and Russia was to have the upper hand to threaten the opposite nation into submision - then the whole thing is ridiculous.

It would seem elimentary reasoning that IF any one of the current nuclear powers uses a nuclear weapon, it will signal the end of their lives as well as the others they attack.  Golda Meir must have considered that when she made her threat.

The U.S. is once again arguing for a reduction in nuclear weapons when even the thought of that goal is more unlikely in their own country than any other.  Is it just another diversion for the destruction of the independent Arab nation of Iran?  And then?

It is perhaps just a coincidence but, the ancient Arab nations were identified by their language and there was the Aramaics (Jesus was reported to speak that), Ethiopian; North African and Hebrew/Canaanite. The latter now claims to be "Western" - how did that come about and why are they worth trusting any more than other Arabs? If Australia is so much valued by the Americans WHY are we not trusted to have a nuclear weapon capability?

IF the UN is to achieve any credibility it must abide by its own rules and treat all nations in the same manner - under the same principles - with the same laws applied equally.  What ever happened to majority rules? 

As the man said: "Justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done", and the moral highground with its light burning brightly, does not exist anymore.

I reluctantly come back to my unhappy conclusion that "A nation is only entitled to that which it can defend"!

God bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.