Search
Recent comments
- I am the storm....
7 hours 48 min ago - biden is a crook....
7 hours 53 min ago - disinfo française......
9 hours 22 min ago - colonial warming.....
9 hours 30 min ago - deserter or double asgent?....
13 hours 20 min ago - bibi's interest.....
16 hours 24 min ago - war and money....
17 hours 48 min ago - lost trust....
19 hours 21 min ago - case dropped....
19 hours 40 min ago - profligate carbon....
19 hours 57 min ago
Democracy Links
Member's Off-site Blogs
steppin' out .....
As Hilzoy noted last night, Sarah Palin has a new and unexpected problem - the Republican National Committee has spent more than $150,000 on clothes and accessories for Palin and her family in just seven weeks.
The figure includes more than $75,000 at Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis, and nearly $5,000 on hair and makeup. The funds were not just directed at the governor - about $5,000 was also spent at Atelier, a high-class shopping destination for men.
The political implications are more than a little humiliating. Consider all the McCain campaign messages a story like this steps on - "elitist," "small-town values," "big spender," "relating to 'real' America," etc.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, American households spend an average of $1,874 a year on clothing. The RNC spent $150,000 on one family in seven weeks. Frankly, I'm not even sure how one family can spend that much so quickly.
We're talking about an average of more than $2,000 a day, every day, since late August. (Yglesias noted, "The total bill is well over double the median household income in the United States.")- By John Richardson at 23 Oct 2008 - 9:15pm
- John Richardson's blog
- Login or register to post comments
weird .....
from Alternet …..
In all sincerity, I had no intention of returning to the subject of Sarah Palin's $150,000 campaign wardrobe, but there's been one unexpected twist.
Up until now, the question has been, "Why did the RNC spend so much money on clothing and accessories?" This afternoon, a report from the New York Times generated a new question: "Why don't the numbers add up?"
Some of the fashion experts consulted Wednesday, for instance, about the $150,000 in purchases that appeared on Federal Election Commission records were puzzled by where all of that money had gone, given what they had seen of Ms. Palin's wardrobe.
Consider also the $4,902.45 charge at Atelier New York, a high-end men's store, presumably for Ms. Palin's husband, Todd, the famous First Dude.
Karlo Steel, an owner there, said he had gone through the store's receipts for September, twice, and found no sales that matched that amount, nor any combination of sales that added up to the total. Because the store carries aggressively directional men's wear, he caters to a small clientele and knows most of his customers by name, as well as the history of their purchases.... "We have no recollection of that sale and no idea what they are talking about," Mr. Steel said.
Similarly, the RNC records show a charge of $98 at a high-end children's boutique in Minneapolis, but after going through their receipts, the store owners found no record of the sale.
And here I thought the story was odd enough before.