SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
opinion: trumpet of fairies, abbottic deception or labor bland? the bland will do.....IMAGINE YOU’RE A BRAND NEW YOUNG ADULT WHO HAS JUST BEEN GIVEN A WEAPON: THE RIGHT TO VOTE. In Australia, it’s also an obligation. In our opinion, Gus’ and his pub mates, you still believe in fairies. You believe that your parents went for the wrong government since the world is crap. You really don’t know, except what you read on TikTok and what the posters in Newtown tell you, and you can't buy a house and find a job. WE OLDIES WERE IN THE SAME BOAT, SO WE HAD TO CLIMB FROM SHIT JOBS UP. For you VOTING is a new thing… for them oldies (everyone above 40 is old when you’re young) the next elections is a choice between the Trumpet of Fairies (the candies are so cheap, they melt in your mouth), the Liberal conservatives deception aka Tony Abbott government (so far away, you were still nappies), and the Labor bland, which isn’t perfect, but which does not promise the moon beyond what is affordable. It’s your gamut of choice as well, unless you are one of the few who "believe in socialism". There, one has to admit it has been a noble cause, which is still rampant in most societies, though the thought police is trying hard to bury the damn thing. On the fairy front, Disney overcooked it… You grew up with Snow White to discover that the DEI gods decided she was brownish… and the seven dwarves were not dwarves but were little mutts that had escaped from Mordor, in the Lord that Rung land… Not a good look, if you’re Chinese (apparently the movie bombed in China). So, we’re making it our duty, to give you a quick lesson in politics, this one coming from a SOCIALIST, John Percy, who analysed the Whitlam victory of 1972… As well, we will place a link on a how the CIA got rid of WHITLAM, 50 years ago… Today, the Trump Empire (formerly known as the American Empire) is full of cockroaches, vermins and opportunists. While the Murdoch media (you’ve heard about the Murdoch media, haven’t you?) was in favour of Whitlam then, it is now supporting the Trumpian decimation of democracy, because — as usual — there is a buck to be made by the rich people at the expense of the poor bastards — YOU… So, please vote carefully for Labor, even if you don’t understand why…
HERE IS JOHN PERCY, IN “RESISTANCE”…. The first issue of DA [DIRECT ACTION*] following the election had a cover story on "What We Can Expect from a Labor Government", by Jim Mcllroy: Labor's victory in the Federal election has thrown up a whole series of questions about what the ALP will do in the coming months. The broad majority of Australian working people of all ages have turned to Labor to provide political solutions to the social crises of our time. Labor has ridden to power on an extremely powerful current of popular frustration with the big business government and all its machinations. Workers, youth, women, blacks and homosexuals all seek a government which really seeks to tackle the widespread exploitation and oppression which they suffer under this society. To those who believe that this Labor administration has the answers a big disappointment is in store. To those who see this tremendous Labor victory as one important stage in a long process of building a movement to replace capitalism, the first signs of the Whitlam leadership's intentions are already quite apparent. And the need for the continual fight to place alternative solutions before the majority of Australians is also clear. Mcllroy pointed out that Labor had pledged to repeal the National Service Act, but it was left on the books for some future emergency. Labor refused to dissociate itself completely from US genocidal policies in Vietnam. Labor sought “neutralisation" of southeast Asia as an alternative to SEATO (South East Asia Treaty Organisation) but "are quite prepared to use Australian troops against revolutionary peoples", and reaffirmed their faith in ANZUS (the defence treaty between Australia, New Zealand and the US). On a whole series of other issues we see the ambiguous character of Labor policy — as a response to broad pressures, and as an attempt to absorb those pressures. The women's movement forced Labor to support equal pay and child-care centres, yet Whitlam and other Labor leaders fell over themselves to declare that the right to abortion was not an issue in the election and that the ALP has no policy on this question. Probably the most important reform promised and introduced was Medibank, the universal health insurance system, which for more than three decades has been whittled down by subsequent governments. Sol Salby pointed out in the same issue of DA that a wing of the ruling class was supporting a Labor government - the Murdoch press, for example: The main reasons why a considerable section of the bourgeoisie changed their allegiance were similar to those previous occasions when the ALP was elected: the worsening economic and political conditions on an international scale. Many businessmen feel that any improvement in the position of the Australian bourgeoisie vis-a-vis its overseas counterparts will depend on three things: (a) the setting back or taming down of any working class upsurge in response to the employers' offensive on the workers' living standards. (b) a more dynamic intervention by the state in the economy including 'indicative planning' and 'incomes policies'. (c) a larger trade with the workers' states in particular the Soviet Union and China. On all three points the ALP looks far more likely to implement those policies designed to help the employers in their current difficulties ... They believe that because of the working class's allegiance to the ALP, the Labor leadership will be able to restrain and perhaps even turn back the working class movement. Nevertheless, there were many immediate gains for the working class from Labor’s victory — the government ended support for US policies in Vietnam; the call-up was scrapped and draft resisters released from jail; South African sporting teams were banned; steps were taken to recognise the People's Republic of China; communist journalist Wilfred Burchett's passport was returned, so he was able to return to Australia; steps were taken to preserve Aboriginal culture and land rights. But the euphoric honeymoon of Labor's election wasn't to last long — on December 18, Nixon resumed bombing Vietnam. (Extract from RESISTANCE) GUSNOTE: THIS STORY IS FOLLOWED BY HOW AUSTRALIA GOT DIDDLED BY THE USA ON ITS QUOTA OF BEEF, ON THE PRICE OF PETROL AND HOW, BY 1975, THE CIA GOT RID OF WHITLAM…
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
|
User login |
*direct action....
Direct Action, then a monthly, was first published by the IWW in Sydney in January 1914. They borrowed some dough from a member and bought themselves an archaic printing press so that all restraints upon expression of 'clear cut revolutionary principles' were removed. In a statement of principles it set itself as being: "For the first time in the history of the working class movement in Australia, a paper which stands for strait-out direct-actionist principles, unhampered by the plausible theories of the parliamentarians, whether revolutionary or otherwise." With the new paper, they declared: "Every contributor, every supporter, is a member of the wage-earning class, who is conscious of his slave status in modem society, who is imbued, therefore, with motives stronger than mere sympathy or sentiment in voicing the aspirations of his fellows."
Success came quickly for their efforts under the initial editorships of Tom Glynn, J. B. King and Tom Barker. The paper was cheaply priced (1 penny) and full of short, humorous, irreverent and stinging comments upon events of the day. In 1915 the paper had moved from a monthly to a fortnightly by May and to a weekly by October. It quickly became an important organising tool for the group. Its sale, together with cheap pamphlets, became an important source of finance for both the locals and the central organisation as dues were often "very light." A regular weekly circulation of 8000 copies made it by far the most impressive revolutionary paper in Australia to that date. And of course radicals in those days tended to pass their papers along when they had finished with them so a single paper often counted for many more than one reader…
Their militancy and anti-war sentiment quickly brought them into conflict with the state and large sections of the community misled by the current war hysteria. Generally, the paper did not conceal the dim view it took of developments and, in the middle of 1915, its editor was arrested for producing a poster advising the Australian working class to "Let those who own Australia do the fighting - Put the wealthiest in the front ranks; the middle class next; follow these with politicians, lawyers, sky pilots and judges. Answer the declaration of war with the call for a General Strike … Don't go to Hell in order to give the plutocratic parasites a bigger slice of Heaven. - Workers of the World, Unite! Don't become Hired Murderers! Don't Join the Army or Navy!" - which put this attitude rather well.
During September and October of 1916 twelve leading militants within the organisation were arrested and charged with treason - a hanging offence. Many of them had links with Direct Action. John Hamilton, a miner, had put up the original cash to buy the press while Glynn was editor and J. B. King a former editor. The charges, later changed to conspiracy to commit arson, were a police frame-up. The most dramatic case in a broad suppression, the twelve were brought before a right wing judge already famed for the viciousness of sentences he imposed upon working class activists. Upon a technicality the press Direct Action was printed upon was confiscated.
Sentences imposed upon the Sydney fellow workers by Justice Pring (three varieties - five, ten and fifteen years of hard labour) tended to put most other things into shadow for a while. Direct Action, however, refused to be suppressed just yet although it had to be put out to a commercial printer.
Late in 1916 Australia's Prime Minister pushed through the first Unlawful Associations Act designed to banish IWWism once and for all. "This organisation", he said, talking about us, "holds a dagger at the heart of our society, and we should be recreant to the social order if we do not accept the challenge it holds out to us. As it seeks to destroy us, we must in self defence destroy it."
However, we proved more difficult than expected to destroy and in the first three months of 1917 seemed to be, if anything, expanding. May saw Direct Action prohibited from being sent through the post. Tom Barker remembers that: "We had to seal and stamp every one of them separately, then the men would go out all over the place and put them through the post boxes. As a matter of fact, it's said that the paper was better delivered in the time when it was illegal than it was before, because people took a pride in getting it and a pride in posting it, and the postmen were largely on our side. A good deal of our stuff went to places like Goulburn by train or by boat to Western Australia, so it didn't come into the postal system. We just made them up into rail parcels to go that way"
In the winter of 1917, again with the support of the Labor Party the original Unlawful Associations Bill was strengthened and its loopholes effectively plugged. All members of the IWW not cutting ties with the group were condemned to six months imprisonment with it left pretty much up to the individual to prove that s/he was not a member. The last edition of this first series of Direct Action, dated August 18, was stolen by the state when police made their final raid the IWW Hall in Sussex Street on 27 July 1917. The union responded variously to the repression with many adopting the civil disobedience tactic of proclaiming themselves true to their ideals and taking the consequences. So was this first incarnation of the IWW in Australia suppressed.
Direct Action re-emerged briefly in 1921 as the organ of the Industrial Union Propaganda League a grouping that consisted of several leading Wobs leading a tortured relationship in and out of the Communist Party. Different styles of action between the Wobblies (always trying to stir the rank and file) and the political sects that coalesced to form the CPA [Communist Party of Australia] (out to capture structures) formed stumbling blocks to this co-operation.
With the end of the war came the end of the repressive legislation with which the ruling classes had silenced the IWW. It was reformed in Australia although it never regained the strength or vivacity of the earlier period but maintaining itself as a thorn in the side of Labor politicians, corrupt and complacent craft union officials and the master class in most states from this time, through the depression years, until the second world war.
Direct Action re-appeared again as our mouthpiece a couple of times in the late 'twenties. Printed then in Adelaide it was not without its effect. Tony McGillick remembers that "in those times, the IWW was most active. Its newspaper Direct Action was sold on the job, at Employment Centres, and in the Botanic Park on Sunday afternoons." This series had less resources to draw upon than its predecessor and was terminated by legal proceedings against one of its editors.
The good name of Direct Action was sullied between 1970 and 1990. The Socialist Workers Party, a Trotskyist grouping took up our title although it did not promote direct action at all. At best it only proposed action mediated by the party and at worst tried to mislead the workers to do ridiculous things such as "vote for a labor Party pledged to socialist policies" without bothering to explain much how such an (in any case pointless) exercise could be accomplished or even where such a strange creature could be found. IWW members during this period were therefore forced to adopt the title Rebel Worker for their publication. The fellow workers concerned, feeling that their aims could better be promoted through an Anarcho Syndicalist Federation cut their ties with the IWW though continued to produce Rebel Worker. The SWP changed the title of their paper to the more trendy monica of Left Greensor something.
So we are back and, the working class willing, here to stay until the toilers get their dues - everything.
- Mike
Direct Action, PO Box 78 Bellingen, NSW 2454
https://www.katesharpleylibrary.net/8932j7
cartoons.....
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.