Saturday 22nd of March 2025

for an equal and orderly multipolar world.....

Let’s restore the trust in China that we once enjoyed. This was the key message I presented to an online forum titled Does China Threaten Australia’s Peace and Security hosted by the Australian Peace and Security Forum on 18 March. Following is a condensed version of my talk.

 

Australia-China relations: A question of trust    By Jocelyn Chey

 

In December 1960, the same month that I arrived in Hong Kong as a graduate student, the Australian Wheat Board set aside a Cold War embargo on trade with China and signed a two-year contract to deliver grain to alleviate China’s serious famine. This willingness to trust China was long remembered and often mentioned to me later by Chinese trade officials.

I started work for the Commonwealth Government at the beginning of 1973 and went on to work on various aspects of the Australia-China relationship over the following 25 years. Having survived the ups and down of the relationship, as one might say, through thick and thin, I would like to present a picture of the China that I have watched and engaged with over the decades, from a practical as well as an academic point of view. My conclusion is that the relationship has been beneficial to both sides and that above all it has been built on trust.

One of the most perceptive books about China I have read recently is Yasheng Huang’s The Rise and Fall of the EAST. Huang is a Professor of Management at MIT and has written extensively on management systems in India and China. He argues that the interplay of the EAST – the national examination system that dates from the Sui Dynasty, the imperial autocracy, the structural stability of society, and the role of technology and innovation — have shaped the China of today.

This chimes with my own experience of living and working in, and with, China. Its values differ from ours and we may well feel that our own (imperfect) democracy is preferable to Chinese socialism as defined by Xi Jinping, but it is a stable political system and independent surveys show that its people have a high degree of trust in their government. Over the decades, I have read many predictions of its collapse, but none have proved true.

Beijing leaders have concentric circles of concern, indicating their degree of concern, starting with domestic issues, then neighbouring countries, and then regional and global connections. China is certainly a land shaped by its history and geography. To this must be added the unique experience of the nation and its people in modern times. Its dismemberment in the 19th century at the hands of the colonial powers led by Britain and the United States determined its subsequent international relations policies and practices. These were reinforced by its people’s experience under Japanese occupation in the first half of the 20th century. The lesson of the need to remember the century of humiliation and never to allow it to recur is imparted to every schoolchild. The corollary is that sovereignty and integrity of territory are the basis of nationalism. China’s foreign policy is based on the principle of mutual respect and a determination to regain what is regarded as its rightful place in the world. It is not expansionist or aggressive.

Australia established relations with China in 1972 just as the country was reorienting its international relations and tentatively opening to cultural and political exchanges with the West. The Fraser Government established the Australia China Council in 1979 (I was the first executive director) to advise and encourage greater understanding of China. For over a decade, Australia was a pioneer in many aspects of cultural and economic exchange, from art to accounting, all warmly welcomed by the Chinese people. Both sides then agreed that there were extraordinary benefits to be gained by closer co-operation in trade and investment. China’s first major overseas investment, a joint venture between Rio Tinto and Sinosteel, was signed in 1987. An enterprise of this scale requires trust from all parties concerned and a recognition that all sides would profit from co-operation. As mentioned earlier, trust is at the heart of all sound relationships.

For both Australia and China, the 1980s was a period of globalisation and reform. China, with Australian support, joined APEC and prepared to join the World Trade Organisation. The domestic economy flourished in the new open environment and, from this time on, maintaining strong growth and raising living standards has been the main pillar of Chinese Government policies, reflected in successive five-year plans. Chinese people saw a bright future and developed new self-confidence even as they ventured overseas for travel, study and business.

China trusted the established international governance system, but it soon emerged that the United States did not return that trust. China’s rapid rise and increasing global presence changed the regional and global balance and generated a predictable geopolitical response. American concerns came to a head at the time of the Global Financial Crisis of 2008. Washington noted that it was Chinese investment in the US and Europe that sustained financial stability at this time. For the first time, the US faced a substantial competitor with the capability of being a leading player in the global economy and the international system.

On this side of the Pacific, Australia’s relationship with China continued to blossom and, despite ups and downs, proved that it was vital for our economy. In 2023, China accounted for one third of our total exports, worth a record $219 billion. Now trade barriers that affected exports after 2020 have been removed. Chinese students have returned to Australian universities. High-level visits and meetings have resumed. It is strange therefore that Australians’ trust in China has declined. In my view, this is due to our negative press, drawing on American sources.

In the last 20 years, the Chinese economy has continued to grow, surpassing Japan, to become the world’s second largest. It is a global leader in manufacturing and has made great advances in technology such as AI and robotics. To me, the greatest change in China has been in people’s mentality. The university and college system in China produces 11 million graduates every year. Young people are now part of the international community of ideas and information. They enjoy many more freedoms than their parents, including freedom of employment and movement.

China is now truly integrated into the global economy. National policy has determined this, and, in any case, it would have been inevitable, given the development of advanced technologies and information and communication systems. In the future, the major challenges that the world will face are global. Climate change cannot be tackled without international co-operation. Australia needs more than ever to understand China and its domestic and foreign policies.

There are abundant ways to do this. The recent National People’s Congress set out government priorities, and Foreign Minister Wang Yi gave a briefing on foreign policy at a press conference on 7 March. To summarise his lengthy speech, he presented China as a responsible and stable global power and, without explicitly saying so, drew comparisons with Trump’s America and its chaotic pronouncements.

It is worthwhile quoting Wang Yi a more fully. In answer to questions, he said:

“We are living in a changing and turbulent world, where certainty is becoming a scarce resource. The choices made by countries, especially major countries, will determine the trajectory of our times and shape the future of the world. China’s diplomacy will stand firm on the right side of history and on the side of human progress. We will provide certainty to this uncertain world.”

He made some more points that I summarise:

“We will be a staunch force defending our national interests. …

“We will be a just and righteous force for world peace and stability. …

“We will be a progressive force for international fairness and justice. We will uphold true multilateralism, and bear in mind the future of humanity and the well-being of the people. We will promote global governance that is based on extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefit. We will observe the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and build more consensus for an equal and orderly multipolar world.

“We will be a constructive force for common development of the world. We will continue to expand high standard opening-up and share the vast opportunities of Chinese modernisation with all countries. We will safeguard the multilateral free trade system, foster an open, inclusive and non-discriminatory environment for international cooperation, and advance a universally beneficial and inclusive economic globalisation.”

Now some people might say this is government propaganda and reject it. To that I reply, where else will you find such a clear and decisive commitment to a rules-based international order? Surely it at the very least offers a potential way forward for us and for our region. It’s a question of whom we should trust.

https://johnmenadue.com/australia-china-relations-a-question-of-trust/

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

take note.....

 

Misinformation in politics: Anti-China Media Watch    By Marcus Reubenstein

 

 

The ABC reveals Chinese social media is again facilitating foreign interference in our elections, Dutton is the true champion of China relations, while Chinese hospitals are overcharging Aussies for lifesaving surgery.

Take note of RedNote

The ABC reports (20/03/25), “Chinese social media platform RedNote fuels misinformation concerns in Australian election”. It’s tabloid-like stuff, throwing a couple of buzz words into a headline and then building a narrative to support a poorly substantiated conclusion. If something can happen it doesn’t automatically mean it will; and if it does happen, that doesn’t mean it will be as bad as the headline suggests.

Is RedNote, the Chinese social media app millions in the English-speaking world flocked to after the US banned TikTok, generating any more or less misinformation than its Western equivalents? US-owned social media platforms Facebook, X and Instagram all play host to millions of posts with false content. In Australia, these platforms produce far more fake content than we see on Chinese social media.

The ABC story throws the spectre of “foreign interference” out in the first sentence of the story. Foreign interference is unambiguous code for the Chinese Communist Party’s sinister attempts to destroy our democracy. There is absolutely no evidence presented in this story to support such assertions… but it makes for a great lead in.

While the ABC makes much of an AI video of Peter Dutton, dubbed in Chinese with a voice similar to his, how many Chinese-Australians believe Dutton actually speaks Chinese? I’m guessing it’s a figure slightly north of zero.

In recent years, there’s been a torrent of election time reports in mainstream media that Chinese-Australians are being fooled by misinformation campaigns. The one thing these reports lack, particularly the ABC’s RedNote report, is evidence that Chinese-Australians are actually influenced by clearly fake posts.

The underlying suggestion is that Chinese-Australians so lack intellect that they can’t distinguish between what’s real and what’s not. In my book, such continual suggestions are racist.

Further, there is not a single mention that both the Liberal and Labor parties are using their own official accounts on TikTok to post misinformation with AI-generated videos.

The principal source for the ABC story is a report authored, but not publicly released, by the RECapture project, a private collaboration of academics from the University of Melbourne, Monash and Deakin universities.

Two years ago, one of the authors published another report concluding that suggestions Chinese state actors were using WeChat to influence Australian elections were overblown, writing, “Despite fears of foreign interference, our study — which monitored multiple rounds of Australian federal and state elections — has not yet identified alleged ‘Chinese influence’ across [WeChat Official Accounts].”

In order to bring some balance back into its argument, the ABC got on the blower and sought comment from Victorian LNP senator and self-proclaimed “China wolverine” James Paterson.  

While Senator Paterson continues to bemoan anything China-related as linked to a totalitarian, hostile enemy, he remains silent on his own party’s use of TikTok, developed and owned by Chinese company Byte Dance.

According to an ABC report, the Liberals are running rings around PM Albanese and the Labor Party in peddling their political influence over the platform. In December 2024, Peter Dutton’s posts reached individual views of 859,250, while Albanese lagged far behind on 89,283. Surely the alternate prime minister’s posting on Chinese social media holds far greater sway over voters than the handful of RedNote posts identified by the ABC?  

Speaking of fooling voters

An exclusive RedBridge poll reported (paywalled) in Murdoch Media (19/03/25) has found that Dutton is the political leader best equipped to manage relations with China. Though the poll is not to be found anywhere on the RedBridge website, it reportedly found that 51% of Australians believe AUKUS has made Australia a safer place.

Oddly enough, 51% of respondents did not believe the AUKUS submarines were a good investment, presumably not the same 51% who think the subs make us safer. Despite the guns of the US and its willing allies being pointed at China, incredibly, 71% did not believe, or expressed no opinion, that AUKUS has increased the risk of war.

Lies, damned lies and statistics; if you think those numbers don’t add up, it’s because they don’t.

Chinese ‘horror’ story

An Australian couple face a “horror” medical bill at the hands of the Chinese, so we need somebody to blame. News.com.au (19/03/25) reports on the plight of an Australian couple holidaying in southern China. After 64-year-old David Crowley suffered a heart attack and received emergency lifesaving surgery at a hospital in Guilin, Murdoch stablemate, Sky News, says the couple was “slapped” with a $2000 a day medical bill.

So, what does $2000 a day get you?

A dive into the report reveals Crowley’s wife alerted staff at the hotel where they were staying that her husband could not move, was pale and had trouble breathing. Within 10 minutes, an ambulance was on the scene, rushing Crowley to a local hospital where, according to his family, he was placed in an induced coma and underwent emergency surgery to have two stents inserted.

To date, according to the couple’s son, the hospital has billed $11,000 for the ambulance, surgery and two days in the intensive care unit. It seems all Crowley got in return for that money was his life.

To give this some perspective, in 2023, I had a 40-minute procedure at a Sydney hospital to repair torn cartilage in my right knee. I was in and out of the hospital in half a day and the entire procedure cost $10,500 – imagine my horror.

The Sky News and news.com.au reports quote Crowley’s son as saying, “They just put the EFTPOS machine in front of Mum when she gets in.” According to the report, the surgery was not covered by insurance because Crowley had a pre-existing heart condition. If only the Crowleys went to Disneyland, then they’d only be looking at a bill of around $100,000 for the same procedure.

It’s indeed a horrible experience for any Australian tourist to face life-threatening medical episodes in a foreign land; but let’s not blame the Chinese for saving this man’s life and then asking to be paid.

 

https://johnmenadue.com/misinformation-in-politics-anti-china-media-watch/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.