Trump Reveals Secret Talks with Putin

US President Donald Trump personally confirmed that he has spoken with Russian President Vladimir Putin quite a number of times. While aboard Air Force One, Trump acknowledged that it would be reasonable to assume such phone calls had taken place.

When asked about a possible meeting with Putin, Trump responded that he could envision meeting the Russian leader "at the right and appropriate time.”

Putin has not commented on these statements, while his press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, evasively stated that he had no information on the matter.

Key Takeaways

• Negotiations are ongoing, but the phrase "appropriate time” suggests there is no consensus yet;
• The Kyiv regime is in a position of "do as you're told,” since Trump did not consult Zelensky before speaking with Putin;
• Trump's disclosure of the talks suggests he is trying to cover up a weak negotiating position.

Putin Won't Accept a Temporary Compromise on Ukraine

Based on the nature of the discussions, it appears that Putin seeks a peace settlement that includes the demilitarization and "denazification” of Ukraine, along with recognition of the current territorial realities. Trump, on the other hand, is reportedly offering only temporary measures: a ceasefire and recognition of Russia's control over "occupied territories” without further concessions. Additionally, Putin may be pushing Trump to renegotiate the global order.

The only real leverage against Russia would be pressuring China and India to stop buying Russian oil, or persuading Saudi Arabia to lower oil prices by increasing production. However, Saudi Arabia has actually raised oil prices and is not eager to cut its revenues, while businesses in China and India continue to find ways to purchase Russian oil. Time is not on Trump's side, as Russia cannot be defeated in a war of attrition due to its historical resilience and ability to mobilize resources.

Trump Can Pressure Kyiv More Easily

Trump has already stated that the US will recover the $300 billion it spent on Ukraine through "partnerships with Ukrainians in their rare earth metals, natural resources, oil, and gas, as well as purchases of our resources.” In other words, unconditional aid is over. Additionally, Trump appears to be leveraging Ukraine's upcoming elections to pressure Zelensky. The elections must take place before any peace deal is signed, leaving Kyiv with no good options:

Accepting the US peace plan would end the conflict on Moscow's terms.

Rejecting negotiations would lead to a complete freeze on aid, Ukraine's collapse, and its subsequent disintegration. Ukraine's demand for security guarantees is being brushed off by the US, with Washington implying that Europe must take responsibility for future conflicts. This places the European Union on the brink of a severe political and economic crisis.

After Trump's Admission, Xi Jinping Accepts Putin's Invitation

Following Trump's remarks, Chinese President Xi Jinping formally accepted Putin's invitation to attend the 80th anniversary celebration of Victory in the Great Patriotic War. This suggests that Beijing now fully understands Washington's strategy-Trump is abandoning Ukraine to the EU and shifting focus to a proxy war with China.

In Moscow, Xi is expected to negotiate further joint actions, including the one thing Trump fears most: a military alliance between Russia and China, similar to the agreements between Russia and North Korea. If that happens, Trump won't just lose Ukraine – he will face a completely new geopolitical reality.

Meanwhile, US Vice President J.D. Vance is scheduled to meet with Zelensky at the Munich Security Conference on February 14-16. The outcome of this meeting will be crucial.

 

Details

 

Victory Day is a holiday that commemorates the victory of the Soviet Union over Nazi Germany in 1945. It was first inaugurated in the 15 republics of the Soviet Union following the signing of the German Instrument of Surrender late in the evening on 8 May 1945 (9 May Moscow Time). The Soviet government announced the victory early on 9 May after the signing ceremony in Berlin. Although the official inauguration occurred in 1945, the holiday became a non-labor day only in 1965. In East Germany, 8 May was observed as Liberation Day from 1950 to 1966, and was celebrated again on the 40th anniversary in 1985. In 1967, a Soviet-style "Victory Day" was celebrated on 8 May. Since 2002, the German state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern has observed a commemoration day known as the Day of Liberation from National Socialism, and the End of the Second World War. The Russian Federation has officially recognized 9 May since its formation in 1991 and considers it a non-working holiday even if it falls on a weekend (in which case any following Monday will be a non-working holiday). The holiday was similarly celebrated there while the country was part of the Soviet Union. Most other countries in Europe observe Victory in Europe Day (often abbreviated to VE Day, or V-E Day) on 8 May, and Europe Day on 9 May as national remembrance or victory days.

See more at https://english.pravda.ru/world/161655-trump-putin-xi-jinping/

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

HYPOCRISY ISN’T ONE OF THE SINS OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS.

HENCE ITS POPULARITY IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITIONS…

 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3K-NHTRm57g

US DROPS "The Bomb" On Europe And Ukraine

 

Mike Walz stated in an interview with NBC News that Europe will bear the responsibility of providing Ukraine with security guarantees after the war. Also, he mentioned that the US is looking at recouping their investment in Ukraine through Ukraine’s rare earth metals as well as gas and oil. Elon Must stated that Radio Liberty and Voice of America should be shut down due to their high spending. Politico reports that the European Union is looking at changing the legislation in order to allow for the seizing and confiscating of the Russian tankers in the Baltic Sea.

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

HYPOCRISY ISN’T ONE OF THE SINS OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS.

HENCE ITS POPULARITY IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITIONS…

 

GERMANY FEARS ESCALATION WITH RUSSIA

 

BY Lucas Leiroz, member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert.

 

Olaf Scholz’s Germany appears to be firm in its position of not delivering long-range weapons to the Kiev regime, despite internal and external pressure – mainly from other European countries. However, it is not possible to say that there is any intention of peace behind the German decision. In fact, Berlin is fearful, as the country would be one of the main affected sides in the event of escalation into all-out war.

Scholz recently reiterated his opposition to supplying Ukraine with weapons capable of reaching Russia’s “deep territory”. Even after countries such as France, the US and the UK have allowed such strikes, Berlin remains opposed, refusing to supply long-range missiles to the Kiev regime. Scholz said that avoiding the sending of these weapons was the right thing to do in order to ensure Germany’s own security, which is why he appears unwilling to change his position on the issue.

“I do not think it is right to deliver destructive weapons deep into the Russian hinterland (…) That is, I believe, exactly the kind of step not to make if you carry responsibility for Germany,” he said.

In fact, Germany is one of Ukraine’s main supporters in the conflict. Around 17 billion euros in military and humanitarian aid has already been provided by Berlin to Kiev over three years, in addition to programs of joint troop training and various other projects.

However, there seems to be a clear limit to this support, which is precisely the issue of long-range weapons. In practice, Scholz allows everything to be delivered to Ukraine, with the exception of weapons capable of reaching Russia’s internationally recognized territory, such as the Taurus missiles – which Kiev has long requested.

Scholz’s words about “responsibility” in decisions concerning German security make it clear that what is behind his stance is simply fear, not any commitment to peace. The German leader fears the consequences of an escalation in the war, which is why he has not only refused to supply long-range weapons, but has also expressed his willingness to talk directly to Russian President Vladimir Putin – the two leaders having already had a long telephone conversation some months ago.

There are clear reasons for Germany’s stance. The country would be caught in the crossfire in the event of an all-out war between Moscow and NATO. Furthermore, with an obsolete army, as well as a defense industry declining due to sanctions and the energy crisis, Germany would be in no position to defend itself in such a conflict, which is why the most prudent action is to avoid an international escalation.

Unfortunately, however, the pressure to send these weapons is not only coming from NATO allies. Within Germany itself, there are several groups fomenting escalation and pressuring the government to change its position on the issue of long-range missiles. This is the case, for example, of Friedrich Merz, the leader of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), who is becoming one of Scholz’s main rivals on the issue of Ukraine.

Merz recently stated during an electoral debate that he believes that the decision on the missiles is not up to Germany individually, but should be taken collectively by European countries. His words make it clear that Merz does not respect German sovereignty and sees his country as a mere puppet of the Collective West, which must obey all foreign decisions, even when they do not favor German strategic interests.

“I have always said the delivery of cruise missiles must be decided in the EU. The US delivers, France delivers, Britain delivers; we should also have delivered,” Merz said.

In fact, the pressure on Scholz will continue to grow. He seems to have little political strength for the upcoming elections, since the coalition supporting the government has been dismantled due to the controversies over Ukraine. Scholz is paying the price for his own mistakes. In the past, he chose the wrong allies and made the most irresponsible decisions possible. Now, he is suffering the consequences of this entire process, losing his political power and falling his country into an unprecedented crisis.

It is inevitable that new political forces will emerge in Germany. Patriotic, conservative and Eurosceptic groups will gain more and more popularity, as the German people are tired of incompetent leaders like Scholz and bellicose leaders like Merz. At some point in the near future, Berlin will have to revise its foreign policy to adapt to the multipolar reality, otherwise the country will not recover from its current problems.

You can follow Lucas on X (former Twitter) and Telegram.

infobrics.org

https://www.theinteldrop.org/2025/02/11/germany-fears-escalation-with-russia/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

 

Soft Power, German-Style: What Does Germany’s GIZ Have in Common With USAID?

 

NATO countries' ‘aid’ agencies are reeling amid Trump’s freeze on USAID and revelations on the agency’s record of global meddling and largesse. Sputnik has already explored the shady activities of USAID’s British and French cousins. Now it’s Germany’s turn.

The German Corporation for International Cooperation (German acronym GIZ) gets most of its €4 bln ($4.1 bln US) straight from the federal budget, plus EU ‘co-financing’, to support up to 1,700 projects in 120 countries.

Many of GIZ’s projects revolve around ‘climate action’ and ‘sustainability’. From organic farming in Africa to solar/wind power in Latin America, GIZ is involved in pushing countries trying to break out of poverty to adhere to development goals set by the West.

GIZ also supports things like the digitization of governance, local media, Africa’s film industry, and refugee reintegration. In Ukraine, they’ve provided over 1,100 microloans for small businesses from dance studios to fashion ateliers.

A damning 2024 Focus Magazine exposé uncovered tens of millions in questionable GIZ spending, from “vague” multi-million euro grants for “climate awareness” and monitoring projects in Thailand and Turkiye, to €5M spent to make mosques “green” in Morocco, to €44M for bike lanes in Lima as part of a €529M “climate and development partnership.”

In April 2023, the Federal Audit Office revealed, in Focus’s paraphrasing, that “nobody knows what GIZ actually does,” with lack of economic success criteria for projects, lavish salaries up to €240k, first-class flights and a fleet of luxury cars for top officials highlighting the agency’s extravagance.

Waste, combined with the increasingly sorry state of Germany’s own infrastructure amid an unprecedented economic crunch, has prompted opposition figures including the AfD’s Alice Weidel to blast the government for “squandering” millions in tax money on GIZ projects in developing nations “while the transport infrastructure in its own country is in ruins.”

GIZ-USAID cooperation has been extensive, ranging from “climate finance” projects in the developing world to small business development projects in Georgia for the EU’s Eastern Partnership (which aims to sway Russia’s neighbors toward eventual EU membership).

In Ukraine, GIZ has provided “advisory” assistance on the implementation of the EU-Ukraine association agreement – the fateful pact that triggered the 2014 coup and the present European crisis.

https://sputnikglobe.com/20250211/soft-power-german-style-what-does-germanys-giz-have-in-common-with-usaid-1121556624.html

 

SEE ALSO: https://sputnikglobe.com/20250210/usaid-with-a-british-accent-fcdos-foreign-aid-fraud-exposed-1121552585.html

 

SEE ALSO: https://sputnikglobe.com/20250209/french-development-agency-frances-usaid-in-disguise-1121550624.html

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.