SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
china is great....Donald Trump’s second term may not be all bad for all nations, including and especially China. For many Chinese internet users, Trump’s policies have unwittingly strengthened their country. This is why he has earned the popular nickname “Chuan Jianguo,” which means “Make China Great.” Thanks Trump, for helping make China great again By Wang Wen
Trump’s first term made at least three notable contributions to China’s rise. First his presidency shattered the image of the US as a paragon of democracy for many Chinese, revealing political chaos and deep societal divisions. For decades some Chinese idealised the United States as a “beautiful country”: the literal translation of the Chinese name for the US. However, Trump’s actions provided what some describe as a “political lesson,” reshaping perceptions and fostering greater appreciation for China’s stability and governance. Second, Trump helped accelerate China’s push toward technological independence. Over 20 years ago, the Chinese government began promoting innovation in science and technology, though many believed there were no borders in this field. It wasn’t until events like the 2018 arrest of Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou and the crackdown on Chinese tech firms that the country fully committed to innovation. By 2024, China had achieved significant strides in tech independence, including breakthroughs in semiconductor manufacturing. This shift was underscored by record-high chip exports in 2024, which surpassed $159 billion, doubling 2018 figures. Third, Trump’s tariffs and trade restrictions pushed China to strengthen its ties with the non-Western world. Through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative, China deepened its relationships with Global South nations. Between 2018 and 2024, trade with these nations grew by over 40 percent, while China’s reliance on the US for trade fell from 17 to 11 percent. Looking back, the combined experience of Trump’s first term and Biden’s policies to contain China over eight years has strengthened the country in the medium term. From a long-term perspective, China has gained a strategic psychological advantage in dealing with Trump 2.0. China’s media and think tanks have responded to the possibility of Trump’s return with relative calm compared to the growing anxiety in Europe and Canada. Beijing seems confident, having already weathered trade wars and technological blockades during Trump’s first term. China won’t actively provoke Trump 2.0, but if aggressive US policies like trade wars or technology restrictions persist, China will respond with calculated countermeasures ‒ and ultimately, become even stronger. On January 7, 2025, both China and the US experienced natural disasters. A 6.8 magnitude earthquake struck Dingri county in Tibet, while a major wildfire broke out in Los Angeles. In Tibet, Chinese authorities swiftly transitioned from emergency response to recovery, relocating 50,000 residents within a day. Meanwhile, the wildfire in Los Angeles raged for over 10 days, worsened by political infighting and mismanagement. This stark contrast highlights the differences in governance and crisis management between the two nations. China’s rapid response to the earthquake, efficiently moving from rescue to resettlement, stands in sharp contrast to the prolonged crisis in Los Angeles, where political leaders traded blame while the fire caused damage surpassing the 9/11 attacks. These contrasting responses underscore the weaknesses in US crisis management and governance. While much of the non-Western world remains relatively at ease, Trump-style neo-fascism is provoking panic across the Atlantic, particularly in Europe and Canada. Questions now surface at the highest levels of international diplomacy: Will Denmark lose Greenland? Will NATO lose US military support? Will Canada become the 51st state? These once-crazy notions are now openly discussed. For many in China, the global impact of Trump 2.0 is unlikely to surpass that of Trump 1.0. If Trump 1.0’s America was like a mischievous child causing global trouble, Trump 2.0’s America may resemble a menopausal patient ‒ unable to influence much beyond his previous allies in the US. In fact, in 2025, many in non-Western countries believe Trump 2.0 will focus mainly on domestic affairs while occasionally stirring up trouble among Western allies. Non-Western observers know full well that Trump 2.0 will not end the Russia-Ukraine conflict in one day. He will not resolve the Palestinian-Israeli dispute anytime soon. He will not prevent China’s long-term trade growth with 60 percent tariffs. He will not, and cannot, curb China’s continued rise. Trump 2.0 will likely continue withdrawing from international agreements, including climate accords and the WTO. The result? The gradual disintegration of US global hegemony. If this trend continues, Trump 2.0 could push the US into regional power status, embracing isolationism. Regardless of the scope of Trump’s impact ‒ whether through trade wars, technological conflicts, or treaty withdrawals ‒ China is well-prepared for the worst. As it has done in the past, China has the ability to turn challenges into opportunities. By 2028 the Chinese will be more confident than ever in saying: “Thank you Trump.” https://johnmenadue.com/thanks-trump-for-helping-make-china-great-again/
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
GUSNOTE: I USED TO APOLOGISE FOR USING WORDS LIKE SHIT, FUCK, POOP, MERDE, EXCREMENTUM, SCHEISSE, ETC, BUT WORLD POLITICS LED BY THE USA HAVE GONE DOWN THE TOILET OF HUMAN EXCREMENTS... SO NO MORE APOLOGIES FROM GUS.
|
User login |
great idiots....
‘Sheep for hire’: Trump, Musk and Zuckerberg’s dangerous plan for Europe
The European Union has long been one of the safest digital spaces for internet users. But that was before Donald Trump’s imminent return to the White House and before two of today's tech titans – Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg – were essentially handed carte blanche to declare war on the EU’s digital defences. Some say the trio has even more sinister plans in the making.
Barely two weeks ahead of Trump’s inauguration, Mark Zuckerberg, the head of Facebook parent company Meta, threw down the gauntlet.
“We’re seeing an ever-increasing number of laws institutionalising censorship,” he railed in a five-minute video posted across social media on January 7. “And we're going to work with President Trump to push back on governments around the world that are going after American businesses."
His statement was a veiled threat directed at the EU, where increasingly stringent digital laws have already cost his interests more than a billion dollars in fines over the past few years.
In the next breath, Zuckerberg announced that he was abandoning the fact-checking programmes that have been key to fighting disinformation on both Facebook and Instagram in recent years – replacing them with voluntary “community note” systems. Although the move would apply only to the United States for now, he indicated that Europe could be next.
Zuckerberg had essentially pledged allegiance to the incoming Trump administration and its war on the mechanisms that have called out disinformation on his platforms. Moreover, he has joined X CEO Elon Musk – now one of Trump’s closest aides – in his virulent campaign against the EU’s digital rulebook.
Win-win trioAnalysts say the president-elect and the two tech giants have formed a very powerful – and potentially very dangerous – trio that is out to dismantle EU digital rules and the democratic values they were built on.
“They come from very different angles and positions into this debate, but their interests have converged,” explained José Ignacio Torreblanca, a geopolitics and technology expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations, noting that they could all benefit from teaming up.
Torreblanca said that Musk, whom he described as being on an “ideological crusade” to save the world from “woke” progressives, will be handed the power to do so. Zuckerberg, on the other hand – whose moral principles Torreblanca likened to “a piece of jelly” – will be able to defend his business interests in peace. And Trump, who has been dying for worldwide attention ever since he was blocked from the world’s biggest platforms – X, Facebook and Instagram – has regained unhindered access to these global audiences.
And he no longer needs to worry about being barred or fact-checked.
Billions in EU finesSo what is Big Tech so angry about? Put simply, that Europe holds them responsible if they fail to keep user data safe or foster the spread of hate speech. EU laws require tech giants to make clear how they use any data collected from social media users, take action if harmful and illegal content (like hate speech or disinformation) is being spread via their platforms, and refrain from engaging in unfair or misleading business practices.
These rules have been years in the making. The EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – touted as the toughest digital security law in the world – was implemented in 2018 to ensure social media companies complied with European laws on the right to privacy.
For users, this means that the option to consent to – or reject – data collection pops up in a window whenever they visit a new website in Europe.
In the past two years, the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Markets Act (DMA) have sought to regulate how tech giants behave in the very markets they dominate. Sixteen probes have since been opened, mostly involving tech giants like Meta, X, Apple, Alphabet and Google.
And the rope has been tightening.
Musk’s X is currently being investigated for a number of things, including whether its new paid-for “blue checkmark” verification system is misleading, since those users are no longer actually verified.
But according to French daily Le Monde, Zuckerberg has been feeling the most heat, with his companies facing a total of five probes: one concerns Meta forcing Facebook and Instagram users either to pay for ad-free subscriptions or consent to their data being collected.
In 2023, Meta was hit with a record €1.2 billion fine for transferring EU user data into the United States in violation of a previous court order.
Flouting regulationsIn a paper named “Glitch in the matrix” that Torreblanca co-authored in December, he warned that the “new US tech agenda” under Trump would test the EU’s ability to regulate Big Tech.
And that it would target these regulations full force.
“In October, Trump vowed to not let the EU ‘take advantage of our companies’, and Vice-president elect JD Vance has also stated that the US could drop support for NATO if the EU further regulates X. As a result, the Trump administration could lobby European leaders to prevent the commission from punishing X,” he wrote.
“Moreover, if the EU does impose the fine, Trump and Vance are likely to support Musk and denounce the fines as illegitimate. Musk could also use the platform itself to mobilise citizens and far-right parties to raise the political cost for EU decision-makers pursuing the crackdown.”
When Zuckerberg appeared on Trump-supporter Joe Rogan’s podcast on January 10, he confirmed the support he expected from Trump in any face-off with the EU from now on. "And it's one of the things that I'm optimistic about with President Trump," Zuckerberg said, borrowing a Trump buzzword to dub the EU penalties "tariffs".
Weaponised dataFrans Imbert-Vier, the CEO of Swiss cyber-security consulting firm UBCOM, said the EU can expect a challenge from the moment Trump walks into the White House. First off, he predicted, Musk and Zuckerberg will overlook any rules that do not originate in the United States.
“They will ignore them to such an extent that American courts won’t even respond to European court injunctions,” he said.
Imbert-Vier said the EU legal framework could be rendered essentially toothless, because even European politicians “need these social networks to survive” in today's environment.
But the real problem, he said, would be if Big Tech firms turn their focus to harvesting user data en masse and using it to promote their own political interests.
“They’re going to go all in,” Imbert-Vier said, singling out Musk in particular for having his own political agenda for Europe that he might use these vast reams of data to realise.
Political meddlingMusk’s interest in, and interference with, European politics has already raised more than a few eyebrows.
Earlier this month he accused British Prime Minister Keir Starmer of being “complicit in the rape of Britain”, claiming the leader had refused to pursue a child grooming ring when he was the country’s chief prosecutor. In a barrage of posts on X, he called on Starmer to be imprisoned and for new UK elections to be held. In fact, the number of prosecutions of child sex abuse rose during Starmer's tenure.
Musk has also gotten involved in politics in Germany – which is due to hold snap elections next month – throwing his weight behind the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), claiming it is “the only party that can save Germany”. He followed up by hosting an exclusive livestream event on X for AfD’s leader.
French President Emmanuel Macron criticised such interference in European politics during a recent speech to French ambassadors, without mentioning Musk by name.
“Ten years ago, who would have imagined that the owner of one of the world’s largest social networks would be supporting a new international reactionary movement and intervening directly in elections, including in Germany,” Macron said.
https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20250117-sheep-for-hire-trump-musk-and-zuckerberg-s-dangerous-plan-for-europe
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
GUSNOTE: MACRON AND SCHOLZ ARE IDIOTS WHO MISSED THEIR CHANCES TO BE GREAT AGAIN.... BY WEAPONISING SANCTIONS ("REGULATIONS") ON MEDIA. SEE:
censorship and truth....