Monday 18th of November 2024

always the same: humans should be more friendly....

Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles announced Sunday that Japanese troops will regularly deploy to northern Australia

About 2,000 U.S. Marines are stationed in Darwin, the capital of the Northern Territory, for six months each year.

The deployment is in response to growing worries among Washington and its allies about China's increasing military strength in the Indo-Pacific region.

"Having a more forward leaning opportunity for greater training with Japan and the US together is a really fantastic opportunity for our defense," Marles said after a meeting with his US and Japanese counterparts, Lloyd Austin and Gen Nakatani.

Alliance against Chinese threat

Japan's Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade, an elite marine unit, will be deployed to Darwin to work and train alongside Australian and US forces regularly.

 "It is a very important statement to the region and to the world about the commitment that our three countries have in working with each other. This is going to build interoperability between our three countries," Marles said.

The partnership would increase intelligence "surveillance and reconnaissance activities" between the three countries, which will "advance our goals for a secure and peaceful Indo-Pacific," Austin said.

The last such meeting was held in Singapore earlier this year. The nations jointly expressed opposition to "any destabilizing and coercive unilateral actions." 

In September, China launched an intercontinental ballistic missile that landed in the Pacific Ocean. This caused worries among several Pacific nations, including Australia. 

Australia is developing its surface fleet and also plans to deploy nuclear-powered submarines in a tripartite deal with the United States and Britain known as AUKUS.

The recent re-election of Donald Trump as President of the US has caused some concern about existing pacts. But Australian officials are confident that the pact will remain. Austin said the Defense Department was focusing "on a smooth and effective transition" to the new administration.

https://www.dw.com/en/japanese-troops-to-start-deployments-in-australia/a-70803218

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

“It’s hard to do cartoons without monkeys…”

         Gus Leonisky

death grip.....

 

Detaching Australia from the death grip of the United States    By Geoff Davies

 

Our challenge now is to detach Australia from the death grip of the United States and to pursue an independent future, which we are quite capable of doing. To do so we will need not only to remove the old sycophantic parties but also to root out the US ‘security’ zealots from our own secretive security establishment. They will not go easily.

The US Democrats failed, again, because they don’t understand that it is what they have been doing that feeds Trump support.

Bernie Sanders gets it. He says an American on an average income is worse off today than they were fifty years ago. Fifty years. All that ‘growth’ of ‘the economy’ and your average punter is no better off, perhaps worse off.

People know it. They know they are struggling, that good jobs are disappearing, that they are slipping backwards. And they can see the fat cats raking in the wealth and flaunting it.

This has been known for a long time. Robert Reich showed it in this simple graphic thirteen years ago. 

Since around 1980 median income in the USA has stagnated, even as productivity has continued to increase steadily, as it did in the immediate postwar decades.

What happened? The game was rigged (and here) so the wealth flowed upwards. One key change was that tight restrictions on the financial sector, imposed after the searing experience of the Great Depression, were loosened by Ronald Reagan, and loosened again by Bill Clinton. Turnover in the financial markets jumped by a factor of fifty (yes, fifty times greater) as their unproductive speculative gaming sucked huge amounts of wealth from the productive economy.

Congress was purchased by Wall Street and the military industrial complex. CEO salaries became obscenely high and the capturing of other people’s wealth became flagrant. Private sector debt rose dramatically until it crashed in 1990 and again in 2008. The rich were rescued from their follies and everyone else was left to flounder and sink.

The value of Reich’s graph is that it shows that things were not always like they are now. In the nineteen fifties and sixties the increasing wealth was shared around (because people demanded it, not because the rich gave it away). The rich were taxed and governments provided valuable services. Most people don’t remember that any more, and economists seem to be too ignorant or compromised to tell us.

Sanders went so far as to call himself a democratic socialist when he ran for the Democratic nomination for President in 2016. ‘Socialist’ is a dirty word in the US, but he quickly attracted a large following.

It is plausible that Sanders could have defeated Trump the first time around because he was appealing to the same dispossessed people, and his message was gaining traction, against all odds. But the Democratic Party power brokers used undemocratic rules to out-muscle him and nominate Hilary Clinton. Clinton advertised her out-of-touch mainstream mindset by calling some of the Trump supporters ‘deplorables’. She lost, and gave the world President Trump.

The blame does not all belong to the Democrats. Reagan and his Republicans started it with the deregulation of the financial sector and shifting government spending from government services to the military. Bill Clinton made it worse by removing restrictions on banks’ gambling with other people’s money.

Barack Obama kept the seat warm for eight years and, apart from a compromised medical insurance scheme, did little to rebalance the social compact. One of Obama’s first moves was to appoint a Wall Street banker to be Secretary of the Treasury, thus demonstrating he had no grasp of the source of growing social divisions. Trump I is a measure of Obama’s failure.

An analysis by Ben Davis offers some support for this interpretation. He says an important factor was that people felt better off because of special social supports introduced during the Covid pandemic, but that Biden let these supports quietly expire and now people feel worse off. Rightly or wrongly, people credit Trump and blame Biden.

The neoliberal ideology has been used as cover by the wealthy sharks to increase their power. As I have written, neoliberalism has been an economic failure and a social disaster. But we should understand that, regardless of any ideology invoked as justification, there has been a series of specific changes made that have led to the present disastrous situation, and those changes can be unmade, or replaced by better ones.

It seems unlikely the Democratic Party will make the radical shift that is needed for it to regain power on behalf of ordinary people. There are some who are trying, like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, but the party power brokers are deeply entrenched in a very corrupt system. It also seems to be more difficult in the US for third parties to gain traction.

Trump’s promise, and his appeal, is that he will smash the system, and the Democratic Party may go down with it. We will see whether anything constructive emerges, or whether the next four years will be a descent into fascism accompanied by civil violence and potential anarchy. It will be a disastrous time for US society and a dangerous time for the world.

We are fortunate in Australia that a challenge is being mounted to the old, corrupt political parties by community independents and others. We have suffered much of the same history as the US, but to a less extreme degree, and our social fabric, always stronger, has not been as badly shredded. Our electoral system more readily allows such challenges. Our challenge now is to detach Australia from the death grip of the United States and to pursue an independent future, which we are quite capable of doing. To do so we will need not only to remove the old sycophantic parties but also to root out the US ‘security’ zealots from our own secretive security establishment. They will not go easily.

https://johnmenadue.com/detaching-australia-from-the-death-grip-of-the-united-states/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

“It’s hard to do cartoons without monkeys…”

         Gus Leonisky

 

SEE ALSO: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_Grip_(film)

Monkey Grip is a 1982 Australian drama film directed by Ken Cameron. It is based on the novel, also titled Monkey Grip(1977), by Helen Garner.[2] It was screened in the Un Certain Regard section the 1982 Cannes Film Festival.[3] The film was produced by Patricia Lovell and stars Noni Hazelhurst and Colin Friels, and featured an original soundtrack by Australian rock band the Divinyls.

Plot

Nora, a single-mother in her thirties living in Melbourne is engaged in an on-again off-again relationship with the heroin addict Javo, who can never quite decide whether he wants his freedom, or romantic commitment. The further their relationship progresses, the harder they find it to let go.