Wednesday 27th of November 2024

trading with china....

THERE WAS A TIME — SAY MORE THAN 20 YEARS AGO, ACCORDING TO THE MAGAZINE COVER ABOVE — (myBUSiNESS, The magazine for ambitious Australian business owners, JULY 2011) WHEN MAKING BUSINESS WITH CHINA WAS WELCOME. THEN, THE AMERICAN EMPIRE, MIFFED THAT CHINA WAS GETTING TOO MUCH TRADE FOR MAKING GOODS TOO GOOD CHEAPER, INTERFERED WITH THE PLAYING FIELD WITH SANCTIONS AND TARIFFS, WITH LAME EXPLANATIONS...

 

 

Failure of trade bullying becoming ever more apparent

 

Reportedly, the US Department of Defense has decided to remove Hesai Technology from the blacklist of enterprises it alleges have links with the Chinese military because the Pentagon believes that the world's leading manufacturer of laser sensors for electric vehicles does not meet the criteria for being blacklisted. This is an embarrassing flip-flop of the Joe Biden administration, which just added the company to the list in January this year claiming it had sufficient evidence to justify its decision.

In June, some US lawmakers also mooted the removal of DJI from the list under mounting pressure from US industry and market as the Chinese company has a large share of the drone market in the United States with the performance to cost ratio of its products unmatched by other manufacturers.

The US Congress passed legislation in 2021 requiring the Pentagon to compile the list. The act aims to strengthen the scrutiny of Chinese companies operating in or selling their products and services to the US.

Notably, the Shanghai-based and Nasdaq-listed Hesai Technology sued the Pentagon in May, saying there was no evidence of its connection with the Chinese military and called the US' blacklisting move "arbitrary and capricious".

Although people familiar with the matter told the media that US government lawyers were concerned that the reasons for blacklisting the company would not withstand legal scrutiny based on the criteria listed in the 2021 legislation, it would still be extremely difficult for Chinese companies to win a lawsuit against the US government on US soil.

The US has also tried to coerce other countries to participate in its trade restriction measures targeting China, particularly in the advanced semiconductor industry, irrespective of the impact this would have on the global industry and supply chains.

The only reason why the Biden administration seems still intent on sticking to its de facto trade bullying and economic coercion practices, after most allies and many US companies have actually started distancing or directly stepping away from them, is that, with the US presidential election around the corner, it simply cannot afford to admit the failure of its China-containment strategy, a hallmark policy of its diplomacy, even if the policy proved not only futile but also self-harming.

https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202408/15/WS66bd3db1a3104e74fddba068.html

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

GUSNOTE: Magazine at top in Gus's collection of references....

not just america....

EU’s new protectionist move set to ‘impede its green development’

Negative impact of protectionist actions to unnerve market: analyst

By 

Wang Cong and Chen Qingrui

 

The EU continues to take protectionist actions against Chinese products, with biodiesel becoming the latest Chinese product targeted by the bloc in a move that will further escalate tension between China and the EU amid the dispute over the EU's additional tariffs against Chinese electric vehicles (EVs).

The EU's protectionist actions will not protect the bloc's businesses from normal market competition, but instead will undermine the competitiveness of EU industries and slow the bloc's transition toward green development, the experts noted.  

In the latest example of the EU's growing protectionism against China, the bloc imposed provisional anti-dumping tariffs of between 12.8 percent and 36.4 percent on Chinese biodiesel starting on Friday, according to media reports. 

China's exports of biodiesel to the EU have dropped sharply since mid-2023, with the volume in the first half of 2024 plunging 51 percent amid the EU's protectionist actions. The EU is one of the largest destinations for Chinese biodiesel exports, accounting for 90 percent of the total export volume in 2023, Reuters reported. 

This is just the latest example of the EU's growing protectionism against Chinese products and companies. The EU has announced so-called anti-subsidy tariffs of up to 37.6 percent against Chinese EVs after what Chinese officials and experts said was a discriminatory investigation into Chinese EVs. The EU has also targeted Chinese companies' involvement in some projects in EU member countries. 

Chinese officials have repeatedly criticized the EU's actions and Chinese industry groups have warned of grave consequences for bilateral economic and trade cooperation as well as the EU's plan to transition toward green development. 

Zhao Junjie, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences' Institute of European Studies, said that the EU's latest actions against Chinese biodiesel is just another example of the bloc's growing protectionism. "The best way forward is cooperation," Zhao told the Global Times on Sunday, "however, the current political environment in the EU has become inward. The EU's protectionist actions, including the so-called anti-dumping investigations, are very unwise." 

Chinese officials have vowed to take all necessary measures to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies. 

As part of China's efforts to protect its rights and interests, the Ministry of Commerce earlier this month announced that it has initiated dispute settlement proceedings against the EU's provisional anti-subsidy measures against Chinese EVs at the WTO.

The EU's protectionist moves against Chinese products and companies have already caused damage to trade in relevant industries. 

In the first half of 2024, Chinese EV exports to the EU plunged by 15 percent year-on-year to 221,000 units, according to Chinese official data. In June alone, EV exports fell below the level of 30,000 units, a decline of 31 percent year-on-year and the lowest in the year, the data showed.

Negative impact

Meanwhile, the EU's additional tariffs have caused significant uncertainty within the bloc. According to the latest data, the share of Chinese EVs among newly registered EVs in the EU reached 12.4 percent in June, compared with 10.4 percent a year earlier. 

Commenting on the data, the China Chamber of Commerce to the EU (CCCEU) said that the change most likely reflects fluctuations created by the EU's plan to impose additional tariffs on Chinese EVs. "The data highlights the nervousness and uncertainty in European markets caused by the EU's protectionist measures," the CCCEU said in a statement shared with the Global Times.

The EU's protectionist actions against Chinese EV and biodiesel may led to declining exports to the EU in the short term, however, the moves will also have negative impacts on the EU's development, particularly its transition toward green development, experts said.

"The EU's protectionist actions may be only targeted at certain Chinese products, but it will hurt more industries," Zhang Jian, a vice president at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times. "Chinese exports of biodiesel are in line with the EU's energy policies because the EU plans for its green transition are about cutting the consumption of fossil fuel. Biodiesel is conducive to the EU's green transition and its goals of cutting carbon emissions." 

In addition to the additional tariffs against Chinese products, the EU has become increasingly hostile toward Chinese investments. Under its so-called Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR), Brussels has launched so-called investigations and even raids against Chinese companies, some of which led to Chinese companies to withdraw from projects in EU member countries. 

Since the beginning of this year, the EU has launched five investigations under the FSR into Chinese companies. In one of the striking examples, in March, Chinese train maker CRRC withdrew from a 610 million euro ($660 million) public tender for a Bulgarian railway project, after the EU launched an investigation into the bid under the FSR framework.

The EU's moves have created great uncertainty for Chinese businesses operating in the EU and it will lead to a decline in Chinese investments, even as some EU member countries are seeking to attract Chinese investments, Chinese industry groups and experts have warned. 

On Friday, the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products warned that EU members' backing of anti-subsidy measures targeting Chinese EV manufacturers will inevitably lead to a loss of investment in Europe.  https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202408/1318257.shtml  

READ FROM TOP

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

澳洲研究

 

From Aussie politics to Henry Lawson: the story of how ‘Australian studies’ spread across China     By Richard Hu and Diane Hu

 

 

There are nearly 40 Australian studies centres in China’s universities and institutes. This is a greater number than anywhere else in the world, including in Australia itself.

We estimate about 250 scholars are involved in the teaching, research and debate of Australian affairs in China. A suite of Australian courses, both compulsory and elective, are offered to undergraduate and postgraduate students. Several programs also offer Master’s and PhD degrees.

The presence of this intellectual community in China is exceptional. And as we explore in our new book, How Australia is Studied in China, its emergence is both accidental and purposeful.

Early pioneers

In early 1979, nine Chinese students came to study at the University of Sydney under a student exchange program that formed part of the first cultural agreement between the two countries.

These “students” were English education scholars in their 30s and 40s. They were among the first Chinese students/scholars to study in Australia (and the West) at a time when China had just started opening up to the world.

The students were well received by their host university and country. They studied Australian literature, culture and linguistics under legendary academics such as Dame Leonie Kramer and Michael A. K. Halliday.

After completing their two-year-long study, these nine “Australianists” returned home and started teaching about and researching Australia. And although Australian and Oceanic studies had been available in China prior to this (such as at Nankai University and Anhui University), these scholars became the pioneers of Australian studies in China as we know it today.

Nicknamed the “gang of nine”, their contributions have extended far beyond Australian studies. They have all become flagship figures in English education, linguistics and English and Western literature in China. Several have taken up high-profile roles in universities or in the national education apparatus.

The gang of nine’s two-year stay in Australia opened a new chapter of intellectual pursuit. More importantly, it opened the door for an ongoing educational and intellectual exchange between China and Australia.

Language, literature and more

The Australian studies centres in Chinese universities are mostly affiliated with English or foreign language schools. Australian courses are offered in English and are usually integral to English language and literature degrees.

Ever since China established its reform and opening-up policy in 1978, English has been very important in the nation’s education system. The rise of Australian studies has met a growing demand for English proficiency and a desire to understand the developed world.

Bespoke courses on various subjects have been taught at many universities. One example is an elective course on Australian children’s literature that was offered at the Inner Mongolia Normal University, with positive learning outcomes.

The main focus of Australian studies in China has been on literature, with a series of monographs published and numerous Australian novels translated.

As such, Chinese readers can access works by Australian writers such as Patrick White, Henry Lawson, Alex Miller, Helen Garner, Peter Carey, Alexis Wright and Thomas Keneally. One prolific translator, Li Yao, has translated more than 50 Australian titles.

Other fields of Australian studies in China include history, economics, trade, tourism, education and Indigenous studies. The scholars of these disciplines actively contribute to academic and policy debates relating to Australia in areas of politics, international relations, technology, innovation and the environment.

Support from both sides

While the efforts of the Australianists have led to remarkable growth and achievements in Australian studies, there has also been long-term support from Australian agencies and individuals.

Founded in 2011, the Foundation for Australian Studies in China (the creation of which was led by the Australia-China Council) has played a strategic role in supporting Australian studies in China.

The foundation’s Australian Studies in China program has delivered books and library resources, translation prizes (and various other output prizes), and project awards for Chinese students and scholars to visit Australia.

It has also organised conferences, sponsored students from both countries and enabled the recruitment of the BHP Chair of Australian Studies at Peking University.

It is thanks to both sides’ efforts and understanding that we have seen the emergence of such an intellectual community in China – a positive outcome of both cultural literacy and cultural diplomacy.

 

Republished from The Conversation, August 22, 2024

https://johnmenadue.com/from-aussie-politics-to-henry-lawson-the-story-of-how-australian-studies-spread-across-china/

 

 

READ FROM TOP

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

patience.....

 

Patience is needed for investments in China    By Yan Xingzhou

 


Christopher Przybylo, board advisor for business expansion in China, from Raben Group NV, said in a recent interview with China Daily Website that companies must focus on building relationships with Chinese business partners and be patient to see returns on investment

https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202409/14/WS66e520d6a3103711928a806f.html