Sunday 8th of September 2024

ardern joins a US pro-war think tank....

Last month the major Democratic Party-aligned think tank in Washington, the Center for American Progress (CAP), announced that former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern will launch a new leadership program as part of the Center’s Global Progress Action initiative.

 

Former New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern joins pro-war US think tank

BY Tom Peters

 

In a June 17 Instagram post, Ardern wrote that the 12-month program, called the Field Fellowship, “supports and connects global political leaders who embody political leadership that draws on the strength of kindness and empathy.… [It] will create a network of like-minded political leaders who use pragmatic idealism, speak to people with hope and optimism rather than fear or blame, and want to unite, rather than divide as we look to solve the challenges ahead.”

She declared that it was part of her “mission to help rehumanise leadership, and just be useful!”

CAP’s chief executive Patrick Gaspard stated that the inaugural fellowship, “beginning this summer, is expected to include women in leadership roles from different European countries.” He said the program would counter the “rise of authoritarianism and the growing influence of the far right in Europe” by helping to “shape the ideas that will steer Europe toward a more hopeful, unifying, and optimistic future.”

Beyond these statements, no details have been released about precisely what the Field Fellowship will do and who will participate. One can say with certainty, however, that its stated aim of opposing the far-right is a sham. The program will train political leaders in how to emulate Ardern’s use of gender identity politics and empty rhetoric about “kindness and empathy” to mask the reactionary and authoritarian agenda of the ruling classes.

The portrayal of Ardern in the corporate media as a “progressive” figure is a fraud. Her 2017‒2023 Labour Party-led government was, by any objective measure, one of the most right wing in New Zealand’s history: it strengthened New Zealand’s alliance with US imperialism, while overseeing a massive transfer of wealth to the rich during the first years of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In every country in Europe and the US, governments of every colouration are carrying out deep attacks on workers’ living standards and democratic rights, while building up their militaries, supporting genocide in Gaza, the escalating the US-NATO war against Russia in Ukraine, and the build-up to a US-led war against China. Ardern’s Field Fellowship is part of the increasingly desperate attempts to put a “human face” on a system that is careening towards dictatorship and world war.

A center for war propaganda

Ardern is joining an organisation described by Politico in 2021 as “the most influential think tank of the Biden era.” The CAP is basically an adjunct of the Democratic Party, the party of Wall Street and the military. Its CEO Gaspard served as executive director of the Democratic National Committee from 2011–13, overseeing the efforts to re-elect President Barack Obama. 

The CAP has received tens of millions of dollars from corporations and the super-rich, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, Amazon, billionaire Michael Bloomberg and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, along with many others.

Johan Hassel, the director of the CAP’s Global Progress initiative—of which Ardern’s fellowship is part—was the international secretary of the Swedish Social Democratic Party from 2018–2022 and is described on the CAP website as “a senior figure in Swedish and European politics.” Significantly, his profile also boasts that he “served in the Swedish Armed Forces and the Kosovo Force”—the NATO-led forces stationed in the imperialist puppet state of Kosovo, which was created through NATO’s bombing of Serbia in 1999.

Throughout its 20-year history the CAP has specialized in the production of “humanitarian” propaganda for war. It criticized the Bush administration’s invasion of Iraq in 2003 on the grounds that it was a diversion from the equally criminal war against Afghanistan, which the CAP endorsed. It likewise supported NATO’s regime change war in Libya in 2011 and the Obama administration’s arming of Islamist “rebels” in the Syrian civil war. All these wars, justified on the pretext of fighting against “terrorism” and for “democracy,” cost hundreds of thousands of lives and devastated entire societies.

In response to Ardern’s post announcing the Field Fellowship, several commenters pointed out the blatant hypocrisy of talking about “empathy and kindness” while refusing to condemn the Israel-US genocide in Gaza. The political leaders who take part in her program will be from countries that are actively supporting and providing political cover for the genocide.

The CAP supports the arming of Israel as Washington’s attack dog in the Middle East, and has a record of whitewashing the oppression of the Palestinian people. In November 2015, the CAP hosted a discussion with Israel’s fascist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, during which CAP president Neera Tanden presented him as the leader of a “democracy… [that] shares values with democracies around the world.” She also hailed Israel’s military for being “very inclusive” of women and gay people. This was one year after Operation Protective Edge, Israel’s brutal bombing of the Gaza Strip, which slaughtered more than 2,300 people.

On October 14, 2023, chief executive Gaspard released a statement endorsing Israel’s genocidal attack on Gaza. He said President Biden was “right to affirm support for Israel as it responds to monstrous acts of terror,” while cynically adding that “US leaders must insist on compliance with international law.” Subsequent CAP statements have echoed the Biden administration’s meaningless calls for a ceasefire, while advocating the ongoing provision of weapons to Israel. Washington has enabled Israel to kill more than 40,000 people and bomb cities into rubble, along with almost all hospitals and schools, and to block the delivery of aid, inflicting mass starvation on hundreds of thousands of people.

When the CAP says it wants to stop “the rise of authoritarianism,” what this actually means is defeating the main rivals of US imperialism, especially Russia and America’s principal economic adversary, China.

In April, the CAP published a report on “managing tensions with China,” which urged the Biden administration to “invest in practical battlefield technology and revamp our advanced manufacturing sector to build a defense ecosystem.” It called for sending more weapons to Taiwan, which is a key part of Washington’s efforts to provoke China into starting an all-out war.

The CAP calls for escalating the war in Ukraine, which has already killed and maimed an estimated 500,000 people. It has demanded more funding for the Zelensky regime and insisted that Russia must suffer a decisive military defeat before there can be talk of peace. By pouring tens of billions of dollars in military aid into Ukraine, the US and NATO are not defending “democracy,” but an extreme right-wing dictatorship that works closely with fascist forces, and is persecuting anti-war activists, including the socialist Bogdan Syrotiuk who has been thrown in prison for his writings on the World Socialist Web Site.

The war is spiraling out of control, as the NATO powers discuss plans to place their economies on a war footing and to send troops to Ukraine, while missile strikes inside Russian territory are raising the threat of a nuclear exchange.

Far from combating the extreme right, the parties promoted by the CAP—the Democrats in the US and the social democratic and Labour parties internationally—have paved the way for these forces. Donald Trump in the US, Marine Le Pen in France and Italy’s Giorgia Meloni have all been able to pose as “anti-establishment” by exploiting widespread anger and disillusionment with the brutal policies of austerity and militarism imposed by supposedly “progressive” or “liberal” capitalist governments.

On every major issue—including war, attacks on immigrants, cuts to welfare and healthcare, the erosion of democratic rights, and the policy of mass COVID-19 infection—Biden’s administration has sought to appease and collaborate with the Republican right. The same basic tendency can be seen in New Zealand under the last Labour government led by Ardern.

Ardern’s record

Ardern is joining the CAP at a time of mass popular opposition to the Gaza genocide and to anti-democratic forms of rule internationally. Her job will be to train politicians to bring this movement under control and to subordinate workers and youth to political forces that uphold NATO’s militarist agenda. This is the role that Ardern has played throughout her political career.

Ardern’s supposedly “empathetic” leadership has been glorified in the international media for years, especially following her response to the Christchurch terrorist attack on March 15, 2019, in which the fascist Brenton Tarrant murdered 51 people at two mosques. According to the media narrative, Ardern’s “kindness” brought the nation together and inspired the world. She was hailed as the antithesis of right-wing leaders such as Trump, who was one of Tarrant’s heroes.

Fawning articles in the New York Times and elsewhere omitted any mention of the fact that Ardern’s Labour Party and its ally the Greens were only able to form a government in 2017–2020 in a coalition with the right-wing, racist New Zealand First Party. NZ First leader Winston Peters, notorious for his anti-Muslim and anti-China rants, was made deputy prime minister and foreign minister by Ardern.

The 2017 coalition deal was supported by US ambassador Scott Brown, who made clear that Washington saw Labour-NZ First as a more reliable government to integrate New Zealand into US war plans against China.

The Labour-NZ First government declared that China and Russia represented the main “threats” to the world order; boosted New Zealand’s participation in US-led military exercises in the Indo-Pacific region; and sent troops to Britain to assist in training Ukrainian conscripts to fight against Russia. Last August, Labour’s Defence Minister Andrew Little declared that the military had to be “equipped and prepared” to join a possible war in the South China Sea, i.e., against China.

The state has suppressed any discussion of the political environment that led to the March 2019 attack—including the racism and anti-Muslim sentiments encouraged by successive Labour and National Party governments to justify their participation in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Many questions remain about why the state did not stop Tarrant and whether he had accomplices.

The Ardern government exploited the attack as the pretext to expand the intelligence agencies and to promote censorship. In May 2019, Ardern partnered with French President Emmanuel Macron to launch a global initiative, the Christchurch Call to Action, which brought together governments and tech giants—including Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Google and YouTube—ostensibly to stop the spread of “violent extremist content” online.

The Christchurch Call indicates the sort of initiatives that the Field Fellowship will advocate for Europe. It has nothing to do with combating the far-right or preventing terrorist attacks. Its aim is to establish a framework for censorship, on an international scale, of any online content that governments decide to label extremist.

In a speech to the UN in 2022, Ardern linked the Christchurch Call directly to the war against Russia, saying it was necessary to stop online platforms from being used as “weapons of war” to spread “disinformation,” “cause chaos and reduce the ability of others to defend themselves.” The speech was an argument for censoring any opposition to the US-NATO war effort.

Ardern’s partnership with Macron is particularly revealing. His government has used police state measures to crush a mass movement of the working class against pension cuts and other attacks. With his party facing defeat in the current French parliamentary elections, Macron is threatening to assume dictatorial emergency powers to enforce deeply unpopular austerity measures and to send French troops into Ukraine.

Ardern stepped down as prime minister in early 2023 and left parliament in April that year. She then began two fellowships at Harvard University, focused on political leadership and countering online extremism, which appear to have been preparation for her role at the Center for American Progress.

The reasons behind Ardern’s departure and her replacement by Chris Hipkins have never been fully explained; at the time Ardern lamely declared that she did not have enough energy to continue as prime minister.

Her resignation, however, came as the working class was turning against Labour. Ardern’s 2017 rhetoric about addressing the housing crisis was revealed to be a fraud, with homelessness becoming more entrenched; and the soaring cost of living was forcing hundreds of thousands of people to rely on food banks to survive. Despite Ardern making herself the minister for child poverty reduction, child poverty actually increased during her government.

Labour’s support began to decline sharply after Ardern scrapped the country’s popular elimination strategy for COVID-19 at the end of 2021, and adopted the policy of mass infection demanded by big business, which had already caused millions of deaths worldwide. Thousands of people died in the following year and the New Zealand healthcare system was overwhelmed with COVID cases.

Labour lost the October 2023 election, with just over half the votes it received in 2020, opening the door for a coalition of the conservative National Party government and the far-right ACT and New Zealand First parties. This deeply unpopular coalition is picking up where Labour left off: it is further strengthening military ties with the US, Britain, Australia and Japan against Russia and China; supporting the genocide in Gaza; and imposing savage austerity measures in healthcare, education and social welfare.

Ardern’s entire career, culminating in her recruitment by one of the main think tanks for US imperialism, vindicates the warnings made by the Socialist Equality Group (SEG) and the WSWS since 2017. In opposition to all the middle class, pseudo-left organisations which promoted Ardern and Labour—including the International Socialist Organisation and Socialist Aotearoa—the SEG explained that her pledges to address poverty were worthless, and that Labour was an imperialist party that would deepen the drive towards war.

Workers and young people who are moving to the left must draw decisive political lessons from the experience of the Ardern years. Above all: the fight against genocide, war and the assault on living standards, must be built in opposition to Labour and all its allies, including the Greens and pseudo-lefts. It must be based on a socialist program, aimed at mobilising the working class throughout the world against the capitalist system that is the root cause of war, fascism and inequality.

  https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/07/06/bsqa-j06.html

fascism in disguise...

 

Jacinda Ardern joins programme by major U.S. think tank the Center for American Progress    By Max Hayton

 

Former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s new international role is leader of a project created by the think tank the Center for American Progress, known as CAP. Reactions to this apparently counter intuitive move have been varied.

The Think Tank Journal describes CAP as ‘a major Democratic Party aligned think tank in Washington DC.’

The more extreme World Socialist Web Site went further and said Ardern ‘joins pro-war US think tank.’

Politico describes the Center for American Progress as ‘the most influential think tank of the Biden era’. CAP has played a significant role in shaping policy and political discourse during President Biden’s administration.

Jacinda Ardern said the project she will head, named ‘Field’, is a 12 month programme to support and connect global political leaders who embody kindness and empathy.

She said Field will create a network of political leaders who use pragmatic idealism, speak to people with hope and optimism rather than fear or blame and want to unite rather than divide in the search for solutions to the challenges ahead.

The first cohort of leaders will meet in July and come from across Europe but this will broaden over time.

Ardern said “Field is an incredibly humbling and exciting project to be leading. It is part of my ongoing mission to re-humanise leadership and just be useful!”

Field is hosted by Global Progress Action, which in turn is an initiative of the Center for the American Progress Action Fund, the CAP fund.

CAP was launched in 2003. It was created by Bill Clinton’s White House Chief of Staff, John Podesta and others who were opposed to Bush-style Republican conservatism. It was a clearing house for progressive ideas and governance. It quickly became an influential player in the Democratic Party’s political landscape, helping to turn the tide of opinion against the Iraq War, preparing the foundations for health care reform in the lead up to the passage of Obamacare, innovating in the world of advocacy media and feeding dozens of personnel to political institutions throughout Washington DC.

Combined with its policy and advocacy arm, CAP currently has a staff of 415 and an operating budget of about US$64 million.

Podesta is on record saying CAP has ‘a very good balance sheet and finances and a reputation (among donors) that it’s a place that if you invest you get good results.’

The donors who invest expecting to ‘get good results’ include a number of anonymous donors.

Others include Microsoft, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie

Corporation, Amazon, Michael Bloomberg, Mark Zuckerberg, Apple, Google and JP Morgan. Some health providers and some entertainers notably Barbara Streisand have made contributions in recent years.

For others CAP appears somewhat sinister and Ardern’s association with it appears to contrast with her reputation for kind and empathetic leadership.

The World Socialist Web Site says the CAP has specialised in the production of propaganda for war. It says CAP opposed the war in Iraq because it thought it diverted resources from fighting in Afghanistan, it supported NATO’s war to change the regime in Libya and supported the Obama administration’s arming of Islamist rebels in Syria.

The WSWS criticises in detail CAP’s support for President Biden’s escalation of tensions with China and CAP’s advocacy for further arms for Ukraine to promote a ‘decisive military defeat (of Russia) before there can be talk of peace’ and talk about empathy and kindness, while failing to condemn the ‘Israel-US genocide in Gaza’ was ‘hypocrisy’.

The Field programme under Ardern’s leadership will begin by involving up to fifteen participants from different European countries. Johan Hassel, senior fellow and director of Global Progress Action said “creating a fellowship for leaders to support, learn and grow together can help restore faith in progressive solutions as a force for good and better combat the shadow of far right extremism.”

“The rise of authoritarianism and the growing influence of the far right in Europe shows the urgency for this program,” said Patrick Gaspard, CEO of CAP Action. “This moment demands more bold and principled leaders who are not afraid to stand firm in their values and who will refocus politics where it belongs, on caring for people.”

Field under Ardern’s leadership will face a well-funded and well organised right wing influencer Steve Bannon who has provided substantial support for European right-wing movements. He has worked with a number of high profile right-wing leaders, including Marine Le Pen in France, Viktor Orbán in Hungary and Matteo Salvini in Italy. Bannon’s efforts have included setting up “war rooms” to strategise and support these parties during elections.

Ardern will face huge challenges matching Bannon’s success and even moderate commentators have questioned what the Field Fellowship might achieve, or whether it is merely window dressing to help the Democratic administration in Washington DC to hang on while losing its grip in other directions.

 

https://johnmenadue.com/jacinda-ardern-joins-programme-by-major-u-s-think-tank-the-center-for-american-progress/

 

READ FROM TOP.

the kiwis go bananas....

 

By Mick Hall
Substack

 

New Zealand as US ‘Force Multiplier’ in Asia Pacific

Opposition is mounting to New Zealand’s alignment with Western proxy war architecture after Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told a British newspaper he wanted to make the country’s military a “force multiplier” for the U.S. and its allies in the Asia-Pacific region.

Luxon revealed to the Financial Times on July 15 that New Zealand would be completing a “status of visiting forces agreement” with the Philippines, which would facilitate deployment of its military there, after Japan militarized its own relationship with the Philippines following April talks in Washington.

He also said there were plans to boost military spending and to “name and shame” China for alleged spying and cyber-attacks. Luxon added he was “very open” to signing up to Pillar II of AUKUS — the U.S., U.K. and Australia nuclear-propelled submarine alliance designed to confront China militarily in its own backyard. Pillar II focuses on advanced technologies, including AI and hypersonic missile systems.

On July 16 former Prime Minister Helen Clark and ex-leader of the National Party, Don Brash, released a joint statement condemning Luxon’s comments, which followed his presence at the three-day NATO summit in Washington, D.C., that ended at the weekend. They said Luxon was jeopardising New Zealand’s foreign policy and economic security. 

The public denunciation reflects growing alarm across the political divide to the ruling coalition’s moves to involve itself in preparations for war with China as the U.S. struggles to compete economically with its peer competitor and battles to maintain hegemony in a world moving inexorably towards multipolarity.

“Just one month after the New Zealand Government hosted the Chinese Premier in New Zealand, and with no hint of a major change in New Zealand foreign policy in the National Party’s election campaign last year, the Prime Minister’s comments to the Financial Times strongly suggest that he has abandoned New Zealand’s independent foreign policy,” Clark and Brash said.

The pair attacked Luxon’s signalling that he would boost defence spending “at a time when public spending is under pressure,” as well as his position on AUKUS, which they said went “well beyond ‘exploring’ options for engagement with it,” the bipartisan position before elections last October. 

“These statements orient New Zealand towards being a full-fledged military ally of the United States, with the implication that New Zealand will increasingly be dragged into US-China competition, including militarily in the South China Sea,” they said. “While the rhetoric from both sides is heightened, it must be noted that the US is demanding that China accept the presence of US naval forces in its vicinity in a way which the US itself would not for a moment accept if the boot were on the other foot.”

The former senior politicians also called out the current China threat inflation, designed to politically facilitate a move towards entanglement in U.S. plans to pursue its doctrine of full-spectrum dominance in the Asia-Pacific region.

Their statement said: 

“Does China spy on New Zealand? Almost certainly, just as the US, the UK, and countless others, including New Zealand, spy on other countries. Is China the only country spying on New Zealand, and is it only governments that engage in spying? Almost certainly not. The obsessive focus on spying by China suggests an agenda going beyond alerting and equipping New Zealanders to better manage all relevant risks.”

In his FT interview Luxon also referred to China as a “strategic competitor” even though China is the destination for 40 percent of New Zealand’s exports and has enjoyed unfettered access to Chinese markets under a free trade agreement.

“China not only poses no military threat to New Zealand, but it is also by a very substantial margin our biggest export market – more than twice as important as an export market for New Zealand as the US is,” Brash and Clark warned.

“New Zealand has a huge stake in maintaining a cordial relationship with China. It will be difficult, if not impossible, to maintain such a relationship if the Government continues to align its positioning with that of the United States.

New Zealand has for decades sought engagement with China and its inclusion in the international system. A policy of isolating China serves no one’s interests, and has major implications for New Zealand’s economic security.”

Luxon is seen as not a having seasoned grasp on international affairs and diplomacy, possibly reflected in his comments to the British broadsheet that he intends to pursue a doubling of exports to China over the next 10 years, while simultaneously drawing the country into a military bloc deeply hostile to its key trading partner and declaring the superiority of Western values widely seen as discredited in the Global South and the rest of the world, particularly in light of ongoing acts of genocide in Gaza.

In 2022, NATO stated at its Madrid summit, attended by then Labour Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, that it viewed China as a systemic competitor that challenged “our interests, security, and values” and sought “to undermine the rules-based international order.”  China issued a warning to New Zealand afterwards it had no time for exclusive blocs and military alliances.

“A better approach would be to follow the example of Singapore – friendly to both China and the US, but definitely not in a treaty relationship with either,” Brash and Clark said. “The course which the New Zealand Government is now taking, with no electoral mandate for a radical change to foreign policy, carries huge risks to our country.”

Luxon’s language, however, signals his foreign-policy settings are being determined by engagements with U.S. officials and not electoral mandates. He told the FT: “Our view is very strongly that what happens in the Euro-Atlantic has an impact on the Indo-Pacific.” It reflects the narrative pushed by political elites in the West that if Russia defeats NATO in Ukraine, equally authoritarian China will be emboldened to “invade” Taiwan.

Following the lead of the U.S. and its sub-imperial partner Australia, New Zealand, under both Labour and the National-led coalition, has been warning that a “free and open Indo-Pacific” was under threat, necessitating making the military “operationally credible” for challenges in an increasingly unpredictable global environment. 

defence and strategy policy document and separate report by the country’s biggest spy agency last August suggested China posed an increasing threat to the country, without presenting credible evidence.

There has been a significant uptick in academics linked to the security state amplifying anti-China war narratives, while the media has also played its role in creating a McCarthyite pre-war environment, most notably Stuff Circuit’s largely vacuous documentary “The Long Game,” looking at Chinese Communist Party influence and alleged interference in New Zealand.

NATO’s Push Into Asia-Pacific 

China and Russia are now leading a charge towards an alternative, multipolar world order, principally through the expanding BRICS trading bloc. The U.S. has been using the increasingly vassalized European Union and NATO member states to escalate its proxy war with Russia in Ukraine, green-lighting attacks deep into Russia with rockets it supplies, as well as the delivery of F-16 fighter jets. Most worrying, Germany has agreed to site U.S. long-range missiles in its territory from 2026, with the capability of delivering a nuclear strike inside Russia within minutes. 

[Related: Destabilizing the US-Russian Nuclear Balance]

There are growing concerns NATO’s expansion into the relatively peaceful Asia-Pacific region will bring similar conflict and the growing threat of nuclear war. 

New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, after talks at the State Department on April 12, declared in a joint statement that the two countries were “working more closely than ever.” The extent of this new relationship is now being revealed with its increased NATO involvement, a trajectory put in motion under Labour, with Prime Ministers Chris Hipkins and Jacinda Arden attending NATO summits. 

Under “Indo-Pacific 4,” Australia, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea will work with NATO on supporting the Ukraine proxy war, artificial intelligence, “disinformation”, and cybersecurity. While the other three countries all finalised “Individually Tailored Partnership Programmes” (ITPPs) with NATO by last year, New Zealand’s agreement is expected to be announced within weeks.

Luxon’s reported comments about revealing supposed cases of Chinese acts of espionage could be more sinister than may be obvious. He was speaking days after the government joined its Five Eyes allies in accusing China of launching cyberattacks against Australia. In March, the government also said China had been behind similar attacks against New Zealand’s Parliament in 2021. 

As independent journalist Kit Klarenberg reported this week, Admiral Robert Bauer, head of NATO’s military committee, in June announced the alliance had finalised plans to recognise state-backed cyberattacks on its members as a dedicated pretext for activating Article 5, namely that foreign hacking can be countered with a collective NATO response, up to and including military action.  

Although New Zealand is not a member of NATO and only a strategic partner, such actions by Luxon will only ramp up the drumbeat of war, as well as put New Zealand’s economic security in the firing line for the sake of U.S. geostrategic interests.

Mick Hall is an independent journalist based in New Zealand. He is a former digital journalist at Radio New Zealand (RNZ) and former Australian Associated Press (AAP) staffer, having also written investigative stories for various newspapers, including The New Zealand Herald.

This article is from the author’s Substack, Mick Hall In Context. 

 

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/07/17/new-zealand-as-us-force-multiplier-in-asia-pacific/

 

READ FROM TOP.