Sunday 8th of September 2024

did the US deep state block trump?

 

The first conviction of a sitting or former US president has made headlines across the globe.

Much of the world's media have been reflecting on what this means for Mr Trump's aspiration to return to the White House.

He was convicted 34 times of falsifying business records to disguise payments to an adult film star to buy her silence just before the 2016 election. He denied the charges and the affair.

So how is this history-making conviction being covered, from Buenos Aires to Beijing? 

We asked our colleagues at BBC Monitoring, which tracks and analyses media around the world.

Russia: 'Justice New York way'

By Sandro Vetsko, BBC Monitoring Russia specialist

In Russia, the largely Kremlin-controlled media have reported Trump's conviction with a bias in his favour - which is par for the course given they supported Trump in his first run for president and are critical of Joe Biden. 

"Justice New York way," was how a presenter on the popular state channel NTV put it, with a correspondent then appearing to suggest the jury may not have considered their decisions thoroughly, saying they deliberated "for just 11 hours".

The Kremlin has portrayed the trial as part of the battle for the White House between President Joe Biden and Trump. "They are effectively simply removing political rivals using all possible legal and illegal means. That much is clear," spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said.

This line has also been echoed in the media. State Channel One TV host Artyom Sheynin asserted on Telegram that America’s judiciary was geared "too blatantly to benefit Biden".

Italy: 'This could derail White House bid'

By Alys Davies, BBC News, London

An editorial in the French newspaper Le Monde takes the view that while American voters were owed “the truth” of what they call Trump’s criminality, the effects of his conviction remain highly uncertain. 

The "real" sentencing will not come on 11 July but on the presidential election day, 5 November, it said. 

US bureau chief for the Italian daily la Repubblica, Paolo Mastrolilli, takes a more strident view that the guilty verdict is a “defeat” for Trump that could “derail” his election bid, despite the continued support of his loyal fanbase. 

By contrast, a comment piece in German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung decries the US political system and the lack of influence the conviction will, in its eyes, have on Trump's standing among Republicans.

“Guilty 34 times… After such a verdict, a candidate for the most powerful job in the world should be politically finished. Instead, his party continues to bow down to Donald Trump,” writes the paper's US correspondent Peter Burghardt. 

Meanwhile Polish daily Rzeczpospolita says the "American left has shot itself in the foot" with Trump's conviction. 

Pawel Lekpowski describes Trump as "a victim of the overzealous political correct moral inquisition" and says "the effect of [the guilty verdict] will be the opposite of what was intended.”

China: 'Old people and criminals' run for White House

By BBC Monitoring China team

Beijing has not officially commented on Trump's conviction but the story has generated significant coverage in state media, much of it factual.

The few commentators who have talked about it have cast it in terms critical of American democracy.

The US election has become "a battle between old people and criminals", said one commentary in the state-affiliated outlet Guancha, which often posts blogs and articles on trending topics with a nationalist tone.

Washington has now entered a "deep-water zone", with the "shabby old ship" of the US facing an upcoming political storm, suggested another.

Another in the same outlet said the ruling exposed the deep "polarisation in US party politics".

Shen Yi, an international relations professor at Fudan University, said in another nationalist outlet, Global Times, that Washington's "divisive" political system was destroying the soft power the US had built up - "bad news" for "American hegemony".

Mexico: 'Guilty of Pornogate'

By Pascal Fletcher, BBC Monitoring Latin America specialist, Miami

The welter of headlines on the Donald Trump verdict, from Mexico to Argentina, reflected the region’s uneasy view of the US ex-president.

While major dailies made a point of splashing on their front pages large photos of a stern-looking Trump, they also made clear that the guilty verdict against him would not stop him from running for re-election.

This is a sobering prospect for many Latin American leaders and governments who have deep misgivings, and fears, about his radical proposals and threats to counter foreign migrants and drug cartels from south of the border.

Prominent Colombian daily El Espectador accompanied a front-page article with the headline: "A criminal headed for the White House".

Others across the region varied in tone, from the Brazilian daily O Globo’s statement of historical fact "Trump is the 1st ex-president of the US condemned for a crime", to Mexican daily Reforma’s deeply unflattering headline “Guilty of Pornogate”.

In Argentina, daily Clarin’s initial report called the guilty verdict “a shock” and leftist daily Pagina 12 saw it causing “commotion in the United States”.

And some commentary elsewhere...

 

Trump's conviction made headlines around the world - from influential pan-Arab TV channels like the Saudi-funded Al-Arabiya to India's newspaper of record, The Times of India. 

Much of this reporting was neutral, but some have echoed Trump's criticisms of American institutions.

On CNN Turk, for example, guests suggested the US judicial system was "rigged” and that “the judge and the jury are biased". 

One caption on the channel repeated a well-known trope voiced by Trump supporters, asking: “Did the US Deep State block Trump?” 

On social media, Iranians who support Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of the last Shah of Iran, condemned the verdict, saying "globalists and leftist are doing all in their power to hold back Trump from becoming US's president again". 

But the pro-government news website Haqqin.az in Azerbaijan wrote: "The insensitivity of American voters even to the criminal conviction of a presidential candidate suggests that the country has reached the brink - there is nowhere to go further."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c28834k8x9po

 

THIS VERDICT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE LAW... WAS THE JUDGE BIASED? WAS THE JURY BIASED? WERE THE CHARGES RIGGED AND DELAYED TILL AFTER THE LAST ARGUMENTS? IF YOU ANSWER NO TO THESE QUESTIONS, YOU COULD BURN IN HELL.... BUT... 

 

There’s a new front line in Donald Trump’s battle to get elected.

Just minutes after Donald Trump was found guilty on all 34 counts against him, I heard from a person close to the former president who described this moment as a “civil war” within the Republican Party.

The historic nature of Trump’s conviction is being leveraged by his campaign as a sort of roll-call vote to see which politicians will defend the former president and which of them will defend America’s legal system. It appears you can’t do both.

Last night, a weather balloon was sent up.

Larry Hogan, a moderate Republican who is running for an open Senate seat in liberal-leaning Maryland, took to social media to urge all Americans to “respect the verdict and the legal process”.

Within minutes, Chris LaCivita, a top official on Trump’s campaign, posted a crystal-clear reply to Mr Hogan: “You just ended your campaign.” The implication: if you’re not with us on this, you’re politically dead.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ck77xpkr0x8o

 

The Democrats just sealed Donald Trump’s victory in NovemberThe Orange Man’s guilty verdict will only make him stronger, and real jail time is unlikely By ROBERT BRIDGE 

Members of the Democratic Party continue to fail to understand that the more mud they fling at the former president, the dirtier they look by comparison.

On Thursday, a unanimous decision from a 12-person jury declared Donald Trump guilty on 34 felony counts, which could see the former president sentenced to 136 years in prison. There’s just one catch: the notorious Orange Man will never spend a single night behind bars. The worst that will happen for the Republican presidential frontrunner is that he will enter the race with a criminal record.

Because the crimes are nonviolent and Trump has no prior convictions, any chance of prison time is a long shot. What could happen instead is that Judge Juan Merchan could sentence him to house arrest – which would undoubtedly make ankle bracelets, much like the famous Trump ‘mug shot,’ the latest fashion accessory – probation or some other lighter form of supervised release.

Another option that would backfire in the Democratic Party’s face is the imposition of community service. While Democrats may relish the idea of Trump being forced to join a prison work gang as punishment, it’s too easy to imagine millions of Trump supporters turning out at some soup kitchen or animal shelter to throw their support behind the most controversial figure in American politics today.

 

READ MORE

https://www.rt.com/news/598583-democrats--donald-trump-victory/

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW...............

political bizo....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Koa80XAm6dI

Speaker Johnson makes bold prediction after Trump conviction

 

House Speaker Mike Johnson joined 'Fox & Friends' to discuss his reaction to the Trump guilty verdict and what to expect from the appeals process ahead of November

 

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

campaign funds

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) - Former President Donald Trump's presidential campaign said in a press release that it raised a record $53 million in the span of 24 hours following his New York conviction.

"In the 24 hours since Crooked Joe Biden and his New York henchmen got their sham trial verdict, the Trump Campaign has raised $52.8 million through the online digital fundraising platform," the release said on Friday.

The new total means Trump's campaign is receiving an average of $2 million in donations each hour, according to the release.

https://sputnikglobe.com/20240601/trump-raises-53mln-in-24-hours-after-conviction-averaging-2mln-per-hour---campaign-1118727000.html

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

 

empirism....

 

“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality…”    By Noel Turnbull

 

“Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty.” 

That’s what the jury announced in answer to each of the charges against Donald Trump in New York.

To most of us that’s clear and unequivocal. But in our era – particular in the US – clear and unequivocal reality has been overtaken by something else altogether.

To understand this new reality of US politics it is worth recalling a 2004 incident involving a George W. Bush advisor and a journalist.

In October 2004, The New York Times reporter Ron Suskind wrote a first-person article about the Bush presidency.

He included in the story a quote from someone he described only as a “senior adviser to Bush.” It’s widely believed to be Karl Rove, but Rove has denied it. The aide told Suskind that people like him were “in what we call the reality-based community who believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.”

Suskind mentioned in response enlightenment principles – which underpinned much of the Founders’ thinking (other than on slavery of course) – but the aide interrupted and said: “That’s not the way the world really works anymore. We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality – judiciously, as you will – we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

That was all 20 years ago, yet we have since seen other ‘post truth’ situations including the Iraq War and weapons of mass destruction.

Moreover, whether we like it or not Americans have been living in this post-truth stage – as illustrated most recently by the January 6 2021 attack on the US Capitol.

Trump may not be the progenitor of post-truth, but he is currently the leading beneficiary of it and will probably be elected President on the strength of it.

A big call? Well, he starts with a structural advantage above and beyond being a beneficiary of the post-truth age. The US is far from being a democracy in the way we in Australia think of it. You can win the total vote as Hilary Clinton and Al Gore did, but be deprived of the win by the Electoral College or the Supreme Court. Third party candidates such as Bernie Sanders and Ralph Nader have also helped Republican Presidential candidates whose policies both would have opposed.

Moreover, if the election is close and contested it is difficult to imagine the Supreme Court not delivering it to Trump just as it delivered the election to Bush instead of Al Gore.

On top of that there is widespread voter suppression with a variety of tactics – all of them directed at Democrat voters.

At this stage the polling is showing Biden and Trump almost in a line ball with a slight advantage to Trump in the national vote but with Trump leading in the swing States, including Michigan, which Biden won comfortably in 2020. Moreover, while Trump may be seen as mad, Biden is seen as senile and too old. On a more positive side for Biden, older voters favoured Trump in 2020 but it is estimated that 10% of them have now gone to the great voting booth in the sky and won’t be there for Trump this year.

Then there are some imponderables. Either or both of the candidates could be assassinated. A distasteful thought but four Presidents have already suffered that fate – Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley and JFK plus a few other attempted assassinations as well.

Given Biden’s age and Trump’s dietary habits both could be removed before the election by stroke or incapacity, let alone attempted or successful assassination.

Not that incapacitation has interfered with some Presidential terms. A stroke didn’t stop Woodrow Wilson continuing but it was easier to keep secrets back then. Today it is doubtful if an incapacitated Biden or Trump could continue semi-secretly through the actions of a wife and advisor as it did with Wilson.

Indeed, Wilson’s wife Edith, was arguably the US’ first female President in that she exercised the Presidential powers to the chagrin of others who claimed it was ‘petticoat government’. Neither Melania Trump nor Jill Biden would be keen on such a role nor countenance it anyway.

However, the reality is that whoever might win in November a majority of Americans would have preferred different candidates altogether.

American politicians are prone to praying God Bless America. Perhaps they should be praying God Save America.

 

https://johnmenadue.com/were-an-empire-now-and-when-we-act-we-create-our-own-reality/

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....