Thursday 28th of November 2024

the nobles aren’t noble. They are sociopathic murderous bastards....

ONE NEEDS TO REREAD “IL PRINCIPE” DAILY… OKAY, WEEKLY… SURE, MONTHLY… DO IT ONCE A YEAR IF YOU ARE LAZY… AT LEAST ONCE IN A LIFETIME.....

... non lo potrà mai fare se non trae di quella equalità molti d'animo ambizioso e inquieto, e quelli fa gentiluomini in fatti, e non in nome, donando loro castella e possessioni e donando loro favore di sustanze e di uomini, acciocché, posto in mezzo di loro mediante quegli mantenga la sua potenza ed essi mediante quello la loro ambizione, e gli altri siano constretti a sopportare quel giogo che la forza, e non altro mai, può fare sopportare loro.

… he will never be able to do it if he does not draw from that equality many with an ambitious and restless soul, and makes them gentlemen in deed, and not in name, giving them castles and possessions and giving them favor in substance and men, so that, placed in through them he maintains his power and they maintain their ambition through him, and the others are forced to bear that yoke that force, and nothing else, can make them bear.

 

infatti in ogni stato si troveranno due diverse proposizioni, che risultano dal fatto che al popolo non piace essere governato e oppresso dai nobili, mentre i nobili cercano di governare e opprimere il popolo. [note: this may not be the exact original text…]

… for in every state there will be found two different propositions, which result from the fact that the people dislike being ruled and oppressed by the nobles, while the nobles seek to rule and oppress the people.

 

Né vi sbigottisca quella antichità del sangue che ei ci riproveranno, perché tutti gli uomini avendo avuto un medesimo principio, sono ugualmente antichi, e da la natura sono fatti ad uno modo. Spogliateci tutti ignudi: voi ci vedrete simili, rivestite noi delle veste loro ed eglino delle nostre, noi senza dubio nobili ed egli ignobili parrano; perché solo la povertà e le ricchesse ci disaguagliano.

Don't be dismayed by the antiquity of blood that they will criticize us for, because all men, having had the same beginning, are equally ancient, and are made in the same way by nature. Strip us all naked: you will see us similar, dress us in their clothes and he in ours, we will undoubtedly appear noble and he will appear ignoble; because only poverty and wealth make us unequal.

 

In ALL these cases, the nobles aren’t noble. They are sociopathic nasty bastards.

And the following story is very close to the bone for Gus… Anyway:

 

By Daria Sukhova

Africa’s Che Guevara: How France pulled off the ‘dirtiest trick’ to assassinate a popular reformer

More than 30 years after the assassination of the president of Burkina Faso, some of those responsible for his death have still not been punished

On August 4, 1983, Marxist revolutionary Thomas Isidore Noël Sankara came to power in the French Upper Volta (present-day Burkina Faso). A fighter for freedom and justice, he rejected colonial dependence, set the country on the course of economic independence and social-democratic development, and carried out innovative reforms. 

During the four years of his presidency, Burkina Faso achieved record economic growth, much to the indignation of its former colonial rulers. Sankara was assassinated during a coup organized with the help of the French military. More than 30 years after this crime, many of its perpetrators have still not been punished.

Sankara’s political path

The future president was born in 1949 and was the tenth child in a Catholic family. His father, a member of the French army, was a representative of the Mossi people – the country’s largest ethnic group – and his mother was a descendant of the Fula people. Sankara’s mixed ancestry made him a “third-class” man.

As a young man, he was encouraged to become a priest, but instead chose a military career. He entered a military academy in Upper Volta and in 1970 continued his studies in Madagascar, where he graduated as an officer. In Madagascar, he became familiar with the works of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin, studied the basics of political science and political economy, and became interested in revolutionary ideas.

During Sankara’s time in Madagascar, the country’s authoritarian leader, Philibert Tsiranana, who maintained close ties with France and sought to strengthen ties with the West, was deposed. His overthrow made the young Sankara consider the possibility of changing the regime in his homeland.

Returning to Upper Volta two years later, Sankara was able to put his military skills into practice. He joined a unit of parachutists, and in 1974 fought against Mali when the latter laid claim to resource-rich land in the northeast of Upper Volta.

The future revolutionary then ended up in Morocco, where he met the people who would later help him come to power – Blaise Compaoré, Henri Zongo, and Jean-Baptiste Boukary Lingani. United by common revolutionary ideals, the young officers created an organization called the Communist Officers Group. 

“Misfortune to those who gag the people”

In 1981, Sankara became secretary of state for information in the government of Burkinabe leader Saye Zerbo, who had come to power in a coup one year previously. However, just a year later, Sankara voluntarily left the post, speaking out against the government’s suppression of the opposition and the ban on trade unions. “Misfortune to those who gag the people!” was the slogan that accompanied Sankara’s resignation, as he denounced the government’s treatment of its people.

In early 1983, Sankara returned to government, this time as prime minister. He attended the congress of the Non-Aligned Movement, an international forum which that year was held in New Delhi. While in India, he met Fidel Castro and Samora Machel – the famous revolutionaries from Cuba and Mozambique.

Sankara’s popularity continued to grow. His eloquent speeches and condemnation of imperialism and neocolonial dependence were supported by the opposition in Ouagadougou. However, due to his reformist and radical views, which contradicted the government’s official stance, Sankara held the post of prime minister for less than six months. His removal was facilitated by the arrival of the adviser to the French president for African affairs, Jean-Christophe Mitterrand, who criticized the views of the young prime minister and threatened to impose sanctions if he continued to pursue this political course.

Sankara wasn’t just removed from his post – he was placed under house arrest. However, after growing public discontent turned into mass protests, President Jean-Baptiste Ouédraogo was forced to release him. 

Sankara’s political experience convinced him that socialist ideas could not be implemented under the government of the time. In an effort to improve the lives of the people of Upper Volta, in June 1983, together with colleagues from the Communist Officers Group, he started preparing a military coup.

“No credence to this gigantic fraud of history”

On August 4, 1983, Blaise Compaoré seized the capital and announced that the country would be ruled by the National Council for the Revolution (CNR), headed by Sankara. Five days later, the officer corps attempted a counter-coup, which was suppressed by the CNR. A new government was formed, which included representatives of national communist associations.

Sankara’s main goal was to transform the state structure. The formation of a socialist society and the development of the country’s economic independence were among the new government’s main priorities. 

In order to break ties with the colonial past, the country’s name was changed in August 1984. Upper Volta became known as Burkina Faso, which in the Mooré and Dyula languages means “the country of honest people.” The new socialist government also changed the state symbols. The red on the flag symbolized the blood spilled by the revolutionaries and the many sacrifices of the people of Burkina Faso, the green stood for the abundance of agricultural riches, and the yellow-green star reflected the guiding ideology of the revolution.

On October 4, 1984, Sankara delivered a speech titled “Freedom Can Be Won Only Through Struggle” at the 39th Session of the UN General Assembly in New York. He said Burkina Faso would not become an ally of the Western or Eastern blocs, and intended to develop partnerships with other developing countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. He also spoke of his intention to carry out economic reforms without foreign involvement, and refused economic assistance from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, and France.

“We place ourselves within this world, while giving no credence to this gigantic fraud of history nor accepting the status of the ‘hinterland of the satiated West’. We do so to affirm our awareness of belonging to a tricontinental whole and to acknowledge as a Nonaligned country and with the full depth of our convictions that a special solidarity unites the three continents of Asia, Latin America, and Africa in a single struggle against the same political gangsters and the same economic exploiters,” Sankara declared

“Look at your plates when you eat”

Sankara launched large-scale reforms aimed at helping the country’s poor, who made up the majority of the population. The measures covered all aspects of public life, including the economy, education, and the rights of women and children. To strengthen the socialist system, new executive bodies and Committees for the Defense of the Revolution (CDRs) were formed, and a youth organization called The Pioneers of the Revolution was created. 

Sankara sought to establish an economy that would not depend on foreign imports. “Many people ask, ‘Where is imperialism?’ Look at your plates when you eat. These imported grains of rice, corn, and millet – that is imperialism,” he said. To achieve this goal, it was necessary to develop domestic production. “The CDRs are there to produce” became one of the slogans of the new economic policy.

Sankara focused on the development of the agricultural sector in order to prevent food shortages in Burkina Faso’s arid climate. He strived to improve agricultural infrastructure instead of focusing on industrialization, which for him was synonymous with imperialism. To help peasants, he introduced economic measures such as the agrarian reform (which included the redistribution of land, reduced land fees, and new cooperatives), and new pricing and tax policies. The government also introduced a state program for the local distribution of grain, and limited the private selling of food products – measures that reduced the country’s dependence on imports from the neighboring Ivory Coast.

His government’s social policy included the construction of public housing (known as “the cities of August 4th”) in place of slums, reduced rent, and literacy campaigns. The healthcare system was also expanded – the government initiated the vaccination of over 2.5 million children, helping reduce child mortality, and brought medical services to villages. Under Sankara, the rights of women and men were equalized, and female circumcision, forced marriage, and polygamy were prohibited. For the first time in the country’s history, women were appointed to top government positions.

The fight against corruption was a significant policy of the National Council for the Revolution, and every official was obliged to provide information on their income. There was even a radio show where people could describe cases of corruption.

The reforms allowed the country to achieve the highest per capita GDP growth rate in its entire history. However, the CNR simply did not have enough time to solve all the social and economic problems.

Burkina Faso’s successful social reforms and its steadfast refusal to receive foreign aid caused concern in France and the neighboring African nations dependent on the former metropole. In 1986, at the initiative of the French government, a conference was held in the city of Yamoussoukro in the Ivory Coast. The meeting, which was attended by the leaders of neighboring countries, demanded that Sankara cease his reformist activities. 

“You cannot kill ideas”

On October 15, 1987, at the age of 37, Sankara was assassinated in a coup organized by the same Blaise Compaoré who had helped him come to power. The overthrow of the socialist president was explained by the fact that his policy had jeopardized relations with the Ivory Coast and France.

Vasily Filippov, who holds a Ph.D. in history and is a leading researcher at the Centre for Tropical African Studies at the Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, wrote an article titled “The African Policy of Francois Mitterrand”. In the paper, he described Sankara’s assassination as “one of Jean-Christophe Mitterrand’s dirtiest tricks.”

The historian notes that Sankara’s reforms were undone “under the vigilant control of France and with its direct participation.” Despite the fact that the government was overthrown in an unconstitutional way, Paris assessed the events as “democratization processes” and legitimized Compaoré’s rule. In 2001, the former coup leader was recognized as “France’s closest friend” in West Africa.

A series of revolts have shaken Upper Volta since it gained independence, but Sankara remains the only leader to have been assassinated. Unlike Sankara, the country’s previous leaders pursued a conservative policy, remaining indifferent to the woes of the people and maintaining strong ties with their former colonial rulers. 

In 2015, the former leader’s widow, Mariam Sankara, accused France of organizing the assassination and demanded that the government provide documents connected to the period of Sankara’s presidency and the events of 1987. Two years later, French President Emmanuel Macron promised to declassify the information and three archives were transferred to Burkina Faso.

Among the papers was a protocol dated October 16, 1987, published by the French newspaper L’Humanité in April 2021. It confirmed the French military’s involvement in organizing and carrying out Sankara’s assassination.

In the fall of 2021, the Burkina Faso government held a trial on Sankara’s murder. In the spring of the following year, Compaoré, who had been in power for 27 years, was sentenced to life in prison. So far, however, only representatives of Burkina Faso have been convicted. 

In 2022, military officer Ibrahim Traoré came to power. Burkina Faso’s new council of ministers officially proclaimed Sankara a national hero and October 15 was declared a national day of remembrance. The government also plans to build a mausoleum at the site of his assassination, while Charles de Gaulle Boulevard, located next to the memorial, was renamed in honor of the deceased president.

Sankara became a symbol of the Burkina Faso revolution and the struggle for justice. He is often called “Africa’s Che Guevara” and “the most honest president” for striving to help everyday people. Thirty-six years after his death, he remains popular and symbolizes the fight for change. The independent course he set is a legacy supported by Burkina Faso’s current government, which – just like Sankara – opposes cooperation with its former colonial rulers. 

By Daria Sukhova, Research intern of the Centre for African Studies, HSE University

 

https://www.rt.com/africa/589422-africa-burkina-faso-france/

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW..................

 

SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvKfRBtLDtU

inhumane....

We tramped along streets of rubble and twisted girders of metal in Gaza – these had been a home, a school and even a hospital. From one heap of rubble, a sobbing Granny ran up to me – it was winter and bitterly cold. She was camped in a hollow in the bombed out ruin of her family home, where she had been the only survivor from a family of 21 people. She grabbed and hugged me and begged me to tell the world what was happening in Gaza. I made a promise to her that I would.

 

Amidst horror, the screeching metal of turnstiles haunts our conscience   By Mary Kelly

 

I was to be in the West Bank these weeks in a voluntary capacity and working, as I have done in previous years, with a Scandinavian female NGO. Our purpose has been to monitor human rights and to help with the olive harvest. Sadly, I had to bow out this year as Peter, my partner, is currently not in the best of health. Recent reports however say that the West Bank is now under a vicious Israeli lock-down and the armed settlers have seriously escalated their brutal violent incursions into Palestinian villages. It seems, in the situation, that I made the right decision.

All human life is precious. The mass attacks committed recently by Hamas against Israeli citizens were horrific, unconscionable and inhumane. They amounted to war crimes and there is no justification in international law for the indiscriminate killing of civilians or the holding of civilian hostages. But, as I see it, the problem is not Hamas but the decades of colonial and apartheid policies that Israel has inflicted on the Palestinians; it makes violent outburst of brutality like this predictable. Antonio Guterres, the UN Secretary General, was quoted as saying a few days ago “violence does not come in a vacuum.”

The world is now watching the barbarity and inhumanity of the genocide of a starving civilian population. Collective punishment by the Israelis at its most grotesque is a flagrant violation of international law and a war crime according to the Geneva Convention. Tragically, it is heading towards creating the worst man-made humanitarian catastrophe since World War Two. There should be righteous anger at the inhumanity of people justifying these atrocities.

I cannot, and will not, read, watch or listen to the media’s coverage of the horror being inflicted in the Palestine/Israeli conflict. My heart is breaking and filled with sorrow and helplessness as I write this. As you all know, the world is awash with analysis, commentary, graphic devastating images, gross mistruths and shocking propaganda. This is being fuelled by the news that the US/UK are ramping up their own war machines and sending massive unconditional military support to Israel – in the case of the US, amounting to an additional $14.3 billion.

I know that the following will be grim reading – the facts of which are rarely and quite deliberately missing from both the media and our governments. To help me in my current deep sadness, I want to share with you my years of first hand witness accounts in the area as a measure of balance and a glimpse into life on the “other” side of this 75 year conflict.

Fifteen years ago, I arrived with my husband in Jordan to commence his posting, bathed in total ignorance of the humanitarian turmoil that I was entering. Within weeks, we were on a journey down into the Jordan Valley on our way to celebrate Easter in Jerusalem. We were taken aback at the treatment we received at the Allenby border crossing. I thought in my ignorance that we were going into Palestine. But no, the bullying and aggression we received from the Israeli border guards in fact told us that we were entering a Palestine controlled by an Israeli army of swaggering, menacing 19 year olds, all decked from head to toe in military hard wear and hell bent on making us feel quite unwelcome.

Driving through Palestinian East Jerusalem, we bounced along roads full of potholes and streets of family houses, mainly run-down and in great disrepair. Bizarrely, among these appeared a few houses displaying the Israeli flag and decorated with giant menorahs on their roofs. (We later learned that these Palestinian houses had been forcibly taken over and stolen by groups of thuggish settler colonialists.) Further on, strolling through the cobbled laneways of the medieval Muslim quarter of old Jerusalem, on our way to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, we passed groups of the IDF (Israeli Defence Force). They were donned in military attire and brandished lethal guns, all at the ready. They seemed delighted with their menacing appearance and spent their bored hours voicing unpleasant comments at the passing Palestinian women who were doing their daily market shopping. Seeing this made us feel very annoyed and disgusted with their abuse. We were impressed though by the way the women bore all this harassment with great dignity.

After the stunning and crowded Easter Service, we ventured through the other quarters of the city – no military presence here – eventually to emerge through David’s Gate into Israeli West Jerusalem. I can only describe it as going through the wardrobe doors in The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. It was overwhelming. I could have been in London, New York or Sydney – shopping malls, expensive high rises, cafes and sealed roads carrying a state of the art tram system. Not a hint of a military presence here either. The contrast between this wealth and consumerism, and the medieval atmosphere I had just left, told me that there was a deep tension within Jerusalem.

During the course of our posting, I returned many times to Jerusalem despite all the stress of gaining entry through the Allenby Crossing. On each crossing, I was taken aside by the IDF, made to sit in a freezing room for hours and aggressively interrogated by four teenage-looking military, all hiding behind their computer screens and demanding why I was returning to Jerusalem yet again.
During some of my visits, I would take the bus (40 minutes) across Israel to Tel Aviv and Jaffa and play tourist. I was always puzzled as to why the landscape en route appeared wooded and green in total contrast with the semi-desert I had left less than half an hour before. Years later I learned that plantations had been sown after 1948, covering up the villages and homes of the Palestinians that had been violently displaced by the settling Israelis and who, as refugees, were forced to relocate to places like Gaza.

On one visit, and out of curiosity, I sought out a bus that would take me to Qalandia, the crossing point into the West Bank. This was a very unpleasant experience. I was forced into a metal hellhole of cages, queued for at least an hour, deafened by the screeching metal of turnstiles, while being locked in and then out of waiting passages. Flashing lights of green and red dazzled me while I was screamed at through speakers to “hurry up”! Palestinians from Ramallah, if they are lucky to hold work visas, have to endure this every day. There is little work for them in the West Bank and they are desperate to seek work in Jerusalem. During this daily ordeal, if the all-seeing cameras notice a facial grimace or a look of annoyance on their faces, their visas are cancelled on the spot. Relieved to be out of the cattle pen, I made my way out into the West Bank. I had indeed entered another world.

So, several years later and anxious to know more, I found myself back as part of an international three week non-governmental study tour of Palestine and Israel. This tour was comprehensive and wide-ranging and, by the end, I had a far better understanding of the complexity of the situation in this area.

We arrived in Tel Aviv. On our first day, we were given access to a local high school and embarked on a discussion with senior students focussing how they viewed their lives. Their responses were all the same; they enjoyed good times. shopping, clubbing, dancing, surfing…in fact all the lifestyle of a typical teenager here at home. The only difference was their comments about their conscription at 18 years into the IDF and how they were all looking forward to it as “a bit of fun over there” and as a rite of passage. However, on leaving the school, strung along the corridors were poignant dramatic posters with blazing warnings not to go near the dangerous West Bank border as it was a “land of terrorists”! This was our first exposure to the fact that there was a tension in the area.

Later that day, we visited a beautifully equipped kindergarten where the children’s colouring and counting books were not depicting flowers and animals but army tanks and fighter planes.

It had been organised that we receive invitations to family houses in Tel Aviv and Haifa, to share meals and to hear very mixed views on the present situation. Many argued that Palestinians should have their freedom and their own state and others argued that Israelis needed to continue to occupy the West Bank for their own safety.

I swam in the Mediterranean on Tel Aviv beach. I could have been in Miami or the Gold Coast and enjoyed all the trappings of a sophisticated tourist resort.

We had a very interesting visit to a huge date plantation in the Jordan Valley, where the manager boasted that they were exporting their dates world wide. I learned later that the plantation was on land recently confiscated from three Palestinian families.

Further south, we spent half a day as guests of the town of Sderot, the nearest Israeli settlement to Gaza. In fact, from a man-made hill close by, we could see over to Gaza. Life here was relaxed and one with which we are very familiar – parks, designer houses, a shopping mall etc. We were welcomed effusively by the mayor and, in his presentation, he mentioned that his town had never suffered a Hamas attack. He went on in detail to tell us that they were protected by the Israeli military “iron dome” (Hamas rockets are very crude and have a short range) and that his country was the world’s most technologically advanced and powerfully armed.  He further added that, as extra protection, his government had built underground tunnels through the town and robust overground shelters. (I might add that, without the massive flow of US arms amounting to $3.8 billion annually, and US diplomatic support, Israel would not be in this commanding position).

After ten days, we made our way through the ghastly Qalandia checkpoint into the West Bank. This land has been under a brutal and intense Israeli military occupation and oppression for many decades. There is no free movement here; the West Bank is riddled with hundreds of military checkpoints so travel is agonisingly slow and stressful. At one particular checkpoint, we had to wait in a queue for over two hours while being told that we were lucky today as yesterday the soldiers had decided not to open the checkpoint at all! School children living only half a mile from their school have to pass through such checkpoints twice daily, often having their uniforms searched and bags ransacked by soldiers who enjoy humiliating and taunting these young ones.

No Palestinian is allowed to rebuild, extend their home, building or farm. We visited a desperately poor village school in chronic need of classrooms. They thought they could evade this restriction by building three very basic concrete classrooms, leaving empty spaces for windows and doors, in other words, a shell. Sitting in this would be fierce for the children in both the searing summer and freezing winter. Another three rooms were then added, built of mud and dried grass. However, only a few days after our visit, the local Israeli authorities flattened the buildings with one of their military bulldozers – they deemed the new buildings unlawful.

In every village and town we visited, there were clusters of young and heavily armed Israeli military roaming the streets, almost looking for trouble. It was so obvious that the Palestinian inhabitants were deeply intimidated by their presence and the atmosphere throughout was one of fear and reticence.

As Noam Chomsky has said, a key feature of the Israeli occupation has always been one of the ongoing humiliation of the Palestinian population.

As we travelled on to Gaza, worse was to meet us.

https://johnmenadue.com/amidst-horror-the-screeching-metal-of-turnstiles-haunts-our-conscience-2/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

SEE ALSO: https://consortiumnews.com/2023/12/31/us-congress-we-stand-with-genocide/

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW...................