Friday 29th of November 2024

on the way to the abattoirs of news heaven....

Using online search engines to look up more information about news stories can lead to believing “low-quality sources,” according to a new study published in the journal Nature on Wednesday.

The study cites data from five experiments, conducted between 2019 and 2021, that purports to show “consistent evidence that online search to evaluate the truthfulness of false news articles actually increases the probability of believing them.”

Doing more research has long been proposed by media literacy and digital literacy programs, but the result shows this might be the wrong approach, Joshua Tucker, one of the six authors of the study, told Vice’s Motherboard on Thursday.

“The question here was what happens when people encounter an article online, they’re not sure if it’s true or false, and so they go look for more information about it using a search engine,” Tucker said.

One of the experiments involving some 3,000 Americans showed that people who had been “nudged” to research online were 19% more likely to believe a “false or misleading article” over those from “reputable sources.”

“It was incredible to us how remarkably consistent this effect was across multiple different studies that we ran,” Tucker told Motherboard. “This isn’t just ‘Oh we ran one study’. We’re very, very confident this is happening.”

According to the study, online searches lead people into “data voids,” defined as informational spaces offering corroborating evidence from “low-quality sources.”

The authors said their findings “highlight the need for media literacy programmes,” more funding for fact-checkers, and for search engines to “invest in solutions” to the highlighted problems.

The study was signed by Kevin Aslett of the University of Central Florida, Nathaniel Persily of the Stanford University Law School, and four researchers from the Center for Social Media and Politics, New York University (NYU): Zeve Sanderson, William Godel, Jonathan Nagler and Joshua Tucker. Nagler and Tucker are also employed at the Wilf Family Department of Politics at NYU.

The Center for Social Media and Politics is best known for the January 2023 study that found “no evidence of a meaningful relationship between the exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior” in the 2016 US presidential election – long after the claim of ‘Russian meddling’ was used to usher sweeping censorship in the American social media ecosystem.

https://www.rt.com/news/589482-own-research-leads-misinformation/

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW..................

today's news.....

Embarking on a compelling dialogue, we engage in a profound exploration of the geopolitical landscape in 2023 alongside esteemed guest Professor John J. Mearsheimer. With his wealth of expertise, we dissect the lessons pertinent to key global figures such as President Joe Biden, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Professor Mearsheimer's deep insights promise to shed light on the intricate strategic decisions, diplomatic challenges, and geopolitical nuances that defined this pivotal year. This conversation serves as an intellectual journey, unraveling the tapestry of successes, setbacks, and essential takeaways that have shaped the political trajectories of these influential leaders within the intricate dynamics of international relations.

Professor John Mearsheimer: 2023: Lessons for Biden, Zelenskyy, and Netanyahu

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4yt3r3Gsbk

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW..................

a brazen lie.....

https://www.zeit-fragen.ch/en/archives/2023/nr-26-12-dezember-2023/die-propagandaformel-putin-wolle-die-ukraine-erobern-und-ein-grossrussland-schaffen-hat-sich-als-dreiste-luege-erwiesen

The propaganda formula of Putin wanting to conquer Ukraine and create a Greater Russia has proven to be a brazen lieby John J. Mearsheimer

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW..................

antibiopigs....

Two years after landmark European Union legislation designed to curb the overuse of antibiotics on farms came into force, new analysis from DeSmog reveals eight key narratives the veterinary medicine and farming lobbies deploy to defend the billion-dollar market for the drugs. 

Aiming to combat the emergence of deadly treatment-resistant bacteria in humans, known in medical jargon as “antimicrobial resistance,” or AMR, the new rules are the world’s most rigorous legislation governing farm antibiotics. The regulations banned the “routine” use of antibiotics on farms for whole herds of healthy animals, including outlawing the practice of using antibiotics to compensate for illnesses caused by poor animal welfare and hygiene.

As the focus turns towards implementation in the EU’s 27 member states, campaigners fear multi-national veterinary medicine companies will use the eight narratives identified by DeSmog across social media, government consultations, company reports, and other communications in an attempt to preserve annual sales of farm antibiotics, estimated to be worth $950 million in 2021, according to Grand View Research

The narratives DeSmog identified after reviewing hundreds of industry communications are:

  1. Restricting antibiotics will endanger animal welfare 
  2. Restricting antibiotics will put your pets at risk
  3. Restricting antibiotics would endanger food security
  4. There is insufficient evidence that antibiotic use in animals risks causing AMR in people 
  5. The real issue is human use of antibiotics
  6. Restricting antibiotics would increase the risk of spreading zoonotic diseases/AMR
  7. The EU and/or animal pharma industry has taken sufficient voluntary action
  8. We should trust vets

Reports that the animal farming industry has lobbied hard against animal welfare regulations in the EU, delaying the implementation of policies that have broad public support, have sharpened concerns that industry could also resist moves to reduce the use of antibiotics.  

“Many of these arguments have been around for decades,” said Cóilín Nunan, a policy and scientific adviser to Alliance to Save Our Antibiotics, a coalition of health, sustainable farming, and civil society organisations. “Undoubtedly, these sorts of arguments are going to be made [at the member state level].”

The veterinary medicines industry dismisses concerns that it may resist implementation of the new rules, saying it is committed to building on reductions in the use of antibiotics on farms that have already been achieved, while continuing to tackle animal disease.  

“The animal health sector strongly supports responsible use and reducing the need for antibiotics,” said a representative of HealthforAnimals, an industry group that represents U.S. drug makers Elanco Animal Health Inc., Phibro Animal Health Corp., and Zoetis Inc.

“Many markets have achieved significant reductions in antibiotic need by leveraging preventative veterinary health practices such as greater vaccination, better nutrition, improved biosecurity, and more,” the representative said. “More work will be done in the years ahead to continue tackling animal disease and reducing antibiotic need and we encourage others to learn from the successes achieved in animal health.”

Antibiotics are a pillar of the intensive farming systems familiar in many European countries, where the drugs have been used to prevent or treat outbreaks of disease among pigs, poultry, cattle, and other livestock kept in crowded conditions. Excessive use of antibiotics on farms is a major driver of AMR in people, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). 

More than 35,000 people die each year due to antibiotic-resistant infections in the European Union, Iceland, and Norway, according to estimates from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.

Without stronger policies to counter the emergence of new superbugs globally, the 700,000 deaths caused by antimicrobial resistance worldwide each year could grow to 10 million by 2050 – a number higher than the amount of people who currently die from cancer, according to a 2016 report.

In 2022, the EU took a significant step towards curbing excessive use of antibiotics by banning farmers from giving the drugs to large groups of healthy animals – seeking to achieve further reductions in the use of antibiotics, which has fallen by 53 percent from 2011 to 2022, according to official data covering 25 European countries. The EU also moved to protect the efficacy of “critically important” drugs by creating a reserve list of antibiotics for human use only. 

Roxane Feller, the secretary-general of AnimalhealthEurope, a Brussels-based lobby group whose members include Elanco Animal Health Inc. and Zoetis Inc., said the veterinary medicines industry had been working with regulators on farm antibiotics for 30 years.

“There will be one day when they’re going to have to stop asking us to reduce because there is a limit to reduction. We’ve started to go down the hill for the last ten years of statistics – but there will be a time when the line will have to go straight,” Feller told DeSmog on the sidelines of the Animal Agtech Innovation Summit in Amsterdam in October.  

“The objective is to continue to reduce, as long as it doesn’t affect animals. Because an animal who doesn’t get treated suffers. Nobody wants that,” Feller added. “The issue stays very high on the agenda of our companies. We are very conscious of the need to reduce antibiotics. It’s a real commitment, and really we are doing our share.” 

Campaigners and academics fear, however, that elements of the veterinary medicines industry may deploy the eight narratives about the purported hazards of reducing antibiotic use to delay multiple stages of the complex implementation process.

The outstanding challenges include developing methods to accurately and consistently measure reductions in antibiotic use on farms; crafting a standardised antibiotic reduction plan for member states to adhere to; and navigating complaints from third countries – those that are not within the EU, but are subject to the antibiotic rules because they import products into the EU – that are pushing back against the rules.

https://www.desmog.com/2023/12/20/narratives-of-delay-how-the-animal-pharma-industry-resists-moves-to-curb-the-overuse-of-antibiotics-on-farms/

 

ONLY BUY ORGANIC OR BIODYNAMIC ANIMAL PRODUCTS AND BE CAREFUL OF THE GENETICALLY MODIFIED CARROTS....

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW...........