BY F. William Engdahl

 

 

Despite strong resident protests, the US Environmental Protection Agency and Florida agencies have approved controversial release of millions of genetically-modified or “gene edited” killer mosquitoes into the Florida Keyes. At the same time the controversial Presidential Science Adviser nominee of Biden is involved in development of the CRISPR technology being used to genetically modify everything from the mosquitoes to the Pfizer and Moderna coronavirus mRNA “vaccines” to gene-edited salmon. How Bill Gates, the Pentagon and the eugenics lobby come together now is alarming to put it mildly. 

On April 30 the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District and the Oxitec biotechnology company announced they will begin release of what will ultimately be some 750 million genetically manipulated or gene-edited Aedes Aegypti mosquitos using CRSPR gene editing technology. The Aedes Aegypti makes up only about 4% of the mosquito population in the Keys. The release is bitterly opposed by residents and environmental groups who demanded a referendum in last year’s election ballot, but which the Mosquito Control Board refused, curiously. Oxitec and the Board claim the release is to kill off the presence of the Aedes Aegypti mosquito which is believed to carry dengue fever, Zika and other diseases.

The project, which sounds positive in the press statements, is alarming in many respects. First, the refusal to allow a citizen vote on the controversial GMO release. Second, there exists no cost-benefit analysis of the risks versus benefits of releasing millions of mosquitoes whose genetic traits are mutating in often unpredictable ways. Is it worth the risk that an ever more robust variety of mosquito will mutate from the project? No one can say. Traditional mosquito control techniques have worked well until now. 

The CEO of Oxitec, Grey Frandsen, has a dark history with the US State Department in the Balkans, as an advisor to the US Navy, and as a Fellow of the George Soros’ International Crisis Group that played a key role in the destruction of Yugoslavia in the 1990s. With no previous experience in biotechnology, Frandsen appears as CEO of Oxitec in 2017. Oxitec, a UK company, is now owned by Third Security, a US venture capital firm in Radford, Virginia headed by Randal J. Kirk who also owns the gene-edited salmon producer, AquaBounty.

Brazil failure 

At another trial by Oxitec for the same Aedes Aegypti gene-edited mosquito in Bahia, Brazil, in a test to see if the gene-edited mosquitoes would mate with local mosquitoes carrying Zika, malaria or other mosquito-borne diseases, following an initial reduction of the target population of mosquitoes, after some months the “population which had been greatly suppressed rebounded to nearly pre-release levels,” according to a study published in Nature Reports journal. A team of scientists from Yale University and several scientific institutes in Brazil monitored the progress of the experiment. What they found was that after an initial period in which the target mosquito population markedly declined, after about 18 months the mosquito population recovered to pre-release levels. Not only that, the paper noted that some of the mosquitos likely have “hybrid vigor,” in which a hybrid of the natural with the gene-edited created “a more robust population than the pre-release population” which may be more resistant to insecticides, in short, resistant “super mosquitoes.” That Brazil Oxitec study concluded, “It is unclear how this may affect disease transmission or affect other efforts to control these dangerous vectors.”

In short, the genetic mutations were unpredictable. Another 2020 scientific study revealed that the “sterile” insects revert back to being fertile, resulting in resistant GMO populations persisting in the environment. The study, published by scientists in China, Germany and the USDA in the United States, shows that spontaneous mutations in laboratory flies can arise, leading to genetic resistance to the intended trait. In other words, “super flies,” or mosquitoes.

Moreover, it is not as if the incidence of dengue fever or Zika in the Florida Keys is a grave problem. According to the official CDC report, there was not one incidence in all the US in 2020 of Zika from the indigenous population and only 4 from foreign travelers. As to the far milder and rarely fatal dengue fever, with symptoms similar to flu, in 2020 there were some 26 cases in the Florida Keyes. That was the first outbreak in almost ten years. Suspiciously, it was a small outbreak of dengue fever in 2010 that Oxitec used to argue for release of its gene edited mosquito in Florida. The new outbreak in 2020 was also suspiciously convenient for Oxitec’s effort to release the gene edited mosquitoes in Florida, which was approved in 2020. 

Oxitec, Gates and DARPA 

What further draws suspicions about the entire gene edited mosquito release in Florida is the fact that the Oxitec project is being supported by two highly controversial agencies—The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or DARPA. Gates— not only a major financial backer of the gene-edited COVID-19 “vaccines” of Pfizer and Moderna, and the largest private donor to the WHO–has funded gene-editing research for more than a decade. Gates is well aware of the malevolent potential of gene-editing technology. It can be used as a bioweapon maker. In 2016 Gates declared, “the next epidemic could originate on the computer screen of a terrorist intent on using genetic engineering to create a synthetic version of the smallpox virus.” In July 2017, John Sotos, of Intel Health & Life Sciences, stated that gene editing research could “open up the potential for bioweapons of unimaginable destructive potential.”

In 2016 Gates’ foundation gave $1.6 million to the PR firm, Emerging Ag, to block a broad effort to get a UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) moratorium on gene drive technology until its safety could be established. According to emails obtained by ETC Group, Emerging Ag recruited more than 65 experts, including a Gates Foundation senior official, a DARPA official, and scientists who had received DARPA funding. They were successful.

Entomological Warfare?

DARPA has been working for several years on genetic editing of mosquitoes. Through its “Insect Allies” program, DARPA has been working, using CRISPR gene-editing and gene drive technologies, on manipulating the Aedes Aegypti mosquito. The US Department of Defense has spent at least $100 million in the controversial technology known as “gene drives” making the US military a top funder and developer of the gene-modifying technology. “Gene drives are a powerful and dangerous new technology and potential biological weapons could have disastrous impacts on peace, food security and the environment, especially if misused,” said Jim Thomas, co-director of ETC Group, an environment safety group. “The fact that gene drive development is now being primarily funded and structured by the US military raises alarming questions about this entire field.”

Entomological warfare is a type of biological warfare that uses insects to transmit diseases. The Pentagon, using DARPA research, has allegedly performed such entomological tests secretly in the Republic of Georgia and Russia. Is the DARPA development, together with Gates’ foundation and Oxitec, of the gene edited mosquitoes a covert program in entomological warfare?

The Pentagon presently has top security bio laboratories in 25 countries across the world funded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) under a $ 2.1 billion military program– Cooperative Biological Engagement Program (CBEP). They are in former Soviet Union countries such as Georgia and Ukraine, the Middle East, South East Asia and Africa. Among their projects, Phlebotomine sand fly species were collected under the heading, “Surveillance Work on Acute Febrile Illness,” in which all (female) sand flies were tested to determine their infectivity rate. A third project, also including sand flies collection, studied the characteristics of their salivary glands. This is weaponization research.

The controversial person picked by the Biden Administration to become the first Cabinet-level science advisor, Eric Lander, came from the MIT-Harvard Broad Institute. Lander is a specialist in gene drive and gene editing technologies and played a major role in the flawed US Human Genome Project. This is not the kind of science we need to be supporting. It is rather part of what is obviously a larger eugenics agenda and Bill Gates is again playing a key role. 

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

 

https://journal-neo.org/2021/05/11/why-are-gates-and-pentagon-releasing-gmo-mosquitoes-in-florida-keys/

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW...........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGiczfkqt4E

YouTube Bans Australian Parliament Speech For First Time In History

 

 

SEE ALSO:

... accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen..... wuhan institute of virology one (WIV1).....

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW

 

 

by Nicholas Hulscher, Paul E. Alexander

SLT Note: According to The Daily Skeptic, this study was withdrawn within 24 hours from the Lancet. It is available here in PDF. Dr Harvey Risch, one of the study's authors, told the Daily Skeptic that he considers this as a "pure government-directed censorship, even after the Missouri v. Biden". In this study "the organ system most implicated in COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths was the cardiovascular system (53%)” and as a reminder, the staggering figure according to this study: "240 deaths (73,9%) were independently assessed as being directly attributable to or significantly contributing to the COVID-19 vaccination."

Abstract:

Context : The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have raised concerns about possible mechanisms of injury, including systemic lipid nanoparticle (NLP) and mRNA distribution. protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction and carcinogenicity. The objective of this systematic review is to examine possible causal links between the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine and death by means of autopsies and post-mortem analyses.

 Methods : We searched for all published autopsy and autopsy reports regarding COVID-19 vaccination up to 18 May 2023. Initially, we identified 678 studies and, after assessing our inclusion criteria, we We included 44 records containing 325 autopsy cases and one autopsy case. Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether the COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause of death or a significant contributor.

 Findings : The organ system most implicated in COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%) and several organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time between vaccination and death was 14,3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week of the last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73,9%) were independently assessed as either directly attributable to or significantly contributing to the COVID-19 vaccination.

 Performance : The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events, their mechanisms, and associated excess deaths, as well as autopsy confirmation and assessment of death by a physician. suggests that there is a high probability of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases. Further urgent investigations are needed to clarify our findings.

Translation SLT

source: Sam La Touch

 

-------------------

 

A strike at an Australian Pharmaceuticals Industry (API) warehouse that has around 190 workers is in serious danger of defeat, amid an ongoing effort by the United Workers Union bureaucracy to isolate the struggle.

The initial strike ballot, reported by the Fair Work Commission on June 2, was sent to 160 API workers covered by the United Workers Union. Of the 135 who voted, 96 percent were in favour of an indefinite strike. This was centrally aimed at rejecting company efforts to impose a real wage cut through a new enterprise agreement.

This determination and unity have since been systematically undermined by the UWU apparatus. One API worker has told the World Socialist Web Site that since the strike began on June 23, significant numbers of workers have left the picket. The worker reported that there are now 86 workers still on strike, while 105 are working in the plant.

The worker also understands that the company’s original offer will be put to the vote again. This was previously voted down because it involved sub-inflation nominal wage rises of 5, 4, 3.5 and 3 percent over the next four years.

On the UWU’s online fund appeal, there is evidence of worker frustration. One comment reads: “I am glad I am out here protesting to get a better wage increase and not one of the ones that went back in with their tails between their legs like weasels.”

It must be strongly emphasised, however, that what has emerged within the API strike is not the fault of those workers who feel unable to continue striking, but rather that of the UWU bureaucracy.

The union has a track record of allowing workers manning picket lines to suffer acute financial hardship. The WSWS recently recalled the experiences of UWU-covered pickets at Smeaton Grange Coles in Sydney (locked out for 14 weeks), McCormick Foods in Clayton (on strike for 6 weeks), General Mills in western Sydney (3-week strike), and Pampas in Footscray (4-week strike). In each instance, sell-out agreements were imposed after workers were worn down.

 

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/07/07/agkw-j07.html

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW

BIOWEAPON... WOULD SOMEONE SOMEWHERE DEVELOP BIOWEAPONS? 

I AM ASKING THIS QUESTION BECAUSE IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO FIND THE TRUTH ABOUT COVID-19.

I HAVE PUBLISHED THE LINK TO DR DAVID MARTIN EXPOSé OF WHAT HE HAS RESEARCHED AND FOUND:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJoi4hGpqa8

THE HEALTH FEEDBACK ORG SAYS:

Financial analyst David Martin misrepresents studies and patent applications to promote the baseless claim that SARS-CoV-2 was developed as a bioweapon

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/financial-analyst-david-martin-misrepresents-studies-patent-applications-promote-baseless-claim-sars-cov-2-developed-bioweapon/

 

PRESENTLY, THERE IS ALSO A CONTROVERSY ABOUT ROBERT KENNEDY JUNIOR... 

In a two-minute video recording of his remarks, published on the newspaper’s web site, Kennedy can be heard saying, “In fact, COVID-19, there is an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately.” He goes on to claim, “COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people” because of “the genetic structure” of the virus. “The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese,” Kennedy said, citing a July 2020 scientific paper which makes no such claim.

Kennedy is a proponent of the conspiracy theory that COVID-19 is a man-made virus released by Chinese scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology together with their American colleagues. The implication of Kennedy’s statement is that the disease is a biological weapon created by Chinese researchers and Jewish American scientists to kill Christians.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/07/17/slgd-j17.html

 

NOW I REPEAT:

WOULD SOMEONE SOMEWHERE DEVELOP BIOWEAPONS? 

WHEN COVID-19 FIRST APPEARED, I PUBLISHED AN ARTICLE:

an uncomfortable notion: the coronavirus is an escaped/released bioweapon...

 

THE CARTOON WAS EXPLICIT:

The war on terror has gone cold…

 

THE MOST DECEITFUL CONCEPT HERE IS THAT IN ORDER TO PREPARE "IMMUNIZATION" AGAINST BIO-WEAPON PANDEMICS, ONE HAS TO DEVELOP SUCH BIO-WEAPONS — OKAY? SO WOULD SOMEONE SOMEWHERE DEVELOP BIOWEAPONS? THE ANSWER HAS TO BE YES.

THE ARTICLED THAT FOLLOWED MY RANT WAS CLEAR:

NEWS RELEASE

1/11/01 

Mark Shwartz, News Service (650) 723-9296; e-mail: mshwartz@stanford.edu 

Biological warfare: an emerging threat in the 21st century 

 

Why is biophysicist Steven Block so concerned about smallpox? 

After all, more than 20 years have passed since the World Health Organization (WHO) announced the eradication of this highly contagious and incurable disease. 

"Simply put, smallpox represents a direct threat to the entire world," says Block, a professor of biological sciences and applied physics at Stanford. 

He points out that, although the disease has been eliminated in the wild, frozen stocks of smallpox virus are still maintained by the governments of the United States and Russia. 

If rogue politicians or terrorists were to get hold of the remaining supplies, "the consequences could be disastrous," he warns.

But Block is haunted by more than the threat of a smallpox attack. 

He points to some two dozen conventional biological agents -- including anthrax, Ebola and typhus -- plus an unknown number of genetically engineered organisms that terrorists could unleash on an unsuspecting public. 

"We're tempted to say that nobody in their right mind would ever use these things," he says, "but not everybody is in their right mind!" 

Block paints a disturbing picture of the international bioterrorist threat in an article published in the Jan./Feb. issue of American Scientist magazine. 

His expertise in biological warfare stems from his work with JASON, an organization of primarily academic scientists who dedicate a portion of their time to solving national security problems. Members of JASON often serve as consultants to the Defense Department and other U.S. agencies 

"In my opinion," he writes, "the terrorist threat is very real, and it's about to get worse." 

Block argues that the United States and other developed countries should be doing more to prevent the spread of biological weaponry, which he calls "a serious threat to peace in the twenty-first century." 

He saves his harshest criticism for his fellow biologists, most of whom have remained silent on the issue. 

"Where are the biological scientists willing to go on the record about bioweapons?" he asks. 

Anthrax

Biological weapons are "the poor man's atom bomb," writes Block in American Scientist. 

He argues that bioweapons offer terrorist groups and "rogue states" (such as Iraq and North Korea) an affordable way to counter the overwhelming military superiority of the United States and other nuclear powers. 

The agent of choice for most biological warfare programs, writes Block, is anthrax. Anthrax bacteria produce extremely lethal spores, and breathing in large numbers can lead to inhalation anthrax -- a disease that usually is fatal unless treated with large doses of a penicillin-type antibiotic immediately after exposure. 

Anthrax spores are easy to produce and can remain viable for more than 100 years if kept dry and out of direct sunlight. 

Their long shelf life makes them "well suited to weaponization in a device that can deliver a widespread aerosol," Block notes. 

Anthrax also is relatively easy and safe to handle. 

"Airborne spores remain infectious until they fall to the ground, where most become inactivated by sunlight," Block writes. 

"Anthrax is not very communicable," he adds, "thereby reducing the risk that it will spread beyond the intended target. Moreover, a well-established vaccine exists that can prevent the onset of the disease, allowing it to be used safely by the aggressor." 

"Black biology"

If anthrax, smallpox and other "conventional" biological agents aren't frightening enough, Block also raises the specter of "black biology" -- a shadowy science in which microorganisms are genetically engineered for the sole purpose of creating novel weapons of terror. 

"The idea that anybody can brew this stuff in their garage vastly overstates the case," he says, "but any technology that can be used to insert genes into DNA can be used for either good or bad." 

Block points out that genetic maps of deadly viruses, bacteria and other microorganisms already are widely available in the public domain. Last summer, for example, a leading scientific journal published the entire genetic code for the cholera pathogen. And legitimate researchers are now in the process of mapping the genomes of more than 100 other microbes -- including the bacteria that cause anthrax, the plague and typhoid. 

Any scientist bent on destruction could use this information to attempt to clone extremely virulent strains of bacteria and viruses, Block contends. 

He also points out that there are plenty of underpaid microbiologists in the world who might be eager to work for unscrupulous clients -- producing incurable "designer diseases," such as penicillin-resistant anthrax, or "stealth viruses" that infect the host but remain silent until activated by some external trigger, such as exposure to a normally harmless chemical. 

History lessons

Biological warfare is as old as civilization, observes Block, but it was international revulsion over the widespread use of poisonous mustard gas during World War I that finally led to a 1925 treaty banning bioweapons during future wars. 

"Disappointingly," Block writes, "neither the U.S. nor Japan ratified the treaty before the advent of World War II, when anthrax and other bioweapons were secretly being developed by both countries -- as well as by Germany, the U.S.S.R [now Russia] and Great Britain." 

During the Second World War, the Japanese military killed thousands of Chinese prisoners by subjecting them to experimental doses of anthrax, cholera, plague and other pathogens. Evidence also exists of a deliberate tularemia -- or rabbit fever -- attack by Soviet forces against German troops in 1942, although some experts say the incident never occurred. 

After World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union launched full-scale bioweapons programs, which included the development of aerosol sprays capable of delivering bacterial and viral agents by plane or ballistic missile. 

"Both sides also stockpiled plenty of anthrax," adds Block. 

In 1969, President Richard Nixon issued an executive order unilaterally and unconditionally ending America's bioweapons program, and all U.S. stockpiles were destroyed by 1972. 

That same year, 160 nations signed a treaty banning all use of biological and chemical weapons. And 143 countries eventually ratified the treaty, including the United States, Russia, Iraq, Iran, Libya and North Korea. Fifty-two nations have not signed on, including Israel, Egypt and Somalia. 

Failed treaty

Despite its noble intentions, says Block, the 1972 treaty lacks any significant provisions for enforcement or verification. As a result, a number of signatories to the treaty have maintained active bioweapons programs. 

"I'm fairly confident that the U.S. has stopped producing biological weapons," he says, "but the Soviet Union carried out ultra-secret bioweapons work right up until it collapsed in 1990." 

In 1979, 100 people and countless livestock died following the accidental release of anthrax spores from a bioweapons plant in the Russian city of Sverdlovsk -- one of 40 such facilities that operated in the former Soviet Union. 

Russia's dismal economic situation raises the question of how out-of-work bioweapons scientists are managing to find gainful employment now, observes Block. 

"Some experts contend that a low but significant level of bioresearch still exists today," he adds. 

Block's ultimate nightmare is that terrorists could somehow get access to the smallpox viruses being kept on ice at the Russian State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology -- a fear bolstered by the testimony of a former official in the Russian biowarfare program, who claimed that smallpox-based weapons were being manufactured there as recently as 1992. 

Iraq also has violated the 1972 bioweapons treaty by mass-producing weapons-grade anthrax and conducting research on a wide variety of other biological agents -- including botulism, rotavirus and gangrene-inducing bacteria. Details of the Iraqi bioweaponry program only came to light in the aftermath of the 1991 Gulf War. 

All told, Block estimates that about a dozen countries are believed to have active bioweapons programs. 

Terrorist threat

Although Block is concerned about the bioweapons buildup in Iraq and other nations, he believes a greater threat comes from terrorist groups willing to risk an out-of-control epidemic and eager to suffer casualties for the good of "the cause." 

A recent example was the 1995 sarin gas attack inside the Tokyo subway by the Japanese apocalyptic cult Aum Shinrikyo. The widely publicized assault, which killed 13 people and hospitalized thousands, had been preceded by a series of failed botulism and anthrax assaults near the Imperial Palace, a Tokyo airport and two U.S. military bases. 

"Groups like Aum Shinrikyo are willing to use biological agents inefficiently just for the terror and propaganda value," Block contends. 

"If anthrax were released haphazardly in a major U.S. city and produced only a handful of cases, the public fear and disruption that would ensue might alone bring about the intended effect," he adds. 

Solutions

During fiscal year 2000, the Clinton administration allocated $1.4 billion to combat both biological and chemical warfare -- a good beginning but not enough, according to Block, who believes more should be spent beefing up America's anti-terrorist intelligence effort and its emergency response capability. 

Block also supports the development of hi-tech devices capable of instantaneously detecting lethal bacteria and viruses in the environment, and he encourages the production and stockpiling of new vaccines ­--a hot-button issue in Washington, D.C. these days. 

The anthrax vaccine has stirred the most controversy. The U.S. military wants to inoculate all 2.4 million active and reserve troops, but no one knows if the current vaccine will provide immunity against inhalation anthrax ­ the type commonly used in bioweapons. Questions of safety, along with a scandal involving the corporation that distributes the anthrax vaccine, have led to a sharp reduction in the military's vaccination effort. 

As for smallpox, routine vaccinations in the United States ended in 1980, the year the virus was officially eradicated, so few Americans still have immunity today. The Centers for Disease Control will make 40 million new doses of the vaccine available beginning in 2004, but critics say that, in the event of a multi-city terrorist attack, hundreds of millions of doses will be needed to prevent the often fatal disease from spreading throughout the country. 

On the diplomatic front, Block argues in favor of strengthening the 1972 bioweapons treaty -- "giving it some 'teeth,'" he says, by requiring reciprocal international inspections to assure treaty compliance. 

"Embarrassingly," he notes, "the United States itself has steadfastly resisted certain attempts to establish provisions for inspections" -- in part to protect the interests of large American pharmaceutical and biotech companies against industrial espionage. 

"As the world's remaining superpower," Block maintains, "the United States bears the unique responsibility to take the moral high ground in this process, assuming a leadership role in support of meaningful weapons treaties." 

He also makes a strong plea to his fellow biologists to break their silence and take a stand against the proliferation of biological weapons. 

"Some folks simply do not take the threat seriously," he observes, "but they should. Others worry about provoking a widespread public backlash against biotechnology in general that might have a chilling effect on their own legitimate biological research." 

None of these excuses stands up to close scrutiny, Block contends, adding that the time to act is now before disaster strikes. 

"We should not have to wait for the biological equivalent of Hiroshima to rally our defenses," he concludes. 

-30- 

By Mark Shwartz 

 

THIS ARTICLE WAS PUBLISHED MORE THAT 20 YEARS AGO NOW. WAY BEFORE MANY OF THE COUNTER CLAIMING ORGS WERE CREATED.

NOTE THAT THE ANTHRAX AFFAIR OF 2001 BLAMED ON SADDAM WAS TRACED TO "A GUY WHO COMMITTED SUICIDE", IRVIN.

Nonetheless, the "anthrax affair" was also used by Bush to place more blame on Saddam while knowing within 24 hours that the strain of Anthrax came from US labs, not Saddam's labs. The investigation by the FBI led, several years later, to a lone weird guy who killed himself before the truth about the affair could come to light in court. How convenient. Although the FBI is nearly 90 per cent sure the fellow did it, there is no motive, nor reason for it to be done by him, especially in regard to provide an official tool for the government to link Saddam with 'evil" and terrorism... 

 

ALSO NOTE THAT HEALTH-FEEDBACK ORG IS FINANCED BY "THE LEFT".... THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THEY ARE WRONG BUT ONE NEEDS TO FOLLOW THE POLITICAL AFFILIATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH.... AND...

 

...JULIAN ASSANGE SHOULD BE FREE FORTHWITH....

WITH JULIAN STILL IN PRISON ONE CANNOT ACCEPT THE "BENEVOLENCE" OF AMERICA AND ITS LACKEYS...

 

READ FROM TOP.........

 

AND WE HAVE NOT MENTIONED IN THIS COLUMN THE AMERICAN BIOLABS IN UKRAINE......

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MshHxXLvglY

 

Anthrax to COVID: Fauci's Underground Bioweapons Program, w/ Saagar Enjeti | SYSTEM UPDATE

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.............

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-eqRoqQNPw

 

Tucker ENDS GOP Presidential Candidate With ONE WORD

 

Tucker Carlson moderated this past Friday’s Family Leadership Summit in Des Moines, Iowa, and his conversation with former Arkansas Governor and current GOP Presidential candidate Asa Hutchinson came to a screeching halt when Hutchinson could not handle basic questions about COVID policy and vaccines.

Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss why so many of these candidates were unprepared for Carlson’s line of questioning.

 

HERE'S KURT APPEARING ON ANOTHER TV SHOW:

 

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW................

WASHINGTON, July 19 (Sputnik) - The White House halted the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s federal funding for allegedly failing to provide documents, US media said, citing a memorandum.

The Department of Health and Human Services, after a review that began in September, told the lab that it found the facility to be noncompliant with federal regulations and is seeking to debar it completely, the report said Tuesday, citing a memo sent from the Department to the lab.

 

READ MORE:

https://sputnikglobe.com/20230719/us-suspends-wuhan-institute-of-virology-funding-for-failing-to-provide-docs-1111983569.html

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW................

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nhaxtaofkI

Gutfeld! 7/19/23 - Gutfeld! Full FULL END SHOW HD | BREAKING NEWS TRUMP July 19 , 2023

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW................

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3d5nnQ7m00E

FAUCI LIED: Rand Paul Uncovers Evidence Fauci Perjured Himself To Congress

 

FAUCI LIED: Rand Paul Uncovers Evidence Fauci Perjured Himself To Congress

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW................

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gusgD9z6cOM

Senate Health committee member Rand Paul, R-Ky., joins ‘The Ingraham Angle’ to discuss his office catching fire and government emails over COVID.

 

Rand Paul: This is no conspiracy theory

 

FAUCI LIED: Rand Paul Uncovers Evidence Fauci Perjured Himself To Congress

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW................

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAOfAtmlWMA

Australian Lawmakers Uncover Pfizer Used A Separate Untested Batch For Its Employees

 

FAUCI LIED: Rand Paul Uncovers Evidence Fauci Perjured Himself To Congress

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW................

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uA55nLQ7go

Rand Paul: We now have the ‘smoking gun'

 

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., outlines why he referred Dr. Anthony Fauci to the Justice Department for a criminal probe, alleging the former chief medical advisor lied under oath to Congress

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....