Saturday 30th of November 2024

lucrativity....

After leading a government that trashed Australia’s relationship with China, Scott Morrison and Arthur Sinodinos have joined Kurt Campbell’s US influence network cashing in on war talk. 

[WITH AN URGENT NOTICE AT THE END FOR A CHANCE TO MOBILISE AGAINST AUKUS].

 

By Robert Barwick

 

At his 15 March 2023 appearance at the National Press Club, the media challenged former Prime Minister Paul Keating on whether his financial ties to China, from his role as Chair of the China Development Bank, influenced his firm views that China is not a threat to Australia or the United States. The imputation was that Mr Keating’s views were so out of step with the prevailing US-UK-Australian narrative, they must be influenced by Chinese money. Mr Keating revealed that his 13-year position at China Development Bank was paid $5,000 per year.

For some reason most of the Australian media are far less interested in the conga line of senior Australian ex-Ministers and government officials now lining up to shamelessly feed at the trough of mega-bucks flowing from the $368 billion AUKUS submarines deal.

They include:

  • Former Treasurer and Ambassador to Washington Joe Hockey, whose consultancy Bondi Partners promotes the business opportunities from AUKUS
  • Former Defence Minister Christopher Pyne, whose Pyne and Partners similarly spruiks the AUKUS gravy boat
  • Former Australian Strategic Policy Institute honchos Peter Jennings and Michael Shoebridge, now in a private firm called Strategic Analysis
  • Former John Howard chief of staff, senior Liberal Party Senator, and Ambassador to Washington Arthur Sinodinos, now with The Asia Group, an American strategic advisory firm
  • Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who has taken advisory board positions with major US think tanks the Hudson Institute and the Centre for the New American Security (CNAS), and is rumoured to be weighing a commercial role with a British weapons manufacturer.

The last two examples, which are also the most recent, are especially interesting and revealing.

First, it is shocking that there are even rumours of Morrison going to work for a British arms manufacturer like BAE Systems. AUKUS was hatched secretly between Morrison and the British PM Boris Johnson, not US President Joe Biden, who was only brought in later, seemingly without enough time before the announcement to learn Morrison’s name (“that fella down under”). The AUKUS deal involves a large chunk of the $368 billion for nuclear submarines going to the UK, for BAE Systems to help manufacture, at its shipyard in Barrow-in-Furness, the subs that will be based on the UK’s next generation design. None of this deal would be possible were it not for the drastic deterioration in Australia’s relations with China that occurred under Morrison’s watch, which fed the false narrative of the China “threat”. It would be blatant corruption for Morrison to go from provoking tensions with China and cooking up a deal to transfer hundreds of billions of Australian taxpayers’ dollars to British arms companies, to cashing in on those tensions by working for a British arm company.

US Strategy Svengali

What is confirmed is that Morrison has joined the Advisory Board of CNAS, at the same time as Sinodinos has joined The Asia Group. This is striking because both were founded by the same US foreign policy Svengali, Kurt Campbell, Joe Biden’s so-called “Asia Czar”.

Campbell co-founded the CNAS think tank in 2007 with Michelle Flournoy (her salary to run it was over $450,000 a year). Biden’s former press secretary Jen Psaki, and current CIA head Avril Haines, who had contributed to Obama’s drone program for extrajudicial killings, also served in CNAS. Arch-neoconservative Victoria Nuland, who has played a key role in the Ukraine escalation as Biden’s undersecretary of state, also served as CNAS CEO. The top donors of the CNAS include the crème de la crème of the US arms industry, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon, which stand to profit handsomely from Morrison’s AUKUS deal.

After founding CNAS, in 2011 Kurt Campbell was the architect of Barack Obama’s Asia Pivot, to shift the USA’s strategic focus from the mess it had made in the Middle East to confronting China. This policy set in train the events that have poisoned US and Australian relations with China and normalised talk of war. It started with Julia Gillard agreeing in 2011 to the previously unthinkable basing of US Marines in Darwin, and expanded with the 2014 Force Posture Agreement, under which Tindal now also hosts nuclear-capable US B52 bombers. China’s much decried build-up of islands in the South China Sea didn’t start until 2013, in response to the Asia Pivot.

In 2013, having organised the Asia Pivot, Campbell co-founded the Asia Group, a commercial consultancy that helps companies, including defence contractors, penetrate markets in the Indo-Pacific region. It should be considered a conflict of interests that Campbell advocates a more muscular military presence in the region while potentially profiting from that posture, but such integrity concerns seemingly don’t apply to the military industrial complex.

The Asia Group’s website touts, among other exploits, a project in which the company helped an unnamed defence contractor get a multi-billion-dollar contract with the Australian government. The Asia Group’s press release on Sinodinos’s appointment makes clear he’s been hired to help them make money from the AUKUS cash cow:

Washington, DC | May 1, 2023 — The Asia Group (“TAG”) is pleased to announce the launch of an Australia practice, chaired by former Australian Ambassador to the United States the Honourable Arthur Sinodinos AO and the newest partner in the firm. … Ambassador Sinodinos joins TAG as Partner and Chair of the Australia Practice, where he is responsible for developing and executing the firm’s business strategy in Australia and supporting C-Suite executives from across TAG’s geographic portfolio to manage evolving risks and seize emerging growth opportunities. Ambassador Sinodinos’ experience in foreign service, particularly at the forefront of Australian engagement with the United States, provides an invaluable perspective at a time when multilateral engagements through AUKUS, the Quad, and the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework are all opening new pathways for commercial engagement. (Emphasis added.)

Morrison and Sinodinos are former senior leaders of the government that undermined Australia’s independent national interest, in terms of our relationship with our biggest partner, to align with the USA’s strategy of confronting China. It says something of the omnipresence of Anglo-American foreign influence in Australia that they can now join strategy Svengali Kurt Campbell’s US consultancies and think tanks that are cashing in on this confrontation, with barely a ripple of interest in the media or Parliament.

AUKUS: Urgent notice:

The just-established, very short Senate legislation inquiry into an AUKUS-related bill, the Defence Legislation Amendment (Naval Nuclear Propulsion) Bill 2023 [Provisions], may be the only chance the Australian public will have to engage with Parliament on AUKUS in a formal process.

It is a chance for all concerned Australians to swamp this inquiry with objections to the whole AUKUS deal, not just the nuclear-related legislative changes.

Enough email submissions to swamp the inquiry will send a shockwave through the politicians, especially those in the ALP already wavering from Paul Keating’s powerful intervention.

The email can be as long or short as you like—just register your emphatic objection to the whole AUKUS deal that sells out our sovereignty and escalates the danger of war.

 

However, this inquiry is very short, so it is imperative that emails be sent immediately, to:

Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee Department of the Senate

PO Box 6100

Parliament House

Canberra ACT 2600

Phone: +61 2 6277 3535

fadt.sen@aph.gov.au

Click here for the inquiry website.

 

READ MORE:

https://johnmenadue.com/war-profiteers-morrison-sinodinos-feed-at-trough-of-pro-war-organisations-picmorrison-sinodinos/

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

joining the war suppliers.....

 BY  Ideally, Warren’s report would precipitate a much larger congressional investigation of the military-industrial complex modeled after the 1934 Nye Committee hearings.

 

At the end of April, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Chair of the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel, released an investigative report: “Pentagon Alchemy: How Defense Officials Pass Through the Revolving Door and Peddle Brass for Gold.”

It reveals, not surprisingly, that nearly 700 former high-ranking and other government officials now work at the top 20 defense contractors, and highlights the need to close the revolving door for ex-government and military officials hired to executive board and lobbyist positions at large defense contractors.

“When government officials cash in on their public service by lobbying, advising, or serving as board members and executives for the companies they used to regulate, it undermines public officials’ integrity and casts doubt on the fairness of government contracting,” Warren wrote. “This problem is especially concerning and pronounced in the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the United States’ defense industry.”

To combat the situation, Senator Warren has introduced the Department of Defense Ethics and Anti-Corruption Act, which would “limit the influence of contractors on the military, constrain foreign influence on retired senior military officers, and assert greater transparency over contractors and their interaction with Department of Defense (DoD).”

 

READ MORE:

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2023/05/12/senate-report-nearly-700-former-high-ranking-pentagon-and-other-government-officials-now-work-at-the-top-20-defense-contractors/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

swindleling.....

 

BY Bakhtiar Urusov

 

AUKUS may turn out to be the largest financial swindle perpetrated by the United States and the United Kingdom against Australia and other Asia Pacific nations

 

Equipment for the country’s ground forces “arrives with depressing regularity,” years behind time, and substantially over budget, according to a report issued on April 19 by the British Parliament’s Budgetary Control Committee. For instance, the programs, which provide new Ajax armored fighting vehicles and Morpheus tactical communication and information systems, have faced significant difficulties. According to the MPs’ assessment, the issue is made worse by underfunding of the defense budget expenditures and the pound’s declining purchasing value in relation to the dollar.

Ten days later, on April 28 this year, the Royal Navy informed the public about the decision to decommission the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier, launched just four years ago (in 2019), to be used as a donor for spare parts for the HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier of the same class. According to the Royal Navy, the $3.72 billion aircraft carrier has docked more frequently than it has participated in naval operations, and the most recent maintenance cost $42 million.

This dispiriting news came just a month after the leaders of the US, the UK, and Australia had disclosed their ambitious long-term plans to build a nuclear-powered submarine fleet for Canberra on the basis of British technology, which will cost the Australian budget $245 billion.

When it comes to extremely sophisticated projects like nuclear submarines, it seems inconceivable that the parties involved would be so irresponsible as to neglect to evaluate the contractors’ capacity to meet their obligations. Still, if you trust the claims made by senior US, British, and Australian officials, the opposite is true in the case of AUKUS. Canberra would never have consented to work together on submarine design and construction with Great Britain’s waning technological strength otherwise. The example of the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier shows that not only is Great Britain unable to complete a big naval project, but it is also facing significant technological difficulties in order to satisfy present ambitions for defense construction and equipment upgrades.

In the realm of economic crime, assigning work to a contractor who is known to be unable to perform is fraud, money laundering, or corruption.

In the context of Anglo-Saxon big politics, this appears to be retaliation against a certain sector of Australia’s elites for Canberra’s departure from a coordinated approach to restrain the PRC back in the day. This is primarily about the carefree era when Australia and China’s trading and economic relations remained unbroken, providing Canberra with significant revenue from exports to the PRC of a wide range of items, from wine and agricultural products to hard coal and other minerals.

Now, it appears that Australia is becoming yet another naval base for the deployment of US and British fleets in the Asia-Pacific Region, including the basing of US nuclear submarines in 2026, without any hope of restoring economic ties with China and, consequently, the prior level of welfare in the near future. This is in addition to paying “compensation” under the guise of investing in unfeasible defense plans.

All nations, including India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand, and some ASEAN members that have been invited to participate in the AUKUS, should take a closer look at this alliance.

Bakhtiar Urusov, a political observer, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.

 

READ MORE:

https://journal-neo.org/2023/05/20/aukus-may-turn-out-to-be-the-largest-financial-swindle-perpetrated-by-the-united-states-and-the-united-kingdom-against-australia-and-other-asia-pacific-nations/ 

 

READ FROMTOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW NOW NOW NOW......