The Jewish mama little boys, Blinken and Zelenskyyyy-y are both supporting the fascist USA, in its conquest of the world. There are differences between NAZISM and FASCISM. But both are designed to CONTROL people in very dubious ways.

Here is a repeat of an article published on this site:

In 1918, Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, poet and thinker, founded the Partito Politico Futurista, which a year later merged with Benito Mussolini's Fasci Italiani di Combattimento. 

Marinetti was one of the first affiliates of the Italian Fascist Party. In 1919, he co-wrote, with Alceste De Ambris (an Italian syndicalist), the Italian Fascist manifesto. Opposed to Fascism’s glorification of existing institutions that he saw as “reactionary” he left the party in 1921, but still inspired it...

In his campaign to overturn tradition, Marinetti rejected traditional Italian food. His Manifesto of Futurist Cooking was published in the Turin Gazzetta del Popoloon, in December 1930. "People think, dress and act in accordance with what they drink and eat”... Marinetti condemned pasta, blaming it for lassitude, pessimism and lack of virility. He promoted Italian-grown rice. Futurist cooking was nationalistic, rejecting foreign foods and food names, and designed to encourage men to be fighters.

Marinetti was fascinated with the idea of processed food, predicting that pills would replace food as a source of energy, and was for the creation of "plastic complexes" to replace natural foods. Food would only be for artistic expression. Many of Marinetti’s meals resembled performance art, such as the "Tactile Dinner” — re-enacted in 2014 for an exhibit at the Guggenheim Museum — where participants wore pyjamas decorated with sponge, sandpaper, and aluminium, and ate salad, without cutlery.

Mussolini supported many styles to keep artists loyal to the regime. “... it is far from my idea to encourage anything like a state art. Art belongs to the domain of the individual. The state has only one duty: not to undermine art, to provide humane conditions for artists, to encourage them from the artistic and national point of view." Mussolini's mistress, Margherita Sarfatti, promoted the Novecento Group, persuading Marinetti, the Futurist, to be on its board.

In Fascist Italy, modern art was tolerated and even approved by the Fascist hierarchy. Towards the end of the 1930s, some Fascist ideologues wished to import "degenerate art" (modern art) from Germany to Italy and condemned modernism ("brutal art"). Their demands were ignored.

A few quotes from Marinetti:

"L’esthétique du futur”… (in French)

“Futurism”…

“... It is not a question of the machine alone, but of the human body. The human body must become metallic like the machine, in order to subjugate it.”

“Through living dangerously, life must become hard, metallic…”

“War is beautiful. It is not merely beautiful; it is essentially aesthetic. We Futurist have been saying that for years. It gives us new materials, creates new architectures. The poets and artists of Futurism know this. It is the principle that guides them in their search for a new poetry, a new plasticity…”

“A dreamed-of metallisation of the human body… War is beautiful for the reason it fertilises a flowering meadow with the flaming orchids of machine guns… for the reason that it combines in symphonic form the rain of riffle bullets, cannonadings, and momentary cessation of firing with the perfumes and odour of decomposition… for the reason it creates new architectures, such as that of great tanks, geometrical squadrons of airplanes, smoke -spirals rising from villages in flame… We shall attain before long a new and plastic extra-terrestrial state of mind…”

Entartete Kunst ("degenerate art")

In the 1920s, under the Weimar government, Germany emerged as a leading centre of artistic avant-garde. It was the birthplace of Expressionism in painting and sculpture, of the atonal musical compositions of Arnold Schoenberg, and the jazz-influenced work of Paul Hindemith and Kurt Weill. Films such as Robert Wiene's The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920) and F. W. Murnau's Nosferatu (1922) brought Expressionism to cinema.

The Nazis viewed this culture of the Weimar, especially Entartete Kunst, with disgust. Their response stemmed partly from a conservative aesthetic taste and partly from their determination to use culture as a propaganda tool. On both counts, a painting such as Otto Dix's War Cripples (1920) was anathema to them. It depicts four badly disfigured veterans of the First World War, then a familiar sight on Berlin's streets, as caricatures. 

Wilhelm Heinrich Otto Dix (1891–1969) was a German painter and printmaker, noted for his ruthless and harshly realistic depictions of German society during the Weimar Republic and the brutality of war. Along with George Grosz and Max Beckmann, he is widely considered one of the most important artists of the Neue Sachlichkeit.

When the Nazis came to power in Germany, they regarded Dix as a degenerate artist and had him sacked from teaching art at the Dresden Academy. He moved to Lake Constance in the southwest of Germany. Dix's paintings The Trench and War Cripples were exhibited in the state-sponsored Munich 1937 exhibition of degenerate art, Entartete Kunst. War Cripples was later burned. The Trench may have been looted during the confusion at the end of the war. It has been called "... a masterpiece of unspeakable horror".

——————————

Storm of Steel — Stahlgewittern — is the memoir of German officer Ernst Jünger's experiences on the Western Front during WW1. It was self-published in 1920. The book is a graphic account of trench warfare. It was largely devoid of editorialisation, but was heavily revised several times.

One of the most important contributions of Jünger's literary production is the Anarch, an ideal figure of a sovereign individual, conceived in his novel Eumeswil (1977), which evolved from his earlier conception of the Waldgänger, or "Forest Fleer" — influenced by Max Stirner's conception of der Einzige (the Unique). 

Jünger develops the Waldgänger from an Anarch in Eumeswil, when the Anarch is an autonomous free man within society; The Anarch becomes a Waldgänger when he is uncovered as an "outsider free spirit" and forced to flee society to preserve this autonomy. An Anarch sees a Waldgänger as a weaker form of freedom, only to be resorted to in an emergency… Of course this concept inspires some religious nuts with hypocritical reactionism to jump from the under-attack mainstream organised religion, into a cut-down version of the said religious beliefs for the isolated self. Isolation becomes the option.

As an aside, Johann Kaspar Schmidt (25 October 1806 – 26 June 1856), known as Max Stirner, was a German philosopher who is seen as one of the precursors of nihilism, existentialism, psychoanalytic theory, postmodernism, and anarchism. We’ve already mentioned him on this site. Stirner’s main work, The Ego and Its Own (The Unique And Its Property) was published in 1845 in Leipzig and has since appeared in numerous editions and translations.

In 1981, Jünger was awarded the Prix mondial Cino Del Duca. In 1984, he spoke at the Verdun memorial, alongside his admirers, French president François Mitterrand and the German chancellor, Helmut Kohl, where he called the "ideology of war" in Germany, before and after WW1, "a calamitous mistake”. [Extra GusNote: It was a deliberate set up by the British]

Ernst Jünger's die Waldpassage (The Forest Passage) explores the possibility of resistance: how the independent thinker can withstand and oppose the power of the omnipresent state. No matter how extensive the technologies of surveillance become, the forest can shelter the rebel, and the rebel can strike back against tyranny. It is a defense of freedom against the pressure to conform to political manipulation and artificial consensus. A response to the European experience under Nazism, Fascism, and Communism, The Forest Passage is still relevant today, wherever an imposed uniformity threatens to stifle liberty.

We are the forest and we have the duty to protect JULIAN ASSANGE.

SEE ALSO: https://yourdemocracy.net/drupal/node/38241

The situation in Ukraine could be solved within the next hour or so. ALL THIS NEEDS IS FOR ZELLNESKYYYY-Y to sign an agreement:...

The Russian (3)  demands have been made CLEAR for at least 8 years:

NO NATO in Ukraine.

The Donbass region to be autonomous in Ukraine.

Crimea to be Russian as prior 1954 and as per the popular vote in 2014.

Easy. Simple. Agree to this and the world is saved. But the West has a point to make: Russia bad, we good. The other real point here is that the USA were running out of country to invade and make money by blowing up bombs, etc... So what is better than get someone ELSE to create a situation where the USA are going to provide weapons — billions worth!!!. Enters Putin and his desire for Russian Security. Excellent. poke him a bit in the eye, ignore his demands, prepare a "Ukrainian invasion" of the Donbass region and voilà...

Putin does not have much choice but to protect the Donbass. He thus decides to destroy the Ukrainian hardware and military as well, plus eliminate the Nazis in Ukraine — which the West HAS now DECIDED NOT TO SEE, including The New York Times which named them very strongly as Neo-Nazis but has now reclassified them as "Extreme-right".

The West could not allow Putin to be correct on the fact that there are Nazis in Ukraine (some people are saying in so minuscule numbers!) especially many in the armed forces...

But as Ukraine is NOT (YET) FULLY INVADED NOR BOMBED BY Russia (the Russian foray near Kiev was a diversion to force the Urainian army to split up while the Russians were taking care of Donbass), Ukraine think they have defeated the Russians. Sure the Ukrainians have put up a fight, but not in a manner that is winning against the intervention. THE RUSSIANS NOW CONTROL MOST OF THE DONBASS REGION, apart from a few pockets of Neo-Nazis, including the steel-mill in Mariupol. The Russians are patient and kind enough to let the people who wanted to leave the Donbass go.

The next step is for Russia to stop the US become rich by getting their factories working overtime to produced more weapons for Ukraine. Some of the rail lines have been bombed, yet I believe the Russians prefer the new weapons to be delivered into Ukraine, before bombing them to smithereens. It becomes a bit teadious though. Three or four, up to six, precision bombs and kabooooom. Another delivery gone up in smoke. 

So Zelenskyyyy-y, who thinks he is a little Churchill or a Queen-Liz the First (he's an actor — he could be a "queen"), is desperately appealing to "other" countries to send him more weapons, and if some nukes come with the lot, that would be good. He said so himself...

This guy is a dangerous turd, but the USA love turds that play the US game of Empire. "Do not agree to anything reasonable with Russia" say the USA to little Turdenskyyyy-y... "Sacrifice more Ukrainian lives please..."... "The USA need to make more weapons and lower unemployment in the bomb-making industries." AND "WE NEED TO WEAKEN RUSSIA...." This is in preparation of the final assault on the HEARTLAND...

MEANWHILE HERE IS AN ARTICLE BY Philip M. Giraldi

Once upon a time United States foreign policy was based on actual national interests, but that was long ago and far away before the country was beguiled into a colonial war with Spain followed by a twentieth century that was chock-a-block full of any type and intensity of warfare that one might imagine, including the use of nuclear weapons. Some might consider that the United States has become a nation made by war, to include a presumption that all the war-making has been both just and necessary, since America is “exceptional” and by default “the leader of the Free World.” Witness what is taking place vis-à-vis Ukraine and Russia right now, pressing forward with a full-scale economic war against Moscow while arming one of the belligerents in support of no actual national interest, as if by habit. The propensity of American politicians to resort to arms to compensate for their other failures is such that among circles in Washington and the media there has long been a joke making the rounds observing that no matter who is nominated and elected president we always wind up with John McCain. But if one is seriously concerned about the tendency of the United States to view nearly every foreign problem as solvable if only one uses enough military force, the joke might be updated to suggest that we Americans now always wind up with the Kagans, the first family of neoconservative/neoliberal advocates for an aggressive, interventionist US foreign policy.

Victoria Nuland, the architect of the disaster in Ukraine and a Dick Cheney and Hillary Clinton protege, is married to Robert Kagan and now serving as number three in the State Department. Robert is the Stephen & Barbara Friedman Senior Fellow with the Project on International Order and Strategy in the Foreign Policy program at Brookings and is also a regular contributing columnist at The Washington Post. His brother is Fred, currently a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Fred’s wife Kimberley is head of the aptly named Institute for the Study of War.

When Congress-critters want to justify a new war, they frequently cite judgements made by one of the various groups associated with the Kagans. Robert is a frequent contributor to the national media both in interviews and opinion pieces calling inevitably for harsh measures against countries like Russia and Iran while Fred uses his bully pulpit to argue in favor of a large increases in military spending to counter “future threats.” Fred and Robert are members of the Aspen Strategy Group. They and their father, Donald, were all signatories to the neocon Project for the New American Century manifesto, Rebuilding America’s Defenses (2000).

Characteristically, the Kagan brothers love war but expect someone else to do the fighting. They are both considerably overweight and could never pass a military entrance physical if they were so inclined, which, of course they are not. The Kagans have been closely tied to the Democratic Party on many social issues and would likely describe themselves as liberal interventionists as well as neocons, since in practice both labels mean the same thing in terms of an assertive foreign policy backed by force. Plus, their flexibility gives them access to the foreign policy establishments of both major parties, as also does their support of Israeli interests in the Middle East, to include outspoken support of the Iraq War and for a covert war against Iran.

The Kagans are labeled by many as conservative, but they are not reliably Republican. Donald Trump was much troubled during his 2016 and 2020 campaigns by so-called conservatives who rallied behind the #NeverTrump banner, presumably in opposition to his stated intention to end or at least diminish America’s role in wars in the Middle East and Asia. The Kagans were foremost among those pundits. Robert was one of the first neocons to get on the #NeverTrump band wagon back in 2016 when he endorsed Hillary Clinton for president and spoke at a Washington fundraiser for her, complaining about the “isolationist” tendency in the Republican Party exemplified by Trump. Many other notable neocons also declared themselves to be #NeverTrump, including Bill Kristol, Bret Stephens, Daniel Pipes, Reuel Gerecht, Max Boot and Jonah Goldberg.

To be sure, some high-profile neocons stuck with the Republicans, to include the highly controversial Elliott Abrams, who initially opposed Trump but later became the point man for dealing with both Venezuela and Iran, attracted by Trump’s hardline with both countries. Abrams’ conversion reportedly took place when he realized that the new president genuinely embraced unrelenting hostility towards Iran in particular as exemplified by his ending of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and the assassination of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani in Baghdad. John Bolton was also for a time a neocon in the White House fold, though he later became an enemy after being fired by the president and then wrote a book critical of Trump.

Even though the NeverTrumper neocons did not succeed in blocking Donald Trump in 2016, they maintained relevancy by slowly drifting back towards the Democratic Party, which is where they originated back in the 1970s in the office of the Senator from Boeing Henry “Scoop” Jackson. A number of them started their political careers there, to include leading neocon Richard Perle.

It would not be overstating the case to suggest that the neoconservative movement together with its liberal interventionist colleagues are dominating foreign policy thinking across the board in Congress and the White House. That development has been aided by a more aggressive shift among the Democrats themselves, with Russiagate and other “foreign interference” still to this day being blamed for the party’s failure in 2016 and for its dreary prospects in midterm elections later this year. Given that mutual intense hostility to Trump, the doors to previously shunned liberal media outlets have now opened wide to the stream of foreign policy “experts” who want to “restore a sense of the heroic” to US national security policy. Eliot A. Cohen and David Frum have been favored contributors to the Atlantic while Bret Stephens and Bari Weiss were together at the New York Times prior to Weiss’s resignation. Jennifer Rubin, who wrote in 2016 that “It is time for some moral straight talk: Trump is evil incarnate,” is a frequent columnist for The Washington Post while both she and William Kristol appear regularly on MSNBC. Russian-Jewish import hardliner Max Boot is a regular feature contributor at the Post.

The unifying principle that ties many of the mostly Jewish neocons together is, of course, unconditional defense of Israel and everything it does, which leads them to support a policy of American global military dominance which they presume will inter alia serve as a security umbrella for the Jewish state. In the post-9/11 world, the neocon media’s leading publication Bill Kristol’s The Weekly Standard virtually invented the concept of “Islamofascism” to justify endless war in the Middle East, a development that has killed millions of Muslims, destroyed at least three nations, and cost the US taxpayer more than $5 trillion. The Israel connection has also resulted in neocon political and media support for the currently highly aggressive and dangerous policy against Russia, due in part to its involvement in defense of Israeli target Syria. In Eastern Europe, neocon ideologues have aggressively exploited the largely illusory policy of “democracy promotion,” which, not coincidentally, has also been a major Democratic Party foreign policy objective, both coming together nicely to justify the current chaos in Ukraine.

The neocons and liberal interventionists are involved in a number of foundations, the most prominent of which is the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), that are largely funded by Jewish billionaires and defense contractors. FDD is headed by Canadian Mark Dubowitz and it is reported that the group takes direction coming from officials in the Israeli Embassy in Washington. Other major neocon incubators are the American Enterprise Institute, which currently is the home of Paul Wolfowitz, and the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at John Hopkins University.

Many former Barack Obama White House senior officials who believe in liberal interventionism and democracy promotion while also hating Russia and Vladimir Putin have developed comfortable working relationships with the neocons. Foreign policy hawks including Antony Blinken, Wendy Sherman, Nicholas Burns, Susan Rice and Samantha Power are calling most of the shots given Biden’s senility but with neocon political and media support.

Unfortunately, nowhere in Biden’s foreign policy circle does one find anyone who is resistant to the idea of worldwide interventionism in support of claimed humanitarian objectives, even if it would lead to an actual shooting war with major competitor power Russia and also possibly China. In fact, Biden himself embraces a characteristically extremely bellicose view on a proper relationship with foreign nations “claiming that he is defending democracy against its enemies.” His language and authoritarian governing style leave no wiggle room for constructive dialogue with adversaries. The script being written by his Administration on how to deal with the rest of the world promises nothing but unending trouble and quite possibly sharp economic decline in the US for the foreseeable future.

Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is councilforthenationalinterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is inform@cnionline.org.

READ MORE: 

https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/liberal-interventionists-and-neoconservatives-dominate-us-foreign-policy/

READ FROM TOP.

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!