Friday 19th of April 2024

the doctors' wives...

women!women!

Scott Morrison and his government enter the new year with a fresh iteration of their "women problem" — the multiple high-profile female independents contesting a number of Liberal seats.

It's not that the next parliament is likely to see a big influx of new lower house crossbenchers.

ABC election analyst Antony Green points out that, to win, independents in these seats would need a 25-30 per cent primary vote and to push the Liberal vote down to about 45 per cent.

One of these aspirants may succeed, two if they were extremely lucky. Perhaps the drive will end up nothing more than colour and movement.

However it goes, their challenges bring serious campaign trouble for Morrison.

Strong female candidates casting themselves as representatives, or "voices", of their communities are standing in North Sydney, Mackellar, Wentworth, Hughes and Hume in NSW, and in Goldstein, Kooyong and Flinders in Victoria.

Their priorities include climate change, integrity and women's issues.

 

There's also Jo Dyer, who was a close friend of the deceased woman who made an allegation of historical rape against Christian Porter — which he denies — standing in Boothby in South Australia. The risk for the government is she might tip that marginal seat to Labor.

Notably, most of these candidates will be extraordinarily well-financed, thanks to climate campaigner Simon Holmes à Court's massive Climate 200 war chest, now totalling $6.5 million and with a target of $20 million.

The Liberals strike a note of outrage about this fund. They were not so offended by Clive Palmer's much-larger election spending spree last election, but then that hit Labor.

Morrison's sledgehammer approach

Fighting the independent candidates will be a costly distraction for the Liberals.

They are pulling out all stops to label the independents a de facto party, with preselections and common talking points.

Morrison declared this week of the "voices" candidates: "They're the voices of Labor. And if you vote for an independent from that ‘Voices Of' movement, you may as well vote Labor."

This smacks of arrogance, a sledgehammer approach.

It also has a ring of Chris Bowen's infamous 2019 line, that those who didn't like Labor's franking credits policy "are, of course, perfectly entitled to vote against us".

But rather than being "voices of Labor", these candidates are "voices of criticism", forming a well-resourced, like-minded, often mutually supportive, protest vote.

Years ago the term "doctors' wives" became fashionable among commentators to describe comfortably off middle-class women in the leafy suburbs likely to vote against the Liberals over the Iraq war, although the phrase went back further.

Today, one Liberal quips: "The doctors' wives are not just voting against us — they're standing against us."

These "doctors' wives" are highly qualified professionals — including a couple of medicos. Monique Ryan, running in Kooyong, is director of the department of neurology at Melbourne's Royal Children's Hospital.

 

For all the Liberals' sledging of the high-profile independents, these candidates will increase the heat on Morrison over such matters as whether, if re-elected, he will continue to refuse to introduce legislation for an integrity commission, on the excuse Labor does not support his model. 

In polling done for Climate 200 this month in nine urban and regional electorates in NSW, Victoria and South Australia, voters in most seats rated the Morrison government's behaviour with regard to integrity and ethics as poor, with the intensity of feeling tending to be strongest in urban seats.

Uncertainties mount

One unknown is the likely gender divide in the coming vote. Morrison is working hard to shore up his support among male "tradies" and the like but, after the year we've had on women's issues, will he lose a significant number of female voters? And, in the leafy seats, will women be attracted to these female independents?

The women's vote is just one of the uncertainties the PM faces as he looks to 2022.

Morrison this week again indicated strongly that he wants the community to put COVID-19 aside — to accept living with the virus.

"The cases, when it comes to COVID-19, are now not the primary issue," he said. What mattered was the impact on the health system and (the instance of) serious illness.

Treasurer Josh Frydenberg declared the states needed to "keep calm and carry on".

The government has made the basic judgement that the community is "over" lockdowns.

But, with Omicron set to surge, the messages from various governments and authorities will be mixed.

The media will feature the case numbers, not just the hospital admissions.

 

Read more:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-12-17/independent-women-candidates-morrisons-problem/100706654

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW ∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞§§§§§§!!!

superior pork-barrelling...

Three years ago, Corangamite was the most pork-barrelled electorate in the country. The major parties threw everything they could at the ultra-marginal seat, promising tens of millions during the election campaign.

The voters might have rejected Liberal Sarah Henderson in favour of Labor’s Libby Coker, but government spending continues apace.

 

A special analysis by The Age and the Sydney Morning Herald of more than 19,000 grants made over the past three years shows Corangamite has been showered with more than $55.2 million. At the same time, the neighbouring seat of Corio, held by deputy Labor leader Richard Marles, got $7.66 million.

The breakdown of 11 grants programs over which MPs or ministers had direct control shows Coalition-held or targeted seats were heavily favoured with major and minor projects.

 

The haul in Corangamite puts it at 10th out of 151 electorates for the amount of money flowing in – one of just two Labor-held seats in the top 10. It also accounts for 10 per cent of all spending in Labor seats.

Ms Coker won Corangamite in 2019 for Labor with a one-point margin, beating the Liberal incumbent, who has since become a senator through a casual vacancy.

 

Read more:

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/swimming-pools-and-surf-life-saving-clubs-net-grants-in-ultra-marginal-corangamite-20211203-p59eo3.html

 

Read from top

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW ∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞§§§§§§!!!

 

throw them out!...

 

 

From David Crowe...

...

 

The formula clearly works, especially when the incumbent is unpopular. It helped Rebekha Sharkie replace Jamie Briggs in Mayo, Cathy McGowan replace Sophie Mirabella in Indi (now held by Helen Haines) and Zali Steggall remove Tony Abbott in Warringah.

The essential elements are to replace a man with a woman and a conservative with a moderate – or, to the fundamental point, someone who is not Labor or Green.

 

But it is rare. McGowan arrived in 2013, Sharkie in 2016, Steggall in 2019. It will not be easy for the campaigners to get one more elected in 2022 and it would be astonishing to see a handful of new ones take the balance of power.

Importantly, Climate 200 has changed the formula. Learning from the failure of several GetUp campaigns at the last election, when conservatives like Peter Dutton comfortably held their seats, the updated movement targets moderate Liberals. This means it is asking voters to throw out Liberals who argued for greater action on climate change (and prodded Prime Minister Scott Morrison to endorse net zero emissions by 2050) and sided against Morrison on same-sex marriage. This is an experiment.

 

 Read more:

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/time-for-a-cold-shower-for-those-dreaming-of-independent-victories-20211216-p59i04.html

 

------------------

 

David Crowe is a discreet ScoMo apologist… He has no fix on the game being played by ScoMo and his “moderate” allies… The "moderate" Liberals — who argued for greater action on climate change, prodded Prime Minister Scott Morrison to endorse net zero emissions by 2050 and sided “against" Morrison on same-sex marriage — are only a second fiddle PR exercise to make ScoMo more palatable to the public. Re-elect these soft cheeses and hard nut ScoMo gets re-elected… The same old ScoMo crap comes back… These "moderates" in the Liberal (COnservative) party would still play along with the main ScoMo crapology… This is why they need to be booted out. 

 

The people who should take a cold shower are these (very few) “moderates” in the Liberal (CONservative) Party… especially the women “who cross the floor, are given a spanking by Frydenberg — and cry while promising to never cross the floor again…” It shows guts like dead goldfishes… The exercise is designed to make these Liberal (COnservative) women more palatable to a moderate electorate, for having stood up against ScoMo for five whole minutes… Throw them out. Replace them with more gutsy independents!

 

ScoMo’s got to go!!!

 

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!