Saturday 21st of May 2022

chasing the votes of extremists...

scomology...scomology...

Victoria's Premier Daniel Andrews has unloaded on the Prime Minister, accusing him of "chasing the votes of extremists" after his comments about the Melbourne protests. 

Key points:
  • Mr Andrews has received threats over his proposed pandemic laws
  • Demonstrators at a weekend protest wheeled out a makeshift gallows with nooses attached
  • Scott Morrison has faced a backlash for saying he understood protesters' frustrations
 

Scott Morrison condemned the violent, anti-government protests, saying "threats and intimidation" had no place in Australia, while also suggesting he understood why the protesters were angry and resentful.

Mr Morrison said that with such high vaccine coverage it was time for the states to wind back their pandemic powers.

"There are many people who are feeling frustrated," he told reporters. 

"It's time for governments to step back and for Australians to take their lives back". 

Mr Andrews, who has received death threats over his proposed pandemic laws, stood by his approach while accusing Mr Morrison of saying one thing and meaning another. 

"We have seen extremists, rabid anti-vaxxers and others making all sorts of threats, threats against me, my wife and my kids," Mr Andrews told Channel Nine.

 

Read more:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-19/daniel-andrews-accuses-scott-morrison-of-chasing-extremist-votes/100633268

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW XXXXXXXX≈≈≈≈≈≈!!!

the useful idiots...

In a courtroom and in politics, you don’t ask a question if you know you won’t like the answer. 

Maybe that’s why the Coalition government hasn’t asked Treasury to model climate change costs. 

Consultants are different. They generally can be relied on to provide the answer the person paying them wants to hear. And if one consultant won’t play the desired tune, there are plenty of others who will. 

 

Consultants are doing extremely well out of Canberra. 

The Australia Institute counts more than $1 billion a year being spent by the Morrison government on consultancies as the public service is increasingly bypassed. 

Michael West has totalled $3.1 billion going to just four firms over the past six years. 

Given how richly they are paid, it’s impossible to feel sorry for consultants having to torture data, bend perceptions, omit inconvenient facts and step around elephants to deliver the findings the government wants to hear. Useful idiots.

I do have some sympathy though for the economists employed in Treasury and various other government departments, especially Angus Taylor’s Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. 

The majority of them are not stupid. 

They know that however much they might try to slip in a factual statement here and telling graph there, they are captive accessories to the Morrison government’s biggest lie: We don’t need to price carbon.

The proportion of economists who believe we don’t need to price carbon – either by a tax or cap-and-trade market mechanism or both – is about the same as the proportion of climate scientists who don’t think we’re suffering climate change. 

 

There might be a debate between reasonable people about the best form of carbon pricing, but the need for it is a given. 

Nothing symbolises the low ebb in Australian politics better than the inability of either major party to talk rationally about a carbon “tax”. 

It’s the lasting stain of Tony Abbott’s Total Opposition – the cynical misrepresentation of carbon pricing for purely political purposes. 

Just as Scott Morrison will forever be the man brandishing a lump of coal in Parliament, the image of Liberal front benchers celebrating their repeal of Labor’s carbon pricing in 2014 defines their integrity.

 

Even the government’s dodgy, rent-an-answer, net-zero modelling had to contain a carbon price of $24 a tonne to get within 15 per cent of what the government wanted to hear, as Richard Denniss has explained.

The irony didn’t escape the Australian Financial Review’s Jacob Greber:

“The stunning and politically explosive concession… reveals every household may need to pay a carbon price equivalent of more than $1400 a year.

“That’s because the full reduction in net emissions by 2050 that Morrison and Taylor promised the world at this month’s UN climate summit in Glasgow requires a carbon price of $80 a tonne, according to the model.

“Clearly, for the Coalition, such a price is completely politically untenable. Which is why the government’s plan is modelled on a far less threatening price of $24 a tonne.

“The irony? Gillard’s short-lived carbon price – before Tony Abbott’s government legislated to abolish it – began at $23 a tonne.”

The joke within the lie that is Mr Morrison’s “technology not taxes” campaign slogan is that the confessed $24 carbon price is “voluntary” – it’s what corporations and individuals will volunteer to pay because we’re nice and care a bit about the future when the government does not. 

Only the aforementioned useful idiots could go along with the nonsense that a voluntary $24 price will do the trick.

At the other end of the scale from such people, on Monday I began work on a Monash University podcast series to run next year by interviewing  Dr Ummul Ruthbah, a senior research fellow with the Monash Centre for Financial Studies, and Jan Ahrens, head of research at SparkChange in Germany, a provider of carbon data and investment products. 

The interview was about the Real Carbon Price Index they have launched to benchmark carbon pricing around the world, in the process measuring global progress and shaming the countries that are not pulling their weight.

While the world needs a price of about $US80 a tonne by 2030 to drive “can-do capitalism” to keep the Paris dream alive, the current global average is just $US4.42. 

The Australian price is zero – we’re freeloading even on that miserably low average.

The Real Carbon Price is both interesting and depressing. The interview underlined the irrefutable sense of pricing carbon, something (almost) every economist knows. It also made our politicians’ denial of the obvious all the more dismaying. 

And perhaps what’s most depressing is that the Australian electorate is so gullible as to have fallen for the cheap politics, the Big Lie. 

We can’t handle the truth.

 

 

Read more:

https://thenewdaily.com.au/finance/2021/11/17/michael-pascoe-useful-idiots-climate-lie-carbon-price/

 

Remember that spectacle:

 

the specthe spec

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

a waste of the future...

Guspinion:

 

Building a New "Sydney Airport" is a waste of money and a blight on the planet in need of ZERO EMISSIONS. Presently, due to Covid-19, the original Sydney Airport is operating at 10 to 20 per cent capacity, presenting an opportunity for the main runway being redone at one end.

 

Meanwhile, the new Sydney Airport is a long way from the City CBD, meaning it demands a fast energy-hungry transport which has not been conceived by the Federal and State governments to date.

 

Imagine having to go and collect your tired relatives, after a long flight, and having yet another hour and a half of bus, car or train, stopping every five minutes on the way home. The whole caper is yet a photo op for the present beefsteak Primal Minister to wear another hard hat as he visits another "industrial site" to hypocritically show that his government does bits, to keep the country going, by DOING NOTHING — and going in the wrong direction as far as Gus is concerned...

 

Visit: https://simpliphipower.com

 

Gus does not endorse products per se, but follows the trails of "independence" from grid suppliers for electricity when possible. ScoMo, the beefsteak Primal Minister and marketeer of soiled nappies — a long time opponent of renewable energy — has "shifted his stand" and now approves the "electric car for the weekend", but my guess is this is a temporary stint to get re-elected, as he still favours a BIG COAL future for this country... Kick ScoMo out...

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ!!!∏∏∏∏∏∏