Thursday 2nd of May 2024

the problems with labels...

labels

I was waiting for the mention of god and religion in a wafty worthy article... It came in the penultimate and last paragraphs after a laborious convoluted academic read. 

Coming from a geezer at the University of Notre Dame, I expected it. Deneen took his time though. The mention of "true humanity" worried me a bit and the worthiness of "achievement of self-governance within the limits of our nature and the natural world" should be lauded though it is fully contrary to the teachings of Christian religion — despite the latest ramblings by the current pope. 

Here is Deneen:

To the extent that modern "conservatism" has embraced the arguments of classical liberalism, the actions and policies of its political actors have never failed to actively undermine those areas of life that "conservatives" claim to seek to defend.

Partly this is due to drift; but more worryingly, it is due to the increasingly singular embrace by many contemporary Americans - whether liberal or "conservative" - of a modern definition of liberty that consists in doing as one likes through the conquest of nature, rather than the achievement of self-governance within the limits of our nature and the natural world.

...

Defenders of a true human liberty need at once to "get bigger" and "get smaller." Rather than embrace the false universalism of "globalism," a true universality - under God - shows us the infinite narrowness of "globalization" and points us to the true nature of transcendence. And the only appropriate way to live in and through this transcendent is in the loci of the particular, those places which do not aspire to dim the light of the eternal City.

We need rather to attend to our States and localities, our communities and neighbourhoods, our families and our Church, making them viable alternatives and counterpoints to the monopolization of individual and State in our time, and thus to relearn the ancient virtue of self-government, and true liberty itself.

Patrick J. Deneen is David A. Potenziani Memorial Associate Professor of Constitutional Studies in the Department of Political Science at the University of Notre Dame. He is the author of Democratic Faith and co-editor of The Democratic Soul: A Wilson Carey McWilliams Reader.

 

read more: http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2016/03/18/4427658.htm

------------------
Gus:
The last paragraph is designed to inspire but falls into the canyon of "true liberty". As an atheist, the "truth is always relative" to me, but I sense in the wording some underlying faith in godly perfection.

Nor do I understand what "the true nature of transcendence" means. The usage of "nature" and "transcendence" in the same breath, leaves me a bit flabbergasted. I suppose it could be just a turn of phrase to enhance the value of transcendence which can only be true should one believe in transcendence, otherwise it would be a belief in relative potato soup. Transcendence is of course an illusion — a trick of the mind which can have some relative value in helping us devise the next trick.

I suppose the point of this article is to show that the present conservatives claims of "liberalism" are bunkum because they are choosy, mostly exclusive to pull the blanket to their advantage. It seems to be a comparative analysis of various forms of "liberalism". But the article is not as clear as it should be. I would say there is a lot of good ingredients here but the conclusion is half-baked. It presents a worthy idealism of ancient virtues that themselves had been idealised by their antiquity creators but never really achieved any political status for good reasons. The sanitation of ideas creates great philosophical meals, but eventually we need to poop. Someone is going to war.

What has been forgotten in Deneen's article has been the main (overused) salt and pepper of humanity: "Competitionism". Many of our activities are dressed up with the cloth of competition. Even competition with our self. From sporting activity to TV and mercantilism, competition rules. This is the case of MKR, "Celebs in a Jungle", all the detective TV shows — and WARS. This competition leads to trade as a form of robbery and the transformation of wants into need through aggressive manipulation of minds. Advertising, politics, religion, class warfare thrive on this manipulation and there is no transcendence in this — only opinions. True liberty itself is an ideality of illusionism. I have already treated with Leo Strauss neo-conservatism in the introduction to "the Age of Deceit".

And of course this is where I believe Deneen fears to treat: freedom from religion, freedom of religion. religious freedom.

Religion is not free — far from it. It imposes demands akin to slavery, which should become enjoyable and liberating because "you believe". It's crap of course. There are many caveats and the freedom of religion is some countries where religion is also the political dogma is oppressive though those born under this rules do not feel the weight of their chains, because they never knew otherwise. Those who try to leave this framing, get pelted like you would not believe.

It's the same when trying to get financial "independence" from the capitalist system. Credit rules ok. 

And religion does not stop the excess of "competitionsim" — it actually encourages the concept of being better than the other and of being god's "chosen people".

McWilliams (possibly one of Deneen heroes since he edited a book about him) commendation to modern liberal democracy, the arts of association and a chastening form of religious faith is quite pretty and sweet. But it is totally immature, has no reality detailed structures and  lacks the necessary elastic ingredient in dealing with the diversity of humanity. 

Deneen can do better, but I guess he is hemmed in by his own religious self.

 

 

I want all of the blanket...

 

The American political reformer Herbert Croly wrote, "For better or worse, democracy cannot be disentangled from an aspiration toward human perfectibility." Democratic Faith is at once a trenchant analysis and a powerful critique of this underlying assumption that informs democratic theory. Patrick Deneen argues that among democracy's most ardent supporters there is an oft-expressed belief in the need to "transform" human beings in order to reconcile the sometimes disappointing reality of human self-interest with the democratic ideal of selfless commitment. This "transformative impulse" is frequently couched in religious language, such as the need for political "redemption." This is all the more striking given the frequent accompanying condemnation of traditional religious belief that informs the "democratic faith.


Deneen argues that democracy is ill-served by such faith. Instead, he proposes a form of "democratic realism" that recognizes democracy not as a regime with aspirations to perfection, but that justifies democracy as the regime most appropriate for imperfect humans. If democratic faith aspires to transformation, democratic realism insists on the central importance of humility, hope, and charity.

 

Here again in this book, Democratic Faith, Deneen seems to be ignoring our main driver: competition and the management thereof. Humility, hope and charity, though somewhat helpful cannot deal with our competitive "rage" that underlies our modern desires. The transformation aspired by Democratic Faith would be going all over the place like the breakdown of artistic styles that are now navel gazing in a million broken pieces, in the search of the new... This why we're on the way towards President Trump...

there seem to be far more guts in this work...

 

 

The Devils We Know


Us and Them in America's Raucous Political Culture


James A. Morone


Is there an American culture? Certainly, says James Morone. Americans are fighting over it now. They have been fighting over it since the first Puritan stepped ashore. Americans hate government (no national health insurance!) and call for more of it (lock em up!). They prize democracy (power to the people) and scramble to restrict it (the electoral college in the 21st century?). They celebrate opportunity—but only for some (dont let those people in!). Americans proclaim liberty then wrestle over which kind—positive (freedom from want) or negative (no new taxes!)?

In this volume Morone offers his own answer to the conundrum of American political culture: It is a perpetual work in progress. Immigrants arrive, excluded groups demand power, and each generation injects new ethnicities, races, religions, ideas, foods, entertainments, sins, and body types into the national mix. The challengers—the devils we know—keep inventing new answers to the nations fundamental question: Who are we?


“Morone is a lively writer and shrewd interpreter of political culture. . . . provide[s] an invigorating tour of multiple sites where American identity has been created and recreated over time.”

—Journal of American History

“Who constitute the ‘them’ outside the American community can differ at any particular time—various immigrant groups, the ‘undeserving poor,’ alcoholics, smokers, and recently, the obese—though race-based exclusion has been, Morone maintains, the cosmological constant in the American cultural universe. Americans’ efforts to separate the culturally normative ‘us’ from the alien ‘them’ has resulted in a politics in which power is gained by cultivating fear of one’s enemies and frequently enacted prohibitionist public policies that are, according to Morone, ‘miserable.’”

—Choice

“How good it is to have this collection of bracing essays by one of the most imaginative scholars of the American experience.Ranging across a wide range of ideas, personalities, events, policies, and ethical challenges, The Devils We Know offers the gift of clarifying crucial conundrums and contradictions in American political culture.”

—Ira Katznelson, author of Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Origins of Our Time

“A landmark book. Morone stands out—yet again—as a pioneer in melding American political thought and political development. In this collection, Morone reworks Louis Hartz to produce a mesmerizing new synthesis of America’s kaleidoscopic political culture—one that despises government but embraces Social Security and Medicare, tolerates stinging racial and income disparities even as it sings the praises of democracy and opportunity, and simultaneously worships individualism and country.”

—Larry Jacobs, coauthor of Health Reform and American Politics

“No one portrays the development of our politics with more verve and insight than James Morone. The Devils We Know displays Morone’s wit and wisdom at its best. With a collection of sparkling essays that span slavery, prohibition, obesity and health care, Morone charms us into taking a hard look at the inspiring and troubling battles for the soul of America.”

—Sidney Milkis, author of Theodore Roosevelt, the Progressive Party, and the Transformation of American Democracy

 

Each essay in The Devils We Know takes up a different aspect of the creative conflicts that shape America. Ranging from Huck Finn to Obamacare, Morone explores the ways in which culture interacts with other forces—most notably the rules and organizations that channel collective choices. The battle to define the nations political culture spills over into every area of American life, but three are especially important: democracy, economics, and morals — each, in turn, complicated by race, race, race. Written over 25 years, these essays constitute a closely observed and deeply thoughtful vision of what America is—its ideas, images, rules, institutions, and culture clashes. Together, they explain just why America is the way it is. And what it might become.

About the Author

James A. Morone is the John Hazen White Professor of Political Science and Public Policy at Brown University. His many books include Hellfire Nation: The Politics of Sin in American History, The Democratic WishThe Heart of Power: Health and Politics in the Oval Office (with David Blumenthal) and, By the People: Debating American Government (with Rogan Kersh).