Thursday 2nd of May 2024

famous coulda...

coulda

NSW Premier Barry O'Farrell says the Liberals are guilty of not saving NSW from the state's biggest corruption inquiry by failing to win government earlier and denying Labor terms during which allegedly criminal deals were struck between ministers Eddie Obeid and Ian Macdonald.
In an interview to mark his second year in office on Tuesday, he said hearings at the Independent Commission Against Corruption involving Mr Obeid and Mr Macdonald confirmed ''just how guilty the Liberal Party was in allowing Labor to be re-elected in the last two elections''.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/i-could-have-saved-nsw-20130323-2gmk5.html#ixzz2OQRZxA8Y
--------------------------

 As if the alleged  corruption from Obeid and MacDonald had much influence of the price of fish in New South Wales... Sure it influenced a bit with the pricing of lampposts and a small patch of land in whoop-whoop-land, but that's about it...

Actually one should be far more worried about O'Feral giving a near "carte blanche" to shooters and fishers to destroy national parks, as well as Bazza sending hordes of unbridled developers in a suburb near you, if it's not your own... 
In the same napoleonic breath, Bazza had no compunction in giving his mate James Packer a public piece of land — ear-marked for recreation — for a recreational private gambling den... If this is not corrupt, what is?...
Bazza HAS NOT, nor COULDA saved New South Wales... The brawling Labor Party in its wisdom — that did not destroy your place by plonking a 30-storey building next to your abode without your consent — did. 

 

a hypocritical mea culpa...

Mr O'Farrell said if Mr Brogden had remained leader, he would have become premier. ''I would have been treasurer, so I have escaped something,'' he joked.
He said Mr Brogden deserved credit for uniting the party for the first time ''and we still imploded when he had his difficulties''.
On taking the leadership, Mr O'Farrell organised a ''round table'' with warring factions and brokered a peace agreement.
He said every organisation had factions, ''even P&Cs and P&Fs''.
''It becomes a problem when the interests of individuals supplant the interests of the organisation,'' he said. ''That's what happened for too long in the Liberal Party.''
Mr Debnam and Mr Brodgen declined to comment.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/i-could-have-saved-nsw-20130323-2gmk5.html#ixzz2OQWVNOJW

meanwhile at the cauldron...

Yet, to those with a sense of organisational politics, culture and leadership, how could there have been any other denouement? It was apparent well before June 2010 that Rudd treated many of those around him badly, even contemptuously. A chronically sleep-deprived, erratic and angry micro-manager does not ordinarily enjoy a long shelf life, whether as a leader of a kindergarten, church, company or footy club. People who work with such individuals resent them. After a time, resentment breeds hostility and anger. And soon after, it becomes hate.

James Button, a gentle and highly experienced journalist, who briefly worked as Rudd's speechwriter and then later with public servants who worked for Rudd, wrote:

The truth is, Rudd was impossible to work with. He regularly treated his staff, public servants and backbenchers with rudeness and contempt. He was vindictive, intervening to deny people appointments or preselections, often based on grudges that went back years.

David Marr penned an analysis that highlighted Rudd's mysterious and sudden bouts of "icy rage" directed at those around him.

http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/4598894.html