Tuesday 24th of December 2024

customary law .....

customary law .....

from Crikey ….. 

Chris Graham: Brough is back, with a record of failure

Chris Graham, managing editor of Tracker, writes:

INDIGENOUS PEOPLE, MAL BROUGH, NT INTERVENTION

The best predictor of someone’s future behaviour is their past behaviour. Which means that with Mal Brough winning pre-selection for the federal seat of Fisher, Parliament is in for a sideshow the likes of which it hasn’t seen since … well, since 2007.

There's a broad expectation that Brough will walk straight back into the ministry if he wins Fisher. And there's widespread fear in black Australia that the portfolio will be Aboriginal affairs, given Brough’s boys own adventure in 2007 with the Northern Territory intervention.

I think the fear is misplaced. Brough today is about as popular with his colleagues as a refugee at a Liberal Party convention. And he was a pretty terrible minister for indigenous affairs to boot. With that in mind, it’s worth revisiting some of the policy disasters over which Brough presided during the Howard years.

Destination anywhere

The Community Development Employment Program - aka the black work for the dole - was designed and run by Aboriginal people, and had been chugging away relatively successfully for more than three decades.

Enter Brough, who decided in 2006 that CDEP had become a "destination" rather than a "path to real employment". He began abolishing CDEP in remote regions, despite the fact CDEP was the ONLY source of employment in impoverished towns, not to mention the major funder of basic services. Aboriginal unemployment when Brough left office was at near record levels.

Who wants a home?

In 2007, Brough decided Aboriginal people were at risk of becoming communists because they couldn’t purchase their own homes on collectively owned Aboriginal land in remote areas. So, after amending the Aboriginal Land Rights Act in the NT, Brough unveiled the Home Ownership on Indigenous Lands program (HOIL), a government-funded scheme aimed at helping blackfellas buy a plot of land they already owned.

He quarantined $100 million in government funding for HOIL while at the same time underfunding the highly successful Home Ownership Program (which enabled Aboriginal people anywhere in the country to access home loans). HOP's waiting list blew out exponentially while money sat locked in the HOIL program.

Finally, after five years of operation, Brough's HOIL was quietly shelved and the money diverted into HOP. The HOP waiting list dropped instantly from 1,500 to just over 400 -- that’s more than 1000 Aboriginal families into home ownership almost overnight. And the cost of Brough’s HOIL adventure? Some $10 million to administer a program that provided just 15 loans worth $2.7 million.

Stashing cash while Rome burns

Brough spent much of his time as minister pounding the state and territory Labor governments for their poor performance on indigenous affairs. A good thing, too. But at the same time, in 2006-07 his department underspent the Indigenous Affairs budget by a staggering $600 million, one-fifth of the total budget. This in the same year that Brough declared "a national emergency" in NT Aboriginal communities.

I didn't finish it … but I did start it

And speaking of the NT intervention, five years on the policy that defined Brough's time as minister has seen school attendance drop, suicide and self-harm rates double, and a more than doubling in reports of violent incidents. All the while the incarceration rate has soared to almost 90% of the prison population.

Brough has the luxury of not being able to be held accountable for the failings of the NT intervention -- he was, after all, cast from office five months after it was launched. But Brough is responsible for the implementation of the intervention, and on that front things aren’t pretty. A parliamentary inquiry found its implementation was very poor -- apart from alienating Aboriginal people and providing no emergency accommodation for anyone but police and soldiers, it caused widespread starvation among Aboriginal communities.

A $1 million porkie

When Brough told media this week that at no stage did he ever request extracts from Peter Slipper's diary (despite text messages showing him requesting extracts from Slipper's diary) he was simply adopting a practice that had worked well for him in the unaccountable world of indigenous affairs. Perhaps his most startling "deny deny deny" moment came when he walked out of a roundtable summit on Aboriginal violence and told media that someone in the meeting had revealed things were so bad in NT Aboriginal communities that $1 million in cash had been found in one remote town, the proceeds from the sale of drugs.

One million in cash? In a remote community? Really? The story, of course, collapsed when it later transpired there was a drug bust in the NT, but it occurred in Darwin, the amount of cash involved was small, and the guy arrested was white, with no links to Aboriginal communities whatsoever.

dirt spreads .....

from politicoz …..

The timing couldn't be worse. On the day after Mal Brough won preselection to contest Peter Slipper's seat at the next election, ABC's 7:30 reported that Slipper's accuser, James Ashby, is himself under criminal investigation, accused of having sex with underage boys.

James Ashby will likely now regret his accusations against Slipper, because it was these that indirectly led to the new allegations against him.The extent of Brough's involvement with James Ashby in the Slipper affair is unclear, although we know he had at least three meetings to advise Ashby before claims were lodged against Slipper, as well as several text messages and phone calls. Brough allegedly also received copies of Slipper's diary extracts from Ashby.Mal Brough, Christopher Pyne and other LNP figures will now be regretting any involvement with Ashby, because this episode clearly has a long way to run.James Ashby, the political aide who accused Speaker Peter Slipper of sexual harassment, is now facing a police investigation into allegations he had sexual relationships with two 15-year-old boys … the claims come from a Queensland man who contacted Mr Slipper after Mr Ashby launched his case.Allegations that James Ashby had sex with underage boys have been dismissed by the federal Opposition as having no relevance to Mr Ashby's claims that he was sexually harassed by the Speaker, Peter Slipper. The shadow attorney-general, George Brandis, cautioned that the reports about Mr Ashby's previous relationships were allegations from an anonymous source. "Let's not get ahead of ourselves." he told Sky News this morning.