SearchDemocracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
cover defence .....The 9/11 Commission has long been suspected of being a bipartisan whitewash of the Bush Administration failures in preventing 9/11 and its botched immediate follow-up after the event. But, according to Think Progress, it turns out that Philip Zelikow, who was chosen to be the executive director of the 9/11 Commission, was actually one of the key people who set up the flawed national security apparatus under cunning-conning-Condi Rice, you know the one that blew off a CIA warning in the summer of 2001 of imminent Al-Qaeda hijackings in the US. Do you get the picture? This was like bushit appointing himself to investigate the Katrina disaster & the Valerie Plame outing. In short, Zelikow - as with the shrub - was in a position to monitor & mould information so as to save his own neck, along with the necks of Rice, bushit & dead-eye dick Cheney. According to ABC News, when 9/11 Commission co-chairs Tom Kean & Lee Hamilton hired Rice’s former aide Philip Zelikow to be executive director, Zelikow failed to tell them about his role helping her set up bushit’s National Security Council in early 2001 - & that he was 'instrumental' in demoting Richard Clarke, the one-time Out House counterterrorism czar, who was fixated on the threat from Osama bin Laden & al Qaeda. It is also now being alleged that Zelikow, contrary to explicit Commission guidelines, discussed the "investigation" with Karl Rove. (Zelikow admits talking to Rove at the time on a number of occasions but says that it was not about Commission work. No doubt, they were discussing the prospects for the Washington Redskins.) Of course, we'll never get to the bottom of it - and perhaps unravel the untold story of 9/11 - because the Democrats in Congress aren't going to use their subpoena powers to undercut a bipartisan commission, even if its executive director appears to have good reason to cover up a lot of the truth. Much of this information is coming from a new book, "The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation," to be published in February by New York Times reporter Philip Shenon. Zelikow, who went on to work for Rice again after his stint with the 9/11 Commission, may continue to deny some of the claims, but the case for an ipso facto conflict of interest is evident. One can speculate Zelikow was more interested in censoring much of the true 9/11 story than revealing it, because it was his actions - along with his buddies in the bushit administration - that were on the line.That's some hypocrisy to whitewash 9/11. That's the granddaddy of them all this decade, along with the lying that led us into the Iraq War.
|
User login |
Recent comments
48 min 1 sec ago
5 hours 10 min ago
5 hours 59 min ago
6 hours 3 min ago
6 hours 9 min ago
6 hours 14 min ago
8 hours 46 min ago
8 hours 55 min ago
10 hours 33 min ago
11 hours 27 min ago