Thursday 25th of April 2024

Congratulation Waleed...

waleed

Oh yes, don't we need some diversity on Aussie TV! Tell the Yanks about this, they are the one who send us our daily fare with visions of ourselves which are not ours but theirs. The ABC is doing its best, but we have had our SBS to let us know about the rest of the diverse world and this is where people with strange name like Smith from India is pronounced Smithee...  But here talking about diversity, from Mustaphah to Gustaphian from Gustaphianaland, I'd like to add my two bob's worth.

I know it's not my place to say something about your religious beliefs but I will anyway. I believe you are an intelligent man, so your main controlling ideologic panel does not make sense. Religion was invented by men, not by god. God does not exist. Religion was invented to subdue other human beings, especially females. To say the least, despite trying hard to appear looking skywards, beyond earthly matters, religion is mostly hell-bent on managing the reproductive sexuality of the species. That's why a lot of Christian religious discourse is focused on anti-abortion, homosexuality, exclusivity of copulation, anti-prostitution and, in Allahism, modesty of the female whom some extreme sects make sure they are kept under black or blue tents as well as being totally uneducated. Even those other sects that allow knowledge of sorts, education is strongly controlled by or exclusively to religious beliefs. How denaturing. 

Your religion — as well as all the other religions, including the Allahist related Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism) — does not make sense. Why would a god create a species of monkeys with a self-inflated belief that they ought to serve Him (god is a singular male of course) to reach an imaginary banquet. 

Yes, it's easy to believe in such crap because, we're lazy and so gullible that we still try to make kids believe in the tooth fairy pillow ritual. The reality is much more complicated, yet so much more exciting. It demands intelligence to do some proper analysis — not "a leap of faith". "Leaps of faith" are easy. 

Religion is a ghastly addiction that is cultivated in us since we're toddlers. We've got to get rid of it, but like all addictions, it is difficult to go cold turkey. Eventually humanity will have to go cold turkey in a global warming context, with its other addictions: fossil fuels. Fossil fuel and religion — add capitalism (mainly greed) for good measure, though it's quite benign compared to the other two — we've got to get rid off.

Religion has many formats. The format we believe in is the only one to believe in, otherwise it would not make sense to believe that someone's other gods are valid as well. Diversity in accepting other religions would not make any universal sense at this level, would it, especially when we beat the crap out of each others, in the name of god? We do beat the crap out of each other using god as a banner, but the aim is resources, especially oil.

Because grown-ups are still addicted to this long lasting infantile sting, and are still perpetuating the sting with rituals and bums pointing in the air or genuflexion, does not mean we should carry on. We can grow up, Can't we?

The reality is that we are evolved monkeys whether we find it palatable or not. E-vo-lu-tion is not a dirty word. Religion is a suspect inflation of our imagined worth, with such a decided importance that we think we deserve eternity. Crap. We are finite beings. We have to take it on the chin.  

Sciences remind us of the complexity of nature. Nature is about processes of the universe, in which species, including our own, evolved over nearly 4 billion years. Ours is a lucky planet, like there would be billions of planet in this large universe with similar luck, though their surface might have encountered slightly different environmental circumstances, eventually leading to some super intelligent species' specimen to win a Godly Logie.

Today we are exposed to more facts. The humanoids did not develop in China, despite China (or the area in which China stands) having possibly more diversity in its Anthropoids (lemurs-like, small monkey-like creatures), population than in Africa. Apparently, these anthropoids from "China", migrated to Africa due to "climatic changes" which saw much cooler temperatures on the planet 38 million years ago. These anthropoids eventually evolved into bigger monkeys and apes. Humanoids developed as several related species in this evolutionary survival chaotic strategy. There were more than one branch of humanoids. We know of two others so far, possibly more than ten, including "Flores man". 

The Neanderthals have now been well catalogued and, apart from Africans who never left Africa, we all carry some of the genes of Neanderthals in us. We interbred with various result of success and failure. Mostly failure for the Neanderthals who became extinct. 

There was another humanoid species that had reached the east. We call them the Denisovans. Though this species is also extinct, "modern humans" also copulated with them, like donkeys with horses, with a more fruitful result. The result is that a small portion of the Denisovan genes are still with some of us today, especially in the Polynesian side of the human family. The Denisovans also became extinct.



On ABC Radio National this morning (9/5/16) there was a panel discussing the struggles of generation and the sense of entitlements, in regard to the Turnbull pseudo-elections. I call them pseudo because there was no need for Malcolm to engender the trickery. Here at this juncture of time, we live in a more peaceful framework (though some would disagree, as they get bombed daily for no reason) and many people have been lifted out of poverty by a mechanism of capitalistic debt which tends to enslave people, especially the younger generation. "in my day", young people never had debt per say. We only got what we could afford — which was not much or what our parents were prepared to buy for us, which was not much as well. These days young people have to take the risk of debt in order to get ahead. Amongst all this the morality comfort of religion has been decomposing. People feel that expressing themselves is somewhat more important than becoming something in a cogworks. Some high priest are trying hard to salvage the dogmas for morality, but the hypocrisy contained is becoming too apparent. Not only some priest indulged in unbecoming sexual acts with minors, but the good books and the history of their writers are filled with unbecoming relationships of men with concubines and underaged wives. We could say the times are different. And I agree. This is why, in the Western world, we have developed over two centuries something called secularity. It's not perfect yet but it's far better grounded in whom we are than being the illusions of little gods. And sciences is helping secularity in finding its feet. This is a time of transition, where some people will still be happy with a "promised" sky banquet while others need to know. 

One of the major problem is that we still teach religion ahead of sciences. We tell kids about Santa (a fancy religious like ephemeral belief) rather than the electric light. There is no morality in sciences, only processes that are very complex and basically show religion as hogwash. But it's hard work.  And the connectivity with secularity is still a long way away when religious dictums are in the way. You shall not marry another man for example. 

A few evangelicals (far too many really) are trying hard to tell us why can't we believe in god and accept that god created the genetic material in one swoop? Really? The idea of god does not make sense. The concept of genetics and genetic manipulation is real science. Not perfect but we're getting better at it.

So our life force, our intelligence, our invention, our ability to be human have all to do with our genes' evolution than with a godly logie. 

Enjoy the Gold Logie, nonetheless.


Gus the Elder

You local decomposing atheist

 

the white australia policy...

 

I could not do better than Bruce petty who in 1969 gave us these views about TV. One is about the Yanks and the other one being the new religion of TV.

 

It's so accurate, it makes me cry:

 

yank TV

 

TV is a religion

 

These two cartoons were published in Overland, 1969. The magazine has been in existence since 1954 and today's first article is about racism:

 

But Australia has a long history of ugly racism – against Indigenous Australians, against Chinese, Afghans, Greeks, Italians, Vietnamese, Sudanese – it’s something the political class has fed and bred for many decades. Richard Marles may claim that ‘offshore processing has been the single most important policy that any Australian government has made’, but Labor was very proud of the White Australia policy as well.


chains to keep aborigines in check...


These days, we embrace diversity... Good on you for your support here, Waleed, as long as diversity remains secular. If people want to believe, that's okay by me as long as their religious beliefs do not interfere with secularity. Political systems can only be secular.

 

 

 

it seems waleed is waking up...

A while back, I though Waleed "did not get it"... Now it seems he has a better understanding of what's what. A long way to go, though then he deserved brickbats and now he needs encouragement. He seems to still have a slanted opinion which stems from his beliefs, rather than analysis. See: 

 


sloppy lazy unfair journalism designed as "entertainment"...

 

milking an issue...

 

Australians are being urged to "eat more cheese" to help dairy farmers survive drastic milk price cuts that some fear could send them broke.

In what he has called the "greatest call to arms I have ever made", prominent TV host Waleed Aly has made an impassioned plea for shoppers to stump up a few cents more for Australian-made brand-name cheese and milk to help save farmers from financial ruin.

"Dairy farmers are begging us to eat more locally produced cheese," he said on Tuesday night's The Project.

"And the good news is, thanks to data released last week by the bureau of statistics, nine out of 10 enough aren't eating enough dairy produce to meet the dietary guidelines ... so chow down."

"Farmers have told us that the best way to lend them a hand is to pay an extra few cents for Australian-produced, brand name milk. It really will help our farmers stay afloat."


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/waleed-aly-wants-you-to-buy-australian-dairy-in-the-greatest-call-to-arms-i-have-ever-made-20160517-goxhh4.html#ixzz48weh4tPB
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook


Thank you Waleed... But is not the point here that the distributors of milk products (mentioned in the article as Murray Goulburn and Fonterra) are the one exploiting our farmers in order to satisfy massive marketing campaigns at Coles (mostly) and Woolies? And what should we do, should we become lactose intolerant from all this extra cheese? 

Should we eat more cheese and drink more milk, would not that fill the pockets of Murray Goulburn and Fonterra, as well as Coles and Woolies, unless they sell the farmers' product at a loss to satisfy the "marketing campaigns" of which supermarket chain has the "lowest price"?

Should we buy our dairy products from the local cheese shops and give Coles a miss? It's an issue difficult to mention directly by TV personalities (boycott Coles) when the TV shows celebrities are on, are financed by advertising such as Coles for prices being down down down, as well as advertise Coles little red cars for cheap insurance and Coles Mastercards with zero whatever... Isn't a system of marketing gone bonkers just to get "market share", while basically farmers become slaves to a system in which, should we eat more cheese, would send them more broke anyway?

Meanwhile:

The value of a so-called dairy fighting fund announced by supermarket giant Coles has been questioned by the chairman of Tasmania's peak dairy council.

Key points:
  • Coles announces new home brand will put 20 cents per litre into dairy farmers fighting fund
  • Dairy council says it's 'only a small amount'
  • Producers trying to "offload cows" to reduce costs

 

Coles has announced plans to establish a new home-brand milk with 20 cents per litre from its sale reinvested into the dairy sector.

The move came in the wake of recent farm-gate price cuts to farmers from dairy companies Murray Goulburn and Fonterra.

Lion Dairy and Drinks has also cut prices to some suppliers in Tasmania.

Third-generation dairy farmer Andrew Lester and Tasmanian Dairy Council chairman said it was not clear how the fund would be distributed.

"We're not really aware how that fighting fund's going to be used, how much access they're going to have to it and what it will go into," he said.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-17/farmers-question-supermarkets-fighting-fund-for-dairy-producers/7422026

 

----------------------

And what about Dairy Farmers, the company which I believe does not sell through Coles?
Dairy Farmers is one of the largest and oldest dairy manufacturers in Australia, established in 1900, supplying products to local and international markets such as Eastern Europe, the Middle East and AsiaKirin Holdings Company, Limited of Japan, via its subsidiary National Foods, acquired the company on 27 November 2008.

 

And is there something wrong with Gus, who buys butter from Ireland because it comes from "certified" cows that eat GRASS (no grains), butter from New Zealand because it's ORGANIC (certified) and Dairy Farmers products (Japanese NSW) because it's made like old-fashioned "cultured" butter, plus GOAT cheese and yogurt because... they are made by local farmers who sell directly to IGA...

failing to stand up for artists...

 

Prominent media personality and academic Waleed Aly has been accused of failing to stand up for artists or arts funding in a provocative essay attacking Australia Council.

In When the Goal Posts Move, academic and writer Ben Eltham says that Aly, a board member of Australia Council, has stayed silent on the dramatic budget cuts inflicted by the federal government on its arts funding agency.

Eltham argues in the essay published by Currency House  that "Aly's public record on Australia Council funding is plain enough: there is none".

"The Gold Logie winner could have been the arts sector's most eloquent spokesperson: after all, he has his own television show," he says. "But at the time of writing, he had so far declined to publicly defend the agency."

Aly is one of 12 board members of Australia Council, which Eltham says has failed to discharge its duties to promote freedom of expression and appreciation of the arts in the face of savage budget cuts.

He is also critical of respected performer and director Robyn Archer, the deputy chairwoman of Australia Council, "whose statements about the funding cuts have been equivocal, to say the least".

In response, Aly says it is not his job to publicly defend the agency. 

"I've not been given a public-facing role and it's not for me to usurp the chairman or the CEO's function just because I happen to work in the media," he says. 

Aly also says he is not free to comment on the federal government's handling of the arts portfolio while he sits on the Australia Council board.

"We have an advisory role - and there has certainly been plenty of advice given," he says. "We can also outline the impact policy will have on the Council - which, we do regularly, and which was evidenced in, for example, the collapse of six-year funding. Beyond that, we have to do the best we can with the resources we're assigned.

 

Eltham says the independence of Australia Council is in "smoking ruins".

"A different membership might have acted differently in response to the unprecedented attack; it's difficult to imagine Donald Horne, when he was chair, staying silent if this had happened on his watch," Eltham says. "But nothing has come to pass. In response to the wholesale assault on the organisation's statutory independence, the Australia Council rolled over."

Australia Council spokeswoman Kate Clark offered a lengthy defence of the agency: "As a Commonwealth agency we are required to work with the policy of the government."

She said Australia Council had continued to advocate on behalf of the arts over the past 12 months: "That advocacy take many forms, particularly as a Commonwealth agency, and it is a one dimensional view that sees the media as the only avenue for that critical work," she said.

Eltham's essay traces the development of arts policy in Australia and what he calls the "excellence raid" in 2015.

Former arts minister George Brandis​ diverted $105 million from the Australia Council in the 2015 budget to a new fund, the National Program for Excellence in the Arts, administered by his office.

Senator Brandis' successor, Arts Minister Mitch Fifield, later restored $32 million to the Australia Council.

Brandis' removal as arts minister may have been due to the backroom lobbying of Australia Council chairman Rupert Myer.

"Some attribute the removal of Brandis as arts minister to Myer's superb connections amongst Australia's ruling elite," Eltham says.

Eltham also takes aim at the board members of the 28 major performing arts institutions – many Liberal Party donors – such as the Sydney Theatre Company, Opera Australia and Australian Ballet.

"Given that they had been quarantined from the funding cuts, they arguably had nothing to lose," he says.

Eltham says artistic leaders such as the Australian Chamber Orchestra's director Richard Tognetti​ and Opera Australia's Lyndon Terracini are public figures whose advocacy would attract attention.

"But in the climate of fear (or was it indifference?) that Brandis' funding raid induced, the major performing arts companies largely stayed silent," he says.

New Sydney Festival director Wesley Enoch​ was among the few leaders who spoke out, Eltham says. "In contrast, Opera Australia callously welcomed the changes, and other artistic directors said nothing."

Eltham says Australia Council's future is precarious

"In the run-up to the 2016 election, the Australia Council now finds itself in a dangerous place," he says. "There is little love on the Coalition backbench for the organisation, and the election of a second-term Turnbull government could well signal the beginning of the end for the agency."

A spokeswoman for Senator Fifield said: "The government is not proposing any changes to the Australia Council."

Eltham likens the attacks on the Australia Council to what he labels as assaults on areas like climate science and the universities: "The target is those remnant sections of Australian society that still support or endorse non-market values."

He says there is an increasingly inhospitable intellectual climate for the public support of culture.

Eltham also echoes earlier complaints about the increasing presence of businesspeople on arts boards at the expense of artists.

"For instance, no-one seems to think it a problem that the chairman of the Sydney Theatre Company is Ian Narev​, the CEO of a major bank," he says. "What does a banker know about theatre?

"In a neo-liberal world, business know-how is transferable to any cultural endeavour. But would an actor ever be appointed chair of the Commonwealth Bank?"

He says it is improbable that an artist or festival director would be asked by government to lead an inquiry into the banking sector.

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/art-and-design/australia-council-waleed-aly-accused-of-failing-to-stand-up-for-arts-funding-20160727-gqekrm.html

 

see also:

I stand with the arts...

short fluff for the airheads...

Digital media is so focused on chasing viral and shareable content that it risks losing the trust of the audience and the ability to reflect and explain, the broadcaster and academic Waleed Aly has warned.

“What I see is a news cycle that’s only getting quicker, and whose attention span is only getting shorter,” Aly said in his Andrew Olle media lecture on Friday night. “That’s been a growing trend in broadcast media anyway, but the growing integration with online platforms clearly isn’t helping changing this.”

The co-host of Channel Ten’s The Project, who frequently produces content which goes viral, warned that the more the media chose popularity over substance the more it damaged its authority with the public.

“And maybe the greatest threat is the prospect that we might forget why we do what we do,” he said. “Not our careers, but our vocation.”

read more:

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/oct/14/waleed-aly-chasing-viral-c...

 

Read from top...